1
The role of CQC in advancing maternity care Professor James Walker - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The role of CQC in advancing maternity care Professor James Walker - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Examining maternity services The role of CQC in advancing maternity care Professor James Walker National Professional Advisor (Maternity) CQC 5 th April 2017 1 About CQC: Our purpose The Care Quality Commission is the independent
About CQC: Our purpose The Care Quality Commission is the independent regulator of health and adult social care in England.
We make sure health and social care services provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and we encourage care services to improve.
2
Our model of regulation
3
Register Monitor, inspect and rate Enforce
Independent voice
We register those who apply to CQC to provide health and adult social care services We monitor services, carry
- ut expert
inspections, and judge each service, usually to give an
- verall rating,
and conduct thematic reviews Where we find poor care, we ask providers to improve and can enforce this if necessary
We provide an independent voice on the state of health and adult social care in England on issues that matter to the public, providers and stakeholders
RCOG/RCM NICE MBRRACE Better Births Morecambe Bay Mid Staffs Monitor, inspect and rate Against Standards and Recommendations provided by the professional and national bodies as well as from reports
- not a standard setting body
- an inspection service
- regulates on whether the accepted
standards are met.
- data collected from trusts
- on-site inspections with a team of
inspectors and specialty advisors
- sometimes planned, sometimes not
Definitions of our five domains
Safe - you are protected from abuse and
avoidable harm
Effective - your care, treatment and support
achieves good outcomes, helps you to maintain quality of life and is based on the best available evidence.
Caring - staff involve and treat you with
compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
Responsive - services are organised so that
they meet your needs
Well-led - the leadership, management and
governance of the organisation make sure it's providing high-quality care that's based around your individual needs, that it encourages learning and innovation, and that it promotes an
- pen and fair culture.
Definitions of our five domains continued..
7
Outstanding The service is performing exceptionally well. Good The service is performing well and meeting our expectations. Requires improvement The service isn't performing as well as it should and we have told the service how it must improve. Inadequate The service is performing badly and we've taken action against the person or organisation that runs it.
What do the overall ratings mean?
- Findings from our first round of
hospital inspections
- First focussed national
analysis
- 136 acute non-specialist
- 18 specialist trusts
- More detailed understanding
- f the NHS at trust and
individual core level than ever before The state of care in NHS acute hospitals report
Spotlight on maternity and gynaecology Services provided to women that relate to gynaecology and pregnancy including the planning and/or prevention of pregnancy;
- Ante and post-natal services
- Labour wards
- Community services
- Theatres (both obstetric and gynaecology)
- Termination of pregnancy
A snapshot of maternity services
The snapshot tells us..
The good news:
- 2/3 of trusts are either good or outstanding
- Examples of excellent practice found
The not so good news:
- An area of concern;
- National shortages of midwives and obstetricians
- Lack of one to one care
- Excessive use of locum and bank staff
- Lack of profile of maternity within trust
- Concerns about safety
- Poor leadership and lack of team working
4
32
59
4
What do we know from our five key questions? - Safety
- Some excellent practice found however;
- safe levels of staffing and one-to-one care
during labour not being achieved.
- 5% rated as inadequate
- 2% were rated as outstanding
- Midwives working with lack of support and
supervision
- Lack of overview of care – good bits/bad bits
13
What do we know from our five key questions? - Effectiveness
- Saving lives – the average maternity unit saves 35
women’s lives each year
- Guidelines followed but inconsistent training
- Supportive with pain relief a normality, but less so with
complications
- Choices are offered, not for home birth (midwife led)
- Outcomes generally good but varied
- Few outstanding units
- Looking beyond the guidance
- How can we make it better?
14
What do we know from our five key questions? - Caring
- This is a caring profession, staff treat women with dignity
and respect
- Positive feedback from patient interviews
- Most feel involved in their care
- Most have good outcomes and are positive about their
experience
- Outstanding units provide high level of care when things
go wrong
- Bereavement midwives as a support for the family not
the hospital
- Often sessions provided only – not dedicated full time
midwife
15
What do we know from our five key questions? - Responsive
- Services are organised so that they meet your needs
- No inadequate - 2% outstanding
- Good care pathways covering all eventualities
- Escalation policies (awareness and willingness)
- Calling a man/woman who can
- Border issues
- Between services
- Between professionals
- Potential fragmentation of the services is a risk and a
worry for the future – needs proper oversight
16
- Strong comprehensive safety system
- Continually monitors outcomes, focuses on
- penness, transparency and learning when
things go wrong
- Safety thermometer results – 100% achieved
since December 2014
- Outcomes good and the service frequently
performed than trust own targets
- Great work being done to reduce stillbirths and
admissions to the Special Care Baby Unit and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
- High levels of multi-disciplinary team working
within service and with external partners
Outstanding practice
St Richard’s Hospital, West Sussex
17
- Time spent is not rushed and care delivered with
kindness, which extended to whole family
- Fully informed and involved in choices
- Feedback actively sought
- Protocols in place for women with complex
social needs taken into account with specialist midwives
- Information in different formats and translation
services for local population groups
- Efforts to engage hard-to-reach community
members and public engagement outstanding
Outstanding practice
Cossham Hospital, Bristol
Clinical dashboards
- Most maternity services used a clinical dashboard to
monitor patient outcomes
- not standardised
- Some used this information to drive a culture of
continuous improvement, but many did not
- Poor outcomes were explained away as a reflection of
the characteristics of the population served and not as a spur for improvement
- Case mix
- Less than a third of the difference between units is
due to case mix
18
Learning culture
- a learning culture in which errors are reported and
investigated is key to delivering a safe service
- some staff behave passively about safety and see it as
the role of senior management to tell them what to do
- others do take reporting seriously and report incidents
when they see them
- but they feel discouraged when they get no
feedback
- Need leaders and champions at all levels
19
20
What do we know from our five key questions? – Well-led
- Leadership of the service is linked closely to how safe a
service is – strong risk management culture
- Reflects on the safety culture within the unit
- Poor multi-disciplinary cultures undermine the quality
and safety of the service
- Effective multi-disciplinary team working is essential
- Good services are run jointly with head of midwifery and
a lead obstetrician
- Staff concerns are listened to and shared between
teams
What do trusts do with the results?
Between inspection of all 136 acute non-specialist and 18
specialist trusts;
thirteen trusts improved five deteriorated
- CQC are encouraging and driving improvement
through recommendations
- Local inspection teams supporting the learning
process
How do we encourage improvement?
- We benchmark how trusts are doing
- Our expert teams give feedback on where
improvements can be made
- We learn about what good looks like and share
best practice and innovation, with other trusts
- We support trusts to improve their service
- We use our independent voice in support of
maternity services
The next phase of regulation
How we propose to update our approach and our assessment framework to reflect the changing provider landscape There will be two consultations on these changes: one in Winter 2016/17, and another in Spring 2017
more integrated approach that enables us to be flexible and responsive to changes in care provision more targeted approach that focuses on areas of greatest concern, and where there have been improvements in quality greater emphasis on leadership, including at the level of
- verall
accountability for quality of care closer working and alignment with NHS Improvement and other partners so that providers experience less duplication
NHS trust inspections – what we are proposing to change
Changes to KLOEs and inspection methodology
- Focus our inspections where we
have the greatest concerns or services that might have improved
- Develop our local relationships
with providers, with Healthwatch and local and regional public
- rganisations
- Accommodate new models of care
- Align our approach with NHS
Improvement to avoid duplication
Consultations on our proposed changes to inspections
NHS Improvement consultation on Use of Resources and ‘well-led’ has also now been closed
20 December 2016 – 14 February 2017
New care models and complex providers Cross sector changes to assessment frameworks Updated guidance for registration of learning disability services Changes to Hospitals inspection methodology
Spring 2017
Changes to Adult Social Care inspection methodology Changes to Primary Medical Services inspection methodology Changes to registration Clarifying guidance on Fit and Proper Person Requirements Regulating place-based models of care How we rate large and complex providers
26