The connection (?) between school spending and effectiveness 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Jan 27, 2023 148 likes •265 views

The connection (?) between school spending and effectiveness 1 Silicon Schools Five Year Goal (in 2012) 25 $25 5 schools million years 2 Where we are now 25 $25 5 schools million years 30 $26.5 4 schools million years 3 How

SLIDE 1

The connection (?) between school spending and effectiveness

SLIDE 2

Silicon Schools Five Year Goal (in 2012)

25

schools

$25

million

5

years

SLIDE 3

25

schools

$25

million

5

years

30

schools

$26.5

million

4

years

Where we are now

SLIDE 4

SLIDE 5

How many students met or exceeded state standards? (SBAC 2015.16)

Reading

California State average

49%

California State average

37%

Silicon Schools average Silicon Schools average

59% 48%

Math

SLIDE 6

How many economically disadvantaged students met or exceeded state standards? (SBAC 2015-16)

California State Average (econ dis)

Reading

California State Average (econ dis)

Math

35% 23%

Silicon Schools (econ dis) Silicon Schools (econ dis)

49% 38%

Overall California State avg. Overall California State avg.

49% 37%

SLIDE 7

40

schools

$40

million

5

years

Where we are going

SLIDE 8

Average cost of ~$10,000 per student across portfolio

6,270 2,161 995 Per student cost

2,000

4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

Technology Central office Facilities Othwe Staffing

$10,178

Portfolio range

SLIDE 9

One of the least expensive models in our portfolio the highest performing

Top Palo Alto E.S. Hollister Prep

2015.16 SBAC performance

ELA Math 81% 85% 86% 76%

Top Palo Alto E.S. Hollister Prep

Cost per student (2015.16)

$s per student $14,700 $9,170

Piedmont Middle School Hollister Prep

SLIDE 10

Costs per student in our portfolio is increasing with new California budgeting approach (LCFF)

2,000

4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Per student (2012-14) Per student (2015 - )

Technology Central office Facilities Other Staffing

$1,500 in increased

spending over last few years

75% of that

increase going to staffing

11% to facilities

Cost per student ($s)

SLIDE 11

The relationship between spending on staffing and state assessment results in our portfolio

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500

% proficient in ELA (2015.16) $s spent on staffing per student

= School in the Silicon Schools Portfolio