Towards Entanglement of Purification for Conformal Field Theories - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

towards entanglement of purification for conformal field
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Towards Entanglement of Purification for Conformal Field Theories - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

18/07/31 Strings and Fields 2018@ YITP, Kyoto Towards Entanglement of Purification for Conformal Field Theories Kotaro Tamaoka (Osaka U.) Based on [1803.10539] with Hayato Hirai, Tsuyoshi Yokoya (Osaka U.) PTEP 2018, no.6, 063B03 (2018)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Towards Entanglement of Purification for Conformal Field Theories

Kotaro Tamaoka (Osaka U.)

Based on [1803.10539] with Hayato Hirai, Tsuyoshi Yokoya (Osaka U.) PTEP 2018, no.6, 063B03 (2018)

18/07/31 Strings and Fields 2018@ YITP, Kyoto

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Towards Entanglement of Purification for CFTs-

Kotaro Tamaoka (Osaka U.)

Based on [1803.10539] with Hayato Hirai, Tsuyoshi Yokoya (Osaka U.) PTEP 2018, no.6, 063B03 (2018)

18/07/31 Strings and Fields 2018@ YITP, Kyoto

Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from Conformal Field Theory

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A bulk object, away from the boundary

[Umemoto-Takayanagi ’17], [Nguyen-Devakul-Halbasch-Zaletel-Swingle ’17]

Question Can we get EWCS directly from CFT?

Entanglement wedge cross section (EWCS)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Our result

Yes! we can get the EWCS from CFT2 4-point functions with twist number-1 channel

− ∂ ∂nG(z, ¯ z)

  • n→1

− → − ∂ ∂nGσn(z, ¯ z)

  • n→1

= EW (A, B)

x1 x3 x2 x4

hO(x1)O(x2) ¯ O(x3) ¯ O(x4)i

= 1 |x12|2∆O|x34|2∆ ¯

O G(z, ¯

z)

OO ∼ σn

the leading contribution for the holographic CFT

A B

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outline

  • 2. EWCS from Holographic CFT2
  • 3. Summary and Discussion
  • 1. EWCS/EoP & “Replica method”
slide-6
SLIDE 6

EE from twist op.s correlation function (Replica method)

in

  • ut

σn ¯ σn

∆n = c 12 ✓ n − 1 n ◆

!Scaling dim. of twist op. → from Conformal WT id.

[Calabrese, Cardy ’04]

Sin = ∂ ∂n hσn¯ σni

  • n→1

CFTn/Zn

slide-7
SLIDE 7

x1 x3 x2 x4

A B A’ A’ B’ B’ AB

̶

AB

̶

EWCS(EoP) as HEE for a new boundary

EWCS: minimal surface of a new boundary!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

x1 x3 x2 x4

A B A’ A’ B’ B’

SAA0|min.

= ∂ ∂n hΨopt.|φn ¯ φn|Ψopt.i

  • n→1

φn ¯ φn

(H)EE → “Replica method”

~ 2pt function in the bulk! Verification: EoP computation using holographic code model

[Pastawski, Yoshida, Harlow, Preskill '15]

AB

̶

AB

̶

EWCS(EoP) as HEE for a new boundary

c.f. Miyaji-Takayanagi ‘15

slide-9
SLIDE 9

For pure states, EoP → EE

A’ A’ B’ B’ A B B A

φn ¯ φn σn ¯ σn Take the size of →0: the original RT formula

AB

̶

AB

̶

AB

̶

[Ryu, Takayanagi ’06]

slide-10
SLIDE 10

“Bulk twist op.” → twist op. in CFT

Boundary condition

! Within framework of the holographic code model, φn is just the HKLL map of σn

φn − → σn

m2

φnR2 AdS = ∆n(∆n − 2)

r → ∞

∆n = c 12 ✓ n − 1 n ◆

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Outline

  • 2. EWCS from Holographic CFT2
  • 3. Summary and Discussion
  • 1. EWCS/EoP & “Replica method”

→ The twist op. exchange in the bulk is important ! → Can be obtained from twist op. conformal blocks

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CFT2 4pt functions with twist number-1 channel

hO(x1)O(x2) ¯ O(x3) ¯ O(x4)i =

1 |x12|2∆O|x34|2∆ ¯

O G(z, ¯

z)

− ∂ ∂nG(z, ¯ z)

  • n→1

− → − ∂ ∂nGσn(z, ¯ z)

  • n→1

= EW

Twist number (n+1)/2, for example

A B

x1 x2 x3 x4

Also, assume the holographic CFT; CB for twist op. σn will dominate !

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Z dλ Z dλ0G∆,0

bb (X(λ), Y (λ0))

∼ e−∆σmin

1 ⌧ ∆ ' mRAdS

[Hijano-Kraus-Perlmutter-Snively ’15]

At the semiclassical limit, only σmin contributes!

O1 O2

O3

O4

φ(↔ O)

(Now we are treating so-called “light operators” (1<<Δi ,Δ<<c))

X(λ) Y (λ0)

Conformal Block from AdS geodesics

A Conformal Block =

slide-14
SLIDE 14

= c 6σmin = 1 4GN σmin = EW

Gσn ∼ e− c

12(n− 1 n)σmin

CFT2 4pt functions with twist number-1 channel captures the EWCS @ large-c

hO(x1)O(x2) ¯ O(x3) ¯ O(x4)i =

1 |x12|2∆O|x34|2∆ ¯

O G(z, ¯

z)

− ∂ ∂nG(z, ¯ z)

  • n→1

− → − ∂ ∂nGσn(z, ¯ z)

  • n→1

= EW (A, B)

A B

x1 x2 x3 x4

σmin.

[Hijano-Kraus-Perlmutter-Snively ’15]

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Extension to the BTZ blackholes

σmin.

σmin.

BTZ t=0

・Reduce to the heavy-light Virasoro CBs

hOH|OL(x1)OL(x2) ¯ OL(x3) ¯ OL(x4)|OHi

・Start from the heavy-light correlators

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Summary

Can obtain the EWCS from CFT2 4-point functions with twist number-1 channel

− ∂ ∂nG(z, ¯ z)

  • n→1

− → − ∂ ∂nGσn(z, ¯ z)

  • n→1

= EW (A, B)

・In the holographic code model, actually related to the EoP

x1 x3 x2 x4

A B [Hirai, KT, Yokoya ‘18]

・EWCS for static BTZ blackhole

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Future directions

Path integral representation of 4pt functions

Extension to the higher dimension Calculation in RCFT or free theories

HKLL map for defects in the bulk?

Thank you !

“EWCS” for non-holographic CFT Twist number ±(n+1)/2 operators, for example

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Back up

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Entanglement of Purification

ˆ ρAB

[Terhal-Horodecki-Leung-DiVincenzo '02]

|ψiABC

a correlation measure for two subregions

HA HB

HA HB HC HA HB HA0 HB0

EP (A : B) = min

|ψiABA0B0

S(ρAA0) ρAB = TrC |ψihψ|

s.t.