the u s national coastal
play

The U.S. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Ashley Chappell, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The U.S. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Ashley Chappell, NOAA Canadian Hydrographic Conference May 17, 2016 1 The Interagency Working Group on Ocean and Coastal Mapping (IWG-OCM) Co-chaired by NOAA, USGS, WHO: NOAA and


  1. The U.S. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Ashley Chappell, NOAA Canadian Hydrographic Conference May 17, 2016 1

  2. The Interagency Working Group on Ocean and Coastal Mapping (IWG-OCM) • Co-chaired by NOAA, USGS, WHO:  NOAA and USACE  USGS • Charged with facilitating “the  USACE coordination of ocean and  NAVO coastal mapping activities and  BOEM avoid[ing] duplicating  NSF mapping activities…”  NGA • Ocean and Coastal Mapping  USCG Integration Act of 2009:  EPA develop an “Ocean and  FEMA Coastal Mapping Plan”  NASA • National Ocean Policy:  and other appropriate develop a topobathy lidar Federal agencies plan, National Coastal involved in ocean and coastal mapping. Mapping Plan 2

  3. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Coastal Lidar Elevation for a 3D Nation • GOAL: – To survey/map the Nation’s coasts/nearshore areas for multipurpose use – Repeat • Requires: – Coordination – Broad Range of Partners – A Plan 3

  4. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Coastal Lidar Elevation for a 3D Nation • Focus initially Uses of Bathy Topo Lidar Data : on coastal Shallow water bathymetry Coastal vulnerability bathy-topo Shoreline delineation assessments Topobathy DEM’s Infrastructure assessment Lidar Regional sediment Tsunami inundation management modeling • Version 2.0: Land/water interface Emergency response mapping Scientific research on – Offshore/OCS Habitat mapping processes of coastal change Bottom type detection Coral reef ecology – Acoustic Coastal erosion monitoring Coral reef genesis – Aerial Navigation/Charting Ecosystem connectivity photography, USGS analysis of 2012 NEEA Study ROI of lidar data, HSS based on multiple-use requirements /uses 4

  5. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Coastal Lidar Elevation for a 3D Nation Four Components: • Annual/Regional Coastal Mapping Summits for coordination • Common standards; • Whole life cycle approach to data; • R&D on new tools/techniques for data collection and use. 5

  6. National Mapping Coordination • Great visualization tool for understanding requirements, plans • NOAA/USGS/USACE and partners worked to maximize Sandy topobathy lidar data collects • Eg. USACE worked with USGS and WA stakeholders to discuss overlap requirements, modify plans for best outcome

  7. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Component 2: Common Standards Vertical accuracy coefficients a,b as Nominal Point Bathy Lidar in Source Pulse Density Example Applications Quality Level sqrt(a^2+(b*d)^2)) Spacing (m) (pt/m 2 ) Detailed site surveys requiring QL0 B Bathymetric 0.25, 0.0075 ≤ 0.7 ≥ 2.0 the highest accuracy and highest Lidar resolution seafloor definition; QL1 B Bathymetric 0.25, 0.0075 ≤ 2.0 ≥ 0.25 dredging and inshore engineering surveys; high- Lidar resolution surveys of ports and harbors Charting surveys; regional QL2 B Bathymetric 0.30, 0.0130 ≤ 0.7 ≥ 2.0 sediment management General Lidar bathymetric mapping; coastal QL3 B Bathymetric 0.30, 0.0130 ≤ 20 ≥ 0.25 science and management applications Lidar Change analysis; deepwater surveys, environmental analysis QL4 B Bathymetric 0.50, 0.0130 ≤ 5.0 ≥ 0.04 Recon/planning; all general applications not requiring higher Lidar resolution and accuracy 7 7

  8. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Component 3: Common data management procedures "Whole Life Data Cycle" Data collection Approach Long-term, Validation proper and secure archiving Data Dissemination processing Stewardship 8 8

  9. National Coastal Mapping Strategy 1.0 Component 4: Consensus on targeted research and development  Topographic /bathymetric lidar and other coastal mapping technologies are rapidly evolving  Federal coastal mapping R&D programs critical  Smart to leverage one another’s capabilities and stretch limited research dollars  Mutual interest areas include: • New sensor technologies (to improve quality and timeliness of data collection) • Algorithms (to process raw data and create usable data and products) • New uses for data (e.g., coastal management and science questions) 9 9

  10. Want to read it? Visit http://iocm.noaa.gov/iwg/ Questions? Contact: ashley.chappell@noaa.gov jennifer.m.wozencraft@usace.army.mil jbrock@usgs.gov 10 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend