titre drawbacks of standard fittings
play

Titre Drawbacks of standard fittings Dead Volume. Parts Inventory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Titre Drawbacks of standard fittings Dead Volume. Parts Inventory Gaskets Welding Panel Design Particle Generation Assembly Twisting of Tubes Footprint Male / Female FLOWMECA The RHP Fitting Patent


  1. Titre

  2. Drawbacks of standard fittings • Dead Volume. Parts Inventory • • Gaskets Welding • Panel Design • • Particle Generation Assembly • • Twisting of Tubes Footprint • • Male / Female

  3. ™ FLOWMECA The RHP Fitting Patent protected

  4. Flange Protection ring Centering ring Gland Ensemble Flange

  5. Gland

  6. Sealing surface Ra 0.4 (10 Ra) Interior surface Ra 0.2 (5 Ra) Gland Surface finish

  7. Protection Ring PTFE Centering Ring Gland Leak Port It's not a gasket

  8. Centering Ring Leak Port

  9. Flanges Screws Silver coated

  10. Metal to metal contact Axial tightening

  11. Standard versus RHP

  12. 134 g 42 g Lighter

  13. 50 mm 12 mm 80 mm 37 mm 24 mm 28 mm Smaller

  14. No Gasket No Dead Volume Cleaner

  15. Clean Contact

  16. No Twist on the tubes

  17. Standard RHP 10 part numbers 3 part numbers Reduced parts inventory

  18. Standard RHP No Male Female end fittings Reduced parts inventory

  19. Standard RHP 50.8 mm 70.6 mm Reduced footprint

  20. Standard RHP Allen 2.5 mm Easy of assembly • Ease of maintenance

  21. Vacuum leak measurement 3 <1.10-10 atm.cm /s

  22. Vacuum and 200 bar pressure test at 300°C No leak detected on any sample

  23. RHP 1/4” Vacuum tests Leak: 3 <1.10-10 atm.cm /s With protection rings Without protection rings +180°C +550°C +20°C +20°C -100°C -100°C

  24. Helium pressure tests Leak: 3 <1.10-10 atm.cm /s 80 bar 650 bar 20 bar +180°C +180°C +20°C

  25. Oil high pressure tests No detected leak RHP 3/8” RHP 1/4” 1,900 bar 1,600 bar 1,600 bar (burst pipe)

  26. At 1,600 bar pipe bursts

  27. Comparative test A = VCR B = S-VCR C = Parker D = RHP

  28. Comparative test

  29. 250 assembly cycles Leak rate: 3 <1.10-10 atm.cm /s

  30. Radioactive Isotope Test D (H ) & T (H ) 2 3 Tritium accumulation in a glove box at 16 bars No leak after 16 days

  31. Drawbacks of standard fittings • Dead Volume Parts Inventory • • Gaskets Welding • • Particle Generation Panel Design • • Twisting of Tubes Assembly • • Male / Female Footprint • ? ?

  32. Applications: UHP Gas Systems UH Vacuum High Pressure Liquids Semi Solids High/Low Temperature

  33. Product: Butt Weld: 1/8” to 4” Tees, Crosses, Ells etc. “Click Pipe”: 1/8” to 1” “And more to come!

  34. RHP winner by technical KO

  35. Weld

  36. Problems related to welding Testing • • Number of Welds Safety • • Deterioration of Tubing Contamination• • Bulky Equipment Personnel Costs • • Clean Area Contamination Maintain Tolerance • • Moisture Retention ? ?

  37. Weld Weld Weld

  38. Patented

  39. Basic Idea

  40. Click Groove Sealing surface Ra 0.4 (10 Ra) A tube

  41. Click pipe

  42. A Click Pipe

  43. Titre

  44. Click Pipe Full

  45. Two tubes

  46. Drawbacks of standard fitting • Dead Volume Parts Inventory • • Gaskets Welding • • Particle Generation Panel Design • • Twisting of Tubes Assembly • • Male / Female Footprint • ? ?

  47. Drawbacks of standard fitting • Dead Volume Parts Inventory • • Gaskets Welding • • Particle Generation Panel Design • • Twisting of Tubes Assembly • • Male / Female Footprint • ? ?

  48. Patented

  49. With some Modular RHP components

  50. Cross Tee Elbow Click-Pipe Straight Flange With only 9 Modular RHP sub-components

  51. RHP Modular Grid 1” x 1”

  52. RHP Modular Grid 1” x 1” components, elbows and tees,

  53. RHP Modular Grid 1” x 1” Components, elbows and tees, tubes and click-pipes,

  54. RHP Modular Grid 1” x 1” Components, elbows and tees, tubes and click-pipes, flanges.

  55. Modular gas panel

  56. -30% to -50% Reduced footprint

  57. Reduced design time -75%

  58. Easy to assemble • Easy to maintain

  59. Main References • Air Liquide Motorola • • Leybold Trikon • • Unaxis Balzers Siemens • • IBM ST Microelectronics • • Argonne Nat Lab Rhône Poulenc • • L'Oréal Matra Marconi Space •

  60. Why IGS Systems ? • Reduced connections. • Fewer welds. • Reduced Footprint. • Lower Cost. • Process improvement • Less dead volume. • ??????

  61. Integrated Gas System • High cost • More Connections • Welding still required • Many different sealing systems • Completely new parts inventory

  62. The Facts • 8 Component IGS Stick has 18 gasketed connections 36 seal planes. • Welds are still required. • Reduced Footprint. Yes BUT $$$ • Cost may be 3-4 X present. • Blocks & Gaskets = dead volume • Process improvement. ???

  63. RHP Modular • Low cost — > Initial — > Replacement • Easily modified • Same parts inventory • Connections — > No Gasket — > No dead volume — > Fewer Connections • Weld free

  64. The Facts • RHP Has 8 gasket free connections. • No welds required. • Reduced Footprint. Yes. • Cost same as present. • No Blocks No Gaskets No dead volume • = Process improvement.

  65. ™ FLOWMECA The RHP Fitting Patent protected

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend