The research-policy nexus: boundary working Alessandro Colombo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the research policy nexus
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The research-policy nexus: boundary working Alessandro Colombo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The research-policy nexus: boundary working Alessandro Colombo Scientific Director Knowledge, Policymaking and Learning in European Metropolitan Areas: Experiences and Approaches. 26 January, Brussels Index | the agenda Who I am The


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The research-policy nexus: boundary working

Alessandro Colombo Scientific Director

Knowledge, Policymaking and Learning in European Metropolitan Areas: Experiences and Approaches. 26 January, Brussels

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Index | the agenda

  • Who I am
  • The questions

– What? – Who? – When? – How?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WHO I AM

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Regional Institute for research, statistics and training

Governmental Institution Based in Milan

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Who I am | a boundary worker?

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Who I am | a boundary worker?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

WHAT

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What | is policy analysis

  • The “policy studies” and the rational

approach (Lasswell 1951)

  • Criticisms: policy process is

– complex, circular or chaotic (Lindblom, 1959) – “garbage can” (March and Olsen, 1976) – “messy process” (Hudson and Lowe, 2009: 7). – Policy study a “science of muddling through” with: limited scientific understanding (Weiss, 1977 and 1980; Lindblom and Cohen, 1979; Majone, 1989; Nowotny 1990).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What | lot has been said

  • Dunn, 2007; Etzioni, 2008; Majchrzak,

1984; Weimer and Vining, 2014; Wildavsky, 1979;

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What | a working / operational definition

The process of providing (producing / transfer) new and usable knowledge about fundamental social (collective?) problems to those who have the power to take decisions affecting the public arena.

(policy research = policy analysis)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What | is policy analysis

Different functions and activities

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What | 6 kinds

  • research and analysis;
  • design and recommend;
  • provide strategic advice;
  • clarify arguments and values;
  • democratize;
  • mediate.

Mayer et al (2004: 173)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What | 7 functions

  • identifying contexts and scenarios;
  • providing ad hoc policy advice;
  • assessing existing policies;
  • evaluating proposed policies (including ex-

ante impact evaluation), their objectives and instruments;

  • recognizing and investigating new problems;
  • identifying and evaluating possible solutions;
  • providing counter-expertise.

Van der Sluijs and Craye, 2005

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What | an art?

Like surgery, the making of policy and the giving of policy advice are exercises of skills, and we do not judge skilful performance by the amount of information stored in the head of the performer or by the amount of formal planning. Rather, we judge it by criteria like good timing and attention to details; by the capacity to recognize the limits of the possible, to use limitations creatively, and to learn from one’s mistakes; by the ability not to show what should be done, but to persuade people to do what they know should be done.

(Majone, 1989: 20)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What | an art?

“Policy analysis (…) is one activity for which there can be no fixed program, for policy analysis is synonymous with creativity, which may be stimulated by theory and sharpened by practice, which can be learned but not taught”.

(Wildavsky, 1979: 3)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

WH0

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Who | does PA?

  • academics do not have the time to deal

with the full range of different issues that policy makers necessarily cover (McGann,

Johnson, 2005, p. 12)

  • policy makers do not have prerequisites

for conducting research (Etzioni, 1978: 2)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Who | does PA?

  • “Anybody" ? (Parsons, 1995: 30)
  • Issues (Objectivity Independence

Robustness)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Who | does PA? 6 categories

Category Definition

Autonomous and independent

Significantly independent from any one interest group or donor and autonomous in its operation and funding from government

Quasi-independent

Autonomous from government but controlled by an interest group, donor or contracting agency that provides a majority of the funding and has significant influence over operations of the agency

University affiliated A policy research centre at a university Political party affiliated

Formally affiliated with a political party

Government affiliated

A part of the structure of government

Quasi governmental

Funded exclusively by government grants and contracts but not a part of the formal structure of government

Source: McGann and Johnson (2005: 14)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Who | does PA?

Competencies and capabilities of the analyst

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Mintron, 2003

  • building expert

knowledge

  • interviewing

informants

  • giving

presentations

  • working in teams
  • facilitating meetings
  • writing for multiple

audiences

  • conflict

management

  • and professional

networking.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Radin, 2000: 125-126

  • case study methods
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • ethical analysis
  • evaluation
  • future analysis
  • historical analysis
  • implementation

analysis

  • interviewing
  • legal analysis
  • political feasibility

analysis

  • public speaking
  • small group facilitation
  • specific program

knowledge

  • statistics
  • survey research methods
  • systems analysis.
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Patton and Sawicki, 1993

  • writing
  • effectively supporting

documentation

  • public speak publicly
  • developing simple models ()
  • evaluating distributional

aspects of policies

  • incorporating political factors

into analysis

  • advocating uncomfortable

positions

  • working under time

constraints

  • developing management skills
  • btaining policy-relevant data
  • synthesizing mountains of

reports and memoranda

  • practicing secondary data

sources

  • designing effective guidelines
  • coping with uncertainty
  • understanding legislative

language

  • developing researched analysis

for staff

  • being sceptical
slide-26
SLIDE 26

In a nutshell… you must be

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Who | does PA? - suggestions

  • Identification
  • Question – a “?”
  • Knowledge creeping – not linear (Weiss,

1977)

  • The importance of limits
  • “It is always your fault”
slide-28
SLIDE 28

“constraint” as “condition”

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

WHEN

slide-30
SLIDE 30

When | does PA occur?

  • Problem identification
  • Agenda-setting
  • Negotiation
  • Deliberation
  • Decision making (?)
  • Implementation
  • Feedback / evaluation

(Howlett et al. 2009)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

When | does PA occur?

  • Any topic / field?
  • fundamental social problems? (Majchrzak, 1984)
  • Collective problem? (Dente, 2011)
slide-32
SLIDE 32

HOW

slide-33
SLIDE 33

How | differences between basic vs policy research

slide-34
SLIDE 34

BASIC RESEARCH POLICY RESEARCH Understanding Changing True Decision Interest Need Robust Relevant Primary Secondary Collecting Interpreting Analytical slices Major facts Public Confidential Ready Needed Published Readable Communication Communication! USEFUL USABLE

slide-35
SLIDE 35

A present…

“papers in Downing Street are written over 24 hours (if you’re lucky), instead of 24

  • months. And, in fact, they often do not

suffer very much from being done that way: I was surprised how good a job can be done in those circumstances”

(Le Grand 2006: 320)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

BUT, ABOVE ALL

slide-37
SLIDE 37

try to enjoy your research…

HAVE FUN!

...some of it will make a big difference!

slide-38
SLIDE 38

thanks

Alessandro Colombo Scientific Director Éupolis Lombardia, Regional Institute for Research statistics and Training

Milan alessandro.colombo@eupolislombardia.it