TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

August 22, 2016

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Topics Covered

2

What is Transportation Conformity Responsibility for Making a Conformity Determination Frequency for Making a Transportation Conformity Key Elements of a MTP & TIP Conformity Determination 1 2 3 4

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Reminder: San Antonio Air Quality Timeline (Estimated)

3

• Oct 2015: EPA Ozone NAAQS Decision – 70 ppb identified standard
• Oc

Oct 2016: G Governors propose n nonat attain inment ar areas as –

• TCEQ proposed Bexar County only
• Oct 2017: E

EPA desig ignates nonat attainment areas

• Dec 2017 to June 2018: AAMPO Develops Metropolitan Transportation

Plan (MTP), Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Conformity Document and conducts public involvement process

• June 2018: Consultative Partners to Receive MTP, TIP and Conformity

Documents

• Oct 2018: Transportatio

ion Conformity D Determinatio ion Due

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

What is Transportation Conformity

• The air quality provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the metropolitan

transportation planning provisions of Title 23 and Title 49 of the United State Code require a planning process that integrates air quality and metropolitan transportation planning.

• The goal of transportation conformity is to ensure that Federal Highway

Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding and approvals are given to highway and public transportation activities that are consistent with air quality goals.

• The CAA requires that MTPs, TIPs and Federal projects conform to the purpose of

the State Implementation Plan (SIP).

• The transportation conformity process assesses the compliance of the MTP, TIP,
• r federal projects with the SIP
• Conformity to the purpose of the SIP means FHWA and FTA funding and

approvals are given to highway and transit activities that will NOT cause: – any new violations of the air quality standard, – increase the frequency or severity of violations of the standard, or – delay timely attainment of the standard or any interim milestone.

4

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Responsibility for Making a Conformity Determination

• The MPO and its governing body, shall make conformity determinations for

all MTPs, TIPs, regionally significant projects, and all other events as required (40 CFR Part 93, Subpart A and sub-sections)

• Once determined locally by the MPO, the MPO will submit to the

Consultative Partners, the approved MTP, TIP and Transportation Conformity document

• Upon completion of the transportation conformity determination review

process, FHWA and FTA will issue a joint conformity finding, indicating the transportation conformity status of the document(s) under review.

5

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Frequency Requirements for Transportation Conformity

• Conformity

y determinat atio ions must b be made at least every f y four year ars – May occur more often if metropolitan transportation plans or TIPs are updated more frequently or amended with non- exempt projects. – Certain SIP actions relating to motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEB) may require an updated conformity determination within 24 months.

• Conformity

y must be demonstrat ated within 12 mo months of EP EPA’s s designa nation n of an an ar area as a as nonat attain inment.

• Fo

For project- level el c conformi mity, a a projec ect must: – come from a conforming metropolitan transportation plan and TIP, – its design concept and scope must not have changed significantly from that in the metropolitan transportation plan and TIP, and – it addresses potential localized emissions impacts.

6

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Conformity Lapse

• If a conformity determination is not made according to the required frequency

requirements, areas have a one-year grace period after the missed deadline before a conformity lapse applies. – (This one-year grace period does not apply to newly designated nonattainment areas.)

• During the 12-month grace period, only transportation projects in the most

recent conforming metropolitan transportation plan and TIP can be funded or approved.

• Once an area is in a conformity lapse, the use of Federal transportation funds is

restricted to certain kinds of projects and no new non-exempt projects can be amended into the metropolitan transportation plan/TIP. – “Exempt projects” include safety projects and certain mass transit projects, TCMs from an approved SIP, and project phases that were authorized by the FHWA/FTA prior to the lapse.

• The FHWA and FTA do not reduce the amount of funding a State receives if there

is a lapse; however, use of Federal funds is restricted during the lapse.

7

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Key Elements of a MTP / TIP Conformity Determination

• One way t

to u understan and transportat atio ion conformity is to know the k key y requireme ments and how they inter

• eract. The

e major components of a a conformi mity determinat ation include: – Interagency Consultation – Public Involvement – Latest Planning Assumptions and Emissions Model – Regional Emissions Analysis

• Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget

– Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures – Fiscal Constraint

8

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Transportation Conformity Process

9

Source: Transportation conformity: A Basic Guide for State and Local Officials http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/air_quality/conformity/g uide/

9

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Reminders

• Transportation conformity will have a significant impact on the transportation

planning process.

• Upon designation of nonattainment, Alamo Area MPO will have 12 months to

demonstrate conformity for their MTP.

• The TPB and MPO staff must be involved in the air quality planning process

and be knowledgeable of the federal and state rules and regulation.

• Going forward, the TPB and MPO staff must ensure that emissions

inventories, emissions budgets, and TCMs are appropriate and consistent with the transportation vision of a region.

• If transportat

atio ion conformity cannot

• t be det

etermi mined ed, projec ects a and p d programs ms ma may be del e delayed.

• Transportation Conformity: A Basic Guide for State and Local Officials

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/air_quality/conformity/guide/

10

TxDOT-SAT August 22, 2016

Contact Information

Timoteo “Tim” Juarez, Jr. MPO Coordination TXDOT – Transportation Planning & Programming Division Work: 512.486.5028 | tim.juarez@txdot.gov Bill Frawley, AICP Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Work: 817-462-0533 | B-Frawley@tti.tamu.edu Todd Carlson, AICP Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Work:817-462-0517 | tcarlson@tamu.edu

11