How networks are shaping Tshwane Tools for urban network analysis – Part II
Serge SALAT
Data analysis by Loeiz BOURDIC Urban analysis by Darren NEL
Tools for urban network analysis Part II Serge SALAT Data analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
How networks are shaping Tshwane Tools for urban network analysis Part II Serge SALAT Data analysis by Loeiz BOURDIC Urban analysis by Darren NEL Urban Morphology Institute University of Pretoria The evolution urban form in Tshwane
Data analysis by Loeiz BOURDIC Urban analysis by Darren NEL
– Nb of intersections per km² – Cyclomatic number – Gamma index
– Nodegram – Routegram, Netgram, Hetgram
Silver Lakes 21 Newlands 27 Irene 39 Brooklyn 28
Silver Lakes 21 Newlands 27 Irene 39 Brooklyn 28 120 Manhattan 186 Paris 195 Amsterdam
Silver Lakes Irene Newlands Brooklyn 4 6 18 19 The cyclomatic number is the number of closed loops in the network. The higher the cyclomatic number, the more available paths in the network.
Silver Lakes 4 Newlands 6 Brooklyn 18 Irene 19 73 Manhattan 131 Paris 114 Amsterdam
Silver Lakes 0.41 Newlands 0.46 Irene 0.51 Brooklyn 0.56
The gamma index measures the connectivity in a network. It is a measure of the ratio of the number of edges in a network to the maximum number possible (that is 3(v-2) ). It is calculated as follows: The index ranges from 0 (no connections between nodes) to 1 (the maximum number of connections, with direct links between all the nodes).
Silver Lakes 0.41 Newlands 0.46 Irene 0.51 Brooklyn 0.56 Manhattan 0.55 Paris 0.54 Amsterdam
Parameter A Parameter B 1 1 1 Parameter C
Parameter A 1 1 1
0.3
Parameter B 1 1 1
0.47
= 0.3+0.47+0.23 = 1
1 1 1 Parameter C
0.23
Proportion
Proportion
1 1 1 Proportion
Brooklyn
Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac
0.28
Brooklyn
% of X junctions % of T junctions % of cul de sac
67 28 6
0.67
Nb of X junctions Nb of T junctions Nb of cul de sacs 73 30 6
Irene
Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac
% of X junctions % of T junctions % of cul de sac
35 59 6
0.35
Irene
Nb of X junctions Nb of T junctions Nb of cul de sacs 30 50 5
Silver Lakes
Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac
% of X junctions % of T junctions % of cul de sac
5 69 26
Silver Lakes
Nb of X junctions Nb of T junctions Nb of cul de sacs 4 59 22
Newlands
Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac
% of X junctions % of T junctions % of cul de sac
89 11
Newlands
Nb of X junctions Nb of T junctions Nb of cul de sacs 16 2
Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands
Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac
Brooklyn Silver Lakes Irene Newlands Brooklyn Silver Lakes
Irene Newlands Brooklyn Silver Lakes Mamelodi 2 Mam 1
Mamelodi 3
Savannah country estate CBD Equestria Mamelodi
Analysed by Loeiz Bordic
0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3
Cyclo/km²
Cyclo/km² 50 100 150 200 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3
Cyclomatic number
Cyclomatic number 0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3
Nb of junctions per km²
Nb of junctions per km²
Most connected areas
Walkable area* Car orientated
Disconnected
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3
Beta index
Beta index 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3
Gamma Index
Gamma Index
Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands CBD Equestria Mam 1 Mam 2 Mam3
Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1
Savannah
the more intersections the road runs through, the stronger its continuity. The continuity of a road indicates its power to continue without stopping
to bring together other routes and make them converge.
national route or any important road), and then counting the number of steps, that is of routes, to take to join up with the analyzed road. A route is more or less deep depending on whether it is directly connected to a main road or hidden in the depth of the city’s street network. The depth reveals the relative orientation of the road to long-range traffic or short-range access to residences. Hierarchically higher-level roads are arterials that connect the city on the big scale.
1 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 6
*
*
Relative depth Relative connectivity 1 1 1 Relative continuity
Relative depth is the ratio of depth by the sum of the three
parameters.
Example Depth = 2 It connects 8 routes Connectivity = 8 It is made up of 7 links Continuity = 7 Relative depth = 2/(8+7+2) = 0.11 Relative connectivity = 8/17 = 0.47 Relative continuity = 7/17 = 0.41
Relative depth Relative connectivity
1 1 1
Relative continuity
Connectivity = 0.47 depth = 0.11 continuity = 0.41
Relative depth Relative connectivity
1 1 1
Relative continuity
Routes in blue
Routes in green and yellow on the map
Relative depth Relative connectivity
1 1 1
Relative continuity
Relative depth Relative connectivity
1 1 1
Relative continuity All culs-de-sac are represented within the same point
Relative depth Relative connectivity
1 1 1
Relative continuity
Relative connectivity
1 1
Relative continuity
1
1 Relative depth
Relative connectivity
1 1
Relative continuity
1
1 Relative depth
Relative connectivity
1 1
Relative continuity
1
1 Relative depth
Relative connectivity
1 1
Relative continuity
1
1 Relative depth
Brooklyn Irene Newlands Silver Lakes
Relative depth Relative connectivity 1 1 1 Relative continuity
1 2 4 6 5 3
difference in depth alone…
Example:
Max depth is 4, there are 11 routes and 11 route types
Complexity is (11-4)/6 = 0.64
Remarks: Complexity relates to the information quantity (bits necessary to describe the network) The complexity of the two precedent networks was zero
Complexity Regularity 1 1 1 Recursivity
Brooklyn
Complexity Regularity
1 1 1
Recursivity
Irene
Complexity Regularity
1 1 1
Recursivity
Silver Lakes
Complexity Regularity
1 1 1
Recursivity
Newlands
Complexity Regularity
1 1 1
Recursivity
Brooklyn Irene Newlands Silver Lakes
Complexity Regularity
1 1 1
Recursivity
A B C D E
Savannah country estate CBD Equestria Mamelodi 3 Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2
Irene
Newlands Brooklyn Silver Lakes