SLIDE 1
The structure of high distance Heegaard splittings Jesse Johnson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The structure of high distance Heegaard splittings Jesse Johnson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The structure of high distance Heegaard splittings Jesse Johnson Oklahoma State University A Heegaard splitting is defined by gluing together two handlebodies . A 2-bridge knot complement and a genus two surface. Inside the surface is a
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
A 2-bridge knot complement
and a genus two surface.
SLIDE 4
Inside the surface is a compression body Outside the surface is a handlebody
SLIDE 5
Two different Heegaard surfaces
(Four more not shown.)
SLIDE 6
A stabilized Heegaard surface.
SLIDE 7
Question: Given a three-manifold, what are all its unstabilized Heegaard splittings?
Answered for:
- 1. S3 (Waldhausen)
- 2. T 3 (Boileau–Otal)
- 3. Lens spaces (Bonahon–Otal)
- 4. (most) Seifert fibered spaces
(Moriah–Schultens, Bachman–Derby-Talbot, J.)
- 5. Two-bridge knot complements
(Morimoto–Sakuma, Kobayashi)
SLIDE 8
The complex of curves C(Σ):
vertices: essential simple closed curves edges: pairs of disjoint curves simplices: sets of disjoint curves
SLIDE 9
Handlebody sets - loops bounding disks (Hempel) distance d(Σ)
- between handlebody sets
SLIDE 10
Theorem (Masur-Minsky): C(Σ) is δ-hyperbolic. Handlebody sets are quasi-convex.
SLIDE 11
A surface self-homeo φ acts on C(Σ).
Theorem (Thurston): If φ has infinite order and no fixed loops then φ is pseudo-Anosov.
SLIDE 12
Theorem (Hempel): Composing the gluing map with (pseudo-Anosov) φn produces high distance Heegaard splittings. g ◦ φn
SLIDE 13
Theorem (Hartshorn): Evey incompressible surface in M has genus at least 1
2d(Σ).
SLIDE 14
Theorem (Scharlemann-Tomova): If 1
2d(Σ) > genus(Σ) then
the only unstabilized Heegaard surface in M
- f genus less than 1
2d(Σ) is Σ.
SLIDE 15
Theorem: Hartshorn’s bound is Sharp. Theorem: For any integers d ≥ 6 (even), g ≥ 2, There is a three-manifold M with a genus g, distance d Heegaard splitting and an unstabilized genus 1
2d + (g − 1) Heegaard splitting.
(Off from Scharlemann-Tomova bound by g − 1.)
SLIDE 16
Surface bundle B(φ): Σ × [0, 1]/((x, 0) ∼ (φ(x), 1)).
SLIDE 17
Theorem (Thurston): If φ is pseudo-Anosov then B(φ) is hyperbolic.
SLIDE 18
Note: B(φn) is a cyclic cover of B(φ).
SLIDE 19
A quasi-geometric Heegaard splitting
SLIDE 20
For large n, a better approximation
Namazi-Souto: Can construct a metric with ǫ-pinched curvature.
SLIDE 21
Lemma: Every incompressible surface F intersects every cross section Σt essentially.
SLIDE 22
Choose F to be harmonic so that the induced sectional curvature is less than that of M. Theorem (Gauss-Bonnet): For bounded curvature, area is proportional to Euler characteristic.
SLIDE 23
Note: Cross sections have bounded injectivity radius. So, length of F ∩ Σt is bounded below.
SLIDE 24
(Hass-Thompson-Thurston): Integrate over length of product ⇒ large area. Corollary: Any incomressible surface has high genus.
SLIDE 25
Theorem (Hartshorn): Every incompressible surface in M has genus at least 1
2d(Σ).
SLIDE 26
Saddles determine a path in C(Σ).
SLIDE 27
Theorem (Scharlemann-Tomova): Every unstabilized Heegaard surface in M is Σ or has genus at least 1
2d(Σ).
SLIDE 28
Flippable - an isotopy of the surface interchanges the handlebodies
?
SLIDE 29
Theorem (Hass-Thompson-Thurston): High distance Heegaard splittings are not flippable.
SLIDE 30
Three handlebody decomposition -
Three handlebodies glued alternately along subsurfaces.
SLIDE 31
Connect a pair of handlebodies
SLIDE 32
A three-handlebody decomposition defines three different Heegaard splittings (all distance two)
SLIDE 33
Subsurface projection dF(ℓ1, ℓ2). Σ F
SLIDE 34
Lemma (Ivanov/Masur-Minsky/Schleimer?): If dF(ℓ1, ℓ2) > n then every path from ℓ1 to ℓ2
- f length n passes through a loop
disjoint from F.
SLIDE 35
Theorem (J.-Minsky-Moriah): If Σ has a distance d subsurface F then every Heegaard splitting of genus less than 1
2d has a subsurface parallel to F.
SLIDE 36
(Ido-Jang-Kobayashi): Flexible geodesics: dFj(ℓi, ℓk) sufficiently large. ℓ1 ℓ3 ℓ5 ℓ7 ℓ9 ℓ11 ℓ13
SLIDE 37
The hyperbolic picture
SLIDE 38
Step 0: ∂F0 = ℓ0
SLIDE 39
Step 1: ∂F ′
1 = ℓ0 ∪ ∂N(ℓ1)
SLIDE 40
Step 2: F1 = F0 ∪ F ′
1 ∪ {vertical annuli}
SLIDE 41
Step 3: ∂F ′
2 = ∂N(ℓ1) ∪ ℓ2
SLIDE 42
Build from both sides
SLIDE 43
The junction
SLIDE 44
In the original surface
SLIDE 45
The full surface:
SLIDE 46