THE SECOND REVOLUTION IN HEALTH CARE SUTTER HEALTH RESEARCH, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the second revolution in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

THE SECOND REVOLUTION IN HEALTH CARE SUTTER HEALTH RESEARCH, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE SECOND REVOLUTION IN HEALTH CARE SUTTER HEALTH RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & DISSEMINATION Buzz Stewart DID YOU MISS THE FIRST REVOLUTION? NO ONE WOULD HAVE PREDICTED THE RESULT OF THE FIRST REVOLUTION HISTORY OF MODERN HEALTHCARE 17.9


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THE SECOND REVOLUTION IN HEALTH CARE

SUTTER HEALTH RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & DISSEMINATION Buzz Stewart

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DID YOU MISS THE FIRST REVOLUTION?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

NO ONE WOULD HAVE PREDICTED THE RESULT OF THE FIRST REVOLUTION

slide-4
SLIDE 4

20 40 60 80 100 120 For-Profit Buyers NonProfit Buyers U.S. Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions

HISTORY OF MODERN HEALTHCARE

4

Health Expenditures as Share of GDP

AMA

1847 1910

Flexner Report

1930 1940’s

Rise of Employer

1965

Social Security Amendments HMO’s Act

1973 1990s

Accountable care (PPACA)

Research specializes and separates from bedside Market growth and fragmentation Rise of systems of care Digital era of care begins Accelerating consolidation Formal

  • rganization
  • f physicians

established Revolutionized medical education

17.9 %

By 2012, 72% of physicians use EMR/EHR systems

slide-5
SLIDE 5

OVERVIEW

  • A revolution has consequences
  • The benefits and challenges
  • Things we should and should not be

doing in the second revolution

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10 100 1000 10000 100 1000 10000 100000

THE per capita [log] GDP per capita [log] R2 = 0.95

Source: Jacques van der Gaag; WHO/IMF 2005

Income elasticity > 1.0 N = 174

U.S. NATIONAL DEBT PROBLEM

1 1.5 2 2.5 3

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Trillions ($) Year

US TOTAL HEALTH CARE SPEND PER YEAR

Strong link between countries' wealth and total health spending

This relationship is largely unaffected by:

  • Relative share of public / private

spending

  • External donor assistance (which

may inadvertently crowd out spending elsewhere)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EXTRAORDINARY HEALTH CARE SPENDING

2007

$2,200 billion U.S. health care $1,020 billion U.S. food* China: personal consumption $1,390 billion

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Source: US Congressional Budget Office, Nov 2007

% GDP

PROJECTED U.S. HEALTH SPENDING

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Childhood (<5) mortality (per 1,000)

R2 = 0.58

GDP PPP per capita Rwanda Kenya

Poorer countries' health is worse

  • ff, in general...

...but poor countries vary widely in health

  • utcomes

1

2 3 50 100 150 200 250 300 100 1,000 10,000 100,000

Similar health outcomes at different levels of wealth: what matters is not total spending, but how it is used

Source: WHO

Source: WHO/IMF 2005

And good health exists across a range of GDP

...BUT COUNTRIES WITH SIMILAR SPENDING HAVE A RANGE OF HEALTH OUTCOMES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

WHAT ARE AMERICANS BUYING?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

OUR HEALTH SYSTEM’S STRENGTHS

Source: OECD, Commonwealth Fund, ‘International Comparison: Access and Timeliness”, Dec 2006, Boehm, T, ‘How can we explain the American dominance in biomedical research and development?’, Journal of Medical Marketing, Vol 5, 2005 NY Times, RAND, MGI

Clinical trials by country Number of trials Top 5 US Hospitals Canada Germany France

UK

Australia Switzerland Japan South Korea Singapore

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ONE VIEW OF EXCESS COSTS (2009)

  • Unnecessary services ($210B)
  • Inefficiently delivered services ($130B)
  • Excess administrative costs ($190B)
  • Prices that are too high ($105B)
  • Fraud ($75B)
  • Missed prevention opportunities ($55B)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

WHY WE BUY SO MUCH

  • Wealth
  • The more we have, the more we

spend on health.

  • Insurance
  • Greater coverage makes us

indiscriminating consumers.

  • Aging population
  • Aging equals more health

problems and more demand.

  • Heroics
  • Make every effort possible,

even if there is no chance of a good outcome.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

WHY WE SELL SO MUCH

  • Business model
  • Volume based model promotes

unnecessary services.

  • Technology
  • The more we have to sell, the

more we sell.

  • Guideline-based

care paradigm

  • Evidence based guidelines for
  • nly 30% of clinical decisions.

The rest is opinion.

  • High prices
  • No price competition.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

IMPROVING CARE AND CONTROLLING COSTS

Using unproven and costly forms of radiation treatments for many early prostate cancer patients:

  • 3-D conformal radiation $11,000
  • Brachytherapy: $15,000
  • IMRT: $42,500
  • Proton Beam: $80,000
  • No head-to-head comparative studies
  • No survival difference -- at best a 10% decline in side effects

from 14% to 4%

Adoption of costly and unproven technology

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SCREENING VERSUS USUAL CARE: PLCO

Prostate-Cancer Deaths

Screening PSA and digital rectal exam (N=76,693)

Andriole GL, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1310-9

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SURGERY VERSUS SURGERY: STICH

LV reconstruction versus CABG only (N=1000)

Jones RH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360 (on line) Eisen HJ, N Engl J Med. 2009; 360 (on line)

Death from Any Cause

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Approximately 40 Million of 100 million dollars

  • f emergency department care at Alta Bates

Summit Medical Center is attributed to the top 10% of patients

slide-19
SLIDE 19

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

10 20 30 40 50 60

Total Cost (includes Direct and Indirect)

Number of Encounters Per Distinct Patient

Top 10 Percent of Most "Costly" ED Patients Visiting from 2011-2012 ( Cutoff 50 encounters)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Encounters for Patients in the Top 10 % of Cost

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Encounters for Patients in the Top 10 % of Cost

slide-22
SLIDE 22

LIFESTYLE VERSUS MEDICAL: DPP

Lifestyle or metformin to prevent DM (N=3234)

Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Joe may only be able to get so far in managing his diabetes even with the help of four specialists, a dietician and trainer.

ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH

  • Patients are on their
  • wn 99%+ of the time
  • Local factors influence

diet, activity, & stress levels

  • The best health care

may have little impact

  • n patient outcomes

Local Physical Activity Opportunity Environment (LPAOE). Municipal boundaries, GHS’s 31 counties, 4287 LPAOE points.

Local Food Environment: Food Sources & Retailers in GHS’s 31 Counties

slide-24
SLIDE 24

STUFF THAT WILL NOT MATTER MUCH

  • More knowledge
  • New knowledge is a

commodity

  • Stuff that yields the

same advice

  • We already know about

eating, exercising, addictions, moderation

  • Stuff that requires a

lot more data

  • Do customers really want this
  • Does it really matter?
  • Providers clearly are not

interested

slide-25
SLIDE 25

STUFF THAT WILL NOT MATTER MUCH

  • More procedures &
  • ther stuff to sell
  • This is what we do now and

it does not help that much

  • Personalized and more

expensive

  • This is what we do now and

it does not help that much

  • Solving problems in

isolation

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ENHANCE CAPABILITIES THAT MATTER

Data Abstraction & Standardization

Liquifying and then purifying for clinical use

Knowledge Access

Exact searching of knowledge by data with intuitive grading

Communication

Process

What are you talking about and do you understand me

Extending Reach

Exact, precise, and portable guides

Patient Tools

Knowing where to go, how to choose, and what to avoid Using tools that work in improving health