Tools for urban network analysis Part II Serge SALAT Data analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tools for urban network analysis part ii
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tools for urban network analysis Part II Serge SALAT Data analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How networks are shaping Tshwane Tools for urban network analysis Part II Serge SALAT Data analysis by Loeiz BOURDIC Urban analysis by Darren NEL Urban Morphology Institute University of Pretoria The evolution urban form in Tshwane


slide-1
SLIDE 1

How networks are shaping Tshwane Tools for urban network analysis – Part II

Serge SALAT

Data analysis by Loeiz BOURDIC Urban analysis by Darren NEL

Urban Morphology Institute – University of Pretoria

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The evolution urban form in Tshwane

Evolution of modernistic planning In Tshwane

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The evolution of the suburban tree

Evolution of modernistic planning In Tshwane How to quantify the divergence of urban forms in Tshwane ?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Presentation of tools

  • Simple metrics

– Nb of intersections per km² – Cyclomatic number – Gamma index

  • Network analysis (based on Marshall)

– Nodegram – Routegram, Netgram, Hetgram

  • Space syntax (later today)
  • Dual approach (later today)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Part 1 – Simple metrics

  • 1. Nb of intersections per km²
  • 2. Cyclomatic number
  • 3. Gamma index
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Number of intersections per km²

Silver Lakes 21 Newlands 27 Irene 39 Brooklyn 28

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Number of intersections per km²

Silver Lakes 21 Newlands 27 Irene 39 Brooklyn 28 120 Manhattan 186 Paris 195 Amsterdam

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Cyclomatic number per km²

Silver Lakes Irene Newlands Brooklyn 4 6 18 19 The cyclomatic number is the number of closed loops in the network. The higher the cyclomatic number, the more available paths in the network.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cyclomatic number per km²

Silver Lakes 4 Newlands 6 Brooklyn 18 Irene 19 73 Manhattan 131 Paris 114 Amsterdam

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Gamma Index

Silver Lakes 0.41 Newlands 0.46 Irene 0.51 Brooklyn 0.56

The gamma index measures the connectivity in a network. It is a measure of the ratio of the number of edges in a network to the maximum number possible (that is 3(v-2) ). It is calculated as follows: The index ranges from 0 (no connections between nodes) to 1 (the maximum number of connections, with direct links between all the nodes).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Gamma Index

Silver Lakes 0.41 Newlands 0.46 Irene 0.51 Brooklyn 0.56 Manhattan 0.55 Paris 0.54 Amsterdam

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Part 2 – Network analysis (based on S. Marshall)

  • 1. Nodegrams
  • 2. Routegrams
  • 3. Netgrams
  • 4. Hetgrams
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Triangle diagrams

Triangle diagrams are a way to plot three parameters on a same chart, when these three parameters sum to one. A+B+C=1

Parameter A Parameter B 1 1 1 Parameter C

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Triangle diagrams

How to read a nodegram? A A=0.3

Parameter A 1 1 1

0.3

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Triangle diagrams

How to read a nodegram? B=0.47

Parameter B 1 1 1

0.47

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Triangle diagrams

How to read a nodegram? C=0.23 A+B+C

= 0.3+0.47+0.23 = 1

1 1 1 Parameter C

0.23

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Nodegram

Nodegrams display the respective proportion

  • f X-junctions, T-junctions and culs-de-sac.

Proportion

  • f T-junctions

Proportion

  • f X-junctions

1 1 1 Proportion

  • f culs-de-sac
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Brooklyn

Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac

0.28

Nodegram

Brooklyn

% of X junctions % of T junctions % of cul de sac

67 28 6

0.67

Nb of X junctions Nb of T junctions Nb of cul de sacs 73 30 6

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Irene

Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac

Nodegram

% of X junctions % of T junctions % of cul de sac

35 59 6

0.35

Irene

Nb of X junctions Nb of T junctions Nb of cul de sacs 30 50 5

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Silver Lakes

Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac

Nodegram

% of X junctions % of T junctions % of cul de sac

5 69 26

Silver Lakes

Nb of X junctions Nb of T junctions Nb of cul de sacs 4 59 22

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Newlands

Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac

Nodegram

% of X junctions % of T junctions % of cul de sac

89 11

Newlands

Nb of X junctions Nb of T junctions Nb of cul de sacs 16 2

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands

Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 1 Proportion of Culs-de-sac

Nodegram

Brooklyn Silver Lakes Irene Newlands Brooklyn Silver Lakes

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Workshop exercises

  • Workshop held at the University of Pretoria
  • Interactive and participatory workshop

– Introduction of theories of urban morphological analysis and resilience – Application of theories on case studies in Tshwane

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Case study areas

Irene Newlands Brooklyn Silver Lakes Mamelodi 2 Mam 1

Mamelodi 3

Savannah country estate CBD Equestria Mamelodi

Analysed by Loeiz Bordic

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Simple Metrics

0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3

Cyclo/km²

Cyclo/km² 50 100 150 200 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3

Cyclomatic number

Cyclomatic number 0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3

Nb of junctions per km²

Nb of junctions per km²

Most connected areas

Walkable area* Car orientated

Disconnected

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Gamma and Beta Index

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3

Beta index

Beta index 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands Savannah CBD Equestria Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2 Mamelodi 3

Gamma Index

Gamma Index

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Combined Nodegram

Silver Lakes Brooklyn Irene Newlands CBD Equestria Mam 1 Mam 2 Mam3

Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1 Proportion of T junctions Proportion of X-junctions 1 1

Savannah

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Routegram

A routegram allows locating a route on a triangle diagram according to:

  • 1. Depth
  • 2. Connectivity
  • 3. Continuity
slide-29
SLIDE 29

What is a « route » ?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

What is a route in a network?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Routegram

  • S. Marshall builds on three indicators for route analysis:
  • Continuity is defined as the number of links that constitute a route. Thus,

the more intersections the road runs through, the stronger its continuity. The continuity of a road indicates its power to continue without stopping

  • r terminating at a more important road.
  • Connectivity refers to the number of roads that are connected by a given
  • road. Connectivity indicates the structuring power of the route, its power

to bring together other routes and make them converge.

  • Depth necessitates choosing a datum route (for example a ring road, a

national route or any important road), and then counting the number of steps, that is of routes, to take to join up with the analyzed road. A route is more or less deep depending on whether it is directly connected to a main road or hidden in the depth of the city’s street network. The depth reveals the relative orientation of the road to long-range traffic or short-range access to residences. Hierarchically higher-level roads are arterials that connect the city on the big scale.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Routegram

  • 1. Depth

The depth of a route is a measure of the distance to a datum (reference route)

1 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 6

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Routegram

  • 2. Continuity is the number of links a route is

made up of

The green road (*) is made up of 6 links

*

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Routegram

  • 3. Connectivity is the number of routes a given

route connects

The green road (*) connects 7 routes.

*

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Routegram

A routegram displays relative depth, connectivity and continuity

Relative depth Relative connectivity 1 1 1 Relative continuity

Relative depth is the ratio of depth by the sum of the three

  • parameters. Same for other

parameters.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Routegram - Brooklyn

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Routegram - Brooklyn

Example Depth = 2 It connects 8 routes Connectivity = 8 It is made up of 7 links Continuity = 7 Relative depth = 2/(8+7+2) = 0.11 Relative connectivity = 8/17 = 0.47 Relative continuity = 7/17 = 0.41

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Routegram - Brooklyn

Relative depth Relative connectivity

1 1 1

Relative continuity

Connectivity = 0.47 depth = 0.11 continuity = 0.41

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Routegram - Brooklyn

Relative depth Relative connectivity

1 1 1

Relative continuity

Routes in blue

  • n the map

Routes in green and yellow on the map

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Routegram - Irene

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Routegram - Irene

Relative depth Relative connectivity

1 1 1

Relative continuity

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Routegram – Silver Lakes

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Routegram – Silver Lakes

Relative depth Relative connectivity

1 1 1

Relative continuity All culs-de-sac are represented within the same point

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Routegram – Newlands

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Routegram – Newlands

Relative depth Relative connectivity

1 1 1

Relative continuity

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Evolution in the routegram

Brooklyn

Relative connectivity

1 1

Relative continuity

1

1 Relative depth

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Evolution in the routegram

Irene

Relative connectivity

1 1

Relative continuity

1

1 Relative depth

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Evolution in the routegram

Silver lakes

Relative connectivity

1 1

Relative continuity

1

1 Relative depth

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Evolution in the routegram

Newland

Relative connectivity

1 1

Relative continuity

1

1 Relative depth

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Brooklyn Irene Newlands Silver Lakes

Relative depth Relative connectivity 1 1 1 Relative continuity

Netgram – averaged routegrams

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Hetgrams

Hetgrams address the issue of heterogeneity and

assist the recognition of networks according to the differentiation of route types. It rests upon three parameters:

  • 1. Regularity
  • 2. Recursivity
  • 3. Complexity
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Hetgrams

  • 1. Regularity
  • A route type is a triplet (continuity,connectivity,depth)
  • The number of route types is the number of different

triplets

  • Irregularity in a network can be calculated as the ratio of the

number of route types by the total number of routes

  • Regularity is the complement to irregularity:

regularity=1-irregularity

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Hetgrams

  • 1. Regularity

Example: 2 route types, 11 routes irregularity = 2/11 = 0.18 regularity = 1 – 0.18 = 0.82

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Hetgrams

  • 2. Recursivity

Recursivity is the number of depth (maximum depth) divided by the number of routes. Example: Max depth is 6 There are 6 routes Recursivity = 6/6 = 1 Recursivity is maximum

1 2 4 6 5 3

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Hetgrams

  • 3. Complexity
  • Complexity can be defined as the number of distinct route types present
  • ver and above the number of distinct route types generated by

difference in depth alone…

  • It is equal to: (nb of route types – depth)/total nb of routes

Example:

Max depth is 4, there are 11 routes and 11 route types

Complexity is (11-4)/6 = 0.64

Remarks: Complexity relates to the information quantity (bits necessary to describe the network) The complexity of the two precedent networks was zero

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Hetgram - Examples

Complexity Regularity 1 1 1 Recursivity

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Brooklyn

Complexity Regularity

1 1 1

Recursivity

Hetgram

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Hetgram

Complexity in Brooklyn – The role of diagonals

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Irene

Complexity Regularity

1 1 1

Recursivity

Hetgram

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Silver Lakes

Complexity Regularity

1 1 1

Recursivity

Hetgram

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Newlands

Complexity Regularity

1 1 1

Recursivity

Hetgram

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Hetgram Recursivity in Newlands

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Brooklyn Irene Newlands Silver Lakes

Complexity Regularity

1 1 1

Recursivity

Hetgram

slide-64
SLIDE 64

A B C D E

Savannah country estate CBD Equestria Mamelodi 3 Mamelodi 1 Mamelodi 2

Irene

Newlands Brooklyn Silver Lakes

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Thank you for your attention !