The Holden Beach Environmental Impact Statement Geoff Gisler April - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the holden beach environmental impact statement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Holden Beach Environmental Impact Statement Geoff Gisler April - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Holden Beach Environmental Impact Statement Geoff Gisler April 29, 2016 National Environmental Policy Act Why? o Public disclosure o Inform decision makers o To comply with other laws How? o Assess environmental baseline o


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Holden Beach Environmental Impact Statement

Geoff Gisler April 29, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

National Environmental Policy Act

  • Why?
  • Public disclosure
  • Inform decision makers
  • To comply with other laws
  • How?
  • Assess environmental baseline
  • Compare effect of various alternatives
  • Environmental effects
  • Economic effects
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

  • Modeled change in shoreline over 4 years
  • Evaluated 6 alternatives:
  • Alternative 1: No Action/Status Quo
  • Alternative 2: Relocation/Retreat
  • Alternative 3: Beach Nourishment
  • Alternative 4: Nourishment and Inlet Management
  • Alternative 5: Short Groin with Nourishment
  • Alternative 6: Intermediate Groin with Nourishment
slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Issue: Chronic Erosion

“T he purpo se o f the Ho lde n Be a c h E a st E nd Sho re Pro te c tio n Pro je c t (Pro po se d Ac tio n) is to re duc e o r mitig a te o ng o ing a nd c hro nic e ro sio n a t the E a st E nd

  • f Ho lde n Be a c h a nd to pro te c t a nd se c ure pub lic

infra struc ture , ro a ds, ho me s, b usine sse s, re nta l pro pe rtie s, b e a c he s, re c re a tio na l a sse ts, a nd pro te c tive dune s.”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Issue: East End Erosion

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Issue: East End Erosion

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Narrowing The Issue

None of the alternatives protect every house.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Narrowing The Issue

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Issue: By the Numbers

  • Parcels affected:
  • Alt. 2: 28 total, 19 improved
  • Alt. 6: 16 total, 11 improved
  • Assessed value:
  • Alt. 2: $5.18M
  • Alt. 6: $2.1M
  • Cost:
  • Alt. 2: $0
  • Alt. 6: $34.43M
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Will A Groin Reduce Beach Nourishment Needs?

  • DEIS only evaluated East End: east of station 40+00.
  • Since 2001: less than 40,000 cy/yr on average (including

post-Hanna nourishment)

  • Alternative 6 (terminal groin): 150,000 cy every four

years (~37,500 cy/year).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Will A Groin Protect the Beach?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions

  • The EIS relies on a model that overestimates erosion and

is limited to only four years.

  • If we assume the EIS modeling is correct, building a

terminal groin will only provide limited protection to five or six houses—no alternative will protect every house.

  • The proposed terminal groin will not significantly

reduce beach nourishment requirements or maintain a recreational beach in front of East End houses.