SGLT2-Inhibition in Cardiology: What is the profile of benefit? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SGLT2-Inhibition in Cardiology: What is the profile of benefit? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SGLT2-Inhibition in Cardiology: What is the profile of benefit? Nikolaus Marx, MD, FESC, FAHA Professor of Medicine / Cardiology Head of Department of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology, Pneumology, Angiology, and Intensive Care Medicine
Faculty Disclosure
Declaration of financial interests For the last 3 years and the subsequent 12 months:
- Speaker: Amgen, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis, MSD, BMS,
AstraZeneca, Lilly, NovoNordisk; Bayer
- Research grant: Boehringer Ingelheim
- Advisory board: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis, MSD, BMS,
AstraZeneca, NovoNordisk NM declines all personal compensation from pharma or device companies
Faculty Disclosure
Declaration of non-financial interests:
- University Hospital Aachen
- Professor of Medicine / Cardiology; Head of the Department of Internal Medicine I
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung (DGK)
- Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Arterioskleroseforschung
- European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
- American Heart Association (AHA)
- Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft (DDG)
- European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)
SGLT2-Inhibition in Cardiology: What is the profile of benefit?
- SGLT2 inhibition – mode of action
- SGLT2 inhibition and cardiovascular benefit
– Clinical outcome data – Potential mechanisms
SGTL2
90% glucose reabsorption
SGTL1
10% glucose reabsorption
Glucose filtration
No urinary glucose excretion
Proximal tubule Distal tubule Glomeruli
Normo- glycaemia
Marx et al. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:3192-3200
SGTL1 SGTL2
SGLT2 expression increased Increased glucose reabsorption
Increased glucose filtration
Urinary glucose excretion
Hyper- glycaemia
Glomeruli Proximal tubule Distal tubule
SGTL2
SGLT2 expression increased Increased glucose reabsorption
Increased glucose filtration
Increased urinary glucose excretion
SGLT2 inhibitor Glomeruli Proximal tubule Distal tubule SGTL1
Hyper- glycaemia
SGLT2-Inhibition in Cardiology: What is the profile of benefit?
- SGLT2 inhibition – mode of action
- SGLT2 inhibition and cardiovascular benefit
– Clinical outcome data – Potential mechanisms
- 1. Zinman B et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:2117-2128
- 2. Neal B et al. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:644-65
SGLT2 inhibitors – CV benefit
3P- MACE
EMPA-REG OUTCOME1 CANVAS program2
Patients with event/analysed Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) p-value
3-point MACE
490/4687 282/2333 0.86 (0.74, 0.99)* 0.0382
CV death
172/4687 137/2333 0.62 (0.49, 0.77) <0.0001
Non-fatal MI
213/4687 121/2333 0.87 (0.70, 1.09) 0.2189
Non-fatal stroke
150/4687 60/2333 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) 0.1638 Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo
Cox regression analysis. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction *95.02% CI
EMPA-REG OUTCOME
3P-MACE and single endpoints
Kaplan-Meier estimate. HR, hazard ratio
EMPA-REG OUTCOME
HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.57, 0.82) p<0.0001
NNT: 39
Results: significant reduction of total mortality by empagliflozin
Zinman B et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:2117-2128
Cumulative incidence function. HR, hazard ratio
HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.50, 0.85) p=0.0017
EMPA-REG OUTCOME
Results: significant reduction of heart failure hospitalisation by empagliflozin
Zinman B et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:2117-2128
Placebo Canagliflozin HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.52 – 0.87) Patienten mit Event (%)
Results: significant reduction of heart failure hospitalisation by canagliflozin
Integrated CANVAS Program
Neal B et al. New England Journal of Medicine 2017
- SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular endpoints in
patients with diabetes and high CV risk most likely through a reduction of heart failure-related events
Outcome of patients with or without heart failure at baseline
Fitchett et al. Eur Hear J 2016; 37:1526-1534
Patients with event/analysed (%) Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HHF or CV death All patients 265/4687 (5.7) 198/2333 (8.5) 0.66 (0.55, 0.79) HF at baseline No 190/4225 (4.5) 149/2089 (7.1) 0.63 (0.51, 0.78) Yes 75/462 (16.2) 49/244 (20.1) 0.72 (0.50, 1.04) HHF All patients 126/4687 (2.7) 95/2333 (4.1) 0.65 (0.50, 0.85) HF at baseline No 78/4225 (1.8) 65/2089 (3.1) 0.59 (0.43, 0.82) Yes 48/462 (10.4) 30/244 (12.3) 0.75 (0.48, 1.19) CV death All patients 172/4687 (3.7) 137/2333 (5.9) 0.62 (0.49, 0.77) HF at baseline No 134/4225 (3.2) 110/2089 (5.3) 0.60 (0.47, 0.77) Yes 38/462 (8.2) 27/244 (11.1) 0.71 (0.43, 1.16) All-cause mortality All patients 269/4687 (5.7) 194/2333 (8.3) 0.68 (0.57, 0.82) HF at baseline No 213/4225 (5.0) 159/2089 (7.6) 0.66 (0.51, 0.81) Yes 56/462 (12.1) 35/244 (14.3) 0.79 (0.52, 1.20)
All treatment by subgroup interaction p>0.41
Favours placebo Favours empagliflozin
SGLT2-Inhibition in Cardiology: What is the profile of benefit?
- SGLT2 inhibition – mode of action
- SGLT2 inhibition and cardiovascular benefit
– Clinical outcome data – Potential mechanisms
Potential mechanisms explaining the CV effects in SGLT2 inhibitor outcome trials
- Glucose lowering
- unlikely
- Blood pressure lowering
- may contribute
- Weight loss
- may contribute
- Reduced arterial stiffness
- may contribute
Even the combination of these effects is unlikely to solely explain the results in EMPA-REG OUTCOME and CANVAS
Many hypotheses – limited data
Potential mechanisms explaining the CV effects of SGLT2 inhibitors
Verma et al. JAMA Cardiology 2017
Potential mechanisms explaining the CV effects of SGLT2 inhibitors
Striepe et al. Circulation. 2017;136:1167–1169
Effect of empaglifozin on hemodynamic parameters
- RCT, cross-over design
- N= 76
- 6 week therapy
Central systolic blood pressure:
- surrogate for afterload
- determined by arterial stiffness
- linked to future CV events
Empagliflozin treatment exerts beneficial effects on vascular function and central hemodynamics
Verma et al. JAMA Cardiology 2017
Potential mechanisms explaining the CV effects of SGLT2 inhibitors
baseline
empagliflozin 10mg/day
1 month
blood draw blood draw
Study design Untargeted serum metabolomics Statistical analysis
Detection of 1269 metabolites: ▪ 863 identified metabolites ▪ 406 unknown metabolites
Patient-matched paired analysis by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Metabolites with p<0.05 and q<0.1 (=FDR 10%) were considered „statistically significant“ 162 metabolites were altered by empagliflozin (thereof 112 identified and and 50 unkown metabolites)
▪ prospective study including: ▪ 25 patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease ▪ on standard antidiabetic treatment ▪ fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial
Study design and analysis
NCT03131232 Patients characteristics: age 64.1±9.9 y; BMI 31.6±5.0 kg/m²; duration of diabetes 11.5±5.8 y; HbA1c: 8.5±1.3%; LV-function: EF 48.7±13.0%; therapy: antihypertensive 96%; lipid-lowering 92%; antiplatelet / anticoagulation 96%.
Metabolomic analysis in empagliflozin-treated pat
Kappel et al. Circulation 2017; 136(10):969-972
Empagliflozin treatment leads to an expanded ketone body utilization and an increased BCAA catabolism in treated patients
Disturbed BCAA catabolism in heart failure
Cardiac Hypertrophy and Dysfunction
Electron transfer chain Branch-chain keto-acids Branch-chain amino-acids
Mitochondria
mTOR
ROS
BCAA Catabolic Activity
Disturbed BCAA catabolism in heart failure
after Sun et al. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016; 1862:2270-2275
Since BCAA catabolism is diminished in HF, empagliflozin could potentially restore these defects and provide
- an optimal energy source for the heart and / or
- exhibit direct effects on cardiac function by influencing
various signaling pathways
Effect on CV death and HHF
Early effects
- Sodium
- Volume
- Hemodynamics
- ……
SGLT2 inhibition and heart failure
Mid- and longterm effects
- Cardiac metabolism
- Cardiac function
- Cardiac oxygen demand
- Reduced oxidative stress
- Glucagon effects
- ……
Fitchett et al. Eur Hear J 2016; 37:1526-1534