The International Surface Temperature Initiative: Update on progress with land surface air temperatures
1 July 2014 Blair Trewin, Peter Thorne, Jay Lawrimore, Kate Willett, Jared Rennie, with thanks to many initiative participants
The International Surface Temperature Initiative: Update on progress - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The International Surface Temperature Initiative: Update on progress with land surface air temperatures 1 July 2014 Blair Trewin , Peter Thorne, Jay Lawrimore, Kate Willett, Jared Rennie, with thanks to many initiative participants History and
The International Surface Temperature Initiative: Update on progress with land surface air temperatures
1 July 2014 Blair Trewin, Peter Thorne, Jay Lawrimore, Kate Willett, Jared Rennie, with thanks to many initiative participants
data set with maximum global coverage
daily, sub-daily)
subject-matter working groups
involvement from NMHSs, as well as other institutions, and experts from other relevant fields (e.g. statistics, metrology)
Michael de Podesta’s ‘Instrument of real beauty’
Image courtesy Michael de Podesta, NPL
US Climate Reference Network website
Various sources online Huge range of instrument types, siting exposures etc. regionally, nationally and globally with many changes over time.
(Matt Menne and Claude Williams, NOAA National Climatic Data Center)
put in place certain structures to enable science advances
and assess
Jay Lawrimore, Jared Rennie and Peter Thorne (2013) Responding to the Need for Better Global Temperature Data, EOS, 94 (6), 61–62 DOI: 10.1002/2013EO060002
Scanned Images of paper record (PDF / JPG)
Not always available
Conversely, a lot of data only exist on paper (or as scanned images) – still a great need for data rescue
Databank policy encourages data be provided in its rawest form; that closest to the measurements that were first reported by the observer.
applied prior to submission
Other Requirements
Stage 1 Stage 0
– NCDC, JMA, BOM
– NCDC, NMA’s, other international organizations
– Raw, quality controlled, bias corrected
– SourceCorp, CDMP, Local Originator
– Main standard synoptic times, intermediate synoptic times, other
– How many days used to calculate monthly average
complete global dataset
automated method due to large number of stations
characterize uncertainty
– ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/globaldatabank/monthly/stage3
– 33 daily (monthly summaries) – 25 monthly
no valuable information is lost
for the recommended merge
considered, to avoid excess duplication
hooray!
version to be released at later date
will occur
increment will occur, adding in new sources accrued. – 10 in queue – please help us increase that number!
homogenisation methods.
the truth – we CANNOT measure performance of a specific method or closeness to real world truth of any one data- product.
software testing) - consistent synthetic test cases, simulating real world noise, variability and spatial correlations potentially enable us to do this.
www.surfacetemperatures.org
https://www2.image.ucar.edu/event/summerprog.surfacetemps
Peter.thorne@nersc.no Data.submission@surfacetemperatures.org