Top coal oal caving Tuesday 23rd Octob ctober 2012: 11.45am - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

top coal oal caving
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Top coal oal caving Tuesday 23rd Octob ctober 2012: 11.45am - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Conference e Presentation Top coal oal caving Tuesday 23rd Octob ctober 2012: 11.45am Allison Golsby MAusIMM(CP), RPEQ, MEn Allison Golsby EngSc(Min Man), MMinEng(Geomech), GDipMVent Chief Execu cutive Officer GPO Box 358


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Top coal

Allison Golsby Tuesday 23rd Octob

Conference

Allison Golsby MAusIMM(CP), RPEQ, MEn Chief Execu

GPO Box 358

Brisbane Qld 4001

  • al caving

ctober 2012: 11.45am

e Presentation

EngSc(Min Man), MMinEng(Geomech), GDipMVent

cutive Officer

allison@golsby.org M +61 409 008 942

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Presentation Summary

Methodology Myth Theory Mining planning Ventilation Development panels

  • http://minin

Roadways The equipment The skills Training “How does it all work?”

  • ing.delgos.org/?p=80
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Background

Thick seam mining More than 4.8m Strata control Premature pillar failure Spontaneous combustion Heavier supports required Subsidence Higher capital Easier to plan More dilution Higher extraction ratio Higher gas make

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Methodology

Same suite of machinery Same suite of machinery Extracts higher than normal LW Upper part of the seam is caved

  • W

!"#$

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Methodology

85-90% recovery 85-90% recovery 6.4Bt estimated Australian reserves suitable for LTCC (UNSW/CSIRO) Stimulation Caving by gravity Caving by gravity LW at foot of seam Two AFCs Suits high fluidity coal with good fragmentation

  • ,-./

%&'(%')*)*)))'&+

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Myth

Use conventional longwall equipm Use conventional longwall equipm Full extraction Low dilution

  • quipment

quipment

/1/2!3*

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Theory

  • Benefits

Recovery Recovery Lower face extraction height Increased face stability Easier development Reduced risk of goaf spon

  • Reduced risk of goaf spon

com Higher resource recovery compared to cost of development Less wall moves

  • 4 5))67( )5(
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Theory

  • Risks

Spontaneous Combustion Spontaneous Combustion Dilution Conditioning – hydro fracing

  • r blasting

Gas make Fire risk

  • Fire risk

Subsidence Dust Convergence of gate roads Parts availability

  • 8 5))9
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Theory

  • Geotechnical risk

Waste angle of repose Top coal max radius Top coal caving angles Yield angles

/

Wall friction energy Wall stress Equipment selection

  • /$,,,%&'(%')*)*)))'&+
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Case study

Case study - Austar Soutirage

:/;,,$

  • $$/$"7%%)!,$
slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • How does top coal caving w

Case study – Austar Case study – Austar

Acknowledge the assistance of: Austar website Ellton Longwall website China National Coal Mining equipment website

:/;,,$

website China Overseas Development co website Kurt Ekanayake – Austar commissioning and now Principle Mining Engineer AMC

  • aving work?

13<23$<235<23='<3%

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Mine planning and panel

Plan Capital Seam thickness Coal recovery Same roof and floor conditions as normal LW Gassy – non simultaneous multislice Sealing and spon com Ventilation

  • el layout
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Ventilation
  • Maintenance
  • Operations

Gas Spon com Dust Heat Good ventilation is important

8 $//:>%=)&'+:: #$$#>

  • #>$#$$7$??,?,)))6&'96='# 4@ 4
slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Predictive tools

Mine planning

  • Predictive tools

Fragmentation Waste slope angle Flow analysis Coal arch behaviour Coal breakage angle Coal breakage angle Particle size Hard to model

"

  • "8$/A7#A$7

%&'(%')*)*)))'&+

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Larger

Development Larger roadways Consider support needs Entries for Entries for vent Services

  • ,7 $$

13<23$<235<23=6

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Roadways

Specialist support Sliding roof bar supports Keep Keep roadways

  • pen longer
  • ,7 $$

13<23$<235<23=6

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Conventional

Longwall

The equipment

  • L
  • Longwall

Powered face supports Shearer Armoured Face Conveyor Conveyor System Electricals and

http://www.rl

S Electricals and communication

  • LTCC

.rlv.si/en/files/default/ANG%20BROSURA%20VOM.pdf

Same equipment modified to suit

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • The equipment

Maingate support to the re Case study Austar

  • rear BSL –

4 5))67( )5(

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Commissioning

The equipment Commissioning Caving – Case study Aust

  • ustar

4 5))67( )5(

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Is new technology availab

Moving forward - Case study Austar

Recovery sequence Recovery sequence Roof support Anticipated increased stress and floor heave

  • able?

4 5))67( )5(

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Moving forward - Case st

Is new technology availab Moving forward - Case st

Increased roadway size Increased valve functions to suppor Maintenance engineering Ventilation – gas/heat Automation

  • study Austar

able? study Austar

upports

4 5))67( )5(

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • New Technology

Vibration Vibration Automation

htt

  • ttp://www.uow.edu.au/eng/longwall/images/equipment/lwred.jpg
slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Skills?

Skills?

Base skills same as LW Equipment

  • peration

$$$

  • peration

Caving behaviour Strata behaviour Gas and dust

  • ,$
slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Training?

Change management Engineering experience Bench marking Operational training Change in equipment More manual use of the LW More manual use of the LW Development cutting and set up needs Gas and dust management Engineering knowledge

  • $$$,$
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • How does it all work?

Systems Experience Training Management Analysis Change Change management Culture Continuous improvement

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Conference

Top coa

Allison Golsby Tuesday 23rd Octob

Conference

  • Allison Golsby MAusIMM(CP), RPEQ, ME

Chief Execu

GPO Box 358 Brisbane Qld 4001

  • e Presentation

al caving

ctober 2012: 11.45am

e Presentation

EngSc(Min Man), MMinEng(Geomech), GDipMVent

cutive Officer

allison@golsby.org M +61 409 008 942