The Smart Grid: Distributed optimization & control challenges - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Smart Grid: Distributed optimization & control challenges - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Smart Grid: Distributed optimization & control challenges Kameshwar Poolla UC Berkeley June 24, 2011 HYCON2 Trento, June 2011 Objectives Cover essential background on power systems Tell you about what is changing -
Objectives
Cover essential background on power systems Tell you about what is changing
- Renewables
- Distribution automation
- Markets
- Communication and sensing
Discuss some opportunities
- Distributed optimization
- Distributed control
Describe our vision of Grid2050
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
- A. The Legacy Grid
- 1. Components
- 2. Complications
- 3. Fact & Figures
- 4. Basic Power Systems Engineering
- 5. Basic Power Systems Economics
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Power System Components
Generation system: power source
ideally with fixed voltage and frequency
Load or demand: consumes power
ideally constant and resistive
Transmission system: transmits power
ideally as a perfect conductor
Distribution system: local reticulation of power Control equipment: many functions
coordinate supply with load, regulate voltage and frequency, protection, handle component failures
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
A simple power system
generator transmission load
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Complications
Loads vary a lot, not purely resistive
not known in advance day-ahead forecast accuracy 2-4%
Generators have constraints: ramping, capacity Transmission lines are reactive, have capacity
constraints
Everything is connected in a complex network of
heterogeneous elements
Must be robust to component failure Must deliver power economically through markets
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Load variability
Aggregate loads in CA on a hot day in 1999 Peak is 2-6pm [system can be very stressed] Variation is 50% of peak load
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Generation, T&D
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Generators
Limited capacity Contain control systems to regulate
frequency and voltage
Many different types with different costs, cold-start
times, ramp rates, inertia
Coal, gas, nuclear, hydro, wind, solar, Other points
- Stability issues are important for thermal generators
- Start-up times require unit commitment in advance
- Require to be taken off-line for maintenance/repair
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Transmission
Operate at high voltages to reduce resistive line loss
[765, 500, 345, 230 kV]
Mainly 3 phase AC HV DC for long lines and undersea cables T & D losses in 2007 Moving electricity across 1000 Km is cheap
0.005 – 0.02 $/kW hr [not counting capital cost] Key fact: aging transmission infrastructure is causing many problems in the US
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
It’s a Complex Network
Distribution network
- has tree structure
- Serving millions of customers
- Changing topology
Transmission network
- has loops, node degree < 5
- Enables routing of power from multiple generators
- 4000-12000 buses
Network aspect can cause problems
- Cascading failures
- Islanding
- Stability issues
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Operations
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Too complex, so broken into control areas Each area handled by a Balancing Authority/System
Operator
Inter-area power transfer for control area imbalances Balancing functions of System Operator
- Ex ante:
Economic Dispatch Schedule generation to meet forecast demand
- Real time: Monitoring
For system failures, power quality, line congestion
- Ex post:
Reserve management Schedule generation to handle unexpected events
North America Interconnections
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Geographic segmentation for easier management of electricity
Electricity Markets
Intimately connect to power systems engineering Electricity is different from bananas Bilateral Contracts 65% of power is sold in long-term bilateral contracts Bulk-power markets Multiple time-scales: Day-Ahead, Hour-Ahead, Real-Time Markets are partially regulated Price caps, subsidies, extra-market mechanisms Ancillary Services Markets for other stuff Reserves, Inertia,
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Economic Dispatch
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Scheduling generation to meet forecast demand Done by SO in advance through electricity markets
1.
Forecast the demand
2.
Get bid stacks from generators
3.
Select generation to minimize cost Constraints Existing bilateral contracts Transmission line limits Power system security It is a centralized optimization problem Output: schedule of committed generation and prices
Power System Security
Must deliver power even when a component fails
- Worry about 1 failure
- Called [N-1 contingency]
SO buys reserve capacity
- to handle single largest failure
- Margins are 7% in CA, 11% in Texas
Feasibility of power flow places constraints on
economic dispatch
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Robustness & Reserves
Power system security
- Contingency Reserves
Demand forecast errors
- Operating Reserves
- When load rises too sharply to schedule other resources
Keep power quality [frequency 60 ± 0.25 Hz]
- Regulation reserves
Management of reserves is complex, centralized
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Facts & Figures
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
US Generation Sources
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Generation Sources in California
Oregon is 57% Hydro, Washington State is 70% Hydro
!"#$%"&'(") *+, !$-&."% /0, 1.2.3"4&.'
5)6&"%7'38297' :.6#;.%<"&=
/>, ?@9%6 //, A6"&'"29'68& >, B#;.% /, C6$%-.D'EC'FGH7'F&.-#%8-' I63.%'H22$"&'>JJ+'K C#"#.' L"#"'M"4&.)
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Generation Sources in Illinois
Coal 55.1% Nuclear 43.6% Renewable 0.0% Petroleum 0.6% Hydroeletric 0.0% Gas 0.6%
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Demand side facts
Power will be defined carefully later
Installed U.S. generation capacity GW [about 3 kW per person] Average load of UCB about 25 MW Average load of California about 34 GW
Annual U.S. electric energy consumption
MWh per person [on average each American uses 1.5 kW of power]
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Retail Electricity Prices
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
AC Power
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
60 Hz in US, 50 Hz in US Phasors Complex power absorbed by a load Complex power delivered by a source Conservation of complex power
! " ! "
Power Flow on a Line
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Real power flow controlled by phase difference Reactive power flow controlled by voltage difference
Reactive power
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
What is it?
- Power that is borrowed and returned each cycle
- Not consumed in net
If reactive power is supplied remotely, we have
Reactive power compensation
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Best to supply reactive power locally Need to adjust compensation as load varies Can be done at load bus by
- Adjustable shunt capacitance
- Load-tap-changing transformer
- Power electronics devices
Three Phase
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
3 conductors instead of 6 for same power transfer Sum of powers across phases is constant
Balanced 3-phase Operation
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Symmetrical loads Symmetrical generation 120o phase shift from one phase to next Allows analysis one-phase-at-a-time Steady-state frequency = 60 Hz Quasi-steady-state frequency 60 Hz Changes slowly, so can still use phasors for analysis Time-varying magnitudes and angles
Generator Models
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Per-phase Includes voltage regulation loop More complex models for transient analysis
[Swing equation]
Still more complex models to analyze field/armature
effects, frequency swings, rotor vibrations, etc ! "
Transmission line Models
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Per-phase Medium to long lines: -model Short lines (< 150 miles) Line loadability Short lines: thermal limits Long lines: stability limits Decent power system model
sparse circuit driven by variable sources serving uncertain loads
Power Quality
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Voltage 1 ± 0.02 per unit Frequency 60 ± 0.25 Hz
Frequency oscillations are an early indicator of system stability Voltage collapse is the result Modest voltage excursions result from poor reactive power support Result is inefficiency
Dispatch
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Selecting generation to meet forecasted demand Centralized
- System operator communicates with generators
- Schedules setpoints
Day Ahead
- Forecast load ± 3%
- Schedule generation in DA markets
Hour Ahead
- Better load forecast ± 0.5 %
- HA is an adjustment market
Real-time Balancing
- Real time is actually 5-10 minute ahead
- Reissue set-points for select generators
Primary Generation Control
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
Also called Load-frequency control To account for minute imbalances between supply
and demand
Completely decentralized How it works
- Frequency drop:
add generation
- Frequency rise:
decrease generation Details
- Done by adjusting governor in thermal generation
- Time scale 0.1 seconds
Contingency Operations
HYCON2 – Trento, June 2011
When something goes wrong
- Load ramps up/down unexpectedly
- Line trips, Generator fails
- Centralized
Beyond capacity of primary AGC Call on reserves: Secondary AGC
- Spinning reserves: can come on line in 5-10 minutes for 30
minutes
- Non-spinning reserves: can come on line in 10-15 minutes for
30 minutes Tertiary AGC
- Reschedule contracted generation
Kameshwar Poolla UC Berkeley June 24, 2011
The Smart Grid:
Distributed optimization & control challenges
- B. The New Frontier
- 1. Drivers for Change
- 2. New Components
- 3. New Problems
- 4. The Smart Grid
Drivers for Change
Global climate change
- Reduce Carbon emissions
- Sequestration: Carbon capture and storage
Energy Security
- Reduce dependence on “unreliable” resources
- Wage war on small countries with oil & gas reserves
These concerns drive
- Renewable generation [ex: wind/solar]
- Efficiency [ex: buildings]
- Increased use of electric vehicles
No Silver Bullet
Source: EPRI
The Grid works now but
New renewable generation Utility-scale wind, Rooftop solar, Thermal solar, PV farms New hardware Power electronics, materials, electricity storage New communication & sensing New loads: EVs, demand response New business practices Intraday markets, aggregators New Problems
Renewable Generation
Utility scale: Wind farms, Thermal solar, PV farms Distribution side: Rooftop solar Utility scale wind
- US leads the world with 35 GW capacity
- Growth rate in China is 100% annually
- 38GW installed in 2009 worldwide
Solar
- China is the world leader
- Costs dropping but heavily subsidized [ex: Germany]
- Bulk-power parity target of 1$ installed per watt
Wind Energy Facts
2008 penetration levels [by energy] 3.7% in EU 2% in the USA 19% in Denmark 11% in Spain, Portugal Aggressive future goals [consumption, not capacity] 20% from renewable sources by 2020 in EU 2-14% from wind by 2020 in EU 30% from renewable sources by 2020 in Denmark “20% Wind Energy by 2030” – US DOE technical feasibility report
Variability
Dealing with variability is the single biggest problem in
utility-scale renewable integration
- Intermittent: Large fluctuations within a day
- Uncertain: power output is random, not known in advance
- Uncontrollable: power output cannot be regulated
Two Consequences
- Under-utilization of T&D resources
Transmission must be sized for peak renewable generation
- Increased reserves to absorb variability
Expensive, defeats the carbon benefits The obstacle: Coordination among and conflicting objectives of power producers, system operators, and regulatory agencies
!"#$%&'()*%+,*",-"."/0
1'2*.0%("#$%)#)*30% 4*'$25/"'#% 6'*$"5%*)3"'# 7)-*2,*0%8999 :;%<%'=%"#;/,..)$% 5,4,5"/0
Source: P. Norgard et al, Fluctuations and predictability of windand hydropower, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark, June 2004
!"#$%&'())*
Dealing with Variability
- 1. Curtail wind
- Makes renewable generation unprofitable
- Spilled wind has value
- 2. Back up with operating reserves
- Costly, who should pay?
- Defeats carbon benefit
- 3. Programmable loads
- Ex: Evs and PHEVs, demand response
- Requires comm infrastructure
New Hardware
Power electronics
- FACTS devices
- STATVARs for reactive power compensation
- Smart Inverters
- Switches for two-way power flow on distribution end
Materials
- For transmission line, longer life transformers
Storage
- Flywheels, CAES, NaS batteries
New Sensing
AMI [advanced metering infrastructure]
- Not so important in my view
- Ex: residential metering
PMUs [Phase measurement units]
- Very important in my view
- Direct measurement of voltage phase at a bus
- Also called synchro-phasors
- Uses GPS clocks
- Accurate, 60 Hz sampling
- IEEE C37.118-2005 standard
!""#$%%&&&'#!()*+,+"-.)'/*.%#!()0+/*1/0#")%#!()*+2(-324(5'!".6
PMU Applications
Wide-area monitoring, protection, and control Early indicators of problems Ex: Florida disturbance of 2003 Replace state estimation by direct state measurement
PMU Deployment
!"##$%&'()*++,)-./0)1%0&2''$34 567$8&$3)&9)$68$$3):++,)-./0);()*+<= =>)?@A2;(&$0)9B)32&2)89''$8&$3)C2@'()B#9D)<++)-./0 EF)<)G$#2;(&$)7$#).9%&HI4 !+,,-./01'23*'4567'#.7/800-9
2:
New Communications
NASPI-net for PMU data
- 1 Terrabyte per month
- Secure
- Publish/subscribe model
Other Multi-layer architectures under development Issues
- Mode: Wireless, cable, power-line
- Protocols
- NIST interoperability standards
- Security
- Ownership
New Loads
Electric vehicles, PHEVs
- These are energy consumers
Deferrable loads
- Commercial refrigeration
- Some manufacturing
Redefining QoS
- Not power-on-demand
- Net energy service in a time window
Demand Response
What is it? [partly] Controllable demand FERC Order 719 elevated DR to generator status Examples
- Industrial:, commercial refrigeration, dimmable lighting in
smart buildings,
- Residential: price-responsive AC, smart appliances,
PHEV/EVs Applications
- Peak-shaving during severe system congestion
- Deferring loads to times when there is a surplus of generation
- Another balancing resource for “generation control”
- Absorbing variability from renewable generation
DR Benefits & Business Models
Benefits
- Reduce wholesale prices during peak periods
- Reduce price volatility
- Reduce capital expenditures in peak generation, transmission,
distribution
- Increase grid reliability
Business models
- Top-down: price signals
- Bottom-up: aggregation [ex: Enernoc]
- I don’t buy residential DR in the US
- The European consumer is different
- Lottery mechanisms for residential DR [Prabhakar@Stanford]
New Business Models
Markets
- Additional intraday markets
- New Ancillary Services Markets
- Inertia markets
Energy Aggregators ex: EnerNoc
- ~$275M in revenue in 2010
- Aggregator or Curtailment Service Provider
- Commercial refrigeration
- ENOC pays for right to defer loads
- Aggregates this and sells to SO as an ancillary service
- Could benefit from distributed decision-making
New Problems
Renewable integration Management of distributed resources Millions of control/optimization loops Requires intelligent architecture
Smart Grids
7*8+/0$9:'9;'9<=>!"10+?9 @'7'9AB:?9C8>8)"9DEEF
Smart Grid Application Areas
$;+,<-='>?5'@-7-8,<A
- C. Opportunities
- 1. Renewable Integration
- 2. Feeder Automation
- 3. Grid2050
Renewable Integration Today
Focus on wind >)#?,*@%A 7*'?%="B)$%4*"5)%='*%("#$%)#)*30%C ?,*@)/%4*"5)%
D%;2-;"$0%
E)*?,#0%C F)#)(,-.)%G#)*30%H'2*5)%:5/I%?2;/%-20%,..%
'==)*)$%("#$%)#)*30%4*'$25/"'#%,/%="B)$%4*"5);
JK%A ,%#)(%=))$C"#%/,*"==%'=%L9M8NO@!P%='*%;?,..%QRST!U%
("#$%4*'V)5/;%
W:%A &XF&%4*'3*,? H2-;"$");Y%=))$C"#%/,*"==;Y%)B/*,C?,*@)/%?)5P,#";?; !"..%#'/%;5,.)%,/%$))4%4)#)/*,/"'#%.)Z).;%5,..)$%='*%"#%F&H
Wind in Conventional Markets
How would a single WPP bid in DA markets? DA markets
- accept firm power
- Penalties for contract deviations
- No subsidy
Must curtail some wind
Pricing
Sell price p [clearing price in DA market] Buy price q [clearing price in RT market]
Assume: prices are constant and known in advance
Remarks
- If contract is not honored, IPP must pay deviation penalties q
- Buy price can also capture cost of using local generation
[CCGT]
- Prices capture economic risk which sets energy risk
Problem Formulation
Conventional contract in DA market Objective functions Profit Expected profit Risk-sensitive profit Can also incorporate value of spilled wind
Optimal Contracts
Open Problems
- 1. Many WPPs servicing many distributed loads
- Network problem with line constraints
- What information should be shared?
- 2. Matching variable generation to programmable loads
- Network problem
- Conventional generation must adjust to realize power flow
- 3. Economics of renewable integration
- Reserve sharing & profit allocation
- Distributed coalitional games
- Who should pay for injecting variability?
These are distributed optimization/control problems
Feeder Automation
Voltage support in Distribution System Why?
Induction loads (ex: motors) most efficient at rated voltage Efficiency drop 2-4% per 1-2% deviation in voltage
Actuation
Load-tap-changing transformers Shunt capacitances D-STATVAR PV inverters
Feeder Automation
Constraints
- Actuation is discrete
- Available only at certain buses
- Limit number of changes (for lifetime issues)
- Voltage measured at some buses
- Voltage support desired at buses
Centralized Problem
Open Problems
- 1. Architectural aspects
- Use of local information
- What is the comm overhead needed?
- 2. Monetizing the benefit
- Who pays for voltage support in feeder system?
- How do you audit QoS?
These are distributed optimization/control problems
Grid2050 Vision
Assumptions
- 40% renewable penetration by energy
- Mainly on distribution end
Distributed Resources
- Appliances, EVs, storage, distributed generation
- Networked
Consequences
- Millions of distributed control loops
- Need to manage resources intelligently
- More energy is produced locally, consumed locally
- Legacy grid diminishes in importance, supplies net energy
imbalance
Managing the Complexity
Resource clusters Managed by a resource aggregator (RA) Net energy imbalance of a cluster
- supplied by legacy grid
- adjustable by shifting demand, use of storage
- uncertain because of randomness in load and generation
Intelligence in the periphery Clusters present less variability to bulk power grid
Grid2050 Architecture
Distributed Control Loops
Grid2050 Benefits
1.
CO2 savings
Enables deep renewable penetrations 2.
Energy cost savings
Reduced variability presented to core grid Smaller reserves requirements 3.
Operational benefits
More energy is produced where it is consumed
- Less system stress, lower congestion,
smaller failure probability, greater operational flexibility
- All these are realized by intelligently managing
distributed resources
Distributed Resource Management
Resource aggregator functions
- Aggregate energy supply and demand within a cluster to compute
future net energy imbalance
- Represent cluster to grid operator as a new entity which offers
programmable load as an ancillary service
- If requested, optimize cluster resources at delivery time to deliver
service
- Issues command to device level control loops
Open Problems
1.
Coarse quantification of economic value in our vision
2.
How do we represent uncertain programmable loads?
3.
How can the cluster manager interrogate its resources to calculate net load on a future horizon?
4.
How can programmable loads be sold into AS markets?
5.
How should the RA dynamically update programmable load models based on new information?
6.
Once a certain commitment is made ex ante, how does the RA optimize resources in its control to deliver the promised load schedule at delivery time?
These are distributed optimization/control problems
More Research Topics
- 1. Intelligent Protection
- Relays on lines
- Trip conditions are (I,t) pairs
- Relay trips when current exceeds I for t seconds
- Completely decentralized
- Could be less conservative by setting relay trip condns based
- n remote information
- Result: greater use of transmission capacity
- 2. Wide-area control
- 3. Dynamic reserve procurement
- 4. Optimal operation of distributed storage
What is a good problem?
Power systems is a mature subject So must work on some new Smart Grid element
- Renewables, Electricity Storage, DR
- New market instruments
- PMUs and other sensing
All of these naturally involve distributed
control/optimization
Barriers to entry
- Must get your hand dirty !
- Must go to bed with a power systems domain expert !!