The 1-type of Waldhausen K -theory F . Muro Max-Planck-Institut fr - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the 1 type of waldhausen k theory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The 1-type of Waldhausen K -theory F . Muro Max-Planck-Institut fr - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The 1-type of Waldhausen K -theory F . Muro Max-Planck-Institut fr Mathematik, Bonn, Germany (joint work with A. Tonks) Sixth Nordrhein-Westfalen Topology Meeting, Dsseldorf 2006 university-logo F. Muro The 1-type of Waldhausen K -theory


slide-1
SLIDE 1

university-logo

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

F . Muro

Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik, Bonn, Germany (joint work with A. Tonks)

Sixth Nordrhein-Westfalen Topology Meeting, Düsseldorf 2006

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

university-logo

Goal

Understanding K1 in the same clear way we understand K0.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-3
SLIDE 3

university-logo

Waldhausen categories

We use the following notation for the basic structure of a Waldhausen category W: Zero object ∗. Weak equivalences A ∼ →A′. Cofiber sequences A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-4
SLIDE 4

university-logo

Waldhausen categories

We use the following notation for the basic structure of a Waldhausen category W: Zero object ∗. Weak equivalences A ∼ →A′. Cofiber sequences A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-5
SLIDE 5

university-logo

Waldhausen categories

We use the following notation for the basic structure of a Waldhausen category W: Zero object ∗. Weak equivalences A ∼ →A′. Cofiber sequences A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-6
SLIDE 6

university-logo

Waldhausen categories

We use the following notation for the basic structure of a Waldhausen category W: Zero object ∗. Weak equivalences A ∼ →A′. Cofiber sequences A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-7
SLIDE 7

university-logo

K-theory of a Waldhausen category

The K-theory of a Waldhausen category W is a spectrum KW and K∗W = π∗KW. The spectrum KW was defined by Waldhausen by using the S.-construction which associates a simplicial category wS.W to any Waldhausen category. A simplicial category is regarded as a bisimplicial set by taking levelwise the nerve of a category.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-8
SLIDE 8

university-logo

K-theory of a Waldhausen category

The K-theory of a Waldhausen category W is a spectrum KW and K∗W = π∗KW. The spectrum KW was defined by Waldhausen by using the S.-construction which associates a simplicial category wS.W to any Waldhausen category. A simplicial category is regarded as a bisimplicial set by taking levelwise the nerve of a category.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-9
SLIDE 9

university-logo

An (m, n)-bisimplex of wS.W

A1,n A2,n · · · · · · Am,n

. . .

  • .

. .

  • .

. .

  • ...

. . .

  • A1,1
  • A2,1
  • · · · · · ·

Am,1

  • A1,0
  • A2,0
  • · · · · · ·

Am,0

  • Examples in low degrees:

m + n = 1, 2 (1, 2) (2, 1) (3, 0)

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-10
SLIDE 10

university-logo

An (m, n)-bisimplex of wS.W

A1,n A2,n · · · · · · Am,n

. . .

  • .

. .

  • .

. .

  • ...

. . .

  • A1,1
  • A2,1
  • · · · · · ·

Am,1

  • A1,0
  • A2,0
  • · · · · · ·

Am,0

  • Examples in low degrees:

m + n = 1, 2 (1, 2) (2, 1) (3, 0)

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-11
SLIDE 11

university-logo

K0 of a Waldhausen category

The group K0W is generated by the symbols [A] for any object A in W. These symbols satisfy the following relations: [∗] = 0, [A] = [A′] for any weak equivalence A ∼ →A′, [B/A] + [A] = [B] for any cofiber sequence A֌B։B/A. The generators and relations correspond to the bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2, respectively, in Waldhausen’s S.-construction.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-12
SLIDE 12

university-logo

K0 of a Waldhausen category

The group K0W is generated by the symbols [A] for any object A in W. These symbols satisfy the following relations: [∗] = 0, [A] = [A′] for any weak equivalence A ∼ →A′, [B/A] + [A] = [B] for any cofiber sequence A֌B։B/A. The generators and relations correspond to the bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2, respectively, in Waldhausen’s S.-construction.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-13
SLIDE 13

university-logo

K0 of a Waldhausen category

The group K0W is generated by the symbols [A] for any object A in W. These symbols satisfy the following relations: [∗] = 0, [A] = [A′] for any weak equivalence A ∼ →A′, [B/A] + [A] = [B] for any cofiber sequence A֌B։B/A. The generators and relations correspond to the bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2, respectively, in Waldhausen’s S.-construction.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-14
SLIDE 14

university-logo

K0 of a Waldhausen category

The group K0W is generated by the symbols [A] for any object A in W. These symbols satisfy the following relations: [∗] = 0, [A] = [A′] for any weak equivalence A ∼ →A′, [B/A] + [A] = [B] for any cofiber sequence A֌B։B/A. The generators and relations correspond to the bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2, respectively, in Waldhausen’s S.-construction.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-15
SLIDE 15

university-logo

How the algebraic model looks like

We are going to define a chain complex of non-abelian groups D∗W concentrated in dimensions n = 0, 1 whose homology is HnD∗W ∼ = KnW. (D0W)ab ⊗ (D0W)ab

·,·

  • K1W

D1W

D0W K0W.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-16
SLIDE 16

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homology groups of C are H0C = Coker ∂, H1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-17
SLIDE 17

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homology groups of C are H0C = Coker ∂, H1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-18
SLIDE 18

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homology groups of C are H0C = Coker ∂, H1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-19
SLIDE 19

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homology groups of C are H0C = Coker ∂, H1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-20
SLIDE 20

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homology groups of C are H0C = Coker ∂, H1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-21
SLIDE 21

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

We define D∗W by generators and relations. This stable quadratic module is generated in dimension 0 by the symbols [A] for any object in W, and in dimension 1 by [A ∼ →A′] for any weak equivalence, [A֌B։B/A] for any cofiber sequence. These generators correspond to bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in Waldhausen’s S.-construction.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-22
SLIDE 22

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

We define D∗W by generators and relations. This stable quadratic module is generated in dimension 0 by the symbols [A] for any object in W, and in dimension 1 by [A ∼ →A′] for any weak equivalence, [A֌B։B/A] for any cofiber sequence. These generators correspond to bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in Waldhausen’s S.-construction.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-23
SLIDE 23

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

We define D∗W by generators and relations. This stable quadratic module is generated in dimension 0 by the symbols [A] for any object in W, and in dimension 1 by [A ∼ →A′] for any weak equivalence, [A֌B։B/A] for any cofiber sequence. These generators correspond to bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in Waldhausen’s S.-construction.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-24
SLIDE 24

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

We define D∗W by generators and relations. This stable quadratic module is generated in dimension 0 by the symbols [A] for any object in W, and in dimension 1 by [A ∼ →A′] for any weak equivalence, [A֌B։B/A] for any cofiber sequence. These generators correspond to bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in Waldhausen’s S.-construction.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-25
SLIDE 25

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations: The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula .

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-26
SLIDE 26

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations: The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula .

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-27
SLIDE 27

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations: The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula .

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-28
SLIDE 28

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations: The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula .

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-29
SLIDE 29

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations: The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula .

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-30
SLIDE 30

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations: The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula .

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-31
SLIDE 31

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations: The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula .

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-32
SLIDE 32

university-logo

A symmetric monoidal category

A stable quadratic module C gives rise to a symmetric monoidal category smcC with

  • bject set C0,

morphisms (c0, c1): c0 → c0 + ∂c1 for c0 ∈ C0 and c1 ∈ C1. The symmetry isomorphism is defined by the bracket (c0 + c′

0, c0, c′ 0): c0 + c′ ∼ =

− → c′

0 + c0.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-33
SLIDE 33

university-logo

A symmetric monoidal category

A stable quadratic module C gives rise to a symmetric monoidal category smcC with

  • bject set C0,

morphisms (c0, c1): c0 → c0 + ∂c1 for c0 ∈ C0 and c1 ∈ C1. The symmetry isomorphism is defined by the bracket (c0 + c′

0, c0, c′ 0): c0 + c′ ∼ =

− → c′

0 + c0.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-34
SLIDE 34

university-logo

A symmetric monoidal category

A stable quadratic module C gives rise to a symmetric monoidal category smcC with

  • bject set C0,

morphisms (c0, c1): c0 → c0 + ∂c1 for c0 ∈ C0 and c1 ∈ C1. The symmetry isomorphism is defined by the bracket (c0 + c′

0, c0, c′ 0): c0 + c′ ∼ =

− → c′

0 + c0.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-35
SLIDE 35

university-logo

A symmetric monoidal category

A stable quadratic module C gives rise to a symmetric monoidal category smcC with

  • bject set C0,

morphisms (c0, c1): c0 → c0 + ∂c1 for c0 ∈ C0 and c1 ∈ C1. The symmetry isomorphism is defined by the bracket (c0 + c′

0, c0, c′ 0): c0 + c′ ∼ =

− → c′

0 + c0.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-36
SLIDE 36

university-logo

The classifying spectrum

Segal’s construction associates a classifying spectrum BM to any symmetric monoidal category M. The spectrum BsmcC has homotopy groups concentrated in dimensions 0 and 1: π0BsmcC ∼ = H0C, π1BsmcC ∼ = H1C.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-37
SLIDE 37

university-logo

The classifying spectrum

Segal’s construction associates a classifying spectrum BM to any symmetric monoidal category M. The spectrum BsmcC has homotopy groups concentrated in dimensions 0 and 1: π0BsmcC ∼ = H0C, π1BsmcC ∼ = H1C.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-38
SLIDE 38

university-logo

The main theorem

The stable quadratic module D∗W is a model for the 1-type of KW:

Theorem

There is a natural morphism in the stable homotopy category KW − → BsmcD∗W which induces isomorphisms in π0 and π1.

Corollary

There are natural isomorphisms K0W ∼ = H0D∗W, K1W ∼ = H1D∗W.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-39
SLIDE 39

university-logo

The main theorem

The stable quadratic module D∗W is a model for the 1-type of KW:

Theorem

There is a natural morphism in the stable homotopy category KW − → BsmcD∗W which induces isomorphisms in π0 and π1.

Corollary

There are natural isomorphisms K0W ∼ = H0D∗W, K1W ∼ = H1D∗W.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-40
SLIDE 40

university-logo

The main theorem

The stable quadratic module D∗W is a model for the 1-type of KW:

Theorem

There is a natural morphism in the stable homotopy category KW − → BsmcD∗W which induces isomorphisms in π0 and π1.

Corollary

There are natural isomorphisms K0W ∼ = H0D∗W, K1W ∼ = H1D∗W.

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-41
SLIDE 41

university-logo

Related work

Deligne’s Picard category of virtual objects of an exact category. Nenashev’s presentation of K1 of an exact category.

skip

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-42
SLIDE 42

university-logo

Related work

Deligne’s Picard category of virtual objects of an exact category. Nenashev’s presentation of K1 of an exact category.

skip

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-43
SLIDE 43

university-logo

Deligne’s category of virtual objects

Deligne defined the category of virtual objects V(E) of an exact category E, which is a symmetric monoidal category with unit object ∗ such that Iso(V(E)) ∼ = K0E, AutV(E)(∗) ∼ = K1E.

Proposition

There is an equivalence of categories V(E) ≃ smcD∗E.

skip

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-44
SLIDE 44

university-logo

Deligne’s category of virtual objects

Deligne defined the category of virtual objects V(E) of an exact category E, which is a symmetric monoidal category with unit object ∗ such that Iso(V(E)) ∼ = K0E, AutV(E)(∗) ∼ = K1E.

Proposition

There is an equivalence of categories V(E) ≃ smcD∗E.

skip

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-45
SLIDE 45

university-logo

Nenashev’s representatives for K1E

Nenashev showed that any element of K1E can be represented by a pair of short exact sequences: A

  • B

C.

The associated 2-sphere in |wS.E| is B A

  • C
  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-46
SLIDE 46

university-logo

Our representatives for K1W

A pair of weak cofiber sequences is a diagram in W C1

  • A
  • B
  • C.

C2

  • The associated 2-sphere in |wS.W| is

B A

  • C1

C2 C

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-47
SLIDE 47

university-logo

Our representatives for K1W

Theorem

Any element in K1W is represented by a pair of weak cofiber sequences. C1

  • A
  • B
  • C.

C2

  • The element in D1W corresponding to the pair of weak cofiber

sequences is: −[C ∼ →C1] − [A֌B։C1] +[A֌B։C2] + [C ∼ →C2] + [A], −[C2] + [C1].

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-48
SLIDE 48

university-logo

Our representatives for K1W

Theorem

Any element in K1W is represented by a pair of weak cofiber sequences. C1

  • A
  • B
  • C.

C2

  • The element in D1W corresponding to the pair of weak cofiber

sequences is: −[C ∼ →C1] − [A֌B։C1] +[A֌B։C2] + [C ∼ →C2] + [A], −[C2] + [C1].

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-49
SLIDE 49

university-logo

The End

Thanks for your attention!

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-50
SLIDE 50

university-logo

The trivial relations

[∗] = 0. [A

1A

→A] = 0. [A

1A

→A։∗] = 0, [∗֌A

1A

→A] = 0.

back

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-51
SLIDE 51

university-logo

The boundary relations

∂[A ∼ →A′] = −[A′] + [A]. ∂[A֌B։B/A] = −[B] + [B/A] + [A].

back

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-52
SLIDE 52

university-logo

Composition of weak equivalences

For any pair of composable weak equivalences A ∼ →A′ ∼ →A′′, [A ∼ →A′′] = [A′ ∼ →A′′] + [A ∼ →A′].

back

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-53
SLIDE 53

university-logo

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

For any commutative diagram in W as follows A

  • B

  • B/A

  • A′

B′ B′/A′

we have [A′֌B′։B′/A′] [A ∼ →A′] + [B/A ∼ →B′/A′] +[A], −[B′/A′] + [B/A] = [B ∼ →B′] +[A֌B։B/A].

back

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-54
SLIDE 54

university-logo

Composition of cofiber sequences

For any commutative diagram consisting of four obvious cofiber sequences in W as follows C/B B/A

C/A

  • A

B

  • C
  • we have

[B֌C։C/B] +[A֌B։B/A] = [A֌C։C/A] +[B/A֌C/A։C/B] +[A], −[C/A] + [C/B] + [B/A].

back

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-55
SLIDE 55

university-logo

Coproducts

For any pair of objects A, B in W [A], [B] = −[A

i1

֌A ∨ B

p2

։B] + [B

i2

֌A ∨ B

p1

։A].

back

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-56
SLIDE 56

university-logo

Bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in wS.W

A A′ A ∼

  • A

B

  • B/A
  • back to bisimplices

back to K0 back to generators back to relations

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-57
SLIDE 57

university-logo

Degenerate bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in wS.W

A A ∼

A

  • A
  • A

A

back

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-58
SLIDE 58

university-logo

Bisimplex of bidegree (1, 2) in wS.W

A′′

  • A′
  • A

  • back to bisimplices

back to relations

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-59
SLIDE 59

university-logo

Bisimplex of bidegree (2, 1) in wS.W

B′ A′

  • B′/A′
  • B
  • A
  • B/A
  • back to bisimplices

back to relations

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-60
SLIDE 60

university-logo

Bisimplex of bidegree (3, 0) in wS.W

A

  • C
  • B/A
  • C/A

C/B

  • B
  • back to bisimplices

back to relations

  • F. Muro

The 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory