The structure of high distance Heegaard splittings Jesse Johnson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the structure of high distance heegaard splittings
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The structure of high distance Heegaard splittings Jesse Johnson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The structure of high distance Heegaard splittings Jesse Johnson Oklahoma State University A Heegaard splitting is defined by gluing together two handlebodies . A 2-bridge knot complement and a genus two surface. Inside the surface is a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The structure of high distance Heegaard splittings

Jesse Johnson Oklahoma State University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A Heegaard splitting is defined by gluing together two handlebodies.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A 2-bridge knot complement

and a genus two surface.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Inside the surface is a compression body Outside the surface is a handlebody

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Two different Heegaard surfaces

(Four more not shown.)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A stabilized Heegaard surface.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Question: Given a three-manifold, what are all its unstabilized Heegaard splittings?

Answered for:

  • 1. S3 (Waldhausen)
  • 2. T 3 (Boileau–Otal)
  • 3. Lens spaces (Bonahon–Otal)
  • 4. (most) Seifert fibered spaces

(Moriah–Schultens, Bachman–Derby-Talbot, J.)

  • 5. Two-bridge knot complements

(Morimoto–Sakuma, Kobayashi)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The complex of curves C(Σ):

vertices: essential simple closed curves edges: pairs of disjoint curves simplices: sets of disjoint curves

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Handlebody sets - loops bounding disks (Hempel) distance d(Σ)

  • between handlebody sets
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Theorem (Masur-Minsky): C(Σ) is δ-hyperbolic. Handlebody sets are quasi-convex.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

A surface self-homeo φ acts on C(Σ).

Theorem (Thurston): If φ has infinite order and no fixed loops then φ is pseudo-Anosov.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Theorem (Hempel): Composing the gluing map with (pseudo-Anosov) φn produces high distance Heegaard splittings. g ◦ φn

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Theorem (Hartshorn): Evey incompressible surface in M has genus at least 1

2d(Σ).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Theorem (Scharlemann-Tomova): If 1

2d(Σ) > genus(Σ) then

the only unstabilized Heegaard surface in M

  • f genus less than 1

2d(Σ) is Σ.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Theorem: Hartshorn’s bound is Sharp. Theorem: For any integers d ≥ 6 (even), g ≥ 2, There is a three-manifold M with a genus g, distance d Heegaard splitting and an unstabilized genus 1

2d + (g − 1) Heegaard splitting.

(Off from Scharlemann-Tomova bound by g − 1.)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Surface bundle B(φ): Σ × [0, 1]/((x, 0) ∼ (φ(x), 1)).

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Theorem (Thurston): If φ is pseudo-Anosov then B(φ) is hyperbolic.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Note: B(φn) is a cyclic cover of B(φ).

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A quasi-geometric Heegaard splitting

slide-20
SLIDE 20

For large n, a better approximation

Namazi-Souto: Can construct a metric with ǫ-pinched curvature.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Lemma: Every incompressible surface F intersects every cross section Σt essentially.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Choose F to be harmonic so that the induced sectional curvature is less than that of M. Theorem (Gauss-Bonnet): For bounded curvature, area is proportional to Euler characteristic.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Note: Cross sections have bounded injectivity radius. So, length of F ∩ Σt is bounded below.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

(Hass-Thompson-Thurston): Integrate over length of product ⇒ large area. Corollary: Any incomressible surface has high genus.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Theorem (Hartshorn): Every incompressible surface in M has genus at least 1

2d(Σ).

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Saddles determine a path in C(Σ).

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Theorem (Scharlemann-Tomova): Every unstabilized Heegaard surface in M is Σ or has genus at least 1

2d(Σ).

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Flippable - an isotopy of the surface interchanges the handlebodies

?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Theorem (Hass-Thompson-Thurston): High distance Heegaard splittings are not flippable.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Three handlebody decomposition -

Three handlebodies glued alternately along subsurfaces.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Connect a pair of handlebodies

slide-32
SLIDE 32

A three-handlebody decomposition defines three different Heegaard splittings (all distance two)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Subsurface projection dF(ℓ1, ℓ2). Σ F

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Lemma (Ivanov/Masur-Minsky/Schleimer?): If dF(ℓ1, ℓ2) > n then every path from ℓ1 to ℓ2

  • f length n passes through a loop

disjoint from F.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Theorem (J.-Minsky-Moriah): If Σ has a distance d subsurface F then every Heegaard splitting of genus less than 1

2d has a subsurface parallel to F.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

(Ido-Jang-Kobayashi): Flexible geodesics: dFj(ℓi, ℓk) sufficiently large. ℓ1 ℓ3 ℓ5 ℓ7 ℓ9 ℓ11 ℓ13

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The hyperbolic picture

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Step 0: ∂F0 = ℓ0

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Step 1: ∂F ′

1 = ℓ0 ∪ ∂N(ℓ1)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Step 2: F1 = F0 ∪ F ′

1 ∪ {vertical annuli}

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Step 3: ∂F ′

2 = ∂N(ℓ1) ∪ ℓ2

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Build from both sides

slide-43
SLIDE 43

The junction

slide-44
SLIDE 44

In the original surface

slide-45
SLIDE 45

The full surface:

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Theorem: For any integers d ≥ 6 (even), g ≥ 2, There is a three-manifold M with a genus g, distance d Heegaard splitting and an unstabilized genus 1

2d + (g − 1) Heegaard splitting.