age genda da
play

Age genda da 1 Southeast Connector Study Area 2 Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

F ORT W ORTH D ISTRICT City of Fort Worth Community Meeting Southeast Connector Photo by Liam Frederick I-20, I-820 & US 287 September 15, 2018 Age genda da 1 Southeast Connector Study Area 2 Project History, Issues, and Constraints


  1. F ORT W ORTH D ISTRICT City of Fort Worth Community Meeting Southeast Connector Photo by Liam Frederick I-20, I-820 & US 287 September 15, 2018

  2. Age genda da 1 Southeast Connector Study Area 2 Project History, Issues, and Constraints 3 Study Goals & Objectives 4 Recommended Alternative 5 Public / Agency Outreach & Involvement 6 July 19, 2018 Public Meeting – Stats & Feedback 7 Project Schedule 8 Project Contact Information 9 Questions 1

  3. Southea east st Co Connect ctor Stud tudy A Are rea I-20 20 – From Forest Hill Drive To Park Springs Boulevard I-820 820 – From I-20 To Brentwood Stair Road US 287 87 – From Bishop Street To Sublett Road 2

  4. Project Pr ct His History March 2005 December 2005 May 2001 Value April 19, 2001 December 11, Funding and Draft Design included Began May 2000 Public Meeting Engineering Report / 2003 Public Environmental Environmental Reversible #1 Draft Preliminary Design Meeting #2 Constraints Assessment Managed lanes Environmental Constraints Air Quality Conformity Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Consistency Funding Constraints Contract Issues April 2016 to Present Day • Update Previous Study • Evaluate Alternatives • Analyze Future Traffic • Integrate with Mobility 2045 • Produce Preliminary Design • Produce Environmental Assessment 3

  5. Con onge gestion stion L Levels s / De Dela lay Year 2 2018 Year 2 204 045 Year 2 204 045 MTP 1 Build Curren rent C Conges gestion No-Buil No ild S Scenar ario io MT ld S Sce cenario 1 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Congestion Index* St Study Ar Area No Congestion Light Congestion Source: MTP 1 Draft Mobility 2045, NCTCOG Moderate Congestion * Congestion Index is based on a percent increase in travel time. Severe Congestion 4

  6. Traffic Pr c Project ctions ns 450,000 Years 2 2010 t 0 to 2040 040 Vehi hicles P Per r Day Sour urce: e: T TxDOT T TP& P&P P Division, on, 2009 2009 400,000 394,400 2010 350,000 2030 348,800 * 2040 300,000 56% 56% 292,300 289,700 Increase 250,000 259,900 255,600 251,500 220,400 200,000 194,600 191,200 182,250 150,000 167,300 153,400 146,500 140,950 134,200 100,000 102,900 94,200 50,000 * 2045 Traffic 0 Projections are I-20 I-20 I-820 N I-820 S US 287 N US 287 S currently being (I-820 to (US 287 to (Brentwood Stair (US 287 (Bishop to (I-20 developed US 287) Park Springs) to US 287) to I-20) I-820) to Sublett) 5

  7. Crash Hi Cr History & & Co Conce ncent ntration From 20 2010 0 to 20 2016  5,460 Crashes  47 Fatalities  A main goal of the project is to improve safety 6

  8. St Stud udy A y Area Con onstr strain ints ts Map Map 7

  9. St Stud udy y Goals ls & Obj & Object ctiv ives  Improve Safety  Improve Mobility  Improve Operations  Provide Transportation Options  Develop Safe Transportation Solutions  Update and Modernize a Design from the early 1960s 8

  10. Reco comme mmend nded A Alt lterna native Along ng I I-20 between I I-820 820 an and US 28 d US 287 Reconstruct existing interchanges • Add general purpose lanes • Construct collector-distributor road systems • Along ng I I-820 820 between I I-20 20 an and US 28 d US 287 Reconstruct and add general purpose lanes • Through ghout th the P e Project S Stu tudy L y Limits Reconstruct interchanges • Widen or Reconstruct general purpose lanes • Modify ramp locations • Eliminate left-hand exits • Reconstruct frontage roads with shared use lanes • Add sidewalks • 9

  11. Reco comme mmend nded A Alt lterna native The recommended alternative DO DOES NO NOT include tolled managed or express lanes. IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE SAFETY MOBILITY OPERATIONS ADA PROVIDE DEVELOP SAFE PED. & TRANSPORTATION BIKE TRANSPORTATION CAR OPTIONS MASS SOLUTIONS TRANSIT 10

  12. Public Publi c / A / Agency Out ncy Outreach & & In Involv lveme ment nt Techn hnical W l Work Group (T (TWG) G) Pub ublic M ic Meetin ing & & Hearing ing Othe her O r Outre reach  TWG M G Meeting ngs  Publi lic Me Meeting – Open House Format;  Project Website through Recommended Alternative and www.txdo xdot.gov  Representatives from Agencies, Alternatives Considered Keyword Search: Local Governments, Chambers So Southeast st Co Connector of Commerce, Schools:  Publi lic H Heari ring – Formal Presentation describing the Preferred Alternative  Newsletters • TxDOT and Environmental Studies • FHWA  Mailing List • NTTA  Advertisements • Trinity Metro  Postcards  Legal N l Notices • NCTCOG  On-call Presentations / • FWISD, AISD, KISD  Pre ress R Releases Briefings • Tarrant County • Cities (Arlington, Forest Hill  Public I c Input  Meetings with Affected Fort Worth, Kennedale, and Property Owners (MAPOs) Mansfield)  Pu Public ic Co Comment  Workshops • Southeast Tarrant Transportation Coalition • Others 11

  13. Jul July y 19, 20 9, 2018 Publ Public c Meeting ng – Quick Quick St Stats  273 Attended  203 General Public  14 Elected Officials  56 Project Representatives  174 Written Comments  33 Received at Meeting  115 E-mailed  26 Mailed 12

  14. Publi Public c In Input ut Co Cont ntinue ues Futu ture P Public H Hea earing On-Ca Call P Present ntatio ions Town wn H Hall Me Meetings Me Meeting wi with P h Prope operty O Own wners Wor orkshop shops 13

  15. Comments in Co in St Study Area NB B Entran ance R Ram amp f from M m Meado adowbrook – 88 Comments SB E SB Entran ance R Ram amp f from Br m Brentwood St Stair air – 49 Comments Crai Cr aig St Street Br Bridg idge A Access ss / / Ped d Br Bridg idge – 25 Comments Noise se W Wal all St Study dy – 51 Comments 14

  16. Northbou ound E Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from om M Meadowbrook ook Proposed Removal of Northbound I-820 Entrance Ramp from Meadowbrook Dr. I-30 Meadowbrook Dr. North 15

  17. Northbou ound E Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from om M Meadowbrook ook WHY? Y? – Con ongesti tion a and Sa Safety – Conflicts with Exit to Brentwood Stair and I-30 Direct Connections causing heavily congested weaving movements and accidents – Distance between ramps near minimum spacing lengths described in roadway design guidelines 16

  18. Northbou ound E Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from om M Meadowbrook ook PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE R TE ROUTES ES A. Head south toward Lancaster Ave, use the improved U-turn lane, and take northbound I-820 entrance ramp North A Craig St. Meadowbrook Dr. UP Railroad E. Lancaster Ave. I-30 17

  19. Northbou ound E Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from om M Meadowbrook ook PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE TE RO ROUTE A Texas U-Turn No Signal Craig St. North Entrance Ramp 18

  20. Northbou ound E Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from om M Meadowbrook ook PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE R TE ROUTES ES B. Head north through Brentwood Stair Rd intersection to go north on I-820 or east on I-30 North B Craig St. Meadowbrook Dr. UP Railroad E. Lancaster Ave. I-30 19

  21. Northbou ound E Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from om M Meadowbrook ook PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE R TE ROUTES ES C. Head toward Brentwood Stair Rd and Bridgewood Dr to go west on I-30 North C Craig St. Meadowbrook Dr. UP Railroad E. Lancaster Ave. I-30 20

  22. Northbou ound E Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from om M Meadowbrook ook PROPOSED ED A ADDITIO IONA NAL ALTERNA RNATIVES ES T TO B BE EVALUATED ED – No-Build (Do Nothing) – Adding entrance ramp from Meadowbrook Dr and exit ramp to Brentwood Stair Rd as they currently exist – Adding entrance ramp from Meadowbrook Dr and removing the exit ramp to Brentwood Stair Rd – Removing the exit ramp to Brentwood Stair Rd but adding a northbound bypass front ntage r road l d lane for Brentwood Stair Rd under Meadowbrook Dr bridge – Adding braid ided r ramps ps (ramps that are bridged, one over the other) for entrance from Meadowbrook Dr and exit to Brentwood Stair Rd Evaluate all alternatives for right-of-way impacts*, mobility, and traffic operations for safety. *Most of these alternatives would require additional right-of-way. 21

  23. Example o le of “Byp ypass F Front ntage R Road L d Lane” Nor orthb hbound US 75 75 at L Legacy cy Dr r in Pl Plano • Frontage Road Image from Google.com street view 22

  24. Exampl ple o e of “Braid ided ed R Ramps ps” Eastbou ound I I-30 e 30 exit it to N o Nola olan R Ryan Expwy/ wy/Baird F Farm rm Rd Rd/ A / AT&T W T&T Way in Arli Arlington • Entrance Ramp Bridge Exit Ramp Image from Google.com street view 23

  25. Sout outhbou ound E Ent ntrance R Ramp f from Brent ntwoo ood Stair WHY? Y? – Con ongesti tion a and Sa Safety – Conflicts with I-30 Direct Connections and Exit Ramp to Meadowbrook Dr causing heavily congested weaving movements – Distance between ramps near minimum spacing lengths described in roadway design guidelines Proposed Removal of Southbound I-820 Entrance Ramp from Brentwood Stair Rd. Craig St. Meadowbrook Dr. North 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend