ultra low latency connectivity for financial capital
play

Ultra-Low Latency Connectivity for Financial & Capital Markets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ultra-Low Latency Connectivity for Financial & Capital Markets Visit us at www.ctamericas.com Global Financial & Trading Center Connectivity London Frankfurt Moscow Dalian Chicago Tokyo Zhengzhou Shanghai New York Shenzhen Los


  1. Ultra-Low Latency Connectivity for Financial & Capital Markets Visit us at www.ctamericas.com

  2. Global Financial & Trading Center Connectivity London Frankfurt Moscow Dalian Chicago Tokyo Zhengzhou Shanghai New York Shenzhen Los Angeles Hong Kong Singapore

  3. Ultra-Low Latency Route Availability SH - LON SH - CHI SH - FRK TOK - NY TOK - CHI London Moscow SH - HK Chicago Frankfurt HK - LON Beijing HK-MOS Tokyo HK - NY New York Shanghai Los Angeles SH - TOK Shenzhen Hong Kong HK - FRK SH - NY HK – SGP Shenzhen SZ – HK HK - LA Singapore HK - CHI SH - SGP Hong Kong

  4. Network Options  Multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) virtual private network (VPN): Get service level agreements with 99.9%- plus availability for secure converged data, voice and, video traffic-all on a single network connection.  Private line services: Support your global networking, security, and business continuity requirements with Ethernet Virtual Private Line, Ethernet Private Line, Optical Wavelength Service and International Private Line.  Internet bandwidth: Connect your users and bandwidth- intensive business applications, with superior peering and interconnectivity—plus reliability with a network \ recovery time of less than 50 milliseconds.

  5. Round Trip Expected Guaranteed Shanghai – Chicago 155ms 158ms Latencies Shanghai – New York 171ms 174ms China-USA Hong Kong – Chicago 172ms 175ms (POP-to-POP) Hong Kong – New York 190ms 193ms June 2018 Hong Kong – Los Angeles 140ms 143ms Tokyo – Chicago 126ms 129ms Japan-USA Tokyo – New York 143ms 146ms Shanghai – Frankfurt (TMP) 155ms 158ms Shanghai – Frankfurt (TSR+) 145ms 147ms Shanghai – London 148ms 151ms • Expected Latency figures are China - Euro Hong Kong – Frankfurt (TMP) 167ms 169ms based on SDH loopback test Hong Kong – Frankfurt (TSR+) 153ms 156ms (Bandwidth: E1, round trip delay) Hong Kong – London 159ms 162ms Hong Kong – Moscow 122ms 125ms Shenzhen – Hong Kong 1.82ms 2.00ms • Expected Latency figures are only obtained from tests between Shanghai – Hong Kong 25ms 26ms the selected POP in each city Shanghai – Singapore 53ms 55ms Inner Asia Shanghai – Tokyo 24ms 26ms Hong Kong – Singapore 30ms 32ms Tokyo – Singapore 65ms 67ms Shanghai – Dalian 35ms 37ms China Shanghai – Zhengzhou 19ms 20ms Mainland Zhengzhou – Dalian 36ms 37ms

  6. Shanghai – Chicago Primary Routing U.S.A. Latency: 155ms Hillsboro Chicago CLS TPE China Shanghai Chongming **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  7. Shanghai – New York Updated: 03-APR-2015 Primary Routing U.S.A. Latency: 171ms Hillsboro Chicago CLS TPE China New York Shanghai Chongming **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  8. Hong Kong – Chicago Updated: 14-APR-2015 U.S. Harbour Pointe PC-1 Japan Seattle Chicago Tokyo Ajigaura Chikura Primary Routing China Latency:172ms SJC Hong Kong Chung Hom Kok **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  9. Hong Kong – New York Updated: 03-APR-2015 U.S. Harbour Pointe PC-1 Japan Seattle New York Tokyo Chicago Ajigaura Chikura Primary Routing China Latency:190ms SJC Hong Kong Chung Hom Kok **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  10. Hong Kong – Los Angeles Updated: 14-APR-2017 U.S.A. Japan China Chikura Los Angeles Unity SJC Hong Kong Chung Hom Kok Primary Routing Latency: 140ms **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  11. Tokyo – Chicago Updated: 14-APR-2015 Primary Routing Latency: 126ms U.S.A. Harbour Pointe CLS Seattle Japan Chicago PC-1 China Tokyo **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  12. Tokyo – New York Updated: 03-APR-2015 Primary Routing Latency: 143ms U.S. Harbour Pointe CLS Seattle Japan Chicago PC-1 New York China Tokyo **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  13. Shanghai – Frankfurt (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Sweden Stockholm Russia Moscow Germany Frankfurt Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 158ms China Shanghai **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  14. Shanghai – Frankfurt (Transit-Kazakhstan) Updated: 07-APR-2016 Russia Kazakhstam Frankfurt Aketobe Urumqi China Primary Routing Shanghai Latency: 147ms **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  15. Shanghai – London (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Sweden Stockholm Moscow Russia U.K. London Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 148ms China Shanghai **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  16. Hong Kong – Frankfurt (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Sweden Stockholm Moscow Russia Germany Frankfurt Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 169ms China Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  17. Hong Kong – Frankfurt (Transit-Kazakhstan) Updated: 07-APR-2016 Russia Germany Kazakhstam Frankfurt Aketobe Urumqi China Primary Routing Latency: 156ms Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  18. Hong Kong – London (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Sweden Stockholm Moscow Russia U.K. London Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 159ms China Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  19. Hong Kong – Moscow (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 08-APR-2016 Moscow Russia Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 122ms China Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  20. Shenzhen – Hong Kong (Terrestrial Cable) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Shenzhen Primary Routing Latency: 2ms New Territories Kowloon Hong Kong Hong Kong Island **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  21. Shanghai – Hong Kong Updated: 14-APR-2015 Wuhu Huzhou Anqing Shanghai Primary Routing Latency: Hangzhou Jiujiang 25ms Jinhua Nanchang Jian Nanping Ganzhou Guangzhou Shenzhen Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  22. Shanghai – Singapore Updated: 14-APR-2015 China Shanghai Shantou Hong Kong Primary Routing Latency: 53ms APCN-2 Malaysia Singapore **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  23. Shanghai – Tokyo Japan Kitaibaraki Tokyo Maruyama Chikura Primary Routing China Latency: 24ms Chongming Shanghai TPE **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  24. Hong Kong – Singapore (Equinix) Updated: 14-APR-2015 China Shantou Hong Kong Primary Routing Latency: 30ms EAC Singapore **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  25. Tokyo - Singapore Japan Kitaibaraki Tokyo China Maruyama Chikura Primary Routing Latency: 65ms APCN-2 Malaysia Singapore **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  26. Shanghai – Dalian Updated: 25-SEP-2015 Dalian Primary Routing Latency: 35ms Yantai Qingdao Rizhao Nantong Suzhou Shanghai **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  27. Shanghai – Zhengzhou Updated: 14-APR-2016 Zhengzhou Lianyungang Shangqiu Huaibei Xuzhou Yancheng Primary Routing Nantong Latency: Suzhou 19ms Shanghai **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  28. Zhengzhou-Dalian Updated: 14-APR-2016 Dalian Yantai Weifang Zibo Jinan Qingdao Zhengzhou Jining Zaozhuang Shangqiu Xuzhou Primary Routing Huaibei Latency: 36ms **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  29. Failover Options TPE (Primary) Failover due to primary fault Shanghai Tokyo APCN2 (Backup) Automatic Restorative Failover TPE (Primary) Auto-recovery Shanghai Tokyo APCN2 (Backup) Manual Restorative Failover TPE (Primary) Manual-recovery Tokyo Shanghai APCN2 (Backup)

  30. Active Recovery After Failover Auto-Recovery Domestic SDH systems (International Usage) Auto-Recovery Overseas SDH systems (ONNET) Manual-Recovery on demand** **Manual-Recovery on demand OFFNET resources OR Submarine cable systems For OFFNET resources or some submarine cable systems which are not controlled by CT, active recovery procedure is as following: – 1. Trouble ticket issued by GCSC upon reception of customer’s requirement – 2. Negotiation with OFFNET vendor or submarine cable NOC to determine maintenance window after primary route fault has been fixed – 3. Switch customer circuit from backup route to primary route during maintenance window

  31. Proximity Hosting Transmission POPs Inside Key Securities Exchanges & Financial Data Centers CME Data Center, Aurora HKEx Data Center Tokyo Chuo Center 1/F SGX Data Center 60 Hudson St. **Extra latency will be introduced due to inner city optical fiber transmission

  32. Industry-leading APAC Latency Figures Route Latency Route Detail Capacity 189ms Via SJC+PC-1 CT 198ms via TPE CT Hong Kong – New 218ms via AAG Other York 205ms via EAC+UNITY Other 196ms via IA+PC-1 Other 2ms HK to SZ Direct CT Hong Kong – Shenzhen 8-10ms via Guangzhou Other 53ms APCN2 via Shantou CT 58ms via EAC Other Shanghai – Singapore 60ms via IA Other 62ms APCN2 via Hong Kong Other 159ms via Mongolia terrestrial cable CT Hong Kong – London 174ms via Mongolia terrestrial cable Other

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend