Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects Broward - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects

Broward County, Florida Continuing Engineering Services for

Why Atkins

2

Existing and Past Clients

3

Roadways, parks, neighborhood improvements, traffic calming

4

Dedicated, focused, driven, and passionate about serving clients well! David Bannett, PE, LEED AP Project Manager

• f experience serving

municipal government and education clients in Broward County

25+ years Experienced in Civil Engineering PM

Water and sewer; paving and grading; drainage; signing and striping

Construction administration

Key Personnel

5

David Bannett, PE, LEED AP Project Manager Glenn Myers, PE Principal of the Firm Joseph Garrity, PE, PMP Quality Assurance Manager Martine Fils-Aime, PE Roadway Design Lead Pijush Talukder, PE, PMP Drainage Design/ Permitting Lead Paul Mannix, PE Signal Design/ ITS Lead Chris Russo, PE, PTOE Transportation Planning/ Traffic Studies Lead Michael Ryan, PE Construction and Engineering Inspection Lead Hector Lopez, PE Structures and Bridge Design

Subconsultants

6

CBE Harold Aiken, PE

Civil Site Engineering and Utility Design

Gregory Stelmack, PE

Geotechnical and Testing Services

Daniel Checchia

Utility coordination and Subsurface Utility Verification

Luis Jurado

Surveying and ROW Mapping

Glenn Davis

Traffic Data Collection

Steven Shaup, PE

Movable Span Bridge Design and Structural Support

Project Management Approach

7

› Scoping meeting with staff › Proposal development › State, federal, local relations › Expedite process › Permit tracking › Conflict resolution › Proactive › Front-end document/bid specs › 30%, 60%, 90%, final reviews › Quantities/cost estimate › Field reconnaissance › Survey › Geotechnical

QA/QC Process

8

Independent process Check for constructability and biddability Perform early and often Documented process

Joseph Garrity, PE, PMP Quality Assurance Manager

Scope

› Identify deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor and recommend solutions to accommodate all modes of viable transportation

9

Major Issues Minor Issues Maintenance Issues

Major Issues

Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor

10

Flamingo Rd Monarch Lakes Blvd Miramar Blvd Pembroke Rd

Bicycle facilities

N

11

Bicycle facilities

Monarch Lakes Blvd Intersection

Major Issues

Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor

12

Flamingo Rd Monarch Lakes Blvd Miramar Blvd Pembroke Rd

Pedestrian facilities

N

Pedestrian facilities

Red Rd intersection Pembroke Rd intersection Aventine Apartments at Miramar

13

Major Issues

Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor

14

Pembroke Rd

Vehicles

N

Minor Issues

Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor

15

Flamingo Rd Monarch Lakes Blvd Miramar Blvd Pembroke Rd

• Widen bus stop pads
• Pavement deterioration
• Cross slopes issues
• Clear zone violations caused

by landscaping

N

Flamingo Rd intersection Flamingo Rd Flamingo Rd Flamingo Rd Flamingo Rd

16

Maintenance Issues

Deficiencies or potential issues along the corridor

17

Flamingo Rd Pembroke Rd Flamingo Rd

• Damaged guardrail
• Cracked/damaged sidewalk
• Silted inlets
• Poor retro-reflectivity on street signs
• Deteriorated pavement markings
• Sodded areas less than 2 feet wide between

sidewalk and curb and gutter

Crash Locations (2013-2017)

Rear end crashes 203

Flamingo Rd Pembroke Rd

N

Traffic Analysis

Volume

LOS Delay

Flamingo Rd Pembroke Rd

Volume

Flamingo Rd Pembroke Rd

AM Peak PM Peak

Operate with significant delays and low average speeds

PM Peak (5:00‐6:00) NBL NB NBR SBL SB SBR EBL EB EBR WBL WB WBR Volume (2016) 322 1241 183 348 1715 285 368 644 231 290 657 316 LOS F D D F D D F E E F E F Delay (Seconds) 84 42 35 84 42 38 84 57 58 83 65 82 Available Storage (Ft) 300 300 300 350 200

n/a

350 475 Synchro 50% Queue 185 14 199 10 210

n/a

166 184 Synchro 95% Queue 241 74 258 81 271

n/a

219 78 HCS 50% Queue 13 11 14 16 15

n/a

12 24 HCS 95% Queue 325 275 350 400 375

n/a

300 600 AM Peak (7:30‐8:30) NBL NB NBR SBL SB SBR EBL EB EBR WBL WB WBR Volume (2016) 425 1357 116 304 1839 188 310 586 389 320 1033 171 LOS F D D E F D F F F F F F Delay (Seconds) 81 53 38 77 77 46 103 88 90 96 75 42 Available Storage (Ft) 300 300 300 350 200

n/a

350 475 Synchro 50% Queue 251 17 175 22 185

n/a

190 Synchro 95% Queue 363 72 223 87 282

n/a

285 57 HCS 50% Queue 300 100 200 200 225

n/a

225 150 HCS 95% Queue 450 175 300 300 350

n/a

350 275

20

PM Peak (5:00‐6:00) NBL NB NBR SBL SB SBR EBL EB EBR WBL WB WBR Volume (2016) 322 1241 183 348 1715 285 368 644 231 290 657 316 LOS F D D F D D F E E F E F Delay (Seconds) 84 42 35 84 42 38 84 57 58 83 65 82 Available Storage (Ft) 300 300 300 350 200

n/a

350 475 Synchro 50% Queue 185 14 199 10 210

n/a

166 184 Synchro 95% Queue 241 74 258 81 271

n/a

219 78 HCS 50% Queue 13 11 14 16 15

n/a

12 24 HCS 95% Queue 325 275 350 400 375

n/a

300 600 AM Peak (7:30‐8:30) NBL NB NBR SBL SB SBR EBL EB EBR WBL WB WBR Volume (2016) 425 1357 116 304 1839 188 310 586 389 320 1033 171 LOS F D D E F D F F F F F F Delay (Seconds) 81 53 38 77 77 46 103 88 90 96 75 42 Available Storage (Ft) 300 300 300 350 200

n/a

350 475 Synchro 50% Queue 251 17 175 22 185

n/a

190 Synchro 95% Queue 363 72 223 87 282

n/a

285 57 HCS 50% Queue 300 100 200 200 225

n/a

225 150 HCS 95% Queue 450 175 300 300 350

n/a

350 275

Storage lengths recommended

450 375 600 300 200 475 50% 88% 26%

Existing

North to west turn lanes East to north turn lanes West to north turn lanes

21

Proposed Solutions

Roadway improvements

22

Flamingo Rd Pembroke Rd

22

Extend right turn lane at Flamingo/Red Road intersection Extend right turn lane at Flamingo/Pembroke intersection Mill and resurface/

• verbuild to correct

roadway cross-slope Extend right turn lane at Flamingo/Pembroke intersection Extend left turn lanes at Flamingo/Pembroke intersection Extend left turn lanes at Flamingo/Pembroke intersection

N

Proposed Solutions

Reconfigure signals to accommodate pedestrian movement

23

Pedestrians flashing signs Pedestrian actuated signal

Flamingo Rd

Green pavement marking all conflict area Provide bike lane widths that meet current standards Provide pedestrian access across Flamingo/Red Road intersection

N

24

Proposed Solutions

Reconfigure signals to accommodate pedestrian movement

25

Current Proposed

Proposed Solutions

Reconstruct curb ramps (ADA complaint) and add detectable warnings at Flamingo/Monarch lakes and Flamingo/Pembroke intersections

26

Reconstruct ADA complaint curb ramps Reconstruct ADA complaint curb ramps Reconstruct ADA complaint curb ramps Reconstruct ADA complaint curb ramps Reconstruct ADA complaint curb ramps Reconstruct ADA complaint curb ramps Reconstruct bus landing pad Reconstruct bus landing pad

Flamingo Rd Miramar Blvd Monarch Lakes Blvd

N

Proposed Solutions

Alternative 1 & 2

Provide a minimum 10’ shared path (Greenway) along western side

• f canal between Pembroke Road and Monarch Lakes Boulevard

Flamingo Rd Monarch Lakes Blvd

N Alt-1

Provide 6' sidewalk (sheet pile wall) along eastern side of canal between Pembroke Road and Monarch Lakes Boulevard

Monarch Lakes Blvd Flamingo Rd

Alt-2

Pembroke Rd Pembroke Rd

27

Benefits of the Proposed Solutions

Flamingo Rd Monarch Lake Blvd Miramar Blvd Pembroke Rd

N

Minimal MOT impacts Improved pedestrian connectivity Reduced lane blockage Increase pedestrian safety Increased visibility of cyclist Improved traffic movement Reduced rear end crashes

Sample Project Experience

29

State Road A1A Reconstruction

Project Description: Reconstruction of State Road A1A from Flamingo Ave to Oakland Park

• Blvd. including roadway, buffered bike lane, sidewalk, landscape, lightning, traffic control, and

signing and pavement markings.

30

American Heritage School Zone Flasher Improvements

Project Description: School zone improvements for American Heritage School, within the City limits of Plantation in Broward County.

31

Why Atkins

Extensive and relevant municipal experience including Complete Street projects with a long track record of successful delivery.

32

Broad based technical abilities and attention to detail, budget, and materials. Successful past and continuing performance on similar contracts. Personal local services and commitment to clients and successful project delivery.

Questions?

33