The Imaging Chain The Imaging Chain 1. energy source 2. object in - - PDF document

the imaging chain the imaging chain
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Imaging Chain The Imaging Chain 1. energy source 2. object in - - PDF document

Review and Overview Review and Overview Imaging Chain includes these elements: The Imaging Chain The Imaging Chain 1. energy source 2. object in Optical Astronomy in Optical Astronomy 3. collector 4. detector (or sensor) 5.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

The Imaging Chain The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy in Optical Astronomy

Review and Overview Review and Overview

“Imaging Chain” includes these elements:

  • 1. energy source
  • 2. object
  • 3. collector
  • 4. detector (or sensor)
  • 5. processor
  • 6. display
  • 7. analysis
  • 8. storage (if any)

Optical Imaging Chain Optical Imaging Chain

1: source 2: object 3: collector 4: sensor 5: processing 6: display 7: analysis

Source and/or Object Source and/or Object

  • In astronomy, the source of energy (1) and the
  • bject (2) are almost always one and the same!
  • i.e., The object emits the light

– Examples:

  • Galaxies
  • Stars

– Exceptions:

  • Planets and the moon
  • Dust and gas that reflects or absorbs starlight

Optical Imaging Chain in Optical Imaging Chain in Astronomy until 1980 or so Astronomy until 1980 or so

1: source 2: object 3: collector 4: sensor 5: processing 6: display 7: analysis 8: storage

(stack of glass)

Optical Imaging Chain in Modern Optical Imaging Chain in Modern Astronomy (post Astronomy (post-

  • 1980)

1980)

1: source 2: object 3: collector 4: sensor 5: processing 6: display 7: analysis 8: storage

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Transition ( Transition (“ “Catch Catch-

  • up

up” ”) Phase: ) Phase: Digitize Plates Digitize Plates

6: display 7: analysis 8: storage

+

Scanner

Optical Imaging Chain in Radio Optical Imaging Chain in Radio Astronomy Astronomy

1,2

radio waves receiver where waves are collected waves converted into electro signals computer received as signal

3,4 5 6,7

Specific Requirements for Specific Requirements for Astronomical Imaging Systems Astronomical Imaging Systems

  • Requirements always conflict

– Always want more than you can have ⇒must “trade off” desirable attributes − Deciding the relative merits is a difficult task

  • “general-purpose” instruments (cameras) may not be

sufficient

  • Want simultaneously to have:

– excellent angular resolution AND wide field of view – high sensitivity AND wide dynamic range

  • Dynamic range is the ability to image “bright” and “faint”

sources

– broad wavelength coverage AND ability to measure narrow spectral lines

Angular Resolution Angular Resolution

  • vs. Field of View
  • vs. Field of View
  • Angular Resolution: ability to distinguish sources

that are separated by small angles

– Limited by:

  • Optical Diffraction
  • Sensor Resolution
  • Field of View: angular size of the image field

– Limited by:

  • Optics
  • Sensor Size (area)

Sensitivity vs. Dynamic Range Sensitivity vs. Dynamic Range

  • Sensitivity

– ability to measure faint brightness

  • Dynamic Range

– ability to image “bright” and “faint” sources in same system

Wavelength Coverage Wavelength Coverage

  • vs. Spectral Resolution
  • vs. Spectral Resolution
  • Wavelength Coverage

– Ability to image over a wide range of wavelengths – Limited by:

  • Spectral Transmission of Optics (Glass cuts off UV, far IR)
  • Spectral Resolution

– Ability to detect and measure narrow spectral lines – Limited by:

  • “Spectrometer” Resolution (number of lines in diffraction

grating)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Optical Collector (Link #3) Optical Collector (Link #3) Optical Collection (Link #3): Optical Collection (Link #3): Refracting Telescopes Refracting Telescopes

  • Lenses collect light
  • BIG disadvantages

– Chromatic Aberrations (due to dispersion of glass) – Lenses are HEAVY and supported only on periphery

  • Limits the Lens Diameter
  • Largest is 40" at Yerkes Observatory, Wisconsin

http://astro.uchicago.edu/vtour/40inch/kyle3.jpg

Optical Collection (Link #3): Optical Collection (Link #3): Reflecting Telescopes Reflecting Telescopes

  • Mirrors collect light
  • Chromatic Aberrations eliminated
  • Fabrication techniques continue to improve
  • Mirrors may be supported from behind

⇒ Mirrors may be made much larger than refractive lenses

Optical Reflecting Telescopes Optical Reflecting Telescopes

  • Concave

parabolic primary mirror to collect light from source

– modern mirrors for large telescopes are thin, lightweight & deformable, to

  • ptimize image

quality

3.5 meter WIYN telescope mirror, Kitt Peak, Arizona

Thin and Light (Weight) Mirrors Thin and Light (Weight) Mirrors

  • Light weight ⇒Easier to point

– “light-duty” mechanical systems ⇒ cheaper

  • Thin Glass ⇒ Less “Thermal Mass”

– Reaches Equilibrium (“cools down” to ambient temperature) quicker

Hale 200 Hale 200" " Telescope Telescope Palomar Mountain, CA Palomar Mountain, CA

http://www.astro.caltech.edu/observatories/palomar/overview.html http://www.cmog.org/page.cfm?page=374

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

200 200" mirror (5 meters) " mirror (5 meters) for Hale Telescope for Hale Telescope

  • Monolithic Mirror (single piece)
  • Several feet thick
  • 10 months to cool
  • 7.5 years to grind
  • Mirror weighs 20 tons
  • Telescope weighs 400 tons
  • “Equatorial” Mount

– follows sky with one motion

Keck Keck telescopes

telescopes, Mauna Kea, HI

, Mauna Kea, HI

http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/geninfo/about.html

400 400" mirror (10 meters) " mirror (10 meters) for Keck Telescope for Keck Telescope

  • 36 segments
  • 3" thick
  • Each segment weighs 400 kg (880 pounds)

– Total weight of mirror is 14,400 kg (< 15 tons)

  • Telescope weighs 270 tons
  • “Alt-azimuth” mount (left-right, up-down

motion)

– follows sky with two motions + rotation

Basic Designs of Optical Basic Designs of Optical Reflecting Telescopes Reflecting Telescopes

1. Prime focus: light focused by primary mirror alone 2. Newtonian: use flat, diagonal secondary mirror to deflect light out side of tube 3. Cassegrain: use convex secondary mirror to reflect light back through hole in primary 4. Nasmyth (or Coudé) focus (coudé ⇒ French for “bend” or “elbow”): uses a tertiary mirror to redirect light to external instruments (e.g., a spectrograph)

Prime Focus Prime Focus

f Sensor Mirror diameter must be large to ensure that

  • bstruction is not significant

Newtonian Reflector Newtonian Reflector

Sensor

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Cassegrain Telescope Cassegrain Telescope

Sensor

Secondary Convex Mirror

Feature of Cassegrain Feature of Cassegrain Telescope Telescope

  • Long Focal Length in

Short Tube

Location of Equivalent Thin Lens

f

Coud Coudé é or

  • r Nasmyth

Nasmyth Telescope Telescope

Sensor

Optical Reflecting Telescopes Optical Reflecting Telescopes

Schematic

  • f 10-meter

Keck telescope (segmented mirror)

Large Optical Telescopes Large Optical Telescopes

Telescopes with largest diameters (in use or under construction:

– 10-meter Keck (Mauna Kea, Hawaii) – 8-meter Subaru (Mauna Kea) – 8-meter Gemini (twin telescopes: Mauna Kea & Cerro Pachon, Chile) – 6.5-meter Mt. Hopkins (Arizona) – 5-meter Mt. Palomar (California) – 4-meter NOAO (Kitt Peak, AZ & Cerro Tololo, Chile)

http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/billa/bigeyes.html

Summit of Mauna Kea, with Maui in background Keck telescope mirror (note person)

Why Build Large Telescopes? Why Build Large Telescopes?

  • 1. Larger Aperture ⇒ Gathers MORE Light

– Light-Gathering Power ∝ Area – Area of Circular Aperture = πD2 / 4 ∝ D2

  • D = diameter of primary collecting element
  • 2. Larger aperture ⇒ better angular

resolution

– recall that:

∆θ λ ≅ D

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Why Build Small Telescopes? Why Build Small Telescopes?

  • 1. Smaller aperture ⇒ collects less light
  • ⇒ less chance of saturation

(“overexposure”) on bright sources

  • 2. Smaller aperture ⇒ larger field of view

(generally)

– Determined by “F ratio” or “F#”

f = focal length of collecting element D = diameter of aperture

F f D #≡

F Ratio: F# F Ratio: F#

  • F# describes the ability of the optic to

“deflect” or “focus” light

– Smaller F# ⇒ optic “deflects” light more than system with larger F#

Small F# Large F#

F# of Large Telescopes F# of Large Telescopes

  • Hale 200" on Palomar: f/3.3

– focal length of primary mirror is: 3.3 × 200" = 660" = 55' ≅ 16.8 m – Dome must be large enough to enclose

  • Keck 10-m on Mauna Kea: f/1.75

– focal length of primary mirror is: 1.75 × 10m = 17.5 m ≅ 58 m

F Ratio: F# F Ratio: F#

  • Two reflecting telescopes with different F#

and same detector have different “Fields of View”:

Small F# Large F# large ∆θ small ∆θ

Sensors (Link #4) Sensors (Link #4)

Astronomical Cameras Astronomical Cameras Usually Include: Usually Include:

1. Spectral Filters

– most experiments require specific wavelength range(s) – broad-band or narrow-band

2. “Reimaging” Optics

– enlarge or reduce image formed by primary collecting element

3. Light-Sensitive Detector: Sensor

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Astronomical Sensors Astronomical Sensors

  • Most common detectors:

– Human Eye – Photographic Emulsion

  • film
  • plates

– Electronic Sensors

  • CCDs

Angular Resolution Angular Resolution

  • Fundamental Limit due to Diffraction in

“Optical Collector” (Link #3)

  • But Also Limited by Resolution of Sensor!

∆θ λ ≅ D

Charge Charge-

  • Coupled Devices (

Coupled Devices (CCDs CCDs) )

  • Standard light detection medium for BOTH professional and

amateur astronomical imaging systems

– Significant decrease in price

  • numerous advantages over film:

– high quantum efficiency (QE)

  • meaning most of the photons incident on CCD are “counted”

– linear response

  • measured signal is proportional to number of photons collected

– fast processing turnaround (CCD readout speeds ~1 sec)

  • NO development of emulsion!

– regular grid of sensor elements (pixels)

  • as opposed to random distribution of AgX grains

– image delivered in computer-ready form

Sensor Resolution Sensor Resolution

  • Obvious for Electronic Sensors (e.g.,

CCDs)

∆x

  • Elements have finite size
  • Light is summed over area
  • f sensor element (“integrated”)
  • Light from two stars that falls on

same element is added together

  • stars cannot be distinguished

in image!

Same Effect in Photographic Same Effect in Photographic Emulsions Emulsions

  • More difficult to quantify
  • Light-sensitive “grains” of silver

halide in the emulsion

  • Placed “randomly” in emulsion
  • “Random” sizes
  • “large” grains are more sensitive
  • (respond to few photons)
  • “small” grains produce better

resolution

Photographic techniques: Photographic techniques: silver halide silver halide

  • Film

– Emulsion on “flexible” substrate – Still used by amateurs using sensitive film

  • B&W and color
  • Special treatment to increase sensitivity
  • Photographic Plates

– Emulsion on glass plates – Most common detector from earliest development

  • f AgX techniques until CCDs in late 70’s
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 Eye as Astronomical Detector Eye as Astronomical Detector

  • Eye includes its own lens

– focuses light on retina ( “sensor”)

  • When used with a telescope, must add yet

another lens

– redirect rays from primary optic – make them parallel (“collimated”)

  • rays appear to come from “infinity” (infinite distance

away)

– reimaging is performed by “eyepiece”

Eye with Telescope Eye with Telescope

Without Eyepiece With Eyepiece Light entering eye is “collimated”

Eye as Astronomical Detector Eye as Astronomical Detector

  • Point sources (stars) appear brighter to eye through

telescope

  • Factor is

– D is telescope diameter – P is diameter of eye pupil – Magnification should make light fill the eye pupil (“exit pupil”)

  • Extended sources (for example, nebulae) do not

appear brighter through a telescope

– Gain in light gathering power exactly compensated by image magnification, spreads light out over larger angle.

2 2

D P

Atmospheric Effects on Image Atmospheric Effects on Image

  • Large role in ground-based optical astronomy

– scintillation modifies source angular size

  • twinkling of stars = “smearing” of point sources

– extinction reduces light intensity

  • atmosphere scatters a small amount of light, especially at

short (bluer) wavelengths

  • water vapor blocks specific wavelengths, especially near-

IR

– scattered light produces interfering “background”

  • astronomical images are never limited to light from

source alone; always include “source” + “background sky”

  • “light pollution” worsens sky background

Scattering Scattering

  • “Wavelength Dependent”

– Depends on color of light – Long wavelengths are scattered “less”

Scattering by Molecules Scattering by Molecules

  • Molecules are SMALL
  • “Blue” light is scattered MUCH more than

red light

– Reason for BOTH

  • blue sky (blue light scattered from sun in all

directions)

  • red sunset (blue light is scattered out of the sun’s

direct rays)

4

1 "Rayleigh Scattering" λ ∝

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Scattering by Dust Scattering by Dust

  • Dust particles are MUCH larger than

molecules

– e.g., from volcanos, dust storms

  • Blue light is scattered by dust “somewhat

more” than red light

1 "Mie Scattering" λ ∝

Link #5: Image Processing Link #5: Image Processing Link #5: Image Processing Link #5: Image Processing

  • Formerly: performed in darkroom

– e.g., David Malin’s “Unsharp Masking”

  • Subtract a blurred copy from a “sharp” positive
  • (or, add a blurred negative to a “sharp” positive)
  • Now performed in computers, e.g.,

– contrast enhancement – “sharpening” – “normalization” (background division) – …

Image Processing Image Processing

  • Once collected, images must be corrected for:

– Atmosphere (to extent possible)

  • e.g., sequence of images obtained at a variety of telescope

elevations usually can be corrected for atmospheric extinction

– CCD defects and artifacts

  • dark current

– CCD pixel reports a signal even when not exposed to light

  • bad pixels

– some pixels will be dead, hot, or even “flickering”

  • variations in pixel-to-pixel sensitivity

– every pixel has its own QE – can be characterized by “flat field”

Links #6 and #7 Links #6 and #7 Image Display and Analysis Image Display and Analysis

Image Display and Analysis Image Display and Analysis

  • This step often is where astronomy really begins.
  • Type and extent of display and analysis depends on

purpose of imaging experiment

  • Common examples:

– evaluating whether an object has been detected or not – determining total CCD signal (counts) for an object, such as a star – determining relative intensities of an object from images at two different wavelengths – determining relative sizes of an extended object from images at two different wavelengths

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Link #8: Storage Link #8: Storage Storage Storage

  • Glass plates

– Lots of climate-controlled storage space – expensive – available to one user at a time – now being “digitized” (scanned), as in the archive you use with DS9

  • Digital Images

– Lots of disk space – cheaper all the time – available to many users