Age genda da 1 Southeast Connector Study Area 2 Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

age genda da
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Age genda da 1 Southeast Connector Study Area 2 Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

F ORT W ORTH D ISTRICT City of Fort Worth Community Meeting Southeast Connector Photo by Liam Frederick I-20, I-820 & US 287 September 15, 2018 Age genda da 1 Southeast Connector Study Area 2 Project History, Issues, and Constraints


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Photo by Liam Frederick

FORT WORTH DISTRICT

City of Fort Worth Community Meeting Southeast Connector

I-20, I-820 & US 287 September 15, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Southeast Connector Study Area Project History, Issues, and Constraints Study Goals & Objectives Recommended Alternative Public / Agency Outreach & Involvement July 19, 2018 Public Meeting – Stats & Feedback Project Schedule

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Age genda da

Project Contact Information Questions

8 9

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

– From Forest Hill Drive To Park Springs Boulevard – From I-20 To Brentwood Stair Road – From Bishop Street To Sublett Road

I-820 820 US 287 87 I-20 20

Southea east st Co Connect ctor Stud tudy A Are rea

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Began May 2000 April 19, 2001 Public Meeting #1 December 11, 2003 Public Meeting #2 March 2005 Draft Environmental Assessment December 2005 Design included Reversible Managed lanes Funding and Environmental Constraints

April 2016 to Present Day

  • Update Previous Study
  • Evaluate Alternatives
  • Analyze Future Traffic
  • Integrate with Mobility 2045
  • Produce Preliminary Design
  • Produce Environmental Assessment

Environmental Constraints Air Quality Conformity Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Consistency Funding Constraints Contract Issues

Pr Project ct His History

May 2001 Value Engineering Report / Draft Preliminary Design

3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

* Congestion Index is based on a percent increase in travel time.

Source: MTP1 Draft Mobility 2045, NCTCOG

Year 2 204 045

No No-Buil ild S Scenar ario io

Year 2 204 045

MT MTP1 Build ld S Sce cenario

St Study Ar Area

Con

  • nge

gestion stion L Levels s / De Dela lay

1 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)

Year 2 2018

Curren rent C Conges gestion

Congestion Index*

No Congestion Light Congestion Moderate Congestion Severe Congestion

4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Traffic Pr c Project ctions ns

251,500 191,200 140,950 182,250 102,900 94,200 348,800 259,900 194,600 255,600 146,500 134,200 394,400 292,300 220,400 289,700 167,300 153,400

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 I-20 (I-820 to US 287) I-20 (US 287 to Park Springs) I-820 N (Brentwood Stair to US 287) I-820 S (US 287 to I-20) US 287 N (Bishop to I-820) US 287 S (I-20 to Sublett)

2010 2030 2040 *2045 Traffic

Projections are currently being developed

* Years 2 2010 t 0 to 2040 040

Vehi hicles P Per r Day

Sour urce: e: T TxDOT T TP& P&P P Division,

  • n, 2009

2009

56% 56% Increase

5

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 5,460 Crashes
  • 47 Fatalities
  • A main goal of the

project is to improve safety

From 20 2010 0 to 20 2016

Cr Crash Hi History & & Co Conce ncent ntration

6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

St Stud udy A y Area Con

  • nstr

strain ints ts Map Map

7

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Improve Safety
  • Improve Mobility
  • Improve Operations
  • Provide Transportation Options
  • Develop Safe Transportation Solutions
  • Update and Modernize a Design from the early 1960s

St Stud udy y Goals ls & Obj & Object ctiv ives

8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Reco comme mmend nded A Alt lterna native

  • Reconstruct existing interchanges
  • Add general purpose lanes
  • Construct collector-distributor road systems

Along ng I I-20 between I I-820 820 an and US 28 d US 287 Along ng I I-820 820 between I I-20 20 an and US 28 d US 287

  • Reconstruct and add general purpose lanes

Through ghout th the P e Project S Stu tudy L y Limits

  • Reconstruct interchanges
  • Widen or Reconstruct general purpose lanes
  • Modify ramp locations
  • Eliminate left-hand exits
  • Reconstruct frontage roads with shared use lanes
  • Add sidewalks

9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Reco comme mmend nded A Alt lterna native

IMPROVE MOBILITY IMPROVE OPERATIONS IMPROVE SAFETY PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS DEVELOP SAFE TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS

CAR

MASS TRANSIT

ADA

PED. & BIKE

The recommended alternative DO DOES NO NOT include tolled managed or express lanes.

10

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • TWG M

G Meeting ngs

  • Representatives from Agencies,

Local Governments, Chambers

  • f Commerce, Schools:
  • TxDOT
  • FHWA
  • NTTA
  • Trinity Metro
  • NCTCOG
  • FWISD, AISD, KISD
  • Tarrant County
  • Cities (Arlington, Forest Hill

Fort Worth, Kennedale, and Mansfield)

  • Southeast Tarrant

Transportation Coalition

  • Others
  • Publi

lic Me Meeting – Open House Format; Recommended Alternative and Alternatives Considered

  • Publi

lic H Heari ring – Formal Presentation describing the Preferred Alternative and Environmental Studies

  • Advertisements
  • Legal N

l Notices

  • Pre

ress R Releases

  • Public I

c Input

  • Pu

Public ic Co Comment

  • Project Website through

www.txdo xdot.gov Keyword Search: So Southeast st Co Connector

  • Newsletters
  • Mailing List
  • Postcards
  • On-call Presentations /

Briefings

  • Meetings with Affected

Property Owners (MAPOs)

  • Workshops

Techn hnical W l Work Group (T (TWG) G) Pub ublic M ic Meetin ing & & Hearing ing Othe her O r Outre reach

Publi Public c / A / Agency Out ncy Outreach & & In Involv lveme ment nt

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 273 Attended
  • 203 General Public
  • 14 Elected Officials
  • 56 Project Representatives
  • 174 Written Comments
  • 33 Received at Meeting
  • 115 E-mailed
  • 26 Mailed

Jul July y 19, 20 9, 2018 Publ Public c Meeting ng – Quick Quick St Stats

12

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Futu ture P Public H Hea earing On-Ca Call P Present ntatio ions

Publi Public c In Input ut Co Cont ntinue ues

Town wn H Hall Me Meetings Me Meeting wi with P h Prope

  • perty O

Own wners Wor

  • rkshop

shops

13

slide-15
SLIDE 15

– 88 Comments

Co Comments in in St Study Area

– 49 Comments – 25 Comments – 51 Comments

NB B Entran ance R Ram amp f from M m Meado adowbrook SB E SB Entran ance R Ram amp f from Br m Brentwood St Stair air Noise se W Wal all St Study dy Cr Crai aig St Street Br Bridg idge A Access ss / / Ped d Br Bridg idge

14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Northbou

  • und E

Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from

  • m M

Meadowbrook

  • ok

North

Proposed Removal of Northbound I-820 Entrance Ramp from Meadowbrook Dr.

Meadowbrook Dr. I-30 15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Northbou

  • und E

Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from

  • m M

Meadowbrook

  • ok

WHY? Y? – Con

  • ngesti

tion a and Sa Safety – Conflicts with Exit to Brentwood Stair and I-30 Direct Connections causing heavily congested weaving movements and accidents – Distance between ramps near minimum spacing lengths described in roadway design guidelines

16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Northbou

  • und E

Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from

  • m M

Meadowbrook

  • ok

PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE R TE ROUTES ES A. Head south toward Lancaster Ave, use the improved U-turn lane, and take northbound I-820 entrance ramp

North

Meadowbrook Dr. I-30

  • E. Lancaster Ave.

Craig St. UP Railroad

A

17

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Northbou

  • und E

Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from

  • m M

Meadowbrook

  • ok

North

Craig St. 18

Texas U-Turn No Signal

PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE TE RO ROUTE A

Entrance Ramp

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Northbou

  • und E

Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from

  • m M

Meadowbrook

  • ok

PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE R TE ROUTES ES

  • B. Head north through Brentwood Stair Rd intersection to go north on I-820 or

east on I-30

North

Meadowbrook Dr. I-30

  • E. Lancaster Ave.

Craig St. UP Railroad

B

19

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Northbou

  • und E

Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from

  • m M

Meadowbrook

  • ok

PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE R TE ROUTES ES

  • C. Head toward Brentwood Stair Rd and Bridgewood Dr to go west on I-30

North

Meadowbrook Dr. I-30

  • E. Lancaster Ave.

Craig St. UP Railroad

C

20

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Northbou

  • und E

Ent ntranc nce R Ramp f from

  • m M

Meadowbrook

  • ok

PROPOSED ED A ADDITIO IONA NAL ALTERNA RNATIVES ES T TO B BE EVALUATED ED – No-Build (Do Nothing) – Adding entrance ramp from Meadowbrook Dr and exit ramp to Brentwood Stair Rd as they currently exist – Adding entrance ramp from Meadowbrook Dr and removing the exit ramp to Brentwood Stair Rd – Removing the exit ramp to Brentwood Stair Rd but adding a northbound bypass front ntage r road l d lane for Brentwood Stair Rd under Meadowbrook Dr bridge – Adding braid ided r ramps ps (ramps that are bridged, one over the other) for entrance from Meadowbrook Dr and exit to Brentwood Stair Rd Evaluate all alternatives for right-of-way impacts*, mobility, and traffic operations for safety. *Most of these alternatives would require additional right-of-way.

21

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Example o le of “Byp ypass F Front ntage R Road L d Lane”

  • Nor
  • rthb

hbound US 75 75 at L Legacy cy Dr r in Pl Plano

Image from Google.com street view

Frontage Road

22

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Exampl ple o e of “Braid ided ed R Ramps ps”

  • Eastbou
  • und I

I-30 e 30 exit it to N

  • Nola
  • lan R

Ryan Expwy/ wy/Baird F Farm rm Rd Rd/ A / AT&T W T&T Way in Arli Arlington

Image from Google.com street view

Exit Ramp Entrance Ramp Bridge

23

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Proposed Removal of Southbound I-820 Entrance Ramp from Brentwood Stair Rd.

North

WHY? Y? – Con

  • ngesti

tion a and Sa Safety – Conflicts with I-30 Direct Connections and Exit Ramp to Meadowbrook Dr causing heavily congested weaving movements – Distance between ramps near minimum spacing lengths described in roadway design guidelines

Sout

  • uthbou
  • und E

Ent ntrance R Ramp f from Brent ntwoo

  • od Stair

Meadowbrook Dr. Craig St. 24

slide-26
SLIDE 26

PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE R TE ROUTE – Head south through Meadowbrook Dr. and take improved entrance ramp to southbound I-820

North

Meadowbrook Dr.

  • E. Lancaster Ave.

Craig St. UP Railroad

Sout

  • uthbou
  • und E

Ent ntrance R Ramp f from Brent ntwoo

  • od Stair

25

slide-27
SLIDE 27

PR PROPO POSED ED A ALTER TERNATE TE RO ROUTE

Sout

  • uthbou
  • und E

Ent ntrance R Ramp f from Brent ntwoo

  • od Stair

26

North

Meadowbrook Dr.

Texas U-Turn = Improved Signal Operations

slide-28
SLIDE 28

PROPOSED ED A ADDITIO IONA NAL ALTERNA RNATIVES ES T TO B BE EVALUATED ED – Adding entrance ramp from Brentwood Stair Rd with ramps as they currently exist – Adding braid ided r ramps ps (ramps that are bridged, one over the other) for entrance ramp from Brentwood Stair Rd and exit ramp to Meadowbrook Dr – Removing entrance ramp from Brentwood Stair Rd but adding a southbound bypass front ntage r road l d lane under Meadowbrook Dr to access southbound entrance ramp Evaluate all alternatives for right-of-way impacts*, mobility, and traffic operations for safety. *Most of these alternatives would require additional right-of-way.

Sout

  • uthbou
  • und E

Ent ntrance R Ramp f from Brent ntwoo

  • od Stair

27

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Existing Pedestrian Bridge to be removed

North

Craig aig Street B Brid idge A Access / / Ped Brid idge

Proposed Craig St. Bridge

Meadowbrook Dr.

  • E. Lancaster Ave.

Craig St. 28

slide-30
SLIDE 30

– Existing pedestrian bridge to be removed because of vertical clearance/height conflicts – Potential conflicts with overhead/high mast power lines – Potential pedestrian bridge meeting American with Disability Act (ADA) requirements expected to be very long and high over roadway

Craig aig Street B Brid idge A Access / / Ped Brid idge

Image from Google.com street view Looking South on I-820 29 Power lines Pedestrian Bridge

slide-31
SLIDE 31

– Existing Craig Street bridge has narrow sidewalks

Craig aig Street B Brid idge A Access / / Ped Brid idge

30 Image from Google.com street view Looking West on Craig Street

slide-32
SLIDE 32

– Proposed Craig Street bridge would be wider with shared use lanes (cars and bikes) and wide sidewalks

Craig aig Street B Brid idge A Access / / Ped Brid idge

Proposed Craig St. Bridge: 1 shared use lane in each direction with Wide Sidewalks / Paths (see typical section below)

31

Proposed Craig Street

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ADDI DDITIONAL ALTERNATIVE TO B BE E EVALUATED – Plan for pedestrian facilities or bridge meeting ADA requirements

Craig aig Street B Brid idge A Access / / Ped Brid idge

Evaluate alternative for right-of-way impacts*, mobility, and traffic operations for safety. *This alternative would require additional right-of-way.

32

slide-34
SLIDE 34

– Noise Analyses would be conducted for entire study limits along I-20, I-820 and US 287 – Noise Abatement would be evaluated for all areas that have noise impacts

Nois ise Analyse ses

33

Example Noise Walls

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Pr Project ct Sche Schedule ule

34

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Tha Thank nk You u for Attend nding!

Pr Proje

  • ject C

t Cont

  • ntac

act I t Inf nformat

  • rmation

ion

www www.t .txd xdot.gov v Se Search ch f for: “ “So Southeast Co Connector” 817 17-37 370-680 6807 SoutheastCon

  • nnector@
  • r@txdot.g

.gov Curtis Loftis, P.E. TxDOT Project Manager Southeast Connector TxDOT Fort Worth District 2501 S.W. Loop 820 Fort Worth, TX 76133 Naser Abusaad, P.E., AICP Consultant Project Manager Southeast Connector Civil Associates, Inc. 9330 LBJ Frwy., Ste. 1150 Dallas, TX 75243

35