Transportation Update
Nita Mensia-Joseph, COO
- Dr. Calvin Frye, Director of Transportation
Transportation Update Nita Mensia-Joseph, COO Dr. Calvin Frye, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transportation Update Nita Mensia-Joseph, COO Dr. Calvin Frye, Director of Transportation Brian Jones, Executive Director of Information Technology Tim Bullis, Executive Director of Communications Presented to the School Board * August 12, 2019
2
package numbers. Special education route packages have increased and Transportation is working with SPED to understand why.
successful automated student routing -- this is for both schools and parents.
school this year. Smaller driver training classes have resulted in higher pass rates, but maintaining a strong pipeline of trainees remains problematic.
information about bus arrival times with My Stop parent app.
3
Total number of Route Packages: 507 (tentative)
○ 101 CCPS SPED and 22 private placement packages (12 private transportation packages not included*) ○ Reconciling transportation requirements in Synergy ○ Working with SPED staff to confirm student requirements for a special bus
*12 students (resulting in 12 route packages) require private transportation per the IEP often due to factors such as violent behavior, behavior not conducive to traveling with other students, and medical concerns. The cost is ~$800K for the year.
4
1. Expanded use of “silver” fleet implemented a. 12 CCPS cars - to transport students with IEP requiring a car rather than a bus b. 3 County vans on lease (+1 additional van available in November) - for small student bus loads (1 to 3 students) transported to private placement facilities c. 15 TWA’s - non-CDL drivers d. Net result is that we spend ~$21,000 for cars and ~$140,000 for drivers rather than ~$800,000 in private transportation e. 3 buses are saved with drivers able to support carrying larger loads of students going to private placement facilities 2. Driver recruitment program for former drivers - early results are very favorable 3. Implementing the use of “second waves” - total of 24 second wave routes
5
○ Multiple sources and modes of dissemination exist for student information (i.e. Google Sheets, Handwritten Documents). ○ Many fields are not being used within Synergy.
○ Variability, hand entry, and dispersed data sets significantly decrease efficiency and increase the risk of errors.
○ Utilize available fields in Synergy to store student data, eliminating other methods intended to communicate updates and changes.
○ Automation capacity would increase. ■ Exports from Synergy would be the “Source of Truth” for making routing decisions ■ Reports generated from Synergy would have a broader scope and analytical possibilities.
6
○ Fields and values across the platforms vary in meaning and use.
○ Increases the difficulty to set parameters and criteria needed for automation.
○ Identify and map fields and values across both platforms. ○ Define common uses and meanings that suit the needs of all users.
○ Automation capacity would increase. ■ Identification of Open Enrollment, Designated Program, and Unfulfilled Request Counts within Versatrans ■ Establishment of defined criteria for making routing decisions. ■ Imports from Versatrans into Synergy would save a significant amount of time at the school level by eliminating the necessity to manually enter bus numbers and determine bus stop information.
7
○ Address changes have to be verified by policy.
○ Decreases transportation’s ability to promptly adjust routes.
○ Identify data that may be made available to parents to make direct changes - other than address changes. ○ Inform parents that address verifications may slow the routing process for their child.
○ Parents may conveniently update most information more timely and efficiently. ○ Parents may view their own information and identify errors for correction. ○ Schools benefit from decreased data entry and increased ability to communicate using the most up-to-date contact information.
8
9
10
11
Contract Provisional Total June 2018 458 10 468 September 2018 480 10 490 June 2019 502 502 August 2019 480 2 482
12
success rate is ~65% to 75% yielding approximately 24 to 27 drivers if all attend the training)
Library, August 23-31, 2019 Recruitment Table at the Chesterfield County Fair
and incoming calls
13
afternoons. ○ 19 elementary schools will conduct traffic control support, two of these will be mega trailer sites. (2 AM only and 2 PM only) ○ 4 middle school will have (hub) support mornings only. ○ 1 (one) high school will have (hub) support mornings only.
○ Evaluate any additional coverage after the first week of school beyond what SSO’s will provide.
14
1. Wait time for bus maintenance at garage site and driver overtime versus the number of spares
2. Increased maintenance costs for buses due to blown engines, damaged seats, and GPS systems. 3. Increased number of special education routes. 4. Increases in the number of SPED students requiring private transportation in their IEP. 5. Reinstatement of a decentralized Field Trip process that satisfies the internal audit recommendations. 6. Changes to routes creating anxiety.
15
1. Per Finance, preliminary end-of-year results for 2019 suggest that Transportation would have come in ~ $500K
2. Salary savings may be impacted as a result of changes made within existing budget funding to address and/or correct issues regarding auxiliary trainer pay, administrative workload, additional SPED aids, and the need for an additional transportation coordinator for each area office to address payroll audit findings, field trips, and incoming calls. 3. Overtime will be reduced this year as a result of: a. Eliminating the use of drivers to perform non-routine duties during the summer. b. Better monitoring of time sheets with added area office support. 4. Impacts yet to be quantified are SPED students requiring private transportation and total cost of increased bus maintenance.
16
On the Downside - what to expect: 1. Opening a new school and unknown traffic impacts and delays. 2. Challenges for the first several weeks of school due to potential driver shortage and student information updates as both families and schools settle into a schedule. 3. Pre-planned buses with relatively full bus loads especially for shorter bus rides. 4. Untimely updates in the student database or an influx of MV and Sped students requiring routing
school. 5. Late buses due to delays in afternoon loading, especially at elementary schools as they help to ensure that younger students find the correct bus. 6. Potentially longer bus rides for CBG students attending programs outside of their home school zone.
17
On the Upside - what to expect: 1. Multiple ways for parents to identify their child’s bus stop: a. The use of E-Link to find the bus stop. b. A paper system posted at the school. c. The familiar system from last year where they can go to the website by school. 2. Use of My Stop to track the location and time of arrival of a bus at a stop. 3. Better traffic control at the start of school. 4. More aggressive reinstatement of CCPS vehicle use for MV and private-placement students.