town of oak bluffs coastal sediment transport study
play

Town of Oak Bluffs Coastal Sediment Transport Study Project Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Town of Oak Bluffs Coastal Sediment Transport Study Project Update Applied Coastal Research and Engineering Mashpee, Massachusetts John S. Ramsey, P.E. Sean W. Kelley, P.E. Bathymetric and Shoreline Change Analyses Bathymetric change


  1. Town of Oak Bluffs Coastal Sediment Transport Study Project Update Applied Coastal Research and Engineering Mashpee, Massachusetts John S. Ramsey, P.E. Sean W. Kelley, P.E.

  2. Bathymetric and Shoreline Change Analyses • Bathymetric change based on CLE 2008 survey and 2000 LIDAR • Shoreline analysis uses data from historical T-sheets, aerial photography, and 2009 GPS survey

  3. Bathymetric Change Analysis • Small-scale beach and nearshore erosion • Results also may show seasonal shifts in beach shape

  4. Shoreline Change 1846 to 2005

  5. Shoreline Change1846 to 2005

  6. Shoreline Change 1846 to 2005

  7. Shoreline Change 1955 to 2005

  8. Shoreline Change 2003 to 2009

  9. Coastal Model Development • Bathymetry from NOAA (GEODAS database supplemented with chart data) and CLE • Open ocean waves from USACE WIS database • Wind data from CMAN platform in Buzzards Bay, 1985 through 2008

  10. Coastal Processes Modeling Wave model of Nantucket sound used to determine wave climate along the Oak Bluffs Shoreline

  11. Coastal Processes Modeling • Local grid with 5-meter grid resolution nested within Nantucket Sound regional model • Local wave model includes – CLE 2008 topography and bathymetry – Harbor Jetties, Steamship Pier, and Groin at Pay Beach

  12. Sediment Transport Potential Modeling • Transport potential along study area is typically ~10,000 cubic yards per year • Actual transport is less due to sediment starved condition of the shoreline and groins

  13. Potential Shoreline Protection Options

  14. Potential Shoreline Protection Options Historical Shore Protection USGS 1941

  15. Potential Shoreline Protection Options Historical Shore Protection U.S. Army Corps 1965 Report

  16. Example 1: Inkwell Beach • 50 ft-wide nourishment • 8,000 cubic yards • Fill lasts longer with rehabilitated groin

  17. Example 2: 2300 ft Nourishment • 50 ft-wide nourishment • 70,000 cubic yards • Rehabilitation of 4 groins • Added protection to base of revetment

  18. Environmental Concerns • Eelgrass beds 250 ft to 300 ft offshore • Regulatory agencies have recently allowed permanent impacts to eelgrass in Woods Hole (direct dredging of the resource)

  19. Environmental Concerns • Example of recently permitted hydraulic placement of sand within ~150 ft of existing eelgrass bed Figure: courtesy of Leslie Fields

  20. Beach Nourishment as a Shore Protection Option • Dead Neck (Barnstable) nourished since 1985 • Most recent large-scale nourishment in 1999 Pre-1999

  21. Beach Nourishment as a Shore Protection Option • ~200,000 cubic yards placed in 1999 • In 2009, approximately 50% remains 1999

  22. Summary • Sediment-starved shoreline • History of “hard” shoreline armoring • Long-term shoreline management using combination of beach nourishment and structures • Possible “structure trading” as a regional approach • Environmental concerns are manageable • Long-term sediment sources…

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend