The Gervais Model A recommendation by the Gervais Middle School - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the gervais model
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Gervais Model A recommendation by the Gervais Middle School - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Gervais Model A recommendation by the Gervais Middle School Site Council The Gervais Model Three years ago our Site Council began working on school improvement. After serious and lengthy discussion and review of our processes we


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Gervais Model

  • A recommendation by the Gervais Middle

School Site Council

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Gervais Model

Three years ago our Site Council began working on school improvement. After serious and lengthy discussion and review of our processes we concluded that we needed to focus on two areas if we were to truly grow:

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • We needed to change our instructional

model because our current model was not helping our students make AYP

  • We needed to improve our climate by

building relationships.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Our demographic is about:

  • 40% migrant children,
  • 14% Russian Old Believer,
  • 73% low SES,
  • and 50% students of mobility. (Students who come to us

having been to three or more schools)

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • These students need strong

relationships to thrive academically and socially.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

We began a long process of research and reflection. We visited other schools and looked at their programs and models. We talked with other Site Council members and principals around the state.

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Ultimately we found the model

that best fits our goals

slide-8
SLIDE 8

One of the Principals we talked to was Dr. Randy Trani of

  • Corbett. His Middle School is rated as one of the 8 best

middle schools in the entire country. These are the 5 key features of his instructional model, features we recommend adapting to become the Gervais model;

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Morning Meeting
  • Integrated thematic instruction
  • Multi-grade classrooms
  • Common teacher preps
  • Continuous progress model of grading
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Morning Meeting

  • A short full school meeting at the start of

each day.

  • Purpose: announcements, awards instead
  • f at assemblies, communication of

expectations.

  • Goal: building community relationships
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Integrated thematic instruction

  • Exploring a theme, such as the Columbia Gorge,

through science, social studies, math and reading.

  • Purpose: develop in depth content knowledge

and cognitive skills through instructional rigor at appropriate learning levels. Facilitate teacher interaction and cooperation.

  • Goal: Increase student knowledge, while

building common student activities. One major topic which the entire student body explores.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Multi-grade classrooms

  • Students of more than one grade in a classroom.

(We do this already in reading 5/6, Enrichment and ELD 5/6 and social studies 7/8.) Students will remain with the same teacher for more than

  • ne year.
  • Purpose: allows peer mentoring, building long

term relationships with both teachers and other students

  • Goal: Long term relationships and trust.

Improved teacher knowledge of student abilities.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Common teacher preps

  • Teachers have simultaneous prep periods
  • Purpose: Improved communication in

teacher teams because teachers have common time to share knowledge about instruction and students.

  • Goal: Stronger instructional model through

peer development of instructional units.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Continuous progress model of grading

  • Evaluating students on their progress in

learning rather than “grading” them.

  • Purpose: Provide teachers and parents

with a more detailed picture of student growth through narrative documentation.

  • Goal: A better understanding of a

student’s overall growth rather than a “snapshot” grade.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The Gervais Model:

The plan for next year as proposed by the GMS Staff

  • Morning Meeting: Incorporate into next

year’s schedule. Begin a “before school” version in May.

  • Implementation: During spring “practice”

invite parents to observe and comment.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Integrated thematic instruction

  • Adopt building wide next year, with a year of

training and support (through School Improvement Funds for Professional development) from Simon Fraser University’s Dr. Kieran Egan and the IERG (Imagination in Education Research Group)

  • Two days of training to happen in May after

OAKS is completed.

  • Parent information newsletter.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Multi-age classrooms

  • We already do this in 5th and 6th grade

reading groups, ELD and Enrichment and 7th and 8th Social Studies. We would extend it to all classes.

  • The plan would be 5/6 and 7/8 mixtures

allowing students to spend two full years with a teacher.

  • Parent information newsletter.
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Common teacher preps

  • This is currently restricted by the schedule.

Next year 3 or 4 teachers at a time can be scheduled for common prep at a time. Prototype schedule already exists.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Continuous progress model of grading

  • The new grading system limits the

implementation of this. Teachers can write a short narrative in the grading program, but translation to Spanish is

  • unavailable. We will begin the narrative

process with core subjects to the extent we are able. Students still receive a letter grade.

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Prior to adoption of this proposal all

certified staff visited Corbett to see the model in progress. Several classified members did as well.

  • The staff vote for the adoption was as

follows.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

48% 36% 8% 8% Very Supportive Supportive Somewhat Supportive Need More Information

100% 25 Totals 8% 2 Need More Information 8% 2 Somewhat Supportive 36% 9 Supportive 48% 12 Very Supportive Responses 1.) I am willing to support and implement a daily morning meeting for students and staff.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

100% 24 Totals 20.83 % 5 Need More Information 25% 6 Somewhat Supportive 20.83 % 5 Supportive 33.33 % 8 Very Supportive Responses 2.) I support a multi-age classroom model.

33.30% 20.80% 25% 20.80% Very Supportive Supportive Somewhat Supportive Need More Information

slide-23
SLIDE 23

100% 24 Totals 8.33 % 2 None of These 4.17 % 1 5,6,7,8 12.50 % 3 5/6/7, 6/7/8 75% 18 5/6, 7/8 Responses 3.) What is the multi-age model for students that I would support next year?

75% 12.50% 4.20% 8.30% 5/6, 7/8 5/6/7, 6/7/8 5,6,7,8 None of These

slide-24
SLIDE 24

100% 25 Totals 20% 5 Need More Information 16% 4 Somewhat Supportive 12% 3 Supportive 52% 13 Very Supportive Responses 4.) I will need on-going staff development to implement the integrated-thematic instructional model.

52% 12% 16% 20% Very Supportive Supportive Somewhat Supportive Need More Information

slide-25
SLIDE 25

100% 24 Totals 16.67 % 4 Need More Information 12.50 % 3 Somewhat Supportive 54.17 % 13 Supportive 16.67 % 4 Very Supportive Responses 5.) I believe that GMS is on the right track for creating a great school focused on success.

16.70% 54.20% 12.50% 16.70% Very Supportive Supportive Somewhat Supportive Need More Information

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • We see these changes as having the

ability to significantly and positively impact student success, both academically and socially.

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • All five points of the model are supported by research

which indicates that:

  • multi-grade classrooms
  • and thematic instruction,
  • with consolidated teacher prep time to support it,
  • produce a rich environment
  • which builds teacher- student and student-student

relationships

  • in the process of improving academic excellence.
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Questions?