Three Towns .. One Community
A Mission-Driven Learning Community with a PK-12 Line of SightThree Towns .. One Community A Mission-Driven Learning Community - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Three Towns .. One Community A Mission-Driven Learning Community - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Three Towns .. One Community A Mission-Driven Learning Community with a PK-12 Line of Sight Timeline Chris Riley Region 4 Board of Education Chairman 2005 Timeline January, 2015: All Boards of Education unanimously endorsed moving forward
Timeline
Chris Riley Region 4 Board of Education Chairman
2005
Timeline
✤ January, 2015: All Boards of Education unanimouslyendorsed moving forward on Regionalization
✤ March, 2015: Regionalization working group begandrafting plan
✤ April, 2015: Draft plan presented to Boards of Education ✤ Now - June: Soliciting public feedback regarding draftplan.
✤ June 4, 2015: Region 4 Board of Education will vote on thedraft plan for a potential September 29 referendum
Upcoming Events
✤ Three additional hearings on specific components of the plan:educational benefits, enrollment, and finances
✤ Smaller group meetings - Invite us over! ✤ Web based feedback area and information portal at Region 4website
What Regionalization Is.. And is Not
Michelle Grow Deep River Board of Education Chairwoman
What Regionalization Is
What Regionalization Is
Better Serves Our Students
What Regionalization Is
Addresses Enrollment Challenges
What Regionalization Is
Saves Each Town Money
What Regionalization Is
Preserves neighborhood schools
What Regionalization Is
Provides a governance structure to effectively address problems at all grade levels when issues occur
What Regionalization Is Not
Regionalization is not a backdoor to school closure
Regionalization is not a backdoor to tiering grades
Regionalization will not weaken local control of education
Why Now?
Lon Seidman Essex Board of Education Chairman
Better Serves Students
Boards, Five Budgets
✤ Lack of a centralizedauthority for fiscal and administrative issues
✤ 33 Board MembersCurrent Structure
Board of Education
Board(s) of Education
Board(s) of Education
Board(s) of Education
Region 4 Chester Deep River Essex
Board(s) of Education
Region 4 Chester Deep River Essex
Fielding Members
Board(s) of Education
Region 4 Chester Deep River Essex
Board(s) of Education
Region 4 Chester Deep River Essex
Board(s) of Education
Chester
Supervision District
Supervision District
Region 4 BOE
Chester BOE
Deep River BOE
Essex BOE
Supervision District Committee PK-12 (Shared Services)
Supervision District
Region 4 Chester Deep River Essex
Supervision District
Region 4 Chester Deep River Essex
Supervision District
25 - 30% of Each Budget
$6,755,255
2015-2016 State Doesn’t Recognize
(minimum)
✤ 5 Public Hearings ✤ 3 Town Votes ✤ 1 DistrictReferendum
Current Budget Structure
Structural Changes to Focus on Education
Current Structure
Supervision District PK-12
Essex Elem K-6 Deep River Elem K-6 Chester Elem K-6Region 4
JW 7-8 VR 9-12 Essex Deep River Chester Central Administrative Office Region 4 BOE Chester BOE Deep River BOE Essex BOERegional Structure
Region 4 Schools CES, DRES, EES PK-6 JW 7-8 VR 9-12 Central Administrative Office Region 4 Board of Education Voters
Current Budget Structure
Regional Structure
Regional PK-12 Budget Approved by Annual Referendum One Monthly Bill to Each Town Town of Chester Town of Deep River Town of Essex
Regionalization Advantages
✤ Centralized focus on teaching and learning PK-12 ✤ Faster implementation of elementary programs ✤ A single governing board accountable for district success ✤ One budget - not five ✤ Better accountability of the entire system PK-12Enrollment
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400
Total ¡(K-‑12) ¡Enrollment
10 - 15 Year Problem
Saving Each Town Money
Towns Retain Building Ownership
$900,000 anticipated savings in the first four years
Inter-municipal agreement brings additional savings to each town
Inter-municipal agreement brings additional savings to each town
Agreement designed to help towns maintain their neighborhood schools
Regional Financial Incentives
✤ Each town will recognize immediate savings ✤ 10% reimbursement “bonus” on school construction projects ✤ $100 per student ECS “bonus” to member towns based onnumbers they send to the state.
✤ R4 towns currently receive this bonus for 7-12 students ✤ Reduction of administrative overhead (payroll, audits, etc) ineach town hall.
1948
It’s Time
Regionalization Governance Subcommittee
A Mission-Driven Learning Community with a PK-12 Line of Sight