Third Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund Project Tanvir - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

third pakistan poverty
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Third Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund Project Tanvir - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ev Evaluating aluating Im Impact: act: Tu Turning ning Promises omises in into to Ev Evid idence ence Third Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund Project Tanvir Hussain/PPAF, Champak Prasad Pokharel/NES, Syed Hassan Akbar/PPAF Christel


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ev Evaluating aluating Im Impact: act: Tu Turning ning Promises

  • mises in

into to Ev Evid idence ence

Tanvir Hussain/PPAF, Champak Prasad Pokharel/NES, Syed Hassan Akbar/PPAF

Christel Vermeersch/World Bank

Kevin Crockford, Imtiaz Alvi/World Bank

Kathmandu, Nepal February 2010

Third Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund Project

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

  • 1. Context

 Nine years of Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund

(PPAF) operations (total US$900 mill). Third 5- year project started in 2009

 Strategy and approaches continue to evolve over

time

 Strong demand from Government of Pakistan,

PPAF management and WB to show results not just project outputs

 Increasing number of donors and sources of

financing

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 2. Background to the Project

 Objective: To empower the poor with increased

incomes, improved productive capacity and access to services to achieve sustainable livelihoods

 Components:  Social Mobilization and Institutional Building  Livelihood Enhancement and Protection  Micro-credit Access  Basic Services and Infrastructure  Outreach: 126 districts, 51,000+ villages  Partners: 82 partner organizations

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • 3. Results Chain

Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Longterm Outcomes

  • Project

funds

  • Technical

assistance

  • 200

PPAF Staff

  • 82

partners Identification and appraisal

  • f partner
  • rganization

Evaluation of proposals from partners and financing Technical capacity building of partners Monitoring and evaluation Poor empowered with increased incomes, improved productive capacity and access to services to achieve sustainable livelihoods Community institutions empowered Following livelihood assets for the poor increased:

  • Financial
  • Social
  • Physical
  • Human
  • Natural
  • Revitalized and new

community

  • rganizations
  • Capacity

development at community and individual levels

  • No. of loans available
  • Productive asset

transfers to poor

  • Community physical

infrastructure built

  • Community health

centers and schools

  • pened and renovated
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

  • 4. Primary Research Questions

 Has the project been able to affect household income,

consumption and production?

 Has the project succeeded in enhancing the following

assets of its target beneficiaries: Financial, Physical, Human, Social, Natural

 Has the project been able to increase access to basic

services and infrastructure?

 Has the project been able to improve community level

institutions in terms of their social capital, empowerment, and governance?

 Has the project been able to reduce vulnerability and

improve food security and resilience to external shocks?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

  • 5. Outcome Indicators

 Household income, consumption, food consumption

and household assets

 Agricultural production and non-farm enterprises

(gender disaggregated)

 Access to drinking water, roads, sanitation, irrigation

schemes, and education and health facilities

 Linkages and access to other public and private

service providers

 Participation of women in community institutions  Participation of poor in community institutions

This exercise will focus on Research Question 1 and the first two clusters of outcome indicators Existing evaluation looking at infrastructure and social mobilisation

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

  • 6. Identification Strategy/Method

 Basic sampling unit: Settlement  Preferred Option: Randomly selected treatment and

control settlements, based on phasing.

 Option 2: Treatment settlements pre-determined and

matching control villages to be identified (propensity score matching).

 Several baseline and impact evaluations staggered

  • ver 8 cohorts, households interviewed at 3 points of

time.

 Difference-in-difference method for analysis, use of IV

for any possible contamination.

 Results augmented with monitoring reports and data.  Poverty scorecard administered in each settlement.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

  • 7. Sample and data

 A representative sample taking care of geographic

spread, partner diversity, financial weight of interventions, and multitude of components and interventions is a challenge.

 Sample to be stratified to ensure adequate

representation of each cateogry.

 Sample is expected to provide statistically valid

results at the project level.

 Based on final stratificaton, 95% confidence level,

and ±3% error margin, a representative sample of settlements and households to be selected.

 Based on simulation, an estimated 4,000 treatment

(and 4,000 control) households will be required.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

  • 8. Time Frame/Work Plan

Timeline of evaluation surveys

Treatment and control groups for each cohort of baseline, mid- term and end-of-project evaluation, cohort fixed effects.

Case studies to be conducted at various points of time.

User/beneficiary surveys to be conducted at the end of each financial year.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

  • 9. Sources of Financing

 A portion of the financing from project

funds

 Seek remaining funds from national,

regional, and global sources

 Existing MoU with premier academic

institutions.

 Similar linkages to be established with

international institutions seeking partnership