THE GRASS INITIATIVE A PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO PROMOTE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the grass initiative
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

THE GRASS INITIATIVE A PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO PROMOTE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE GLOBAL RATING & ASSESSMENT SERVICE: THE GRASS INITIATIVE A PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO PROMOTE RATINGS AND TRANSPARENCY IN MICROFINANCE TRANSPARENCY IN MICROFINANCE Presented by ADA, SDC, MIL, ResponsAbility 1 European


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THE GLOBAL RATING & ASSESSMENT SERVICE:

THE GRASS INITIATIVE

A PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO PROMOTE RATINGS AND TRANSPARENCY IN MICROFINANCE TRANSPARENCY IN MICROFINANCE

Presented by ADA, SDC, MIL, ResponsAbility European Microfinance Week 12-14th of November 2008

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CURRENT RATING MARKET OVERVIEW

Source: Rating Market Outlook Report 2008 ADA KPMG Source: Rating Market Outlook Report 2008, ADA-KPMG

250 200 LAC 100 150 LAC Asia EECA SS Africa 50 MENA

  • In 2007, a total of 539 ratings took place (with 19 social ratings). Since 1997,

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

, g p ( g ) , 1003 MFI have been rated

  • The rating market grew at a rate of 19% in 2007 and 32% per year since 2003
  • LAC and Asia represent 78% of the rating market meaning EECA, SS

2

p g g , Africa and specially MENA are underpenetrated regions with only 22% of the market

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CURRENT RATING MARKET OVERVIEW

  • Asia represents 35% of the rating market but within

Asia, India and Indonesia account for 87% of ratings and all the other countries for only 13%, meaning these countries are also underserved markets This enable us to conclude GRASS has to focus its support on underserved regions and markets

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

WHY CONTINUE TO CO-FUND RATINGS ?

For Financial ratings

1)

Give newcomer MFIs the opportunity to experience first hand the benefits that ratings and transparency bring

)

H l t id th i l ti b bli

2)

Help to avoid these regional rating gaps by enabling MFIs, especially young and small, to overcome the initial cost barrier

3)

Address the lack of available transparent information on MFIs by helping more institutions to enter the market

For social ratings: support the establishment of a

social rating market for MFIs and drive in the long term to social rating market for MFIs, and drive in the long term to the double bottom line, a cost-efficient way to rate.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CO-FUNDING RATINGS

In order to best respond to these issues, ADA decided to launch a joint the GRASS Initiative decided to launch a joint the GRASS Initiative which :

1) Create a facility made up of a public-private

partnership. p p

2) Co-fund a first or second rating, be it a financial

rating (credit risk/Performance/mini/diagnostic etc.) for small to medium MFIs, and /or a social rating rating.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OBJECTIVES

Objective 1: Promote and contribute to the

j establishment of a financially viable, sustainable microfinance rating market both from the demand and supply side in underserved demand and supply side in underserved regions or markets.

Objective 2: Address in the long term the lack of

available, transparent information on MFIs for i t d i fi t k h ld t investors, donors, microfinance stakeholders etc. and for the MFIs themselves.

Objective 3: Ensure the availability of market

studies on the microfinance rating sector in

6

general.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MAIN FEATURES

Duration: 4 years Duration: 4 years Aim: To encourage at least 800 new MFIs to have entered

the rating process around the globe within this time frame the rating process around the globe within this time frame

3 types of activities:

A rating subsidy service (for financial ratings and/or

social ratings)

Awareness-raising (with a distributed regional focus) Rating market information and studies (Rating

Market Outlook report/ compilation of feedback from rated MFIs etc.)

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Governance and Administration

The Steering Committee :

I d f i f bli d i t t k h ld

  • Is composed of a mix of public and private stakeholders
  • nominated by the initial funding institutions
  • Exercise governance of the initiative and take strategic decisions
  • Meet twice a year

Advisory Boards (for financial and social rating): Advisory Boards (for financial and social rating):

  • Actors concerned : members of the Social Performance Task

Force, MFIs, rating agencies, Investors, etc.)

  • These groups should meet twice a year to give the steering

committee recommendations on elements such as products, criteria for eligible MFIs and rating agencies.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Governance and Administration… Governance and Administration…

Administration will be undertaken by ADA as it

Is launching the GRASS initiative with a

commitment of funding

Has extensive experience in managing subsidy

funds and a long-term involvement in the topic of microfinance ratings Since 2004 ADA microfinance ratings. Since 2004, ADA

Has dealt with over 250 grant allocations to MFIs Has disbursed over US$1.9 million in grants

Has disbursed over US$1.9 million in grants

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SOME OF THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Financial ratings :

  • Total assets between min €150,000 and max €10 million

,

  • Average loan size of less than € 3,200 (or 30% of its portfolio

dedicated to microfinance loans of less than € 3,200)

  • The programme will co-fund 70% of a first rating and 50%

p g f f f g

  • f a second with imposed ceilings of €8,000 and €6,000

respectively

  • All regions are eligible except Latin America (IADB

g g p ( project) with a specific focus on Africa with 50% of GRASS’ activities

Social ratings:

  • Eligibility criteria for social ratings were defined in

collaboration with the Social Performance Task Force.

  • All regions are eligible

10 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LESSONS LEARNED

According to feedback collected since 2005 from MFIs

that used co-funding from the Rating Fund (342):

83.2% of MFIs used RF co-funding for their first or

second rating second rating

97.2% said they would repeat the rating exercise Of these MFIs:

54.6% said they would update their 1st rating

without any financial support from the Rating Fund Fund

73% said they would update their 2nd rating

without the financial support from the Rating F d Fund

This enabled us to conclude that offering 2 rounds of co-

11

This enabled us to conclude, that offering 2 rounds of co- funding is sufficient for the MFI to understand the benefits

  • f regular ratings as well as the rating process itself.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BUDGET

Total estimated initial budget :

  • Around € 3 5 million for the 4 year period
  • Around € 3.5 million for the 4 year period
  • Of this total budget:
  • €2,520,000 will be dedicated to co finance ratings

, , g

  • €80,000 for awareness-raising activities
  • €180,000 for website and production of market information

B d th f di f i i f 70 ti g

  • Based on the co-funding of a minimum of 70 ratings per

year (includes both social and financial ratings).

  • The Luxembourg Cooperation through ADA will

The Luxembourg Cooperation through ADA will contribute €1,000,000 to the initiative over the 4 year period and will cover 96% of the total administration fees.

  • 96% of all funding from other stakeholders will go

directly into funding the initiative’s activities. The remaining 4% will go towards covering a small part of

12

g g g p administrational costs.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

HOW TO APPLY ? HOW TO APPLY ?

A MFI i t t d i fi i l d/ Any MFI interested in a financial and/or social rating should contact by mail or phone: by mail or phone: David QUIEN David QUIEN Manager of the Program- ADA Mail: David.ada@microfinance.lu Tel: 00 352 45 68 68 24

Further information on GRASS can be found at : www.microfinance.lu

13 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

INVOLVED PARTNERS MET THROUGH MFP eMFP

GRASS had its first steering Committee in September 2008. g p To date, its formal members are the following institutions:

  • Luxembourg Development Cooperation

Luxembourg Development Cooperation

  • Swiss Development Cooperation
  • The Microfinance Initiative Liechtenstein

ResponsAbility

  • ResponsAbility

But Other public or private institutions are still welcome to But Other public or private institutions are still welcome to join the GRASS Initiative Do not hesitate to talk to us

David QUIEN M f h GRASS I i i i 14 Manager of the GRASS Initiative ADA 14