Unique Applications for Topical Anti-Infectives in the Treatment of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

unique applications for topical
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Unique Applications for Topical Anti-Infectives in the Treatment of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Unique Applications for Topical Anti-Infectives in the Treatment of Nail and Foot Infections Andrew Orwick, Pharm.D. Precision Compounding Pharmacy April 26 th , 2019 Disclosure Presenter has no financial or non-financial interest to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Andrew Orwick, Pharm.D. Precision Compounding Pharmacy April 26th, 2019

Unique Applications for Topical Anti-Infectives in the Treatment

  • f Nail and Foot Infections
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosure

 Presenter has no financial or non-financial interest to disclose  Status of medications and devices mentioned in this presentation are

  • ff-label use and for informational purposes only
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Disclaimer to Any Compound

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does

not review any compound from any pharmacy for safety and efficacy

 It is recommended to utilize a pharmacy that

strictly follows USP guidelines

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Disclaimer to Any Compound

 A pharmacy can promote that it follows USP

guidelines, but it cannot claim that the compounds are safe or effective

 The compounds discussed herein have not

been approved by the FDA and, therefore, should not be promoted as safe or effective for any use

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Objectives

 Identify potential uses for unique applications of

topical anti-infectives including bath irrigation, topical sprays, nail soaks, and topical gels

 Explain specialized delivery devices utilized for topical

delivery

 Discuss topical anti-infectives available for use and

their mechanism of action

 Review specific patient cases and outcomes with the

use of topical anti-infectives

 Discuss the role of the pharmacist in culture review,

product selection, and patient education

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How do we categorize different anti-biotics?

By Mechanisms of Action

  • Cell wall
  • Cell membrane
  • DNA/RNA
  • Ribosomal 50s/30s

By type of bacterial coverage?

  • Gram-positive (MRSA)
  • Gram-negative(Pseudomonas)
  • Anaerobe
  • Atypical
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Bacterial structure and Antibiotic MoA

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Potential Benefits of Topical Anti-Infectives

 Low systemic effect of the drug on patients  High concentration of Anti-Infectives at the site of infection  Combination treatment of bacterial and fungal infections when it

is suspected to be polymicrobial

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Potential Benefits of Topical Anti-Infectives

 Alternative option when desired outcomes have not been achieved

using standard oral antibiotics and/or antifungals

 Patient has failed treatment using one or more commercially

available topically delivered medication

 Avoid using oral or IV medications  Concomitant delivery with oral or IV medications

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Available dosage forms

 Capsules  Powders  Gels  Ointments  Sprays

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Topical Powders

 Combination of an antibiotic, antifungal,

antiviral, and/or an anesthetic can be compounded in a powder delivery form

 Patient then sprinkles/spreads the dry

powder directly onto the wound site or can be mixed into bath irrigation

 Examples –  Gentamicin 5%, Mupirocin 5% powder  Levofloxacin 3%, Tobramycin 5% powder  Powder treatment can be followed by an

  • intment to occlude the wound if desired
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Topical Ointments

 Combination of an antibiotic,

antifungal, and/or antiviral can be compounded into an ointment

 Patient directly applies ointment to the

wound site or can be mixed in bath irrigation

 Example –  Tobramycin 2.5%, Doxycycline 2.5%,

Mupirocin 1.855%, Itraconazole 1%

  • intment
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Topical Spray

 Combination of an antibiotic,

antifungal, antiviral, and/or an anesthetic can be compounded into a spray delivery form

 Patient sprays the medication

directly on the wound site or patient make soak gauze in the solution then apply to wound

 For extremely painful wounds,

patient is able to avoid any direct contact

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Anti-Infective Bath Irrigation System

 Foot Spa with Bubbles & Heat  Medications to be mixed into solution

just prior to treatment

 Detailed instructions by a pharmacist

  • n how to step up and use their bath

irrigation system, along with a mixing jar.

 Patients will soak their feet in the

medicated solution for up to 10 minutes two times a day

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Bacteria Resistance Mechanisms

 Bacteria can mutate to change or protect the structure of the antibiotic

target site whilst maintaining function

 Gram-negative cells can mutate and/or block the target site of fluoroquinolones

(DNA gyrase) which reduces drug binding and provides resistance

 Bacteria are able to produce enzymes, which can inactivate or modify the

antibiotic rendering it ineffective.

 Extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) are more commonly being found in Gram-

negative species globally reducing the efficacy of penicillins, cephalosporins and aztreonam

 Bacteria can prevent effective concentrations of the antibiotics to their

target site

 By up-regulating the normal level of efflux activity of the cell  Reducing the permeability of the cell membrane by repressing porin production.

 P

. aeruginosa and E. coli are capable of efflux pumps to export multiple drugs

Hughes, G., and Webber, M. A. (2017) Novel approaches to the treatment of bacterial biofilm infections. British Journal of Pharmacology, 174: 2237– 2246. doi: 10.1111/bph.13706. Ciofu, O, Rojo‐Molinero, E, Macià, MD, Oliver, A. Antibiotic treatment of biofilm infections. APMIS 2017;125: 304– 319.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Biofilms and Topical Treatments

 Bacteria capable of forming biofilm are present in up to 80% of all bacterial

infections and 90% of all chronic wounds

 Biofilms allow bacteria to demonstrate up to 1000-fold increase in antibiotic

tolerance

 This is due to physical impedance and enzymatic inactivation of the drugs, coupled

with lowered metabolic rates in many biofilm-associated cells

 Altered environment and growth kinetics of bacteria in biofilms

 Bacteria at the lower end of the gradient exist in a stationary phase, with limited

diffusion of oxygen, glucose and other nutrients.

 Metabolically dormant and highly antibiotic resistant  Can survive antibiotic exposure and occasionally come out of dormancy and act to re-

populate the biofilm

 Bacteria in the upper end of the gradient have better access to nutrients and are

more susceptible to antibiotics

Fleming D, Rumbaugh KP . Approaches to Dispersing Medical Biofilms. Microorganisms. 2017; 5(2):15. Hughes, G., and Webber, M. A. (2017) Novel approaches to the treatment of bacterial biofilm infections. British Journal of Pharmacology, 174: 2237– 2246. doi: 10.1111/bph.13706.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Biofilms and Topical Treatments

 Systemic antibiotics are useful during early stages of infection

 However chronic biofilm wound infections will likely be treated most efficiently with

local antibiotics

 Local administration of antibiotics

 Allows for delivery of antibiotics at significantly higher doses  Allowing the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration to be obtained  Without the risk of toxicity encountered during systemic delivery of high dose antibiotics

 Combined antimicrobial therapies maybe be required

 Biofilms are bacterial communities that exhibit not only different structural areas but

also different metabolic states

 Combining some agents that attack metabolically active layers

 Tobramycin, Ciprofloxacin, or the beta-lactams

 With antibiotics that preferentially kill biofilm cells with low metabolic activity provides

a framework for combination therapy

 Colistimethate

Blanchette KA, Wenke JC. Current therapies in treatment and prevention of fracture wound biofilms: why a multifaceted approach is essential for resolving persistent infections. J Bone Jt Infect. 2018;3(2):50–67. Published 2018 Apr 12. doi:10.7150/jbji.23423 Ciofu, O, Rojo‐Molinero, E, Macià, MD, Oliver, A. Antibiotic treatment of biofilm infections. APMIS 2017;125: 304– 319.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Biofilms and Topical Treatments

Acetic acid: A weak organic acid (WOA)

 Applied topically within dressings (at concentrations between 2% and 5%)  Higher hydrophobicity and lipid permeability allows them to diffuse into the

bacterial cell cytoplasm before dissociation occurs

 Lower the internal cytoplasmic pH of the bacteria in a process known as ion

trapping

 This can then lead to a disruption of metabolic activities, and as the dissociated acid

components do not readily pass across membranes

 There is an intracellular accumulation of the breakdown products of the WOA.

 As cytoplasmic WOA accumulates there is an increase in turgor pressure causing an

  • smotic effect

 The decrease the internal cytoplasmic pH, it can also increase the osmolality

resulting in an influx of water

Hughes, G., and Webber, M. A. (2017) Novel approaches to the treatment of bacterial biofilm infections. British Journal of Pharmacology, 174: 2237– 2246. doi: 10.1111/bph.13706.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Biofilms and Topical Treatments

Urea: An amide that is theorized to break down biofilms by disrupting the hydrogen bonds that are vital for extracellular polymeric substance(EPS) mechanical stability.

 Exhibited dispersal ability against biofilms from

 P

. aeruginosa

 S. epidermidis  K. pneumoniae

 Biofilms formed by S. epidermidis that were treated with urea became more

deformed and exhibited significant biofilm loss(71% reduction) during the post-treatment flow challenge.

 During the treatment soak phase, biofilms exposed to urea swelled

 Potentially allowing great access of antibiotics

Fleming D, Rumbaugh KP . Approaches to Dispersing Medical Biofilms. Microorganisms. 2017; 5(2):15. Brindle, E.R.; Miller, D.A.; Stewart, P .S. Hydrodynamic deformation and removal of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms treated with urea Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108, 2968–2977. Blanchette KA, Wenke JC. Current therapies in treatment and prevention of fracture wound biofilms: why a multifaceted approach is essential for resolving persistent infections. J Bone Jt Infect. 2018;3(2):50–67. Published 2018 Apr 12. doi:10.7150/jbji.23423

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Potential uses and advantages in Diabetic Foot Infections

 Most DFI are polymicrobial

Aerobic gram-positive cocci, MRSA is present in 10% to 32%

Including gram-negative bacteria

Anaerobic pathogens are more commonly present in necrotic wounds and infections of the ischemic foot.

 Common Treatment of Mild to Moderate DFI

Treated with oral antibiotics in an outpatient setting for 1-3 weeks depending on severity

No single antibiotic regimen is clearly superior

 Up to 40% of patients with DFI also have peripheral arterial disease

Reduced effectiveness of oral and IV therapies

 Broader spectrum coverage recommended

In patients with ABX-Resistant infection, Chronic and/or previously treated

Gemechu FW, Seemant F , Curley CA. Diabetic foot infections. Am Fam Physician 2013;88(3):177-184. IDSA Guideline for Diabetic Foot Infections; 2012

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Potential uses and advantages in Chronic Non Healing Wounds

 Constant state of inflammation

 From repeated tissue trauma, infection, and/or ischemia/hypoxia

 Chronic wounds had increased activation and expression of MMPs

 MMPs degrade new formed tissue/ECM  Delays/stops the normal healing process

 Need to change the wound environment to a non-inflammatory state

 This can be achieved pharmacologically with topical doxycycline

Stechmiller J, Cowan L, Schultz G. The role of doxycycline as a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic wounds. Biol Res Nurs 2010. April;11(4):336–344. Iqbal A, Jan A, Wajid MA, Tariq S. Management of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds by Hirudotherapy. World J Plast Surg 2017;6(1):9-17. Patel S, Maheshwari A, Chandra A. Biomarkers for wound healing and their evaluation. Journal of Wound Care 2016;25(1):46-55.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Potential uses and advantages in Fungal Nail Infections

 Difficult to treat

 Complete cures can take up to 18 months  20-25% of patient fail to reach cure

 High Prevalence and Recurrence Rate  Contagious, with potential to spread  Other nails, web spaces, toes, and the whole foot  Increased susceptibility in patients with chronic comorbidities

 Increased likelihood of polypharmacy (no oral antifungals)

Christenson JK, Peterson GM, Naunton M, Bushell M, Kosari S, Baby KE, Thomas J. Challenges and Opportunities in the Management of Onychomycosis. Journal of Fungi. 2018; 4(3):87.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Drug Review - Vancomycin

Mechanism of action – inhibits cell wall synthesis in gram positive bacterial (can conceivably have activity against gram negative – but typically very minimal) Considered by many healthcare practitioners as the “end-all-save-all” for gram-positive infections

Examples: Vancomycin 50mg capsule Vancomycin 5% ointment

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Drug Review - Mupirocin

Mechanism of action – strongly inhibits protein and RNA synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus while DNA and cell wall formation are also minimally impacted Specifically FDA-indicated against MRSA when reviewing Mupirocin 2% Ointment insert

  • Referencing commercially available medication only

No oral or IV options are commercially available

X

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Drug Review - Penicillin(s)/Cephalosporin(s)

 Mechanism of action – inhibits the formation of

peptidoglycan cross-links in the bacterial cell wall (less resistance historically seen with cephalosporin(s))

 Penicillin(s)

 Examples – Piperacillin-Tazobactam powder

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Drug Review - Cephalosporin(s)

As one transitions from 1st Generation to 4th Generation,

  • ne generally sees increased coverage of gram-negative

bacteria and decreased coverage of gram-positive bacteria 1st Generation Example – Cephalexin 2nd Generation Example – Cefoxitin 3rd Generation Example – Ceftriaxone 1 gram powder 4th Generation Example – Cefepime 1 gram powder

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Drug Review - Carbapenems

Example – Meropenem 500mg powder

Mechanism of action-inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis through disruption of normal protein utilization

Drug structure historically renders them resistant to most beta-lactamases

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Drug Review - Polymyxin(s)

Mechanism of action – Surface active agent (detergent) which penetrates into and disrupts the bacterial cell membrane

Example – Colistimethate 150mg powder

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Drug Review - Aminoglycoside(s)

 Mechanism of action of aminoglycosides is to inhibit bacterial

biosynthesis by binding reversibly to bacterial subunits 30s of the bacterial ribosome thereby inhibiting translocation of transfer-RNA (tRNA)

 Examples –  Tobramycin 100mg capsule, 2.5% ointment  Gentamicin 80mg capsule, 2.5% ointment  Streptomycin 1 gram powder

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Drug Review - Aminoglycoside(s)

Tobramycin, as a drug, often shows activity against a wide variety of gram-negative bacteria (typically including numerous Pseudomonas species) as well as a few gram-positive (including Staphylococcus aureus) Gentamicin, as a drug, often shows activity against a wide variety of gram-positive bacteria (occasionally including MRSA) and gram-negative bacteria (occasionally including certain Pseudomonas species) Streptomycin, as a drug, often shows activity against a wide variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (typically including E. coli, Enterococcus, and Proteus)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Drug Review - Quinolone(s)

 Mechanism of action of quinolones is to inhibit DNA

replication and transcription

Newer medications typically have higher number of generation (the higher the generation, the less resistance is typically seen)

 1st Generation Example – Ofloxacin  2nd Generation Example – Ciprofloxacin 90mg capsule  3rd Generation Example – Levofloxacin 3% ointment  4th Generation Example – Moxifloxacin

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Drug Review - Quinolone(s)

 Ciprofloxacin, as a drug, often shows activity against a limited number of

gram-positive bacteria (typically excluding MRSA) and gram-negative bacteria (typically excluding certain Pseudomonas species)

 Levofloxacin, as a drug, often shows activity against a wide variety of gram-

positive bacteria (typically excluding MRSA) and gram-negative bacteria

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Drug Review - Tetracycline(s)

 Mechanism of action – inhibit bacterial protein biosynthesis by binding

reversibly to the bacterial subunit 30s of the bacterial ribosome thereby inhibiting translocation of peptidyl transfer RNA

 Examples – Doxycycline 2.5% ointment, 100mg capsule

Tetracycline 250mg capsule

 Topical doxycycline, a synthetic MMP inhibitor (MMPI), to enhance healing

  • f chronic wounds.

 Beneficial effects were independent of the antimicrobial effect

Stechmiller J, Cowan L, Schultz G. The role of doxycycline as a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic

  • wounds. Biol Res Nurs 2010. April;11(4):336–344.

Dixon H. Xu, Ziwen Zhu and Yujiang Fang*, “The Effect of a Common Antibiotics Doxycycline on Non-Healing Chronic Wound”, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (2017) 18: 360. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389201018666170519095339

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Drug Review - Lincosamide(s)

Mechanism of action – inhibit bacterial protein biosynthesis by binding reversibly to the bacterial subunit 50s of the bacterial ribosome thereby inhibiting translocation of peptidyl transfer RNA Example – Clindamycin 1% solution, 300mg capsule Anaerobic coverage, possesses activity against Staphylococcus aureus

No activity against aerobic gram-negative bacteria

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Drug Review – Folic Acid Metabolism

  • Example –

Sulfamethoxazole 80 mg capsule Mechanism of action is to inhibit bacterial utilization of PABA (para- aminobenzoic acid) for the synthesis

  • f folic acid which is an important

metabolite in DNA synthesis

  • Example –

Trimethoprim 50mg capsule Mechanism of action is to block the production of tetrahydrofolic acid from dihydrofolic acid by binding to and reversibly inhibiting the required enzyme, dihydrofolate reductase.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Drug Review – Nitrofuran(s)

Nitrofurantoin inhibits bacterial DNA, RNA, and cell wall protein synthesis. The mechanism of action is unusual among antibacterial medications, it activated by the bacterial flavoproteins to intermediates that exhibit the anti-infective properties

Example – Nitrofurantoin 25mg capsule

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Drug Review - Linezolid

 Mechanism of action is to bind to the site on the bacterial 23S

ribosomal RNA of the 50s subunit and prevent the formation of a functional 70s initiation complex – which is essential for bacterial reproduction

 Active against  VRE  MRSA  Example –  Linezolid 600mg powder

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Drug Review – Azole(s)

Clotrimazole, as a drug, often shows activity against a variety of fungi (more limited than Itraconazole/Voriconazole) Ketoconazole, as a drug, often shows activity against a variety of fungi (more limited than Itraconazole/Voriconazole) Itraconazole, as a drug, often shows activity against a wide variety of fungi (occasionally including 2 species of Aspergillus) Voriconazole, as a drug, often shows activity against a wide variety of fungi (typically including all primary species of Aspergillus including niger and terreus)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Drug Review – Azole(s)

IV or Oral Azole(s) Problems

 Inhibitors of CYP3A4  Estimated up to 50% of all commonly

prescribed drugs are metabolized by the CYP3A4 enzyme

Elewski B, Tavakkol A. Safety and tolerability of oral antifungal agents in the treatment of fungal nail disease: a proven reality. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2005;1(4):299-306.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Azoles vs Amphotericin B

 Ampho B: Mechanism of action is to bind to the sterol component of a cell membrane

which leads to alterations in cell permeability and cell death although it has a high affinity for both fungal and mammalian cells thereby often causing redness and irritation when it comes in contact with human skin

 Amphotericin B will not be used in topical deliver systems

 Because of Ampho B lack of selectivity towards fungal cells there is a high likelihood of an

adverse reaction following treatment

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Drug Review - Naltrexone

 Approved for oral use by the FDA for the treatment of opioid addiction

and alcoholism

 Naltrexone is a non-selective pure opioid antagonist

 Highest affinity for the mu-opioid receptors  Also binds to the kappa, delta, and zeta opioid receptors

 For this presentation we are going to focus on Naltrexone’s effects on

the zeta-opioid receptor(opioid growth factor receptor, [OGFr])

 Example – Naltrexone 1mg/ml gel  Applied directly onto wound site

Toljan K, Vrooman B. Low-Dose Naltrexone (LDN)—Review of Therapeutic Utilization. Medical Sciences. 2018; 6(4):82 Li, Z.; You, Y .; Griffin, N.; Feng, J.; Shan, F . Low-dose naltrexone (LDN): A promising treatment in immune-related diseases and cancer therapy. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018, 61, 178–184.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Topical Naltrexone in Wound Healing

 Opioid growth factor (OGF), and its unique receptor (OGFr)  OGF is produced by the body tonically (continuous or sustained)

 Alterations to this system can increase or decrease cell division  Autocrine and Paracrine effects

 OGF is a naturally occurring opioid (chemical name Met5-enkephalin)

 Its physiologically effect is to depress cell division when bound to its receptor  OGFr has no resemblance to classic opioid receptors

 OGF-OFGr system has been conserved from bacteria to humans

Joseph W. Sassani, Patricia J. Mc Laughlin, and Ian S. Zagon, “The Yin and Yang of the Opioid Growth Regulatory System: Focus

  • n Diabetes—The Lorenz E. Zimmerman Tribute Lecture,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 9703729, 23

pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9703729. Immonen, J. A., Zagon, I. S., & McLaughlin, P . J. (2014). Featured Article: Selective blockade of the OGF–OGFr pathway by naltrexone accelerates fibroblast proliferation and wound healing. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 239(10), 1300–

  • 1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370214543061
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Topical Naltrexone in Wound Healing

 OGF is an inhibitory growth factor  When OGF is bound to OGFr cell division is

suppressed

 Naltrexone blocks OGF from binding to OGFr  Antagonism of the inhibitory effect causes

increased cell proliferation

 Topically applied Naltrexone increases cell proliferation

in diabetic wound models

 Increased expression of PDGF

, VEGF

 Accelerated DNA synthesis

Joseph W. Sassani, Patricia J. Mc Laughlin, and Ian S. Zagon, “The Yin and Yang of the Opioid Growth Regulatory System: Focus on Diabetes—The Lorenz E. Zimmerman Tribute Lecture,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 9703729, 23 pages,

  • 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9703729.

McLaughlin PJ, Cain JD, Titunick MB, Sassani JW, Zagon IS. Topical Naltrexone Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Standard Treatment

  • f Diabetic Wounds. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017;6(9):279-288.

Ondrovics M, Hoelbl-Kovacic A, Fux DA. Opioids: Modulators of angiogenesis in wound healing and cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(15):25783-25796.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Patient Case #1

 69 y.o. Female

 Patient has a wound on the lateral plantar area of her right foot  Size: 1cm2  Chronic non-healing wound  IV antibiotics 2 months prior to her getting an Rx from the pharmacy  The wound has a history of MRSA colonization per physician  Culture results showed  MRSA and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Patient Case #1

 Physician sent over a request for a recommendation for the patient

based on the patient’s Culture and Susceptibility Report

 Pharmacist to interpret the results from the C&S Report and identify

therapeutic options that will treat the infection

 Spray application was requested  C&S Results:

 MRSA: Vancomycin (S), Levofloxacin(S), Tetracycline(S), Methicillin(R),

Penicillin(R)

 Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Tobramycin(S), Gentamicin(S), Ceftazidime(S),

Levofloxacin(S), Ciprofloxacin(S)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Patient Case #1

Based off C&S report the pharmacist found options that were pharmacologically effective and covered by the patient’s insurance

 Treatment Plan

 Linezolid 600mg powder → Protein synthesis (23s of the 50s)  Tobramycin 100mg powder → Protein synthesis (30s)  Ceftriaxone 1gram powder → Cell wall synthesis 

Patient would mix all three powders with sterile sodium chloride

The solution was then applied onto sterile gauze to saturate

Medication to be reapplied daily for 1 month

Patient had a follow up in the office 2 weeks out

The wound had completely healed with no remaining signs of infection

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Patient Case #2

 62 y.o. Male

 Chronic venous stasis with ulcerations, peripheral edema, DM, HTN, Morbid

  • besity, Hyperlipidemia

 Patient has had wound care treatment at multiple facilities with little to no

success

 Powder treatment followed by an ointment was requested  Broad Spectrum coverage was requested

5 wounds on lower left leg Wound #1: 1.5 x 3.5 x 0.2 cm → Medial ankle Wound #2: 1 x 2 x 0.2 cm → Anterior shin Wound #3: 2 x 4 x 0.2 cm → Anterior lateral shin Wound #4: 1 x 2 x 0.2 cm → Lateral calf Wound #5: 1 x 2 x 0.2 cm → Lateral calf

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Patient Case #2

 Pharmacist to interpret the results from the C&S Report and identify

therapeutic options that will treat the infection

 The options need to be affordable to the patient, finding options that are

covered by the patient’s insurance is important

 Culture results showed

 Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)  Pseudomonas Aeruginosa  Enterococcus Faecalis  Morganella Morganii  Proteus Mirabilis

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Patient Case #2

 C&S Results:

Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA): Gentamicin(S), Tetracycline(S), Levofloxacin(R), Oxacillin(R)

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Ciprofloxacin(S), Gentamicin(S), Levofloxacin(S), Ceftazidime(S)

Enterococcus Faecalis: Vancomycin(S), Ampicillin(S), Penicillin(S), Gentamicin(R)

Morganella Morganii: Ceftriaxone(S), Ciprofloxacin(S), Gentamicin(S), Levofloxacin(S), Ampicillin(R)

Proteus Mirabilis: Ampicillin(S), Ciprofloxacin(S), Gentamicin(S), Levofloxacin(S),

 Treatment Plan

Powder followed by occlusive ointment

Powders

Gentamicin: Protein synthesis(30s) Doxycycline: Protein synthesis(30s)/MMPI Levofloxacin: DNA gyrase Linezolid: Protein synthesis (23s)

Ointment

Mupirocin: Protein synthesis (tRNA)/ Cell wall synthesis

slide-50
SLIDE 50

PAR Form

Patient Assessment Request (PAR)

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Involved Pharmacist improve patient

  • utcomes

 Pharmacist will select appropriate anti-infective therapy based off the culture

and susceptibility report

 The most effective therapy is selected individually per patient

 Pharmacist will find the best therapeutic option for the patient based off their

insurance coverage

 Medication that is affordable to the patient is more likely to be filled

 Pharmacist will educate the patient on the importance of the treatment and

how to properly use the prescription

 Increases patient compliance

slide-52
SLIDE 52

THE TRIAD

Patient Pharmacist Physician Relationship

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Andrew Orwick, Pharm.D. andrewo@pcpnewalbany.com (812) 941-9300