Bayesian Variable Selection for Nowcasting Economic Time Series
Steven L. Scott Hal R. Varian July 2012 THIS DRAFT: August 21, 2013
Time Series Steven L. Scott Hal R. Varian July 2012 THIS DRAFT: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Bayesian Variable Selection for Nowcasting Economic Time Series Steven L. Scott Hal R. Varian July 2012 THIS DRAFT: August 21, 2013 Introduction Hal R. Varian (2010) Computer Mediated Transactions , The American Economic Review
Steven L. Scott Hal R. Varian July 2012 THIS DRAFT: August 21, 2013
speed
ads, to the spacing between the ads, which resulted in a number of changes in the system.
suggestions of things to buy based on your previous purchases, or on purchases of consumers like you.
predict the current level of economic activity for automobile, real estate, retail trade, travel, and unemployment indicators.
Bayesian Variable Selection for Nowcasting Economic Time Series
the use of real-time data to estimate the current state of the economy.
2
index of search activity on queries entered into Google.
3
20 40 60 80 100 120 لبط رلبد
4
have the same amount of search volume for that term.
in New York don't search for this term at all. They
comprise a small portion of the search volume from New York as compared to other regions
5
relevance to the particular prediction problem.
category would be good candidates for forecasting automobile sales while queries such as “file for unemployment” would be useful in forecasting initial claims for unemployment benefits.
6
Bayesian Structural Time Series:
Bayesian interpretations and tend to play well together.
7
as determined by consumer opinion. Consumer sentiment takes into account an individual's feelings toward his or her own current financial health, the health of the economy in the short term and the prospects for longer term economic growth.
January 2004-April 2012.
giving us 100 observations.
with economics. These potential predictors were chosen from the roughly 300 query categories using the authors' judgment.
8
probability (PIP) for the top 5 predictors
effect
effect
estimated models in which that predictor was present.
9
along with the actual
model predicts reasonably well with a mean absolute one-step- ahead prediction error of about 4.5%.
a mean absolute one-step- ahead prediction error of 5.2%, indicating an improvement
about 14%.
10
11