On the 1-type of Waldhausen K -theory . Muro 1 A. Tonks 2 F 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on the 1 type of waldhausen k theory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K -theory . Muro 1 A. Tonks 2 F 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K -theory . Muro 1 A. Tonks 2 F 1 Max-Planck-Institut fr Mathematik, Bonn, Germany 2 London Metropolitan University, London, UK ICM Satellite Conference on K -theory and Noncommutative Geometry, Valladolid 2006


slide-1
SLIDE 1

university-logo

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

F . Muro1

  • A. Tonks2

1Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik, Bonn, Germany 2London Metropolitan University, London, UK

ICM Satellite Conference on K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry, Valladolid 2006

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

university-logo

Goal

Understanding K1 in the same clear way we understand K0.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-3
SLIDE 3

university-logo

Waldhausen categories

We use the following notation for the basic structure of a Waldhausen category W: Zero object ∗. Weak equivalences A ∼ →A′. Cofiber sequences A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-4
SLIDE 4

university-logo

Waldhausen categories

We use the following notation for the basic structure of a Waldhausen category W: Zero object ∗. Weak equivalences A ∼ →A′. Cofiber sequences A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-5
SLIDE 5

university-logo

Waldhausen categories

We use the following notation for the basic structure of a Waldhausen category W: Zero object ∗. Weak equivalences A ∼ →A′. Cofiber sequences A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-6
SLIDE 6

university-logo

Waldhausen categories

We use the following notation for the basic structure of a Waldhausen category W: Zero object ∗. Weak equivalences A ∼ →A′. Cofiber sequences A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-7
SLIDE 7

university-logo

K0 of a Waldhausen category

The abelian group K0W is generated by the symbols [A] for any object A in W. These symbols satisfy the following relations: [∗] = 0, [A] = [A′] for any weak equivalence A ∼ →A′, [B/A] + [A] = [B] for any cofiber sequence A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-8
SLIDE 8

university-logo

K0 of a Waldhausen category

The abelian group K0W is generated by the symbols [A] for any object A in W. These symbols satisfy the following relations: [∗] = 0, [A] = [A′] for any weak equivalence A ∼ →A′, [B/A] + [A] = [B] for any cofiber sequence A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-9
SLIDE 9

university-logo

K0 of a Waldhausen category

The abelian group K0W is generated by the symbols [A] for any object A in W. These symbols satisfy the following relations: [∗] = 0, [A] = [A′] for any weak equivalence A ∼ →A′, [B/A] + [A] = [B] for any cofiber sequence A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-10
SLIDE 10

university-logo

K0 of a Waldhausen category

The abelian group K0W is generated by the symbols [A] for any object A in W. These symbols satisfy the following relations: [∗] = 0, [A] = [A′] for any weak equivalence A ∼ →A′, [B/A] + [A] = [B] for any cofiber sequence A֌B։B/A.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-11
SLIDE 11

university-logo

K-theory of a Waldhausen category

The K-theory of a Waldhausen category W is a spectrum KW. The spectrum KW was defined by Waldhausen by using the S.-construction which associates a simplicial category wS.W to any Waldhausen category. A simplicial category is regarded as a bisimplicial set by taking levelwise the nerve of a category.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-12
SLIDE 12

university-logo

K-theory of a Waldhausen category

The K-theory of a Waldhausen category W is a spectrum KW. The spectrum KW was defined by Waldhausen by using the S.-construction which associates a simplicial category wS.W to any Waldhausen category. A simplicial category is regarded as a bisimplicial set by taking levelwise the nerve of a category.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-13
SLIDE 13

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homotopy groups of C are π0C = Coker ∂, π1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-14
SLIDE 14

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homotopy groups of C are π0C = Coker ∂, π1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-15
SLIDE 15

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homotopy groups of C are π0C = Coker ∂, π1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-16
SLIDE 16

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homotopy groups of C are π0C = Coker ∂, π1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-17
SLIDE 17

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homotopy groups of C are π0C = Coker ∂, π1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-18
SLIDE 18

university-logo

The nature of our algebraic model

A stable quadratic module C consists of a diagram of groups Cab

0 ⊗ Cab −,−

− → C1

− → C0 such that a, b = −b, a, ∂a, b = −b − a + b + a, ∂c, ∂d = −d − c + d + c. The homotopy groups of C are π0C = Coker ∂, π1C = Ker ∂.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-19
SLIDE 19

university-logo

A symmetric monoidal category

A stable quadratic module C gives rise to a symmetric monoidal category smcC with

  • bject set C0,

morphisms (c0, c1): c0 → c0 + ∂c1 for c0 ∈ C0 and c1 ∈ C1. The symmetry isomorphism is defined by the bracket (c0 + c′

0, c0, c′ 0): c0 + c′ ∼ =

− → c′

0 + c0.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-20
SLIDE 20

university-logo

A symmetric monoidal category

A stable quadratic module C gives rise to a symmetric monoidal category smcC with

  • bject set C0,

morphisms (c0, c1): c0 → c0 + ∂c1 for c0 ∈ C0 and c1 ∈ C1. The symmetry isomorphism is defined by the bracket (c0 + c′

0, c0, c′ 0): c0 + c′ ∼ =

− → c′

0 + c0.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-21
SLIDE 21

university-logo

A symmetric monoidal category

A stable quadratic module C gives rise to a symmetric monoidal category smcC with

  • bject set C0,

morphisms (c0, c1): c0 → c0 + ∂c1 for c0 ∈ C0 and c1 ∈ C1. The symmetry isomorphism is defined by the bracket (c0 + c′

0, c0, c′ 0): c0 + c′ ∼ =

− → c′

0 + c0.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-22
SLIDE 22

university-logo

A symmetric monoidal category

A stable quadratic module C gives rise to a symmetric monoidal category smcC with

  • bject set C0,

morphisms (c0, c1): c0 → c0 + ∂c1 for c0 ∈ C0 and c1 ∈ C1. The symmetry isomorphism is defined by the bracket (c0 + c′

0, c0, c′ 0): c0 + c′ ∼ =

− → c′

0 + c0.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-23
SLIDE 23

university-logo

The classifying spectrum

Segal’s construction associates a classifying spectrum BM to any symmetric monoidal category M. The spectrum BsmcC has homotopy groups concentrated in dimensions 0 and 1. Moreover, π0BsmcC ∼ = π0C, π1BsmcC ∼ = π1C.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-24
SLIDE 24

university-logo

The classifying spectrum

Segal’s construction associates a classifying spectrum BM to any symmetric monoidal category M. The spectrum BsmcC has homotopy groups concentrated in dimensions 0 and 1. Moreover, π0BsmcC ∼ = π0C, π1BsmcC ∼ = π1C.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-25
SLIDE 25

university-logo

The classifying spectrum

Segal’s construction associates a classifying spectrum BM to any symmetric monoidal category M. The spectrum BsmcC has homotopy groups concentrated in dimensions 0 and 1. Moreover, π0BsmcC ∼ = π0C, π1BsmcC ∼ = π1C.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-26
SLIDE 26

university-logo

The main theorem

We define a stable quadratic module D∗W by generators and relations which models the 1-type of KW:

Theorem

There is a natural morphism in the stable homotopy category KW − → BsmcD∗W which induces isomorphisms in π0 and π1.

Corollary

There are natural isomorphisms K0W ∼ = π0D∗W, K1W ∼ = π1D∗W.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-27
SLIDE 27

university-logo

The main theorem

We define a stable quadratic module D∗W by generators and relations which models the 1-type of KW:

Theorem

There is a natural morphism in the stable homotopy category KW − → BsmcD∗W which induces isomorphisms in π0 and π1.

Corollary

There are natural isomorphisms K0W ∼ = π0D∗W, K1W ∼ = π1D∗W.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-28
SLIDE 28

university-logo

The main theorem

We define a stable quadratic module D∗W by generators and relations which models the 1-type of KW:

Theorem

There is a natural morphism in the stable homotopy category KW − → BsmcD∗W which induces isomorphisms in π0 and π1.

Corollary

There are natural isomorphisms K0W ∼ = π0D∗W, K1W ∼ = π1D∗W.

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-29
SLIDE 29

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

We define D∗W as the stable quadratic module generated in dimension zero by the symbols [A] for any object in W, and in dimension one by [A ∼ →A′] for any weak equivalence, [A֌B։B/A] for any cofiber sequence. These generators correspond to bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in Waldhausen’s S.-construction

bisimplices

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-30
SLIDE 30

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

We define D∗W as the stable quadratic module generated in dimension zero by the symbols [A] for any object in W, and in dimension one by [A ∼ →A′] for any weak equivalence, [A֌B։B/A] for any cofiber sequence. These generators correspond to bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in Waldhausen’s S.-construction

bisimplices

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-31
SLIDE 31

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

We define D∗W as the stable quadratic module generated in dimension zero by the symbols [A] for any object in W, and in dimension one by [A ∼ →A′] for any weak equivalence, [A֌B։B/A] for any cofiber sequence. These generators correspond to bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in Waldhausen’s S.-construction

bisimplices

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-32
SLIDE 32

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

We define D∗W as the stable quadratic module generated in dimension zero by the symbols [A] for any object in W, and in dimension one by [A ∼ →A′] for any weak equivalence, [A֌B։B/A] for any cofiber sequence. These generators correspond to bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in Waldhausen’s S.-construction

bisimplices

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-33
SLIDE 33

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations. The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula . features more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-34
SLIDE 34

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations. The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula . features more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-35
SLIDE 35

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations. The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula . features more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-36
SLIDE 36

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations. The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula . features more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-37
SLIDE 37

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations. The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula . features more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-38
SLIDE 38

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations. The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula . features more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-39
SLIDE 39

university-logo

The algebraic model D∗W

The generating symbols satisfy six kinds of relations. The trivial relations

formulas bisimplices .

The boundary relations

formulas bisimplices .

Composition of weak equivalences

formula bisimplex .

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Composition of cofiber sequences

formula bisimplex .

Coproducts

formula . features more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-40
SLIDE 40

university-logo

Related work

Nenashev’s presentation of K1 of an exact category. Deligne’s Picard category of virtual objects of an exact category.

more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-41
SLIDE 41

university-logo

Related work

Nenashev’s presentation of K1 of an exact category. Deligne’s Picard category of virtual objects of an exact category.

more skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-42
SLIDE 42

university-logo

New features of our approach

Valid for Waldhausen categories. Use of strict algebraic structures of optimal nilpotency degree. Generators and relations are given by objects, weak equivalences, and cofiber sequences. Functoriality and compatibility with products.

skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-43
SLIDE 43

university-logo

New features of our approach

Valid for Waldhausen categories. Use of strict algebraic structures of optimal nilpotency degree. Generators and relations are given by objects, weak equivalences, and cofiber sequences. Functoriality and compatibility with products.

skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-44
SLIDE 44

university-logo

New features of our approach

Valid for Waldhausen categories. Use of strict algebraic structures of optimal nilpotency degree. Generators and relations are given by objects, weak equivalences, and cofiber sequences. Functoriality and compatibility with products.

skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-45
SLIDE 45

university-logo

New features of our approach

Valid for Waldhausen categories. Use of strict algebraic structures of optimal nilpotency degree. Generators and relations are given by objects, weak equivalences, and cofiber sequences. Functoriality and compatibility with products.

skip

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-46
SLIDE 46

university-logo

What I couldn’t tell you in this talk

The multiplicative structure. If W is a monoidal Waldhausen category then D∗W is endowed with the structure of a quadratic pair algebra and hence by results

  • f Baues-Jibladze-Pirashvili it represents the first Postnikov

invariant of KW as a ring spectrum k1 = {D∗W} ∈ HML3(K0W, K1W). Comments on the proof. For the proof we compute a small model of the fundamental 2-groupoid of wS.W by using an Eilenberg-Zilber-Cartier theorem for ∞-groupoids. Then we use Curtis’s connectivity result to

  • btain nilpotency degree 2.
  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-47
SLIDE 47

university-logo

What I couldn’t tell you in this talk

The multiplicative structure. If W is a monoidal Waldhausen category then D∗W is endowed with the structure of a quadratic pair algebra and hence by results

  • f Baues-Jibladze-Pirashvili it represents the first Postnikov

invariant of KW as a ring spectrum k1 = {D∗W} ∈ HML3(K0W, K1W). Comments on the proof. For the proof we compute a small model of the fundamental 2-groupoid of wS.W by using an Eilenberg-Zilber-Cartier theorem for ∞-groupoids. Then we use Curtis’s connectivity result to

  • btain nilpotency degree 2.
  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-48
SLIDE 48

university-logo

What I couldn’t tell you in this talk

The multiplicative structure. If W is a monoidal Waldhausen category then D∗W is endowed with the structure of a quadratic pair algebra and hence by results

  • f Baues-Jibladze-Pirashvili it represents the first Postnikov

invariant of KW as a ring spectrum k1 = {D∗W} ∈ HML3(K0W, K1W). Comments on the proof. For the proof we compute a small model of the fundamental 2-groupoid of wS.W by using an Eilenberg-Zilber-Cartier theorem for ∞-groupoids. Then we use Curtis’s connectivity result to

  • btain nilpotency degree 2.
  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-49
SLIDE 49

university-logo

What I couldn’t tell you in this talk

The multiplicative structure. If W is a monoidal Waldhausen category then D∗W is endowed with the structure of a quadratic pair algebra and hence by results

  • f Baues-Jibladze-Pirashvili it represents the first Postnikov

invariant of KW as a ring spectrum k1 = {D∗W} ∈ HML3(K0W, K1W). Comments on the proof. For the proof we compute a small model of the fundamental 2-groupoid of wS.W by using an Eilenberg-Zilber-Cartier theorem for ∞-groupoids. Then we use Curtis’s connectivity result to

  • btain nilpotency degree 2.
  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-50
SLIDE 50

university-logo

The End

Thanks for your attention!

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-51
SLIDE 51

university-logo

The trivial relations

[∗] = 0. [A

1A

→A] = 0. [A

1A

→A։∗] = 0, [∗֌A

1A

→A] = 0.

back

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-52
SLIDE 52

university-logo

The boundary relations

∂[A ∼ →A′] = −[A′] + [A]. ∂[A֌B։B/A] = −[B] + [B/A] + [A].

back

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-53
SLIDE 53

university-logo

Composition of weak equivalences

For any pair of composable weak equivalences A ∼ →A′ ∼ →A′′, [A ∼ →A′′] = [A′ ∼ →A′′] + [A ∼ →A′].

back

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-54
SLIDE 54

university-logo

Weak equivalences of cofiber sequences

For any commutative diagram in W as follows A

  • B

  • B/A

  • A′

B′ B′/A′

we have [A′֌B′։B′/A′] [A ∼ →A′] + [B/A ∼ →B′/A′] +[A], −[B′/A′] + [B/A] = [B ∼ →B′] +[A֌B։B/A].

back

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-55
SLIDE 55

university-logo

Composition of cofiber sequences

For any commutative diagram consisting of four obvious cofiber sequences in W as follows C/B B/A

C/A

  • A

B

  • C
  • we have

[B֌C։C/B] +[A֌B։B/A] = [A֌C։C/A] +[B/A֌C/A։C/B] +[A], −[C/A] + [C/B] + [B/A].

back

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-56
SLIDE 56

university-logo

Coproducts

For any pair of objects A, B in W [A], [B] = −[A

i1

֌A ∨ B

p2

։B] + [B

i2

֌A ∨ B

p1

։A].

back

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-57
SLIDE 57

university-logo

Bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in wS.W

A A′ A ∼

  • A

B

  • B/A
  • back to generators

back to relations

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-58
SLIDE 58

university-logo

Degenerate bisimplices of total degree 1 and 2 in wS.W

A A ∼

A

  • A
  • A

A

back

  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-59
SLIDE 59

university-logo

Bisimplex of bidegree (1, 2) in wS.W

A′′

  • A′
  • A

  • back
  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-60
SLIDE 60

university-logo

Bisimplex of bidegree (2, 1) in wS.W

B′ A′

  • B′/A′
  • B
  • A
  • B/A
  • back
  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory

slide-61
SLIDE 61

university-logo

Bisimplex of bidegree (3, 0) in wS.W

A

  • C
  • B/A
  • C/A

C/B

  • B
  • back
  • F. Muro, A. Tonks

On the 1-type of Waldhausen K-theory