the interaction of gravitational radiation with
play

The interaction of gravitational radiation with superconductors: A - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The interaction of gravitational radiation with superconductors: A progress report on experiments at UC Merced at the interface of: Quantum General & Mechanics Relativity Invited lecture at the Time and Matter Conference in Bled,


  1. The interaction of gravitational radiation with superconductors: A progress report on experiments at UC Merced at the interface of: Quantum General & Mechanics Relativity Invited lecture at the “Time and Matter Conference” in Bled, Slovenia by Raymond Chiao August 28, 2007

  2. Co-workers • Students: S. Minter, J. McLane • Collaborators: C. Rowe, K. Wegter- McNelly* *Work sponsored by the Center of Theology and Natural Sciences STARS program

  3. Hoover dam is an efficient hydroelectric energy converter of: Gravitational energy � electrical energy

  4. Can we convert gravitational wave energy efficiently into electromagnetic wave energy? Answer: YES

  5. What is a gravitational wave? • It is a time-varying tidal gravitational field (think of jello with grapes embedded inside it)

  6. Tidal forces of a gravitational wave 5 g 4 3 2 1 0 c. m. -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

  7. One possible GR-to-EM wave converter Levitated superconducting sphere B B d(t) I Ring with supercurrent I

  8. Levitated superconducting sphere B B d(t) I Ring with supercurrent I

  9. Faraday’s law leads to high conversion efficiency for superconductors Lenz’s law implies that: = − F F GR EM ⋅ ∴ = F v Power absorbed from GR wave GR rad ⋅ = − = F v Power emitted into EM wave. EM rad

  10. Similarly, in the time-reversed process of EM-to-GR wave conversion = − F F EM GR ⋅ ∴ = F v Power absorbed from EM wave EM rad ⋅ = − = F v Power emitted into GR wave. GR rad

  11. Wave conversion from gravitational to EM wave out electromagnetic waves transducer Quantum GR wave in

  12. B superconducting supercurrent I Ring with Levitated d(t) sphere I Example: B

  13. EM wave in Time-reversal symmetry transducer Quantum GR wave out

  14. Hertz-like experiment Quantum transducer EM wave in GR wave EM wave out Quantum transducer

  15. Einstein's field equations π 8 G − = 1 R g R T μν μν μν 2 4 c ≈ η + For weak fields, g h μν μν μν ⎛− ⎞ 1 0 0 0 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ 0 1 0 0 η = << η where and h . ⎜ ⎟ μν μν μν 0 0 1 0 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 0 0 0 1 = = = Then in the transvers e - traceless gauge ( h h h 0 ) μ 0 ij , j kk ∂ 2 π h μν 1 16 G ∇ 2 − = − h T μν μν 2 ∂ 2 4 c t c

  16. Maxwell-like equations for weak gravitational fields ρ ∇⋅ = − = G E where E g ε G G G ∂ B ∇× = − ∂ G E G t ∇⋅ = B 0 G ∂ ⎛ ⎞ E ∇× = μ − + ε G ⎜ ⎟ B j ∂ G G G G ⎝ ⎠ t

  17. where π 16 G − μ = = × 30 3.7 10 SI units G 2 c 1 ε = = × 9 1.19 10 SI units π G 4 G

  18. Gravity wave speed and impedance 1 = = × 8 c 3.00 10 meters/sec ε μ G G μ − = = × 18 G Z 2.79 10 SI units ε G G

  19. Why quantum mechanics? • Efficiency of quantum transducers depends on “quantum rigidity” • Efficiency of quantum gravity wave antennas depends on “quantum dissipationlessness” • Both arise from the ENERGY GAP (e.g, the BCS gap) of the quantum system and the quantum adiabatic theorem.

  20. Energy gap of a two-level quantum system Excited state ENERGY GAP Ground state

  21. What’s the difference between a normal metal and a superconductor? normal superconductor metal � � ω ω � � � � magnetic field = ω m B = created by B 2 e 0 e London moment

  22. Reflection of a gravitational plane wave from a normal metal vs. a superconductor superconductor normal metal in the presence of in presence of gravito-magnetic field gravito-electric field � � B G g v=0 � -2e +Ze s G -e +Ze -2e +Ze cm v=0 -e +Ze � ⊗ B G - g � � � = 1 ( × s E B ) μ G G G G

  23. An important application: “Gravity Radio” • Intercontinental communication by microwave-frequency gravity waves directly through the interior of the Earth

  24. Gravity waves from the Big Bang Cosmic Gravitational Wave Background (CGB) Slow-Roll Inflationary Big Bang 0 Ekpyrotic/Cyclical Model Pre-Big Bang Model Advanced LIGO/VIRGO Sensitivity (ground-based) Fractional Energy Density [Log 10 h 02 Ω gw ] LISA Sensitivity (space-based) Planck Sensitivity (space-based, indirect EM measurement) -5 Big Bang Observer (space-based, LISA follow-on) 0.9 K Thermal Spectrum (Wien peak f = 53 GHz) -10 -15 -20 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Frequency [Log 10 f(Hz)]

  25. CONCLUSIONS: • A pair of superconducting bodies can become an efficient transducer between GR and EM waves. • Observations of “Cosmic Gravitational-wave Background” (CGB) should be possible. • “Gravity radio” communications between continents should be possible.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend