trans ranspor portation tation me megap gaprojects ojects
play

Trans ranspor portation tation Me Megap gaprojects ojects SPUR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The he Rol ole of e of Ci Cities ties in in Plan lanning ning Trans ranspor portation tation Me Megap gaprojects ojects SPUR UR Oakl kland, and, November ember 28, 2018 + E Eliza izabe beth h Deakin kin / UC Berk rkeley +


  1. The he Rol ole of e of Ci Cities ties in in Plan lanning ning Trans ranspor portation tation Me Megap gaprojects ojects SPUR UR Oakl kland, and, November ember 28, 2018 + E Eliza izabe beth h Deakin kin / UC Berk rkeley + E Eric Eidlin in / City y of San Jo Jose + D Doug Johnso nson / City y of San Francisc isco

  2. Th The e Role ole of of Citie ities s in in Pla lanning nning Trans anspor portation tation Meg egaproj aprojects ects • Elizabeth Deakin • What is a megaproject? What makes them so challenging? • Challenge of transportation governance in megaregions • Eric Eidlin: San Jose Diridon Station • Doug Johnson: Rail Alignment and Benefits (RAB) Study • Q&A

  3. Th The e Ur Urban an Cen entur tury • Majority of world population is urban, but “urban” (includes many small places) • Metropolitan regions are key drivers of economic growth- concentrate human and physical capital, resources, entrepreneurship • Megaregions are leaders in innovation, opportunity • “Going glocal ” – integrating global and local knowledge Credits: NASA • Cities and regions as innovation testbeds

  4. One One Version sion of of U. U.S. S. Megaregions aregions

  5. Challenges allenges • Global warming • Public safety • Disparities in wealth, health, opportunity • Environmental quality • Diversity and inclusion • Housing and infrastructure • Governance, effective management Ca Can we we al alle levia iate e th thre reat ats s an and ca captu ture re opportu tunit nities ies?

  6. Me Mega gapr projects: jects: A Ma A Major jor Challeng hallenge Projects that are exceptionally costly, controversial, context-specific, challenging to design, complex to construct • Often strain institutional capacities • Takes skill to keep them from becoming catastrophic, career-ending • Examples: Channel Tunnel, Eastern Span - Bay Bridge, London congestion pricing, many urban rail projects

  7. Tod oday • Cases of big projects led by cities • Urban setting poses challenges but also major opportunities for creating more livable, vibrant places • Many elements means many stakeholders – need to be creative in managing the process

  8. Tra ranspor nsportation tation Me Mega gapr projects ojects • Cities want them. But don’t want the negative impacts. • They have profound place-defining effects on the communities in which they are built. But their design often fails to account for this. • Many fail to put the user first and are not developed to maximize integration.

  9. CONNECTING CALIFORNIA 4,300 lane miles + 115 Airport gates would be needed to create equivalent capacity of high speed rail 545 Million TRIPS between regions CALIFORNIA 2015 2065 GROWTH In 2040. That is 50% more than 2010 Population 39 M 52 M + 33% California will grow Employees 16 m 28 m + 77% 260,000 NEW RESIDENTS EVERY YEAR Option: MAXIMIZE RAIL OR EXPAND AIRPORTS/HWYS 9

  10. Di Diri ridon don In Integra grated d Stat Station ion Concept ncept Pla lan 10 A Joint Effort of The City of San Jose, VTA, Caltrain, and the California High-Speed Rail Authority In collaboration with Arcadis & Benthem Crouwel

  11. Wh Why y is s Di Diridon don Stati ation on so so Imp Important? ortant? Pla lann nned Major jor Regiona onal Rail il Service ices s San Jose Dir irid idon Sacrament ento z  High- Speed ed Rail Stockt ckton  BART Oakland San Franci cisc sco  Caltr train ain San n José Diridon Station Merced ced  ACE Gilroy Fresno  Capit pitol

  12. 1 FOR EVERY EMPLOYED RESIDENT IN SAN JOSE, THERE ARE ONLY 3.0 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.3 .8 .85 1.0 Jobs SAN JOSE PALO CUPERTINO MOUNTAIN SANTA FREMONT SUNNYVALE ALTO VIEW CLARA

  13. • Attract more activity, especially • Establish Diridon Area as major employment, to downtown and destination transit-rich locations • Foster a lively public realm that • Reduce driving supports walking and bicycling

  14. Diri rido don n vs. Othe her r DIRIDON DON 2040 040 CA Tra CA ranspo nsportation tation Facilitie ilities DIRIDON DON TODAY 140k 140k Pas Passe senger ngers/Da s/Day 17k Source VTA/AECOM SFO TODAY L.A. UNI NION N TODAY SF T F TRANSB NSBAY FU FUTU TURE RE 145k 145k 110k 0k 11 110k 0k Source TJPA

  15. Netherland’s busiest train station ion, , nestle tled d in heart of histor oric ic mid-siz sized ed city 300,000 300,000 pe peop ople pe per r da day y in in stati station 25,000 bike parkin rking g spaces es 500 car pa r parking rking spaces es Utrecht

  16. “A station is a public space with a roof on top” -- Jan Benthem

  17. CA CAHSR SR Ae Aerial l St Station on Pro ropos osal al

  18. Diridon Integrated Station Concept Plan The Concept pt Plan n will establi blish sh: • Seamless ss connecti ections ns bet betwee ween transpo nsportatio tation n mode des. • A harmoni nious us relatio ionsh nship ip be betwe ween n the stati tion n and d surrou rounding ndings. s. • An effec fective tive organizat nizatio ional nal struc ucture ture to de deliver ver the v vision. on.

  19. Diridon Station and Surroundings NORTH

  20. San Francisco Rail Alignment And Benefits (RAB) Study November 2018

  21. CONNECTING neighborhoods FIDI, Mission Bay, 2015 2065 GROWTH SOMA, So. Bayfront Population 87,000 257,000 194% Employees 304,000 554,000 82% 20,000 new households in southern bayfront are planned, from Mission Creek to Executive Park 35,000 new jobs + 520 acres of open space are also planned in the Southern Bayfront 6 east-west roads could be reconnected across Caltrain tracks Option: UNDERGROUND RAIL OR NEIGHBORHOOD ISOLATION 21

  22. Why now? Major planned new infrastructure Caltrain Electrification High Speed Rail (HSR) Salesforce Transit Center 22

  23. Why do we need this study? • To coordinate state, regional and local infrastructure for generations of growth • To connect neighborhoods while supporting Caltrain and High-Speed Rail operations • Current plans require 16 th St to be closed 20+ minutes every hour (during peak) 23

  24. RAB Study Components Each component: • Is independent of others • Will affect San Francisco for 100+ years 1 2 3 4 5 Rail Alignment Railyard Urban Form Transit Center Boulevard I-280 to Salesforce Reconfiguration/ and Land Use (SFTC) Transit Center Relocation Considerations Extension/Loop 24

  25. Rail Alignments to Salesforce Transit Center 1 25

  26. Railyard Reconfigurations / Relocation 2 What if Caltrain SEPARATED operations from staging and storage/maintenance? 26

  27. 27 Urban Form and Land Use Considerations 3

  28. Transit Center (SFTC) Extension/Loop 4 An extension or loop is not needed now but will be when more trains travel the corridor 28

  29. 29 Boulevard I-280: Does not Impact Rail Alignments 5 • Removing I-280 does not create new opportunities for rail • No physical relationship to other components • Removing I-280 requires much longer conversation with Caltrans 29

  30. ONGOING COORDINATION TO carry rail projects forward Approximate schedules, subject to change

  31. Prob oblem lem: : Megapr aprojects ojects th that at Fai ail l to o Of Offer r th the Full ll Rang nge e of Mo f Mobi bility lity, , Eco conom nomic ic Developm lopment ent, , an and Pl d Plac acemak emakin ing g Be Bene nefits its th that at th they Co y Could ld Possible solutions • A bigger role for one or more of the following: • Cities • Regional government • State government • Creation of project-specific entities that are set up to foster multimodal integration and maximize both transportation and city-building benefits

  32. The e way in in wh whic ich h we e curre rrently ntly work rk toge gether ther

  33. The e way in in wh whic ich h we e curre rrently ntly work rk toge gether ther

  34. Fre renc nch h St Stat ation ion Are rea a Governanc ernance e En Entit ities ies

  35. Qu Ques estions tions • How can cities focus both on the needs of global investors and local residents (i.e. have a ‘ glocal ’ focus)? • How can projects serve the needs of broad geographies (i.e. region or state) while also furthering the place-making goals of cities? • What would an ideal governance entity for urban megaprojects look like? • How would it attract the necessary talent and have the wide array of in- house skills that are necessary for building integrated “urban” projects? • What changes would need to be made to the model that has been employed until now for these types of projects in California, the JPA?

  36. The he Rol ole of e of Ci Cities ties in in Plan lanning ning Trans ranspor portation tation Me Megap gaprojects ojects SPUR UR Oakl kland, and, November ember 28, 2018 + E Eliza izabe beth h Deakin kin / UC Berk rkeley + E Eric Eidlin in / City y of San Jo Jose + D Doug Johnso nson / City y of San Francisc isco

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend