The 6th Regional Coordinators Meeting
April 23 - 25, 2012
Paris
The 6 th Regional Coordinators Meeting April 23 - 25, 2012 Paris - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The 6 th Regional Coordinators Meeting April 23 - 25, 2012 Paris Opening Remarks Welcome by OECD 2 Meeting Sessions I. Meeting Objectives and Global Status Report Regional Status Reports II. III. Metadata and Quality Questionnaires IV.
Paris
2
3
Overall Objective Specific Objectives Governance decisions from EB meetings Report to the Executive Board Status of Main Survey (HHC Data) Submission Status of National Account Data Submission Global Validation Potential Risks Global Office Activities – Q1, 2012 Upcoming Governance Meeting & Reporting
4
Complete the current ICP round timely and successfully, at both regional and global level Meet the Executive Board demands related to the soundness of the proposed computation and linking methods, as well as the reliability and quality of input data and ensuing results
5
generated by the regions and the Global Office, in a timely fashion, in accordance with the prescribed quality requirements: ICP Coverage: country coverage; regional participation; survey coverage. Prices: completeness; frequency; time and space consistency; comparability; level of disaggregation; etc. National Accounts: SNA compliance; exhaustiveness; consistency; metadata reporting; etc Importance indicators: relevance; consistency; reliability; completeness.
schedule as well as subsequent activities.
all the countries pricing Global Core items for all possible basic headings.
6
HHC Average Price Data Compiling HHC Data Validation Special Survey Average Price Data Compiling Special Survey Data Validation Consistency of National Accounts Aggregates and Expenditures used in the two regional programs
7
TAG and GO to carefully examine issues related to the concept of importance and the extra-pricing of GCL items by a particular country. TAG to carry out a sequence of tests on the translation of importance into quantitative weights. GO to update the Board on any potential risk situations, and stabilize the number of participating economies.
Status and Risk Assessment
RCs to improve punctuality in data submission so that the 2011 round can proceed according to the planned timeline, without sacrificing data quality.
Technical Aspects Outreach Activities and Data Access
GO to prepare a 1-2 page foreword providing a layman definition of PPP and a brief review of the major uses of ICP statistics. GO and TAG to test thoroughly the computation processes . Countries to explain their GDP splitting procedures and provide the sources of the data along with any underlying assumptions applied, extrapolation and calculation methods. Board to explore outreach activities related to PPP results usage in its next meeting in order to prepare a comprehensive communication strategy. OECD and CIS-STAT to communicate with their countries on the potential access to regional non- Core average price data. Board tentatively approved revised 2011 Data Access Policy, except on the access to regional non-Core average prices, which will be further discussed.
8
TAG and GO to carefully examine issues related to the concept of importance and the extra-pricing of GCL items by a particular country. TAG to carry out a sequence of tests on the translation of importance into quantitative weights. GO to update the Board on any potential risk situations, and stabilize the number of participating economies.
RCs to improve punctuality in data submission so that the 2011 round can proceed according to the planned timeline, without sacrificing data quality.
GO and TAG to test thoroughly the computation processes. Countries to explain their GDP splitting procedures and provide the sources of the data along with any underlying assumptions applied, extrapolation and calculation methods.
The feasibility of the linking approach Availability of required data and metadata Timeliness of submission Testing Analysis of plausibility of results The quantification
indicators The impact of countries in a region pricing more or less Global core items than most
Reliability and completeness of importance indicators Testing Recommendations of formula and resulting weights to be used Risk assessment
Feasibility Quality Timeliness Access Linking
√ √
Regional results
√ √ √
Global results
√ √
9
Africa Asia - Pacific CIS LAC WA
46 22 N/A 17 8
ICP
94
CAR PAC Sin.
… … 1
Q1
47 22 10 18 8 106 … … 1
Data Submitted
43 23 N/A 17 10 94 … … 1
Q2
48 23 10 18 10 110 … … 1
Survey Conducted Data Submitted
22 23 N/A 16 9 71 … … 1
Q3
48 23 10 18 11 112 … … 2
Survey Conducted Data Submitted
9 N/A N/A N/A 2 11 … … N/A
Q4
48 23 10 N/A 11 94 … … 2
Survey Conducted Data Submitted
OECD- ESTAT
N/A 47 N/A 47 N/A 47 N/A 47
(Dual Part.)
N/A
N/A
Grand Total
92 150 92 154 71 158 11 140
Survey Conducted Participation
23 50 10 18 12 154 21 18 2 47
197 10
Asia Africa CIS LAC WA ICP Region Total Caribbean Pacific Isl. Singleton
MORES format … … 8 12 9 30 … … 1 Other format 12 48 … … … 60 … … …
11 OECD-Eurostat
... 46
Grand Total
30 106
Review of data and metadata received by the Global Office and the VEG in terms
12
Timeliness of data and metadata from regions No Submission of particular type of data and metadata by a region Low coverage of non-reference PPP basic headings Low number of GCL items per basic heading No GCL items under a basic heading Single GCP price quotations Coverage Any schedule slippage will have adverse effect on the publication of global and regional PPPs as for Global core items, Global validation depends on regional validation and vice versa. Poor National Accounts metadata reporting
13
Regional Workshops Mission to Countries Regional Meetings Bilateral Meetings
Asia-Pacific Region Data Review Workshop organized by ADB (Siem Reap, Cambodia, March 19-30) 5th Western Asia ICP Regional Workshop organized by UN-ESCWA (Dead Sea, Jordan, March 12-15) EGM on Price Statistics and National Accounts organized by UN- ECLAC for CARICOM, CARTAC and ECCB (St. Kitts, March 26-30) 5th mission of the bilateral comparison between Armenia and Georgia for ICP 2011 (Tbilisi, Georgia, February 20-23) Western Asia Regional Executive Board Meeting (New York, February 27) ICP side meeting to review the status of ICP 2011 Round in the Caribbean (New York, February 29) GO-AfDB (Tunis, Tunisia, March 5-9) GO-ESCWA (Dead Sea, Jordan, March 16-17)
Governance Meeting
ICP Executive Board Meeting (New York, February 27)
14
Reports Meetings TAG Meeting (September 17-18, 2012) RC Meeting (September 19-21, 2012) VEG Meeting (September 21, 2012) ICP Executive Board Meeting (November 2012) Interim Progress Report to the EB (July 2012) Report to the 44th session of the UNSC (November 2012)
15
Status of data collection, submission, and validation for the main survey Status of data collection submission, and validation for the special surveys Status of submission of NA data and metadata Comments and feedback from countries on operational aspects Upcoming regional events
16
ICP Survey Framework Questionnaire NA Supplemental Quality Assurance Questionnaire ICP Quality Assurance Checklists
17
Objectives Demand- driven Demand from Executive Board for more metadata on geographical coverage Demand from TAG for systematic recording of country coverage, especially urban/rural Demand from users of PPP data for better metadata to accompany data releases Collect information on the Main Price Survey framework including population by region, outlets selected, product items priced, and data collection periods. Examine exhaustiveness and reliability of collected price data. Use information in reviewing the quality of the survey as well as for data validation and computation purposes. Structure Country name and comments
Example Annex 1 Annex 2 Annex 3
18
Uses Background With more detailed technical questions, this questionnaire is meant to help national accountants identify specific SNA compliance issues. It may or may not be relevant to other regions, depending on the status of implementation of SNA in the regions in question. Structure Instructions Questionnaire (33 questions) Proposed and used by Asia-Pacific. This questionnaire is designed to supplement, not replace, the National Accounts Quality Assurance Questionnaire, which was already circulated to the Regional Coordinators.
19
A framework for assessing the quality of the ICP. This framework will constitute a structured tool to
evaluate the quality of:
ICP processes in countries, regional
Office ICP data, including input data, intermediary data and output data
ICP Quality Assurance Framework Objectives ICP-QAF checklists
A set of questionnaires to help collect the information
required to evaluate the ICP based on the ICP-QAF framework.
Three sets of questionnaires: National implementing agency Regional coordinating agency ICP Global Office
20
Structure
Prerequisites of quality: review of the legal and institutional environment
Integrity
Methodological soundness
Serviceability
Accessibility Five dimensions
Format
21
Instructions page
Available in 4 languages: English, French, Spanish, and Arabic
Construction Machinery and Equipment Water
22
OVERVIEW
Construction PPPs
Description of process to calculate the PPPs Item trees Codes
VALIDATION
Suggested process for intra and inter-country validation Steps and checks to be carried out Additional information for validation Initial Resource Mixes
The method for calculating construction PPPs and initial results of the survey will be further discussed at the forthcoming TAG meeting in September
23
Materials Sub-Heading: 38 material inputs Equipment Sub-Heading: 5 types of equipment hire services Labor Sub-Heading: 7 categories of construction labor
Establishment of Sub-Headings; selection of important items for each BH (Residential and Non-residential buildings and Civil engineering works) per country
Sub-Headings to be treated as “Basic Headings” PPPs to be calculated using CPD
Calculation of Sub-Heading PPPs
24
Establishment of Sub-Heading Weights
Actual Levels Considered as Aggregate or BH Nominal Expenditure (LCU) RM Shares RM weighted Nominal Expenditure (LCU) Aggregate Aggregate level GFCF 120 Category Aggregate level CONSTRUCTION 70 Group Aggregate level RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 18 Class Aggregate level Residential buildings 18 BH Aggregate level Residential buildings Sub-Heading Basic Heading Materials 70% 12.6 Sub-Heading Basic Heading Equipment 5% 0.9 Sub-Heading Basic Heading Labor 25% 4.5
25
Using the established Sub-Headings weights, the Sub-Heading PPPs can be aggregated to BH, Class, Group and finally up to the level of Construction Category, using the selected aggregation method (EKS, GK, Iklé)
Aggregation of PPPs
Adjustment for productivity can be done by applying factors based on specific capital and productivity levels of a country The work on the productivity adjustment in the 2011 ICP round is still
September
Adjustment for Productivity
26
Equivalent materials Unit of measurement and dimensions
Prices
INTER country validation
RCs together with NCs, check the completeness and correctness of the data submission and conduct validation of price and metadata across countries Initial Data Validation Importance Other information Completeness NCs together with national construction experts verify completeness and correctness of the information collected during the survey Validation of price data using Validation Tables Importance Resource Mixes Construction PPPs Approximate Project Prices
There is a need to split selected Machinery and Equipment Goods items Unspecified items will be categorized to identify comparable brands and models The Global Office recommends to split during the validation process Data collected from the field will be used to confirm ex-ante splitting assumptions Regrouping is possible especially when there is no clear demarcation Only items similar to GCL ones will be retained for linking; others will remain region
28
Following requests from Regions, the Global Office has initiated the revision of the Water Tariff operation materials The Objective was to simplify the data collection form and amend the Operational Guide where more clarification is needed The new data collection form features the harmonization of issues related to taxes, especially the Value Added Tax (VAT) and Sales Tax It requires the countries to submit actual bills as metadata for validation purposes together with Internet links (URL) to relevant utility companies web site for easy access and reference An example of form is provided to show how to handle the calculation It allows countries to provide data sources through
29
Process of data validation followed in each region Tools used for data validation Constrains/challenges faced Presentation of the validation tables for the second quarter price data for selected basic headings Lessons learned
30
Objectives Issues reported Summary Charts Quality Indicators Graphs Price Spreads by Regions Outlier and Leverage Analysis PLI Graphs Summary of Issues by Region
31
Input Data All analysis carried out and presented are based on preliminary data submitted by the ICP Regional Coordinators Substantial changes are expected to be introduced during the further validation process by the RCs and the participating countries Present and discuss methods and approaches for data validation at the global level Identify main areas for data quality improvements Discuss plans for further validation activities Presentation Objectives
32
Data integrity issues
Missing prices for many basic heading, classes, groups and categories Duplicated item codes in average price files Reporting prices for regional basic headings (over the official 155)
Overall data quality
Data sources (CPI) Item List issues (Number of GCL items vs. Number of regional items) Reporting currency issues on average prices
Data entry Errors (UoM, Decimal points, Currency Units) Low number of price quotations High variation coefficients Very low Min/Max Ratio Limit
33
The feasibility of the linking approach
Choice of base country – Option to have the region as a base High basic heading coefficient of variation for PPP Prices High variation of Exchange rate/ PPP Price Ratios Too wide ranges of Basic heading Price level index (BH PLI) Importance of GCL items Same for both Regional and Global comparisons? Brand levels How to ensure consistent interpretation across regions? Low comparability of services and/or possibly different approaches across regions E.g. telecommunication, air transport, pharmaceuticals, medical services Reference PPP Different regions have different BHs for which reference PPPs are used Low coverage BHs (BHs with only a few GCL products ) Consider how to calculate the linking factors?
34
35 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Africa LAC Asia
Number of GCL Items for which x% of the countries collected prices
x<25%: Q1 x<25%: Q2 25<=x<50%: Q1 25<=x<50%: Q2 50<=x<75%: Q1 50<=x<75%: Q2 75<= x<100%: Q1 75<= x<100%: Q2 x=100%: Q1 x=100%: Q2
36 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Africa LAC Asia
Number of BHs for which x% of the countries collected prices
x<25%: Q1 x<25%: Q2 25<=x<50%: Q1 25<=x<50%: Q2 50<=x<75%: Q1 50<=x<75%: Q2 75<= x<100%: Q1 75<= x<100%: Q2 x=100%: Q1 x=100%: Q2
37 5 10 15 20 25 30 Africa: Q1 Africa: Q2 LAC: Q1 LAC: Q2 Asia: Q1 Asia: Q2 WAS: Q1 WAS: Q2 17 12 10 12 5 6 29 24
Average number of GCL items with high CVs reported by country
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
GIN COM MRT TGO TCD TUN NAM GNB NER STP CIV BEN BDI GAB GHA SLE CAF SYC BFA SEN COG MLI MDG COD MAR GMB KEN RWA CMR MUS CPV DZA SDN LBR MWI UGA ZAF TZA EGY ZMB SWZ MOZ ZWE LSO BWA NGA
Number of items priced
Number of Item Priced
Africa- Q1 Total GCL 38
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Rice Bread Beef and veal Poultry Fresh or frozen fish … Cheese Fresh or chilled fruit Fresh or chilled … Frozen or preserved … Confectionery, … Mineral waters, soft … Tobacco Garments Garments Maintenance of … Furniture and … Major household … Small electric … Small tools and … Household services Pharmaceutical … Pharmaceutical … Medical Services Motor cars Motor cycles Other services for … Passenger transport … Telephone and … Recording media Garden and pets Newspapers, books … Catering services Hairdressing and … Other personal … Bread Pork Fresh or frozen fish … Preserved fish and … Eggs and egg-… Frozen, preserved … Fresh or chilled … Frozen or preserved … Food products n.e.c. Coffee, tea and … Clothing materials … Garments Garments Cleaning and … Repair and hire of … Furniture and … Major household … Glassware, … Household services Telephone and … Major durables for … Catering services Catering services Personal care …
Number of countries
Availabilty per Basic Heading
Africa - Q1
GCL Regional List
39
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
LAO NPL IND CHN BTN FJI MDV LKA MYS MMR IDN BRN VNM PAK MAC SGP KHM MNG HKG TWN THA PHL
Number of items priced
Importance and Number of Item Priced
Asia & Pacific - Q1
Total items Importance Single
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Rice Rice Other cereals and … Other bakery … Pasta products Beef and veal Lamb, mutton and … Poultry Fresh or frozen fish … Preserved fish and … Preserved milk and … Eggs and egg-… Other edible oils … Fresh or chilled fruit Frozen, preserved … Fresh or chilled … Fresh or chilled … Frozen or … Frozen or … Confectionery, … Food products n.e.c. Food products n.e.c. Coffee, tea and … Spirits Tobacco Garments Garments Garments Cleaning and … Footwear Gas Furniture and … Household textiles Major household … Repair of … Major tools and … Non-durable … Pharmaceutical … Pharmaceutical … Other medical … Medical Services Paramedical services Motor cars Fuels and lubricants Maintenance of … Passenger … Passenger … Postal services Telephone and … Audio-visual, … Audio-visual, … Recording media Other recreational … Veterinary and pet … Cultural services Catering services Catering services Personal care … Jewellery, clocks … Other services
CV Values
Variation Coefficient per List
Asia & Pacific - Q1
GCL Regional List
41
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000
CUB PAN HND ECU CRI HTI PRY COL SLV VEN DOM BRA URY BOL NIC PER
Number of price quotations
Analysis of Price Quotations
Latin America & Caribbean - Q1 Price quotations Single quotations
Share of single quotations
42
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 CV Value
Range of Coefficient of Variation
Latin America & Caribbean - Q2
Low values (-) High values (+)
43
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Rice Bread Beef and veal Poultry Fresh or frozen fish … Cheese Fresh or chilled fruit Fresh or chilled … Frozen or … Confectionery, … Coffee, tea and … Beer Garments Garments Footwear Gas Repair of furniture Major household … Glassware, … Non-durable … Pharmaceutical … Pharmaceutical … Other medical … Motor cars Motor cars Maintenance of … Passenger … Telephone and … Audio-visual, … Recording media Garden and pets Newspapers, books … Catering services Personal care … Other personal … Other bakery … Lamb, mutton and … Fresh milk Other edible oils … Fresh or chilled fruit Frozen, preserved … Fresh or chilled … Sugar Food products n.e.c. Spirits Clothing materials … Garments Garments Cleaning and … Maintenance of … Household textiles Major tools and … Pharmaceutical … Pharmaceutical … Therapeutic … Maintenance of … Audio-visual, … Newspapers, books … Personal care …
CV Values
Variation Coefficient per List
Western Asia- Q1
GCL Regional List
44
10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 CV Value
Range of Coefficient of Variation
Western Asia - Q2
Low values (-) High values (+)
45
46
Egypt Liberia Cuba Uruguay Maldives Taiwan, Province of China Oman Palestinian Territory
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
110112101 - Beef, Fillet
Africa LAC Asia WAS
Helps detect major outliers
47
Egypt Gabon Cuba Uruguay Maldives Taiwan, Province
Oman Palestinian Territory 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
110112101 - Beef, Fillet
Africa LAC Asia WAS
Mauritius
Once major
excluded from analysis, other
48
Morocco Tunisia Cuba Uruguay Brunei Darussalam Myanmar Palestinian Territory United Arab Emirates
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
110112104 - Beef, for stew or curry
Africa LAC Asia WAS
Helps analyze whether regional average prices are close, and detect quality differential across regions.
49
Egypt Gabon Cuba Dominican Republic Myanmar Philippines Iraq Palestinian Territory
20 40 60 80 100 120
110321103 – Men’s Nike/Adidas/Asics Sports Shoes
Africa LAC Asia WAS
Helps detect issues of pricing
imitation
50
Congo Kenya Nicaragua Paraguay
Myanmar Thailand
Oman Palestinian Territory
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
110111305 - Sliced White bread
Africa LAC Asia WAS
Helps detect error is product code conversions.
51
Burkina Faso Algeria Brazil Cuba Myanmar Taiwan, Province of China Iraq Jordan
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
110732103 - Interurban Bus (InterCity Bus) - 50 Km
Africa LAC Asia WAS
Helps detect major outliers
52
Burkina Faso Algeria Cuba Haiti Myanmar Taiwan, Province of China Iraq Jordan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
110732103 - Interurban Bus (InterCity Bus) - 50 Km
Africa LAC Asia WAS
Once major
excluded from analysis,
appear.
Overall price level for Oman is 0.78 Price levels for BHs 1104411 (Water) and 1104511 (Electricity) are very low and are pushing down the
The two Oman BHs are showing as extreme negative residuals . Their leverage is not significant, that is, they do not appear to deviate significantly from their mean, probably because the mean is also low.
53 Source: Validation Report by Bettina Aten, VEG member
However, at least one of the Oman BHs has an extremely high influence on its predicted value, and another one is also significantly influential as seen by their Cook’s D statistics, which measures the influence
removed.
54 Source: Validation Report by Bettina Aten, VEG member
This anomalous set of Item prices for Oman in BH 1104511 (Electricity) is seen more easily in graph form, where each country is on the horizontal axis and the log of the price relative is on the vertical axis.
55 Source: Validation Report by Bettina Aten, VEG member
…based on: All items (A) Global Core List items (B) CPD, Region = 1
56
Test how well the GCL items represent the regional PPPs Identify potential problems with priced GCL and regional items, in case these have not been identified during earlier validation Note: PLI Ratios do not detect cases where problems are associated to both GCL and regional items The aim is to present and discuss the approach No concrete conclusions are to be derived from this presentation The graphs presented are based on preliminary price data Comparison of PLI Ratios can be used to If outlier GCL PLIs are indentified, and validation cannot solve these cases, the respective BH PPPs may need to be deleted (??)
57
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
20 40 60 80 100
Iraq Jordan Oman Palestinian Territory Qatar United Arab Emirates
UAE: Gardens and pets Regional PLI 2.21 times higher than GCL PLI Reason: Extreme price variation within the BH Qatar: Gardens and pets Regional PLI 0.24 times lower than GCL PLI Reason: Extreme price variation within the BH UAE: Electricity Regional PLI 1.89 times higher than GCL PLI Reason: Problematic BH due to reference quantities Qatar: Fuels Regional PLI 1.63 times higher than the GCL PLI Reason: One extreme regional item
58
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Bahrain Iraq Jordan Kuwait Oman Palestinian Territory Qatar United Arab Emirates Yemen
59
Indicator Bahrain Iraq Jordan Kuwait Oman Geomean 1.29 1.05 1.01 1.04 1.08 Min 0.40 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 # Below 0.75 11 26 30 27 23 Max 20245.50 13570.90 11855.26 20245.56 23639.68 # Above 1.33 7 12 12 12 13 CV 241936 136307 123604 207831 228634 Indicator Palestinian Territory Qatar UAE Yemen Total Geomean 1.02 1.09 1.04 0.88 Min 0.23 0.32 0.32 0.07 # Below 0.75 30 22 26 23 218 Max 23302.81 20245.52 38377.79 7.04 # Above 1.33 9 14 10 9 98 CV 240697 204267 384841 95
60
AF AS LAC WA TOTAL Data integrity issues 2 1 1 4
Missing prices for many Basic Headings, Classes, Groups, and Categories
√ 1
Duplicated item codes in average price files
√ √ 2
Reporting prices for regional basic headings (over the official 155)
√ 1 Overall data quality 2 1 2 5
Data sources (CPI)
√ √ 2
Item List issues (Number of GCL items vs. Number of regional items)
√ 1
Reporting currency issues on average prices
√ √ 2 Intra country validation 3 2 2 7 Data entry Errors (UoM, Decimal points, Currency Units) √ √ 2 Low number of price quotations √ 1 High price observation variation coefficients √ √ √ 3 Inter country validation 4 1 3 4 12 Choice of base country (Option to have the region as a base) √ √ √ √ 4 High BH variation coefficients (dispersion of PPP-Ratios for a BH) √ √ √ 3 High country variation coefficients (dispersion of PPP-Ratios for a country) √ √ √ 3 High variation of Basic Heading Price level indices (BH PLIs) √ √ 2 Importance information (too soon to conclude) TOTAL 11 3 7 7 28
61
Objective and Methodology Overall Summary of Findings Household Consumption Government Gross Fixed Capital Formation Problematic Basic Headings Misreported Basic Headings
62
Each country’s 2009 and 2005 Data National Accounts Data (GDP Expenditure by BH) Population figure Exchange Rate Regional country clustering
Conduct GDP Expenditure temporal Analysis on country and regional level for 2009 and 2005 Relevant ICP Reference
ICP Classification (ICP Operational Guide 2.2) Information on the ICP Classification (ICP Operational Material B.1.07)
Steps
Country Level Analysis Validate SNA Compliance for both 2009 and 2005 Temporal Analysis Regional Level Analysis GDP structures or country shares Per Capita expenditures for HHC Regional Level Temporal Analysis
63
Asia Africa CIS LAC WA Caribbean Pacific Isl. Singleton
<> 0 5 30 8 10 1 … … 1 < 0 1 2 1 2 … … … 1 > 0 2 9 1 1 … … … … 12 47 … 5 8 … … 1 8 18 5 4 5 … … 1 1 10 3 4 4 … … 1
(*)
64
Maximum number of countries that fail the criteria S>5% Skew St. Skew pc Maximum number of countries that comply the criteria
(*) <>0 :Should Be Non Zero; S>5%: Share > 5% of GDP;
Asia Africa CIS LAC WA Caribbean Pacific Isl. Singleton
4 22 6 6 1 … … 1 1 2 1 … … … … … 1 3 … … … … … … 12 47 … 5 8 … … 1 6 16 5 4 5 … … 1 1 10 3 4 4 … … 1
(*)
(*) <>0 :Should Be Non Zero; S>5%: Share > 5% of GDP;
65
<> 0 < 0 > 0 Maximum number of countries that fail the criteria S>5% Skew St. Skew pc Maximum number of countries that comply the criteria
Asia Africa CIS LAC WA Caribbean Pacific Isl. Singleton
5 30 8 10 1 … … 1 … 1 1 1 … … … … 1 1 … 1 … … … … 11 47 … 4 6 … … 1 4 9 4 2 4 … … 1 … 5 … 1 3 … … 1
(*)
66
<> 0 < 0 > 0 Maximum number of countries that fail the criteria S>5% Skew St. Skew pc Maximum number of countries that comply the criteria
(*) <>0 :Should Be Non Zero; S>5%: Share > 5% of GDP;
Asia Africa CIS LAC WA Caribbean Pacific Isl. Singleton
2 2 1 10 1 … … … … … … 2 … … … … … 1 … 1 … … … … 11 47 … 5 6 … … 1 7 18 4 4 2 … … … 1 9 1 4 1 … … 1
(*)
67
<> 0 < 0 > 0 Maximum number of countries that fail the criteria S>5% Skew St. Skew pc Maximum number of countries that comply the criteria
(*) <>0 :Should Be Non Zero; S>5%: Share > 5% of GDP;
68
1102311 Narcotics 1112211 Prostitution 1112611 FISIM 1113111 Purchases by residential households in the rest of the world 1113112 Purchases by non-residential households in the economic territory of the country 1201111 Individual consumption expenditures by NPISHs 1301111 Housing 1302111 Pharmaceutical products 1302112 Other medical products 1302113 Therapeutic appliances and equipment 1302121 Out-patient medical services 1302122 Out-patient dental services 1302123 Out-patient paramedical services 1302124 Hospital services 1302221 Intermediate consumption 1302241 Net taxes on production 1302251 Receipts from sales 1303111 Recreation and culture 1304111 Education benefits and reimbursements 1304221 Intermediate consumption 1304231 Gross operating surplus 1304241 Net taxes on production 1304251 Receipt from sales 1305111 Social protection 1401121 Intermediate consumption 1401131 Gross operating surplus 1401141 Net taxes on production 1401151 Receipts from sales 1601111 Opening value of inventories 1601112 Closing value of inventories 1602111 Acquisitions of valuables 1602112 Disposals of valuables 1302231 Gross operating surplus Codes Heading
The following items have been reported to be problematic during previous ICP rounds
Should Be Non Zero Should Be Negative Should Be Positive A basic headings is referred to as misreported if it fails to satisfy any of the criteria below We performed an assessment of misreported items per region and
the following Excel table… Misreported items should be corrected before the MORES are transmitted to the Regional Office for processing.
69
70
Total 618 Africa Asia Latin
America
Wester n Asia Africa
Asia
Latin
America
Wester n Asia
71
In all 4 lists In 3 lists In 2 lists In 1 list*
291 222 85 8
*GCL products that are only on 1/4 list (except Fast-Evolving Technology Products): 110211104 Bailey's Irish Cream 110212102 Red wine, Bordeaux Supérieur 110312127 Boy's Corduroy Pants 111231101 Children's wrist-watch (Only WA has prices for these)
72
(Approx. 91-100% covered)
(Approx. 81-90% covered)
(Approx. 51-80% covered)
(Approx. 21-50% covered)
(Approx. 1-20% covered)
*Percentage share of countries in the coverage range (The number of countries).
73
Percentage of Countries in the region by the level of BH coverage
(Approx. 91-100% covered)
(Approx. 81-90% covered)
(Approx. 51-80% covered)
(Approx. 21-50% covered)
(Approx. 1-20% covered)
*Percentage share of countries in the coverage range (The number of countries).
74
Percentage of Countries in the region by the level of BH coverage
75
Ratio of Important items over Priced items*
76
(3) Check the products with # of obs. higher than the country's average (4) Check neighboring countries (with similar economic structures, geographical location, etc.)
Suggest to country that this product may be important Suggest to countries modifying their importance indicators based on findings from neighboring countries
(1) Check whether each basic heading has important item (Country level)
Identify at least 1 item as important per BH
(2) Check whether each item is declared important in at least 1 country (Regional level)
For each product, identify at least one country in the region where the product is important
77
Major Milestones and Activities for 2012 and 2013 Timetable HHC Data Submission Timetable NA Data Submission Timetable for Special Surveys Timetable for Computation of preliminary PPPs
78
June August July September Submission of 3rd and 4th quarters price data for LAC/Asia/Africa/WA (end
June) and GO computation of approximate Nat. Ann. Averages + Regional PPPs for LAC/Asia/Africa/WA (mid July) Or Submission of preliminary Nat. Ann. Average data + Regional PPPs for LAC/Asia/Africa/WA (end June / mid July) Submission of Nat. Ann. Average data + Preliminary Regional PPPs for OECD/Eurostat and CIS (end June / mid July) Transmission of preliminary data to CoTaf/VEG (end July) TAG, RC, CoTaf and VEG meetings (September) Testing of methods and preliminary results (August) Consolidate TAG recommendations and include in report to the Executive Board (September-October) Executive Board meeting (November) Report to UNSC (November)
Interim Report to the Executive Board (beginning July)
79
November
Jan-Mar April June Sep-Nov Submission of final national annual average price data for all regions
Submission of preliminary 2011 national accounts data Submission of FINAL FINAL data Executive Board meeting Report to UNSC
2013
Interim Report to the Executive Board
80
November
RC/TAG/VEG/CoTaf meetings
February
Executive Board meeting Release of Global PPPs data
December September
RC/TAG/VEG/CoTaf meetings
May-Aug
Submission of data updates
81
HHC Data Africa Asia CIS LA CA WA Pacific Eurostat- OECD Singl. Q3 2011 Aug’12 Jul’12 Jan’12 Jan’12 Nov’12 Q4 2011 Aug’12 Jul’12 Jun’12 May’12 Jun’12 Nov’12 Q1 2012 Aug’12 May’12 Jul’12 Jul’12 Q2 2012 Aug’12 Aug’12 Sep’12 Sep’12 Q3 2012 Nov’12 Nov’12 Dec’12 Q4 2012 Feb’13 Jan’13 Mar’13 Annual Jan’13 Mar’13 Jun’12 (P) Dec’12 Feb’13 Jan’13 Jun’13 Jun’12 (P) Dec’12
82
National Accounts Africa Asia CIS LA CA WA Pacific Eurostat- OECD Singl. LATEST YEAR
Basic Heading Final
Aug’12 Dec’11 Dec’11 Dec’11 Jul’12 Feb’12 N/A Mar’12 REFERENCE YEAR
Major Aggregates Premilinary
Dec’12 Dec’12 Apr’13 Dec’12 Mar’13 Dec’12 N/A Dec’12
Final
Jun’13 Jun’13 Dec’13 May’13 Jul’13 May’13 N/A Dec’13 Dec’12
Basic Heading Premilinary
Dec’12 Dec’12 Apr’13 Dec’12 Mar’13 Dec’12 N/A Dec’12
Final
Jun’13 Jun’13 Dec’13 May’13 Jul’13 May’13 N/A Dec’13 Dec’12
83
ICP Component Africa Asia CIS LA Survey Subm. Survey Subm. Survey Subm. Survey Subm. Water 2011 2012 Dec’12 2012 Dec’12 Machinery and Equipment 2011 Q3’12 Q4’12 Q4’11 Dec’12 2011 May’12 Q4’11 Jun’12 Construction 2011 Q3’12 Q4’12 Q3’11 Dec’12 2011 May’12 Q3’11 Jul’12 Housing Rents Q3’12 Q4’12 2011 Sep’12 2011 Jun’12 Quantity Q3’12 Q4’12 2012 Sep’12 2012 Dec’12 2012 Jul’12 Compensation LY Q1’12 Jul’12 Q1’12 Sep’12 2011 Q3’12 Q4’12 Q4’12 Apr’13 2012 Dec’12 Q4’12 Apr’13 Private Education 2011 Q2’12 Q3’12 Q1’12 Jul’12 Q1’12 Jul’12
84
ICP Component Caribbean WA Eurostat-OECD Singletons Survey Subm. Survey Subm. Survey Subm. Survey Subm. Water 2011 2012 Dec’12 2012 Dec’12 Machinery and Equipment 2011 Q3’12 Dec’12 Q4’11 Jun’12 2011 Jun’12 Q4’12 Dec’12 Construction 2011 Q4’12 Dec’12 Q4’11 Jul’12 2011 Oct’11 Q4’12 Dec’12 Housing Rents Q3’12 Dec’12 2011 Apr’12 Quantity Q4’12 Mar’13 2012 Dec’12 2012 Dec’12 (P) Q3’12 Dec’12 Compensation LY Q1’12 Jul’12 2011 Q4’12 Mar’13 Q4’12 Apr’13 2012 Dec’12 (P) Q3’12 Dec’12 Private Education 2011 May’12 Jul’12 Q1’12 Jul’12
85
ICP Data Submissions 2012 2013 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 HHC Preliminary Price Data Submission NA LY Data Submission Calculation of Preliminary HHC PPPs Private Education Data Submission Machinery and Equipment Data Submission Construction Data Submission Housing Data Submission HHC Final Price Data Submission NA 2011 Preliminary Data Submission Compensation Data Submission Calculation of GDP Preliminary PPPs NA 2011 Final Data Submission Calculation of Final PPPs
86
87
Thorough intra- and inter-validation needed at regional level with focus on BHs with high NA Expenditures Calculation of annual averages to be discussed at next RC meeting Build complete tableau of price, NA, and importance data availability by country Indicate major BHs where many countries in a region did not price GCL items
Metadata Questionnaires
Survey Framework Questionnaire to be circulated in 4 languages to countries (prefilled with available info) and completed by Dec. 2012 Quality Assurance Checklists to be circulated in 4 languages Country Checklist to be completed by Mar. 2013 Region Checklist to be completed by Dec. 2013 GO Checklist to be completed by Mar. 2014 NA QA supplementary questionnaire proposed by Asia very useful but optional to other regions
Construction: Productivity adjustment yet to be discussed by TAG Equipment: GO to examine item splitting done by regions
88
Immediate Data Submission Deadlines
End June: submission of preliminary HHC average price data (shop items) + preliminary LY NA data + validated importance indicators Aug 10, 2012: final deadline for submitting updated HHC average price data (shop items) + preliminary LY NA data + validated importance indicators
Proposal for Operational BH Classification to be provided by the GO in September for discussion at the RC meeting RCs will decide whether the Operational Classification, if approved, should be conveyed to TAG and EB for information
Importance
Validation of importance indicators to be conducted before next RC meeting GO to send to RCs guidance on validating importance
89
Upcoming Meetings and Major Activities
TAG meeting: 17-18 September 2012, to be attended by RCs RC meeting: 19-21 September 2012: presentation on global validation findings and recommendations agreement will be reached as when the RCs will submit updated/improved data based on VEG/GO findings or confirm data VEG and GO to thoroughly validate data (Jul-Aug) and submit findings to RCs before next RC meeting TAG and CoTaf to thoroughly test linking methods, importance, and extra/under pricing of GCL items before their next meeting GO to report to EB in November 2012 on TAG findings and risk assessment
GO reminders
GO to send data submission formats GO to ask RCs for the size of their matrix (number of items and countries) GO to circulate meeting minutes
List of data and metadata to be provided to the Validation Expert Group (VEG) and Computation Task Force (CoTaF) for the validation, testing of methods, and computation of preliminary results: Validated quarterly/annual average prices for both Global Core and Regional items (national, sub-national, urban/rural) Information on availability and importance Validation tables including validation indicators (Number of price quotations, Min prices, Max prices, Min/Max price rations, Variation coefficients and Outlier indicators) Preliminary PPPs by the ICP Classification Local currencies and quarterly/annual average exchange rates of local currencies Population, for the latest available year Major Aggregates for the latest year Basic Heading expenditure values and underlying metadata (MORES) for the latest year GDP Exhaustiveness questionnaire NA Quality Assurance questionnaire
90
91