towards a perceptual quality metric for computer
play

Towards a Perceptual Quality Metric for Computer-Generated Images - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Towards a Perceptual Quality Metric for Computer-Generated Images Pierre Boulenguez Boris Airieau Mohamed-Chaker Larabi Daniel Meneveaux XLIM Lab., SIC Dept.,


  1. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Towards a Perceptual Quality Metric for Computer-Generated Images Pierre Boulenguez Boris Airieau Mohamed-Chaker Larabi Daniel Meneveaux XLIM Lab., SIC Dept., Poitiers, France Electronic Imaging 2012 1 / 12

  2. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context 2 / 12

  3. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) 2 / 12

  4. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; 2 / 12

  5. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; electronic gaming; 2 / 12

  6. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; electronic gaming; lighting engineering; 2 / 12

  7. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; electronic gaming; lighting engineering; ... 2 / 12

  8. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; electronic gaming; lighting engineering; ... Physically Based Rendering 2 / 12

  9. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; electronic gaming; lighting engineering; ... Physically Based Rendering Geometrical/wave/quantum optics 2 / 12

  10. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; electronic gaming; lighting engineering; ... Physically Based Rendering Geometrical/wave/quantum optics, but: 2 / 12

  11. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; electronic gaming; lighting engineering; ... Physically Based Rendering Geometrical/wave/quantum optics, but: exhaustive simulation impossible; 2 / 12

  12. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Work Context Computer-generated images (CGIs) scientific visualisation; electronic gaming; lighting engineering; ... Physically Based Rendering Geometrical/wave/quantum optics, but: exhaustive simulation impossible; complexity reducing assumptions ! 2 / 12

  13. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions 3 / 12

  14. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions ambiant term; 3 / 12

  15. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions ambiant term; diffuse/specular scattering; 3 / 12

  16. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions ambiant term; diffuse/specular scattering; trichromatic; 3 / 12

  17. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions ambiant term; diffuse/specular scattering; trichromatic; ... 3 / 12

  18. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions ambiant term; diffuse/specular scattering; trichromatic; ... Compromize ? 3 / 12

  19. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions ambiant term; diffuse/specular scattering; trichromatic; ... Compromize ? Complexity reduction ratio of a given assumption. Quality reduction 3 / 12

  20. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions ambiant term; diffuse/specular scattering; trichromatic; ... Compromize ? Complexity reduction ratio of a given assumption. Quality reduction Problem 3 / 12

  21. Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion Conclusion Problematic Classical Assumptions ambiant term; diffuse/specular scattering; trichromatic; ... Compromize ? Complexity reduction ratio of a given assumption. Quality reduction Problem No metric to quantify the perceptual quality of a CGI ! 3 / 12

  22. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Metric 4 / 12

  23. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Metric Objective function M 4 / 12

  24. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Metric Objective function M Q = M ( C 1 , . . . , C n ) M relates: 4 / 12

  25. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Metric Objective function M Q = M ( C 1 , . . . , C n ) M relates: the overall perceptual quality Q , 4 / 12

  26. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Metric Objective function M Q = M ( C 1 , . . . , C n ) M relates: the overall perceptual quality Q , to the perceived qualities of the criteria C 1 , . . . , C n . 4 / 12

  27. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Metric Objective function M Q = M ( C 1 , . . . , C n ) M relates: the overall perceptual quality Q , to the perceived qualities of the criteria C 1 , . . . , C n . Assessment of Q and C 1 , . . . , C n 4 / 12

  28. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Metric Objective function M Q = M ( C 1 , . . . , C n ) M relates: the overall perceptual quality Q , to the perceived qualities of the criteria C 1 , . . . , C n . Assessment of Q and C 1 , . . . , C n psychovisual experiments; 4 / 12

  29. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Metric Objective function M Q = M ( C 1 , . . . , C n ) M relates: the overall perceptual quality Q , to the perceived qualities of the criteria C 1 , . . . , C n . Assessment of Q and C 1 , . . . , C n psychovisual experiments; automated measurement (work in progress). 4 / 12

  30. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria 5 / 12

  31. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria every possible aspect of Q ; 5 / 12

  32. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria every possible aspect of Q ; intuitive; 5 / 12

  33. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria every possible aspect of Q ; intuitive; automatically measurable. 5 / 12

  34. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria every possible aspect of Q ; intuitive; automatically measurable. Five Retained Criteria 5 / 12

  35. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria every possible aspect of Q ; intuitive; automatically measurable. Five Retained Criteria 1 Color Bleeding 5 / 12

  36. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria every possible aspect of Q ; intuitive; automatically measurable. Five Retained Criteria 1 Color Bleeding 2 Shadows 5 / 12

  37. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria every possible aspect of Q ; intuitive; automatically measurable. Five Retained Criteria 1 Color Bleeding 2 Shadows 3 Noise 5 / 12

  38. Introduction Materials & Methods Quality Model Results & Discussion Subjective Quality Experiment Conclusion Perceptual Quality Criteria Constraints on the Criteria every possible aspect of Q ; intuitive; automatically measurable. Five Retained Criteria 1 Color Bleeding 2 Shadows 3 Noise 4 Aliasing 5 / 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend