the artificial physicist
play

The Artificial Physicist or fully automatic modeling with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist or fully automatic modeling with statistical learning Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar Project INRIA Workshop on Statistical Learning IHP 05/12/2011 Guillaume Charpiat


  1. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist or fully automatic modeling with statistical learning Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar Project INRIA Workshop on Statistical Learning IHP 05/12/2011 Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  2. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Statistical Learning ◮ Learning what ? What for ? In which scope ? ◮ Most often : predefined models , estimation of parameters ◮ Range of models thus learnable ? → Model selection : within a family (idem : meta-parameters) ֒ ◮ How to learn the model itself ? the algorithms ? Creativity ? ◮ Flexibility, expressivity, evolvability ? → Expressivity : of classifiers [Vapnik], of languages... ֒ → Evolvability [Valiant] : what is learnable ? evolutionary (genetic) algo. ֒ ◮ Genuine AI : No absolute prior model (everything questionable) → No restriction (could discover any kind of new model) ֒ → Be creative : expressivity = useless if no way to propose new models ֒ → Strategies for exploration (to find new models) ֒ Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  3. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist ◮ Aim : to model the world → fully unsupervisedly (surprise us !) ֒ ◮ Which world ? Which scale ? → Physics : quantum mech. / Newtonian mech. / relativity ֒ → Chemistry : molecular / material science ֒ → Daily life : constant gravity / solid mech. / heuristics... ֒ ◮ Which criterion ? to assert whether a model is good → Compactness : Kolmogorov complexity, min. descr. length ֒ → Time complexity : crucial and better-posed (computable) : ֒ time needed to detect / recognize / use / apply → All parts in a model should be justified /optimized : ֒ a concept makes sense only with fast recognition/appl. methods → Hierarchical models : intuitive... but justification ? ֒ Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  4. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist (... bis...) ◮ What ? (data observed) → Emergence of patterns at a given scale ? ֒ → Recurrent patterns : ֒ → self-organization → self-replication (life, etc.) → Statistical relevance : frequency, correlations... ֒ ◮ How ? → No restriction to predefined (meta-)models ֒ → Be sure the span of algorithms (models) reachable is not limited ֒ → requires a new way of programming → Stochastic search ? ֒ → not necessarily : e.g. exhaustive deterministic search → not just stochastics : need good laws ( strategies ) → algorithms/models preferred to be reachable first ? → Levin’s measure : 2 − Kolmog ( algo ) → time expectancy before finding suitable model ? → no free lunch ? → Related to : Efficient ways to explore ... mathematics ? to prove ֒ theorems ? to do research as a community ? (or no free lunch !?) Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  5. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist (... ter) ◮ How many suitable models ? → Structure from chaos : ֒ in a randomly-chosen world, given a scale where processes seem to be chaotic, what is the probability to find another scale and an arbitrarily-simple model that fits approximately arbitrarily-well the phenomena ? → i.e. probability of emergence of approximate structure ֒ or, equivalently, of existence of suitable approximate models Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  6. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  7. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World laws of physics interface neural net (e.g.) Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  8. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World sensor Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  9. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World sensor actor Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  10. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World tool sensor actor Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  11. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World tool Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  12. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  13. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Brain ◮ Ergo-systems [Gromov] : structure of the brain ↔ structures in the world understandable by the brain → hence list all mathematical structures, to get clues on a mathematician’s ֒ brain → cf. also M. Galtier’s PhD (NeuroMathComp) ֒ ◮ Expressive power of the brain should be sufficient → approximate Turing machine , provided stability and basic computations ֒ possible → independent of the materials ? of the universe structure/laws ? → cf. game theory : ant colonies, Conway’s game of life : expressivity = ֒ Turing but low efficiency/representation Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  14. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Sensors ◮ In classical machine learning : kernels methods : equivalence choice of the features ↔ choice of the kernel ◮ But here : sensors and brain are of different nature ! (materials, physics...) : no equivalence choice of sensors ↔ choice of information retrieval algorithm ◮ New sensors ? Need actors. Sensor World Brain Any Brain−type Sensor−type material material (neural net) materials feature learning algo. Input Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  15. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Tools ◮ to operate better or to make new sensors, i.e. for new scales/modalities in action/sensing. Think of Human Kind without technology. ◮ by exploiting physical properties of the (external) world ◮ require experiments (to discover these properties) ◮ require analysis & modeling by the brain ◮ Note : tool can be an external brain (with different materials & properties) Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  16. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Discussion ◮ follows. Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend