translating glp 1 trial outcomes to cardiology practice
play

Translating GLP-1 trial outcomes to cardiology practice Which - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Translating GLP-1 trial outcomes to cardiology practice Which patients will benefit ? Lars Rydn Senior Professor Department of Medicine K2 Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden Munich August 27, 2018 For internal Medical Affairs


  1. Translating GLP-1 trial outcomes to cardiology practice Which patients will benefit ? Lars Rydén Senior Professor Department of Medicine K2 Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden Munich August 27, 2018 For internal Medical Affairs training only

  2. Lars Rydén Conflicts of interest Advisory Board/Speaker AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis Research Support Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation Swedish Diabetes Foundation Family Erling Perssons Foundation Karolinska Institutet, Private Foundations Stockholm County Council Swedish Medical Assembly Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim MSD, Novo Nordisk

  3. Incretin-based glucose lowering Two options DPP-4 inhibition GLP-1 receptor agonism GLP-1 receptor agonists Requires injection Effects Mimics the effect of GLP-1 Insulin secretion Reduces HbA 1c by ≥1% Glucagon secretion Causes weight loss of 2 – 3 kg Beta-cell mass Low risk of hypoglycaemia Insulin sensitivity when used with metformin Gastric emptying Reduced risk of hypoglycaemia Satiety if combined with insulin Baggio LL & Drucker DJ. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2131 – 2157

  4. GLP-1 receptor agonists Broad approach Exendin-4 based Shortacting Exenatide BID Lixisenatide OD GLP-1 Human analogues receptor Liraglutide QD agonists Semaglutide QW Dulaglutide QW Longacting Exendin-4 based Exenatide LARQW ITCA 650 Meier JJ. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2012;8:728 – 742 Drucker DJ. Cell Metab 2016;24:15 – 30 Madsbad S et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011;13:394 – 407

  5. Outcome trials of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in type 2 diabetes Initiated since 2008 ELIXA SUSTAIN 6 (Lixisenatide, GLP-1RA) (Semaglutide, QW GLP-1RA) n=6068; follow-up ~2 yrs n=3297; duration ~2.8 yrs Q1 2015 – RESULTS Q3 2016 – RESULTS REWIND (Dulaglutide, QW GLP-1RA) n=9622; duration ~6.5 yrs Completion Q3 2018 LEADER HARMONY OUTCOMES (Liraglutide, GLP-1RA) (Albiglutide, QW GLP-1RA) n=9340; duration 3.5 – 5 yrs n~9400; duration ~4 yrs Q2 2016 – RESULTS Completion Q2 2018 FREEDOM EXSCEL PIONEER 6 (ITCA 650, GLP-1RA in DUROS) (Exenatide ER, QW GLP-1RA) (Oral semaglutide, GLP-1RA) n=4000; duration ~2 yrs n=14,752; follow-up ~3 yrs n=3176; duration ~1.5 yrs Q2 2016 – RESULTS Q3 2017 – RESULTS Completion Q4 2018 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Rydén L et al. Clin Ther 2016;38:1279 – 1287; ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed 15/3 2018)

  6. GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes Results from available outcome trials Exendin-4 based Shortacting Exenatide BID Lixisenatide Lixisenatide OD GLP-1 Human analogues receptor Liraglutide QD agonists Semaglutide QW Dulaglutide QW Longacting Exendin-4 based Exenatide Exenatide LARQW ITCA 650 ITCA 650 ITCA 650 is an investigational product and not currently approved

  7. Lixisenatide Type 2 diabetes and recent ACS n=6,068 Treatment Lixisenatide Placebo Follow-up: 25 months (median) Impact on CV death or non-fatal MI, stroke or unstable angina HbA 1c at the end of study Lixisenatide 7.4% Placebo 7.6% Pfeffer MA et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2247 – 2257

  8. Exenatide Type 2 diabetes with (74%) or without CVD n=14,752 Treatment Exenatide (2 mg once weekly) Placebo Follow-up: 3.2 years (median) Impact on CV death or non-fatal MI or stroke HbA 1c at the end of study Exenatide 7.7% Placebo 7.9% Holman RR et al. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1228 – 1239

  9. GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes Results from available outcome trials Exendin-4 based Shortacting Exenatide BID Lixisenatide Lixisenatide OD GLP-1 Human analogues receptor Liraglutide QD Liraglutide agonists Semaglutide QW Semaglutide Dulaglutide QW Longacting Exendin-4 based Exenatide LARQW ITCA 650 Semaglutide is an investigational product and not currently approved

  10. Liraglutide Type 2 diabetes at high risk for CVD n=9,340 Treatment Liraglutide (1.8 mg once daily) Placebo Follow-up: 3.8 years (median) Impact on CV death or non-fatal MI or stroke HbA 1c at the end of study ~ 7.7% Liraglutide Placebo ~ 8.0% Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:311 – 322

  11. SUSTAIN 6 Semaglutide Semaglutide sc once-weekly Type 2 diabetes at high risk for CVD n=3,297 Treatment Semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg once daily) Placebo Follow-up: 3.8 years (median) Impact on CV death or non-fatal MI or stroke HbA 1c at the end of study ~ 7.3% Liraglutide Placebo ~ 8.3% Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1834 – 1844 Semaglutide is an investigational product and not currently approved

  12. Liraglutide and semaglutide SUSTAIN 6 Semaglutide sc once-weekly Let us go into some details... Semaglutide is an investigational product and not currently approved

  13. Liraglutide Placebo Patient characteristics at study start Variable 100 Male sex (%) 64 Percentage of patients 80 Age (years) 64 Diabetes duration (years) 13 60 HbA 1c 8.7 40 BMI (kg/m 2 ) 32.5 20 Blood pressure (mmHg) 136/77 0 Heart failure (%) 18 With previous CVD With CVD risk factors ( age ≥ 5 0 ) ( age ≥ 6 0 ) Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:311 – 322

  14. Liraglutide Placebo Background therapy at study start Liraglutide Placebo 100 Proportion of patients ( % ) 77.1 75.8 80 60 50.8 50.6 45.6 43.7 40 20 6.3 6.0 3.8 3.7 3.0 2.6 0 M e t f ormin Su lphony lure a s Alpha - glucosida se inhibit ors TZ Ds Glinide s I n sulin Metform in SUs Alpha-glucosidase TZDs Glinides I nsulin Metformin SU AGI TZD Glinides Insulin inhibitors 100 92.7 92.1 Proportion of patients ( % ) 76.3 75.2 80 68.7 66.8 60 41.8 41.8 40 20 6.7 7.0 0 Antihypertensive therapy Diuretics Lipid-lowering drugs Platelet aggregation inhibitors Other Antihypertensive Diuretics Lipid-lowering Platelet Other anti-throm botic anti-thrombotic medication BP-lowering Diuretics Lipid-lowering ASA Plat stab therapy drugs aggregation m edication inhibitors Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:311 – 322

  15. Treatment recommendations Treatment/guideline • HbA 1c ≤7.0% (individualised) Blood glucose • Blood pressure Target: 130/80 mmHg • Target LDL <100 mg/dL (<70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L] if CV events) Lipids • Statins: Recommended for all patients • Antiplatelet therapy Aspirin or clopidogrel (if aspirin intolerant) if CV events Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:311 – 322

  16. H azard ratio p- value for N o. of Consistency H azard Subgroup Subgroup ( 95% CI ) interaction patients ( 95% 0.87 ( 0.78 ; 0.97) Prim ary analysis Prim ary analysis 9340 0.87 ( 0.78 0.84 Sex H bA 1c ≤ 8.3% 0.89 (0.76 ; Female 0.88 (0.72 ; 1.08) 3337 >8.3% 0.84 (0.72 ; Male 0.86 (0.75 ; 0.98) 6003 Duration of diabetes 0.27 Age ≤ 11 years 0.82 (0.70 ; <60 years 0.78 (0.62 ; 0.97) 2321 >11 years 0.90 (0.78 ; ≥ 60 years 0.90 (0.79 ; 1.02) 7019 Risk of CVD 0.20 Geographic region p=0.04 Age ≥ 50 years and established CVD 0.83 (0.74 ; Europe 0.82 (0.68 ; 0.98) 3296 Age ≥ 60 years and risk factors for CVD 1.20 (0.86 ; North America 1.01 (0.84 ; 1.22) 2847 Chronic heart failure Asia 0.62 (0.37 ; 1.04) 711 Yes 0.94 (0.72 ; Rest of the world 0.83 (0.68 ; 1.03) 2486 No 0.85 (0.76 ; 0.32 Race Antidiabetic therapy White 0.90 (0.80 ; 1.02) 7238 1 OAD 0.75 (0.58 ; Black or African 0.87 (0.59 ; 1.27) 777 >1 OAD 0.95 (0.78 ; American Insulin with OAD(s) 0.89 (0.74 ; Asian 0.70 (0.46 ; 1.04) 936 Insulin without OAD 0.86 (0.63 ; Other 0.61 (0.37 ; 1.00) 389 None 0.73 (0.42 ; 0.30 Ethnic group p=0.01 Renal function Hispanic or Latino 0.74 (0.54 ; 1.02) 1134 <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 0.69 (0.57 ; Not Hispanic or 0.89 (0.79 ; 1.00) 8206 ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 0.94 (0.83 ; Latino 0 .2 2 1 0 . 2 1 2 Hazard rat io ( 9 5 % CI ) H azard rat io ( 9 5 % CI ) Favours liraglut ide Favours placebo Favours liraglu t id e Favours placebo Marso SP et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:311 – 322

  17. Primary outcome by insulin use at baseline Primary outcome in patients never treated with insulin during the trial Liraglutide Placebo Liraglutide Placebo Hazard ratio Hazard ratio (95% CI) (95% CI) N % N % N R N R Total number of patients 4668 4672 Total number of patients 4668 4672 Primary outcome 0.87 (0.78 ; 0.97) 608 13.0 694 14.9 Primary outcome 0.87 (0.78 ; 0.97) 608 3.4 694 3.9 Patients not on insulin at baseline 2630 2541 Insulin use at baseline (Y/N) Primary outcome 0.82 (0.68 ; 0.98) 229 2.9 217 3.5 Yes 0.88 (0.75 ; 1.03) 295 14.5 347 16.3 No 0.86 (0.74 ; 1.01) 313 11.9 347 13.7 0,5 0,75 1 1,25 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0,5 0,75 1 1,25 Favours liraglutide Favours placebo Hazard ratio (95% CI) Favours liraglutide Favours placebo Presented at the American Diabetes Association 77th Scientific Sessions, Session 1-AC-SY13. 11 June 2017, San Diego, CA, USA

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend