1
The Imaging Chain The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy in - - PDF document
The Imaging Chain The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy in - - PDF document
The Imaging Chain The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy in Optical Astronomy 1 Review and Overview Review and Overview Imaging Chain includes these elements: 1. energy source 2. object 3. collector 4. detector (or sensor) 5.
2
Review and Overview Review and Overview
“Imaging Chain” includes these elements:
- 1. energy source
- 2. object
- 3. collector
- 4. detector (or sensor)
- 5. processor
- 6. display
- 7. analysis
- 8. storage (if any)
3
Optical Imaging Chain Optical Imaging Chain
1: source 2: object 3: collector 4: sensor 5: processing 6: display 7: analysis
4
Source and/or Object Source and/or Object
- In astronomy, the source of energy (1) and the
- bject (2) are almost always one and the same!
- i.e., The object emits the light
– Examples:
- Galaxies
- Stars
– Exceptions:
- Planets and the moon
- Dust and gas that reflects or absorbs starlight
5
Optical Imaging Chain in Optical Imaging Chain in Astronomy until 1980 or so Astronomy until 1980 or so
1: source 2: object 3: collector 4: sensor 5: processing 6: display 7: analysis 8: storage
(stack of glass)
6
Optical Imaging Chain in Modern Optical Imaging Chain in Modern Astronomy (post Astronomy (post-
- 1980)
1980)
1: source 2: object 3: collector 4: sensor 5: processing 6: display 7: analysis 8: storage
7
Transition ( Transition (“ “Catch Catch-
- up
up” ”) Phase: ) Phase: Digitize Plates Digitize Plates
6: display 7: analysis 8: storage
+
Scanner
8
Optical Imaging Chain in Radio Optical Imaging Chain in Radio Astronomy Astronomy
1,2
radio waves receiver where waves are collected waves converted into electro signals computer received as signal
3,4 5 6,7
9
Specific Requirements for Specific Requirements for Astronomical Imaging Systems Astronomical Imaging Systems
- Requirements always conflict
– Always want more than you can have ⇒must “trade off” desirable attributes − Deciding the relative merits is a difficult task
- “general-purpose” instruments (cameras) may not be
sufficient
- Want simultaneously to have:
– excellent angular resolution AND wide field of view – high sensitivity AND wide dynamic range
- Dynamic range is the ability to image “bright” and “faint”
sources
– broad wavelength coverage AND ability to measure narrow spectral lines
10
Angular Resolution Angular Resolution
- vs. Field of View
- vs. Field of View
- Angular Resolution: ability to distinguish sources
that are separated by small angles
– Limited by:
- Optical Diffraction
- Sensor Resolution
- Field of View: angular size of the image field
– Limited by:
- Optics
- Sensor Size (area)
11
Sensitivity vs. Dynamic Range Sensitivity vs. Dynamic Range
- Sensitivity
– ability to measure faint brightness
- Dynamic Range
– ability to image “bright” and “faint” sources in same system
12
Wavelength Coverage Wavelength Coverage
- vs. Spectral Resolution
- vs. Spectral Resolution
- Wavelength Coverage
– Ability to image over a wide range of wavelengths – Limited by:
- Spectral Transmission of Optics (Glass cuts off UV, far IR)
- Spectral Resolution
– Ability to detect and measure narrow spectral lines – Limited by:
- “Spectrometer” Resolution (number of lines in diffraction
grating)
13
Optical Collector (Link #3) Optical Collector (Link #3)
14
Optical Collection (Link #3): Optical Collection (Link #3): Refracting Telescopes Refracting Telescopes
- Lenses collect light
- BIG disadvantages
– Chromatic Aberrations (due to dispersion of glass) – Lenses are HEAVY and supported only on periphery
- Limits the Lens Diameter
- Largest is 40" at Yerkes Observatory, Wisconsin
http://astro.uchicago.edu/vtour/40inch/kyle3.jpg
15
Optical Collection (Link #3): Optical Collection (Link #3): Reflecting Telescopes Reflecting Telescopes
- Mirrors collect light
- Chromatic Aberrations eliminated
- Fabrication techniques continue to improve
- Mirrors may be supported from behind
⇒ Mirrors may be made much larger than refractive lenses
16
Optical Reflecting Telescopes Optical Reflecting Telescopes
- Concave
parabolic primary mirror to collect light from source
– modern mirrors for large telescopes are thin, lightweight & deformable, to
- ptimize image
quality
3.5 meter WIYN telescope mirror, Kitt Peak, Arizona
17
Thin and Light (Weight) Mirrors Thin and Light (Weight) Mirrors
- Light weight ⇒Easier to point
– “light-duty” mechanical systems ⇒ cheaper
- Thin Glass ⇒ Less “Thermal Mass”
– Reaches Equilibrium (“cools down” to ambient temperature) quicker
18
Hale 200 Hale 200" " Telescope Telescope Palomar Mountain, CA Palomar Mountain, CA
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/observatories/palomar/overview.html http://www.cmog.org/page.cfm?page=374
19
200 200" mirror (5 meters) " mirror (5 meters) for Hale Telescope for Hale Telescope
- Monolithic Mirror (single piece)
- Several feet thick
- 10 months to cool
- 7.5 years to grind
- Mirror weighs 20 tons
- Telescope weighs 400 tons
- “Equatorial” Mount
– follows sky with one motion
20
Keck Keck telescopes
telescopes, Mauna Kea, HI
, Mauna Kea, HI
http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/geninfo/about.html
21
400 400" mirror (10 meters) " mirror (10 meters) for Keck Telescope for Keck Telescope
- 36 segments
- 3" thick
- Each segment weighs 400 kg (880 pounds)
– Total weight of mirror is 14,400 kg (< 15 tons)
- Telescope weighs 270 tons
- “Alt-azimuth” mount (left-right, up-down
motion)
– follows sky with two motions + rotation
22
Basic Designs of Optical Basic Designs of Optical Reflecting Telescopes Reflecting Telescopes
1. Prime focus: light focused by primary mirror alone 2. Newtonian: use flat, diagonal secondary mirror to deflect light out side of tube 3. Cassegrain: use convex secondary mirror to reflect light back through hole in primary 4. Nasmyth (or Coudé) focus (coudé ⇒ French for “bend” or “elbow”): uses a tertiary mirror to redirect light to external instruments (e.g., a spectrograph)
23
Prime Focus Prime Focus
f Sensor Mirror diameter must be large to ensure that
- bstruction is not significant
24
Newtonian Reflector Newtonian Reflector
Sensor
25
Cassegrain Telescope Cassegrain Telescope
Sensor
Secondary Convex Mirror
26
Feature of Cassegrain Feature of Cassegrain Telescope Telescope
- Long Focal Length in
Short Tube
Location of Equivalent Thin Lens
f
27
Coud Coudé é or
- r Nasmyth
Nasmyth Telescope Telescope
Sensor
28
Optical Reflecting Telescopes Optical Reflecting Telescopes
Schematic
- f 10-meter
Keck telescope (segmented mirror)
29
Large Optical Telescopes Large Optical Telescopes
Telescopes with largest diameters (in use or under construction:
– 10-meter Keck (Mauna Kea, Hawaii) – 8-meter Subaru (Mauna Kea) – 8-meter Gemini (twin telescopes: Mauna Kea & Cerro Pachon, Chile) – 6.5-meter Mt. Hopkins (Arizona) – 5-meter Mt. Palomar (California) – 4-meter NOAO (Kitt Peak, AZ & Cerro Tololo, Chile)
http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/billa/bigeyes.html
Summit of Mauna Kea, with Maui in background Keck telescope mirror (note person)
30
Why Build Large Telescopes? Why Build Large Telescopes?
- 1. Larger Aperture ⇒ Gathers MORE Light
– Light-Gathering Power ∝ Area – Area of Circular Aperture = πD2 / 4 ∝ D2
- D = diameter of primary collecting element
- 2. Larger aperture ⇒ better angular
resolution
– recall that:
∆θ λ ≅ D
31
Why Build Small Telescopes? Why Build Small Telescopes?
- 1. Smaller aperture ⇒ collects less light
- ⇒ less chance of saturation
(“overexposure”) on bright sources
- 2. Smaller aperture ⇒ larger field of view
(generally)
– Determined by “F ratio” or “F#”
f = focal length of collecting element D = diameter of aperture
F f D #≡
32
F Ratio: F# F Ratio: F#
- F# describes the ability of the optic to
“deflect” or “focus” light
– Smaller F# ⇒ optic “deflects” light more than system with larger F#
Small F# Large F#
33
F# of Large Telescopes F# of Large Telescopes
- Hale 200" on Palomar: f/3.3
– focal length of primary mirror is: 3.3 × 200" = 660" = 55' ≅ 16.8 m – Dome must be large enough to enclose
- Keck 10-m on Mauna Kea: f/1.75
– focal length of primary mirror is: 1.75 × 10m = 17.5 m ≅ 58 m
34
F Ratio: F# F Ratio: F#
- Two reflecting telescopes with different F#
and same detector have different “Fields of View”:
Small F# Large F# large ∆θ small ∆θ
35
Sensors (Link #4) Sensors (Link #4)
36
Astronomical Cameras Astronomical Cameras Usually Include: Usually Include:
1. Spectral Filters
– most experiments require specific wavelength range(s) – broad-band or narrow-band
2. “Reimaging” Optics
– enlarge or reduce image formed by primary collecting element
3. Light-Sensitive Detector: Sensor
37
Astronomical Sensors Astronomical Sensors
- Most common detectors:
– Human Eye – Photographic Emulsion
- film
- plates
– Electronic Sensors
- CCDs
38
Angular Resolution Angular Resolution
- Fundamental Limit due to Diffraction in
“Optical Collector” (Link #3)
- But Also Limited by Resolution of Sensor!
∆θ λ ≅ D
39
Charge Charge-
- Coupled Devices (
Coupled Devices (CCDs CCDs) )
- Standard light detection medium for BOTH professional and
amateur astronomical imaging systems
– Significant decrease in price
- numerous advantages over film:
– high quantum efficiency (QE)
- meaning most of the photons incident on CCD are “counted”
– linear response
- measured signal is proportional to number of photons collected
– fast processing turnaround (CCD readout speeds ~1 sec)
- NO development of emulsion!
– regular grid of sensor elements (pixels)
- as opposed to random distribution of AgX grains
– image delivered in computer-ready form
40
Sensor Resolution Sensor Resolution
- Obvious for Electronic Sensors (e.g.,
CCDs)
∆x
- Elements have finite size
- Light is summed over area
- f sensor element (“integrated”)
- Light from two stars that falls on
same element is added together
- stars cannot be distinguished
in image!
41
Same Effect in Photographic Same Effect in Photographic Emulsions Emulsions
- More difficult to quantify
- Light-sensitive “grains” of silver
halide in the emulsion
- Placed “randomly” in emulsion
- “Random” sizes
- “large” grains are more sensitive
- (respond to few photons)
- “small” grains produce better
resolution
42
Photographic techniques: Photographic techniques: silver halide silver halide
- Film
– Emulsion on “flexible” substrate – Still used by amateurs using sensitive film
- B&W and color
- Special treatment to increase sensitivity
- Photographic Plates
– Emulsion on glass plates – Most common detector from earliest development
- f AgX techniques until CCDs in late 70’s
43
Eye as Astronomical Detector Eye as Astronomical Detector
- Eye includes its own lens
– focuses light on retina ( “sensor”)
- When used with a telescope, must add yet
another lens
– redirect rays from primary optic – make them parallel (“collimated”)
- rays appear to come from “infinity” (infinite distance
away)
– reimaging is performed by “eyepiece”
44
Eye with Telescope Eye with Telescope
Without Eyepiece With Eyepiece Light entering eye is “collimated”
45
Eye as Astronomical Detector Eye as Astronomical Detector
- Point sources (stars) appear brighter to eye through
telescope
- Factor is
– D is telescope diameter – P is diameter of eye pupil – Magnification should make light fill the eye pupil (“exit pupil”)
- Extended sources (for example, nebulae) do not
appear brighter through a telescope
– Gain in light gathering power exactly compensated by image magnification, spreads light out over larger angle.
2 2
D P
46
Atmospheric Effects on Image Atmospheric Effects on Image
- Large role in ground-based optical astronomy
– scintillation modifies source angular size
- twinkling of stars = “smearing” of point sources
– extinction reduces light intensity
- atmosphere scatters a small amount of light, especially at
short (bluer) wavelengths
- water vapor blocks specific wavelengths, especially near-
IR
– scattered light produces interfering “background”
- astronomical images are never limited to light from
source alone; always include “source” + “background sky”
- “light pollution” worsens sky background
47
Scattering Scattering
- “Wavelength Dependent”
– Depends on color of light – Long wavelengths are scattered “less”
48
Scattering by Molecules Scattering by Molecules
- Molecules are SMALL
- “Blue” light is scattered MUCH more than
red light
– Reason for BOTH
- blue sky (blue light scattered from sun in all
directions)
- red sunset (blue light is scattered out of the sun’s
direct rays)
4
1 "Rayleigh Scattering" λ ∝
49
Scattering by Dust Scattering by Dust
- Dust particles are MUCH larger than
molecules
– e.g., from volcanos, dust storms
- Blue light is scattered by dust “somewhat
more” than red light
1 "Mie Scattering" λ ∝
50
Link #5: Image Processing Link #5: Image Processing
51
Link #5: Image Processing Link #5: Image Processing
- Formerly: performed in darkroom
– e.g., David Malin’s “Unsharp Masking”
- Subtract a blurred copy from a “sharp” positive
- (or, add a blurred negative to a “sharp” positive)
- Now performed in computers, e.g.,
– contrast enhancement – “sharpening” – “normalization” (background division) – …
52
Image Processing Image Processing
- Once collected, images must be corrected for:
– Atmosphere (to extent possible)
- e.g., sequence of images obtained at a variety of telescope
elevations usually can be corrected for atmospheric extinction
– CCD defects and artifacts
- dark current
– CCD pixel reports a signal even when not exposed to light
- bad pixels
– some pixels will be dead, hot, or even “flickering”
- variations in pixel-to-pixel sensitivity
– every pixel has its own QE – can be characterized by “flat field”
53
Links #6 and #7 Links #6 and #7 Image Display and Analysis Image Display and Analysis
54
Image Display and Analysis Image Display and Analysis
- This step often is where astronomy really begins.
- Type and extent of display and analysis depends on
purpose of imaging experiment
- Common examples:
– evaluating whether an object has been detected or not – determining total CCD signal (counts) for an object, such as a star – determining relative intensities of an object from images at two different wavelengths – determining relative sizes of an extended object from images at two different wavelengths
55
Link #8: Storage Link #8: Storage
56
Storage Storage
- Glass plates
– Lots of climate-controlled storage space – expensive – available to one user at a time – now being “digitized” (scanned), as in the archive you use with DS9
- Digital Images