Town of Oak Bluffs Coastal Sediment Transport Study Project Update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

town of oak bluffs coastal sediment transport study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Town of Oak Bluffs Coastal Sediment Transport Study Project Update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Town of Oak Bluffs Coastal Sediment Transport Study Project Update Applied Coastal Research and Engineering Mashpee, Massachusetts John S. Ramsey, P.E. Sean W. Kelley, P.E. Bathymetric and Shoreline Change Analyses Bathymetric change


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Town of Oak Bluffs Coastal Sediment Transport Study

Project Update

Applied Coastal Research and Engineering Mashpee, Massachusetts John S. Ramsey, P.E. Sean W. Kelley, P.E.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Bathymetric and Shoreline Change Analyses

  • Bathymetric change based on

CLE 2008 survey and 2000 LIDAR

  • Shoreline analysis uses data

from historical T-sheets, aerial photography, and 2009 GPS survey

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Bathymetric Change Analysis

  • Small-scale beach and

nearshore erosion

  • Results also may show

seasonal shifts in beach shape

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Shoreline Change 1846 to 2005

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Shoreline Change1846 to 2005

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Shoreline Change 1846 to 2005

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Shoreline Change 1955 to 2005

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Shoreline Change 2003 to 2009

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Coastal Model Development

  • Wind data from CMAN platform in

Buzzards Bay, 1985 through 2008

  • Bathymetry from NOAA

(GEODAS database supplemented with chart data) and CLE

  • Open ocean waves from

USACE WIS database

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Coastal Processes Modeling

Wave model of Nantucket sound used to determine wave climate along the Oak Bluffs Shoreline

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Coastal Processes Modeling

  • Local grid with 5-meter

grid resolution nested within Nantucket Sound regional model

  • Local wave model

includes

– CLE 2008 topography and bathymetry – Harbor Jetties, Steamship Pier, and Groin at Pay Beach

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sediment Transport Potential Modeling

  • Transport potential along

study area is typically ~10,000 cubic yards per year

  • Actual transport is less

due to sediment starved condition of the shoreline and groins

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Potential Shoreline Protection Options

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Potential Shoreline Protection Options Historical Shore Protection USGS 1941

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Potential Shoreline Protection Options Historical Shore Protection U.S. Army Corps 1965 Report

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Example 1: Inkwell Beach

  • 50 ft-wide nourishment
  • 8,000 cubic yards
  • Fill lasts longer with

rehabilitated groin

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Example 2: 2300 ft Nourishment

  • 50 ft-wide nourishment
  • 70,000 cubic yards
  • Rehabilitation of 4 groins
  • Added protection to base of

revetment

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Environmental Concerns

  • Eelgrass beds 250 ft to 300

ft offshore

  • Regulatory agencies have

recently allowed permanent impacts to eelgrass in Woods Hole (direct dredging of the resource)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Environmental Concerns

  • Example of recently

permitted hydraulic placement of sand within ~150 ft of existing eelgrass bed

Figure: courtesy of Leslie Fields

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Beach Nourishment as a Shore Protection Option

  • Dead Neck (Barnstable)

nourished since 1985

  • Most recent large-scale

nourishment in 1999 Pre-1999

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Beach Nourishment as a Shore Protection Option

  • ~200,000 cubic yards

placed in 1999

  • In 2009, approximately

50% remains 1999

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summary

  • Sediment-starved shoreline
  • History of “hard” shoreline

armoring

  • Long-term shoreline

management using combination of beach nourishment and structures

  • Possible “structure trading”

as a regional approach

  • Environmental concerns

are manageable

  • Long-term sediment

sources…