Unveiling the Molecular Environment
- f the Carina Nebula
The 2015 Nanten2 Consortium Workshop February 6th
David Rebolledo
Postdoctoral Fellow University of Sydney University of New South Wales
Unveiling the Molecular Environment of the Carina Nebula The 2015 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Unveiling the Molecular Environment of the Carina Nebula The 2015 Nanten2 Consortium Workshop February 6th David Rebolledo Postdoctoral Fellow University of Sydney University of New South Wales Motivation a b 0:30 The Carina Nebula
The 2015 Nanten2 Consortium Workshop February 6th
David Rebolledo
Postdoctoral Fellow University of Sydney University of New South Wales
active star formation.
the nearest extreme star formation region.
studying clustered star formation, stellar feedback and triggered star formation.
288 287 286 Galactic Longitude Galactic Latitude 0:00 0:30
288 287 286 Galactic Longitude
a b
[O III] Hα [S II] Parkes 3.4 cm continuum NGC3324
a- Smith et al. (2000) b- Huchtmeier & Day (1975)
as an evolved HII region with no current star formation activity.
several candidates for sites of current star formation.
sources are located at the heads of dust pillars or dark globules behind ionization fronts
surveys at X-rays, optical and infrared wavelengths. However, radio has been absent.
8.5 deg2
12CO(1 → 0)
13CO(1 → 0)
500µm
Hi-Gal* (Molinari et al. 2010)
* The Herschel Infrared Galactic Plane Survey
500µm 70µm 160µm 250µm 350µm
Fν = ΩBν(Tcold)(1 − e−τν)
τν = τ0(ν/ν0)β
β = 2 τ0 = 1
Tcold
ν0 Mgas
RDG
κν
Dust opacity Dust to gas ratio
Tcold
HI integrated intensity K km s−1
NHI atoms/cm2 = 1.82 × 1018
MHI
McClure-Griffiths et al. (2005) The Southern Galactic Plane Survey (SGPS)
12CO integrated intensity
MH2 Msun = 4.4
K km s−1pc2 XCO 2 × 1020cm−2/(K km s−1)
log(MHI + MH2 Msun ) log( Mgas Msun ) MH2+HI Mgas
log
cm−2/(K km s−1)
Msun )
XCO = Mgas − MHI FCO
With Mopra Telescope, we have mapped 12CO and 13CO
I fit Herschel SEDs of each pixel with a modified blackbody to obtain the temperature of the cold gas in the central part
Under the current assumptions, I found that atomic + molecular hydrogen mass overestimates the gas mass provided by the SEDs analysis. Xco factor is one order of magnitude smaller than the value commonly assumed. Range is about two orders of magnitude.