The 1st World Congress on Controversies in Hematology (COHEM) Rome, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the 1st world congress on controversies in hematology
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The 1st World Congress on Controversies in Hematology (COHEM) Rome, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The 1st World Congress on Controversies in Hematology (COHEM) Rome, Italy 3 September, 2010: CLL Is eradication of MRD feasible and worthwhile in CLL? Moderator: K. Rai, USA Yes: G. Marti, USA No: G. Gaidano, Italy Bioethical Approach to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The 1st World Congress on Controversies in Hematology (COHEM) Rome, Italy 3 September, 2010: CLL

Is eradication of MRD feasible and worthwhile in CLL?

Moderator: K. Rai, USA Yes: G. Marti, USA No: G. Gaidano, Italy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Analytical Validity Certitude: MRD Detection: BM Bx, IHC, 4-color FCM, consensus PCR, qPCR ASO Scientific-Medical or Clinical Validity: The Biology of MRD and Clinical Trial Considerations. Clinical Practice Benefit Utility: F, FR/FC, FRC, Earlier Rx: IIB Consolidation and Maintenance Paradigm Shift: Palliative to Control to Possible Cure

Bioethical Approach to MBL/MRD

slide-3
SLIDE 3

677-514-1014 H&E

slide-4
SLIDE 4

102 103 104 105 <PerCP-A>: CD19 PerCP Cy55 102 103 104 105 <APC-A>: CD5 APC 13.5 8.54 75.7 9.93 4.14

102 103 104 105 <FITC-A>: Kappa-MONO FITC 102 103 104 105 <PE-A>: Lambda-MONO PE 11.1 86 63.8

102 103 104 105 <FITC-A>: Kappa-MONO FITC 102 103 104 105 <PE-A>: Lambda-MONO PE

102 103 104 105 <FITC-A>: Kappa-MONO FITC 102 103 104 105 <PE-A>: Lambda-MONO PE

Overall B cells Clone NR B cell

slide-5
SLIDE 5

102 103 104 105 <PerCP-A>: CD19 PerCP Cy55 102 103 104 105 <APC-A>: CD5 APC 82.1 8.94 4.2 0.22 3.48

102 103 104 105 <FITC-A>: Kappa-MONO FITC 102 103 104 105 <PE-A>: Lambda-MONO PE 60.4 32.4 7.42 102 103 104 105 102 103 104 105 <PE-A>: Lambda-MONO PE

2 3 4 5

102 103 104 105 <PE-A>: Lambda-MONO PE Over all B cell clone NR B cell

slide-6
SLIDE 6

QuickTim e™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Rawstron Blood 2001, FCM MRD PFS and OS

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Moreton et al 2005 J ClinOnc

slide-8
SLIDE 8

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Wierda, W, et al 2005, PCR IVGH, FCR, Refractory

slide-9
SLIDE 9

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Moreno,C et al, 2006 Blood, Autologous SCT

slide-10
SLIDE 10

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Schweighofer et al 2008 BJH, RQ-PCR

slide-11
SLIDE 11

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Tam, CS, et al, Blood, 2008, CD5CD19 and PCR IVGH

slide-12
SLIDE 12

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Del Poeta, et al, Cancer 2008, MRD+ with and without Consolidation/Maintenance Del Poeta, et al,Cancer 2008,MRD+ with Consolidation/Maintenance Versus MRD-

slide-13
SLIDE 13

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Del Poeta, et al, Cancer 2008, ZAP70+

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Editorial Montserrat E. (2005) Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: achieving minimal residual disease-negative status as a goal. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23(13), 2884-2885. Called for Standardization and revision of 1996 NCI WG Response Guidelines MRD-CR?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Rawstron, A et al Leukemia, Standardization

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Hallek et al Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment

  • f CLL: a report from the International WS on Chronic

Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the NCI WG 1996 guidelines; Blood, Jan 2008 On-Line MRD The complete eradication of the leukemia is an obvious desired end point. MC FCM and RT qPCR, have determined that many patients who achieved a complete response by the 1996 NCI-WG guidelines have detectable minimal residual disease (MRD)…Patients will be defined as having a clinical remission in the absence of MRD when they have blood or marrow with less than one CLL cell per 10 000 leucocytes. The blood generally can be used for making this assessment except …Future clinical trials that aim toward achieving long- lasting CRs should include at least one test to assess MRD because the lack of leukemia persistence using these sensitive tests seems to have a strong, positive prognostic impact.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What has emerged? Palliative versus control versus the realistic possibility of a cure MRD is a surrogate marker for comparing responses of differing therapies (Montillo, Schinkoethe, an Elter). MDR would be a maker for: PFS, TTT, OS Nodular PR benign and malignant; Predict favorable outcome Monitoring to predict clinical evolution Due to the correlation between the blood and marrow, for patient comfort, the blood should be the first site tested for MRD What is the single objection? Patients that achieve MRD- status may have less aggressive or more favorable biologic disease meaning a better clinical prognosis in the first place.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Andritsos L, Byrd J, Hewes B, Kipps T, Johns D, and Jan A.

  • Burger. Preliminary results from a phase I dose escalation study

to determine the maximum tolerated dose of plerixafor in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. [Abstract 2010] What is AMD300, Perixafor or Mozobil? bicyclam molecule blocks CXCR4 and SDF-1 Mobilization of CD34 Stem Cells Endostial Stromal Niche: CXCR4/CXCL12 axis Block Protective Pro-Survival Effects Mobilize CLL and test for MRD