Thai Oil Public Company Limited Presentation to Investors PTT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

thai oil public company limited
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Thai Oil Public Company Limited Presentation to Investors PTT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Thai Oil Public Company Limited Presentation to Investors PTT Corporate Day arranged by Deutsche Bank 23-24 January 2006 Disclaimer: The information contained in this presentation is intended solely for your personal reference only.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Thai Oil Public Company Limited

Presentation to Investors

“PTT Corporate Day”

arranged by Deutsche Bank 23-24 January 2006

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, NOT AN OFFER OF SECURITIES

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this presentation is intended solely for your personal reference only. Please do not circulate this material. If you are not an intended recipient, you must not read, disclose, copy, retain, distribute or take any action in reliance upon it.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Content

I) Highlights II) Business & Operations Update III) Consolidated Financial Results IV) Investment Projects V) Conclusion

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

I) Highlights

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

9% 55%

Thaioil Group Thaioil Group

Thaioil Power Thaioil Power (TP) (TP)

3-on-1 Combined cycle Electricity 118 MW Steam 168 T/hr

Independent Independent Power (Thailand) Power (Thailand) (IPT) (IPT)

PTT 20% Thaioil 24%

2-on-1 Gas-fired, Combined cycle Electricity 700 MW

Related Business & Income Stability Thai Paraxylene Thai Paraxylene (TPX) (TPX) Thai Lube Base Thai Lube Base (TLB) (TLB)

Capacity: Current:348 Kt/y (PX) Mid 07: 853 Kt/y total 408 Kt/y (PX) 160 Kt/y (Bz) 136 Kt/y (To) 149 Kt/y (MX)

Value Enhancement

Capacity: Lube Base oil: 270 Kt/y

Thaioil Marine Thaioil Marine (TM) (TM)

A fleet of 5 oil & petrochemical vessels with int’l classifications Total capacity: approx 30,000 DWT

Thappline Thappline

Multi-product Pipeline Capacity: 26,000 mn Litres/Y.

Product Marketing Support

100% 56% 100% 100%

Capacity: Current: 220 Kbd Mid 07: 270 Kbd

Utility Supply to Group

Thaioil Thaioil (TOP) (TOP) Refinery Refinery Petrochem Petrochem/ / Lube Base Lube Base OIl OIl Power Power Transportation Transportation

TOP Info: # of shares: 2,040 mn Mkt Cap: ~US$ 3.4bn Mkt Cap Ranking: 7 Shareholder structure PTT 49.54% Free float 43.28% Others 7.18%

PTT 26% JPOWER 19%

Core Refining Operations

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

(Bt Mn) 9M/05 9M/04

+/- 9M/04

FY04

  • 1. Sales Rev.

182,030 130,317

+40%

184,801

  • 2. EBITDA

24,201 18,364

+32%

25,494

  • 3. Profit Bef. Tax

16,633 11,063

+50%

18,040 4.Tax (3,157) (1,014)

+211%

(2,967)

  • 5. Net Profit

13,476 10,049

+34%

15,073

  • 6. EPS (Bht/share)

6.61 5.29

+25%

7.82

Financial Highlights

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

1%

Significant Increased Contributions from Subsidiaries Significant Increased Contributions from Subsidiaries

+40%

Sales Revenue Sales Revenue

+34% 99%

Net Profit Net Profit

Remark: % is based on total amount Before deducting inter-company transaction.

Refinery Power 4% Transportation

95%

9M’04

Refinery Power 1%

9M’05

* acquired 100% in Oct’04

Transportation

68% 27%

1% Refinery Transportation Petrochem/ Lube Base*

81% 15%

Refinery Power 4% Power 4%

  • Bt. 182
  • Bt. 182 bn

bn. .

  • Bt. 13
  • Bt. 13 bn

bn. .

  • Bt. 130
  • Bt. 130 bn

bn. .

  • Bt. 10
  • Bt. 10 bn

bn. . Petrochem/ Lube Base* 0%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

II) Business & Operations Update

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

CDU-1 CDU-2 CDU-3 TCU 19,300 HCU-1 FCCU 10,300 CCR-1 HDT-1 KMT 2,400 HDS-1 LPG ULG 95 JET KEROSENE GAS OIL ULG 91 HCU-2 47,600 CCR-2 50,000 HVU-1 HVU-2 HVU-3 95,000 HDT-2 HDT-3 74,900 205,000 FUEL OIL HDS-2 HDS-3 74,000 MX MX* 34,300

Thaioil Refinery Simplified Process Diagram

Crude

Distillation/Separation Conversion/Upgrading Treating

Long Residue LVGO Gas Oil Kerosene CDU Overhead Short Residue TC Residue TC Waxy Heavy Cycle Oil HC Gas Oil Heavy Naphtha Platformate LPG Light Plat Light Cycle Oil H C K e r

  • Waxy

CC Gasoline ADIP Isomerate NGL 72 RON Mixed Xylene 50 RON 70 RON ISOM 21,500 Waxy IN-LINE BLEND BATCH BLEND Light Naphtha Imported LR TC Kero/GO 95 RON 103 RON 89 RON 91 RON

* Sold to TPX in Apr’05 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

70% 67% 40% 39% 39% 38% 31% 24% 24% 18% 18% Thaioil Caltex Australia Singapore Petroleum Reliance BPCL S-Oil Indian Oil SK Corp ESSO Malaysia Petron Zhenhai Refining

One of the Most Complex Refineries in Asia Pacific One of the Most Complex Refineries in Asia Pacific

(%)

Thaioil can meet new environment specifications at lower cost Thaioil can meet new environment specifications at lower cost

Upgrading Upgrading-

  • to

to-

  • Refining Ratio

Refining Ratio(1)

(1)

Source: 2004 Oil and Gas Journal, The Company (1) Hydrocracking, catalytic cracking, thermal cracking, catalytic reforming and isomerization capacities divided by total crude distillation capacity (2) Hydrocracking, hydrotreating and hydrodesulfurization capacities divided by total crude distillation capacity

Hydrotreating Hydrotreating-

  • to

to-

  • Refining Ratio

Refining Ratio(2)

(2)

(%)

Higher conversion ratios yield higher refining margins Higher conversion ratios yield higher refining margins

(%)

92% 65% 43% 43% 42% 41% 29% 27% 22% 18% 9%

Thaioil S-Oil Singapore Petroleum BCP SK Corp ESSO Malaysia Petron BPCL Caltex Australia Zhenhai Refining Indian Oil

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Operating Cost Index Annualized Maintenance Costs Maintenance Effort (Based on Headcounts)

  • Avg. Personnel Cost

Shell Personnel Index (Based on Headcounts) CEL Corrected Energy Loss Utilization Operational Availability

2003 2004

One of the Best Performing Refineries in the World

Shell Worldwide Annual Benchmarking

High maintenance effort and Personnel Index is offset by low labor costs.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 913 230* 153 139 139 178 62 12 Intake (Kbd) 86% 105% 90% 92% 92% 83% 52% 58% Utilization

9 50 101 121 121 144 217

KBD

Oil Production by Refinery1)

Local refineries run at 90% in Q3/05. However, operating rate reduced to 86% for 11M/05, reflecting shutdown

  • f RRC/SPRC in Oct.

Oil demand for 11M/05 is appx. 745 kbd, 2% rose from 2004. Drop in local demand was seen in Q3/05 as a result of rainy season, flooding and high oil price after the oil subsidy removal in Jun.

Note 1) Exclude feedstock for petrochemical plant

Tight Domestic Oil Demand/Supply

Domestic Oil Demand / Refinery Intake

Thaioil Esso RRC SPRC TPI BCP RPC

Source: Company

764 765 712 745 731 67 70 92 141 85 88 32 126 66 34

86% 90% 84% 88% 90%

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% Oil Demand Feed for Petrochem Net Export % Utilization rate (rhs)

KBD

Q1/05 Q2/05 Q3/05 2004 11M/05

862 900 925 920 (Intake) 911

11-Month 2005 11-Month 2005 Total Country

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

30 40 50 60

J 2 4 M M J S N J ' 5 M M J S N

With multiple cracking and treating facilities, Thaioil has flexibility to select most economical crude capitalizing on the favorable sweet and sour differential to optimize refinery operation. 2005 Average Oil Prices Upto 80% of crude from Middle East (whose prices are more attractive than Far East sweet grade) are normally processed. LR purchased from BCP during the first 9 months was about 9 kbd on average. Thaioil could process higher Far East and local crude due to better quality when price differential between M/E-F/E became narrow (i.e. in Q3/05). Middle distillate was produced to meet local demand (represents about 50% of Country's demand).

Refinery Intake and Production

Thaioil Thaioil’ ’s s Crude Mix and Product Yield Crude Mix and Product Yield

US$/bbl

Tapis Dubai

8.58 8.58 TP TP-

  • DB

DB 40.31 40.31 64.03 64.03 62.10 62.10 57.90 57.90 49.32 49.32 Fuel Oil Fuel Oil Diesel Diesel ULG 95 ULG 95 Tapis Tapis Dubai Dubai

80% 75% 6% 6% 14% 19% 16% 53% 56% 56% 38% 28% 9% 11% 33%

Thaioil Thaioil’ ’s s Crude Mix and Product Yield Crude Mix and Product Yield

Middle East Far East Heavy Light Distillate Middle

2005

Others

2004

Crude Mix Product Yield Domestic Demand

11M05

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

BCP 4% TPX 11% Shell/Caltex, 14% PTT, 49% Export, 14% Other Independent domestic, 15%

39 49 59 69 79

J u l ' 4 A S O N D J ' 5 F M A M J J A S

Refinery Customers Breakdown Refinery Customers Breakdown

FY 05

Including 7% export of PTT

Appx 49% of products was sold to PTT at the market prices. (Domestic 42% and Export 7%). About 14% of products was sold to Shell and Caltex (Marketing). While Sales to other customers was 15%. Although the export in Q3/05 increased due to rainy season and slow domestic demand growth, overall export for 2005 was only 14% (compared with country export of 17%). When export, Thaioil switched to produce more Jet fuel at the expense of diesel due to its more favorable price.

Jet Diesel

US$/bbl

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

20 30 40 50 60 70 80

J a n ' 4 M M J S N J a n ' 5 M M J S N

Oil Prices Movement and GRM

Oil Prices Movement

Strong demand and tight supply supported high oil prices during the first 9M. Hurricanes in US and slow recoveries of US refineries fueled gasoline, diesel and other oil prices in Q3. Delayed and warmer winter in The States, coupled with high stock pile post Katrina weakened prices in Q4/05. Dipped in Thaioil’s GRM in Q2/05 was due to softening product price in May (high US inventory). GRM in Q3/05 rebounded as a result of Katrina. Regional GRM was pressured In Q4/04, due to warmer weather, stock up in US, prompt high VLCC freight as well as lackluster demand from high oil price (after subsidy reduction/removal in certain countries).

Thaioil’s GRM (incl. MX)

* Transfer MX to TPX as from April 1 2005 * Transfer MX to TPX as from April 1 2005

US$/bbl

Diesel Gasoline Tapis Oman Fuel Oil

US$/bbl 2 4 6 8 10

Q1/05 Q2/05 Q3/05 FY/04 9M05

8.75 6.55+1 8.52+1 7.50 7.9+0.7

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

(in kbd) 2005 2006 2007 2008-10 China 60 466 640 880 India 208 115* 280 620 Indonesia – 100 – 150 Thailand1) – – 50 – Taiwan 42 – 42 – Pakistan – – – 150 Vietnam – – – 121 Total addition 310 681 1,012 1,921 (in kbd) 2004P 2005F % Growth 2010 % Annual Growth (2005-10) China 6,105 6,470 +6.0% 8,494 +5.6% India 2,318 2,412 +4.1% 2,906 +3.8% South Korea 2,218 2,253 +1.6% 2,441 +1.6% Thailand (1) 731 768 +5.0% 930 +4.1% Total Demand 22,583 23,311 +3.2% 27,433 +3.3% Total Supply 22,786 23,096 +1.4% 26,710 +3.0%

Regional Oil Demand/Supply Continue to be Tight

Note: excluding Middle East demand & refining capacity additions * exclude 220 kbd expected to come on stream in end Q4/06 Source: FACTS, Fall 2005 and (1) The Company

Asia Pacific Refinery Capacity Additions Regional Oil Demand Asia-Pacific Demand/Supply Additions

728 1,536 2,369 310 991 2,003

2005 2006 2007

kbd

Accum Demand Additions Accum Supply Additions 4,840 3,924 2008 - 2010

  • The regional oil demand, as forecasted by FACTS as of Oct’05,

might not have taken into account the weaker-than-expected demand in Q4/05 partly as a result of oil subsidies in many countries.

  • China’s 2004 demand growth (15%) decelerated in 2005 (to

3.5%)., while its GDP grew by 9%

  • The decoupling of GDP growth & oil consumption (in China &

Other regional countries) could not sustain.

  • FACTS’s forecasted capacity additions could also prove
  • ptimistic, in view of the tight construction market in the region.
  • The regional oil demand/supply is therefore believed to continue

to be tight.

  • Furthermore, countries across Asia Pacific are moving towards

more stringent product specx, which fuels shortage of supply situation.

kbd

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

AP Refinery Capacity Likely Changes through 2010

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000

Current CDU Capacity Additions in 2005 Additions through 2006-10

China Japan S Korea India Singapore Taiwan Indonesia Thailand Australia Malaysia Pakistan Phillipines Vietnam

(in kbd)

Source: FACTS, Fall 2005 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

TPX’s Business

Jan04 M M J S N Jan'05 M M J S N

Plat

PX, MX and Platformate Spot Prices

PX MX

US$/Ton

* Transfer MX to TPX as from April 1 2005

PX-Plat PX-MX

Background

After years of liquidity and profitability problems, TOP acquired 100% shares in Oct’04. In Jan’05, TPX invested US$ 5 M. to change catalyst and effectively increase PX output to 348 KTA (a 21% increase). In Apr’05, transfer MX unit was transfer to TPX.

2004 9M05 Gross Margin (US$ M.) 20 80 (Equivalent to $/bbl) 0.25 1.00 Net Profit (Baht M.) 115 2,371

PX Market

Other S.E.Asia N.E.Asia Europe North America Utilization (rhs) Capacity (rhs) South America

Source Company

World Production by Region

1,000 800 600 400 200

A utilization rate of more than 80% would trigger investment in new capacity. Regional PX demand grows at 6%, outpacing the supply growth of 2%, mainly driven by China. Thailand PX market 2005 2006

Demand

  • Tuntex

295 362

  • SMPC

714 965

  • Indorama
  • 0-

429 Supply

  • ATC

495 455

  • Exxon

445 485

  • TPX

340 340 Surplus / (Deficit)

1,009 1,280 1,756 1,387 271 (476)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

TLB’s Business

Background

  • Strong lube base oil price is supported by growing regional

demand, tight supply (after closures of plants in Asia) and strong diesel price.

  • Lube base - HSFO spread widened from 280 US$/Ton in

2004 and 380 US$/ton in 2005.

  • 9M/05 saw a 83% (full capacity utilization of lube base

production unit). Net profit has gone up by 186%, as compared to 2004, to 1,352 Baht M.

  • Prior to TOP acquisition, TLB had experienced financial

problems as a result of Baht devaluation and depressed lube base oil market.

  • In Oct 04, TOP acquired 100% shares of TLB and fully

integrated it with the refinery.

  • TOP has commissioned a team to study and has

identified 15 synergy projects with the refinery.

  • TLB LT debt was reduced to zero.

Higher MPU’s Utilization / Profitability Lube Base Market

J a n / 4 M M J S N J a n ' 5 M M J S N

US$/Ton

HSFO 500SN

20 370 331 1,4351,352

  • 422

83% 70% 60%

  • 500

500 1000 1500 2000

2003 2004 9M05

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

EBITDA Net Profit % MPU Utilization (Lube Production Unit) Baht M.

Lube Base - HSFO

800 600 400 200

% Utilization

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

IPT Business IPT Business

Plant Availability Improved Financial Performance IPP Industry Background

  • Established in 1995 as a JV of TOP, Westinghouse and

Unocal.

  • During first IPP bidding in 1995, IPT won the mandate to

build the power plant to EGAT as the first ranked bid proposal among 32 bidders.

  • IPT experienced technical problems with Westinghouse

GTs which were later replaced with Siemens GTs in 2003 and 2005, respectively, at Siemens and Insurance expenses.

  • With the new 2 GTs, IPT declared full availability of 700

MW as from Jun’05.

  • Steady revenue nature, as PPA allow IPP to pass through

variable cost to EGAT. IPP will get availability payment (AP) which covers fixed cost, debt service and return.

  • Thailand electricity demand grows inline with GDP.

Therefore EGAT plan to announce new round IPP in end 2006 / H107.

  • TOP is ready for the 2nd IPP bidding (700-1400 MW),

(Baht M.) 9M/05 9M/04 +/(-)

  • EBITDA

1,099 577 522

  • Profit bef. FX/Extra Exp.

613 (200) 813

  • FX/Extra. Expense

(444) (269) (175)

  • Net Profit

169 (469) 638

77% 70% 78% 57% 48% 41%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

700 MW from Jun’05

* In year 2001, IPT report net profit of 813 Baht M.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

III) Consolidated Financial Results

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Consolidated Financial Results Consolidated Financial Results

EBITDA

TOP 74% TLB 6% TPX 13% IPT&TP 7%

EBITDA

TOP 69% TLB 10% TPX 17% IPT&TP 4%

Net Profit

TM 1% TOP 93% IPT&TP 7% TOP 102% IPT&TP -1% TM -1%

  • Bt. 24,201
  • Bt. 24,201 mn

mn. .

  • Bt. 18,364
  • Bt. 18,364 mn

mn. .

  • Bt. 13,476
  • Bt. 13,476 mn

mn. .

  • Bt. 10,049
  • Bt. 10,049 mn

mn. .

9M/2005 9M/2004 9M/2005 9M/2004

  • EBITDA and Net Profit rose significantly mainly due

to:

  • Favorable refinery margins and higher

utilization rates

  • TPX output increased after catalyst change in

Jan’ 05

  • IPT full 700 MW as from Jun’05
  • Increase in contributions from subsidiaries

(TPX/TLB) from 7% to 26%.

  • Effective tax rate for TOP group is expected to be

lower than 20% during 2006-10:

Corporate BOI Tax Loss Income Tax Holiday Carry Forward TOP 25%

  • n/a

TPX

  • 0-

until 2009

  • Bt. 2,200 mn.

TLB 30%

  • Bt. 3,000 mn.

TP

  • 0-

until 2006

  • IPT
  • 0-

until 2008

  • +32%

+34%

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Financial Strength

Balance Sheet

2,486

2,957

Dec ’02 Dec ’04 Current Assets Fixed Assets Other Liabilities Total Equities

US$ mn

2,816

Sep ’05

2,462

Dec ’03 Long-term Debts

1,564 1,279 982

874

Note: Convert by 41 Baht/US$

Since 2002,

  • Total Assets:

up ~Bt 20 bn (+20%)

  • Total Debt:

down ~Bt 28 bn (-44%)

  • Total Equities:

up ~Bt 26 bn (+70%)

Key Financial Ratios

3.0 4.8 11.2 15.0 6.5 2.2 1.4 0.7 0.6 3.5 1.3 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 2002 2003 2004 2005 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0

ICR LT Debt/Equity Debt/EBITDA

Interest Coverage LT Debt / Equity Net Debt/EBITDA

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Group Debt Structure

  • Dividend policy is at least 25% of net profit after legal
  • reserve. (pay at Bt1.80/share in May’05 (3.27% dividend

yield or 13.09% annualized).

Dividend Policy

Consolidated Repayment Profile Consolidated Repayment Profile

10-Year Bullet Bond

US$ 350 M. @ coupon 5.1%. (Moody’s Baa1 / S&P’s BBB)

5-Year revolving US$

Loan: US$ 200 M.

6-Year syndicated

  • nshore loan (US$ 65
  • M. + THB 2,600 M.)

Consolidated Long Term Debt Profile

  • Total LT Loan is 83% in USD to match with USD-

linked revenue.

  • Total fixed interest is appx. 50% of total borrowing.
  • Average cost of debt is appx. 6% p.a. (before

corporate tax)

TOP 72% ($629M) TLB & TM 0% IPT 18% ($156M) TP 3% ($27M) TPX 7% ($62M)

112 324 377 59 100 200 300 400 1 Yr 2-4 Yr 5-7 Yr 8-10 Yr

US$ M.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

IV) Investment Projects

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Updated CAPEX Requirements

US$ Mn 2005 F 2006 F 2007 F Total In 2005-07 CDU-3 Debottlenecking1) 54 110 54 218 Mercury Removal Units 6 2 8 SBM Expansion 20 75 55 150 Power Projects2) 11 21 11 43 Maintenance Projects 15 15 15 45 TPX (Expansion) 10 50 55 115 TLB (Synergy Project) 5 5 10 Thaioil Marine 6 6 12 Total 127 284 190 601

US$ Mn

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

US$ Mn Total In 2005-07 CDU-3 Debottlenecking 218 Mercury Removal Units 8 SBM Expansion 150 Power Projects 43 Maintenance Projects 45 TPX (Expansion) 115 TLB (Synergy Projects) 10 Thaioil Marine 12 Total 601

Updated CAPEX Requirements

Size: 50 kbd (additional 23%) EPC: ABB PMC: Foster Wheeler Investment Cost: US$ 4,000 /bbl Expected C.O.D : Mid 2007 IRR: ~ 20% based on 4.5 US$/bbl GRM Size: 52”diameter * 14.5 km long pipeline EPC: SAIPEM PMC: Bechtel Expected C.O.D : Mid 2007 Benefit: Freight saving Size: 500,000 T/Yr (additional) Cost: US$ 115 M. est. Expected C.O.D : Mid 2007 Benefit: Margin base on aromatics (BTX) over ULG95 and able to supply oil product For example, TLB/TOP Hot Oil Exchange Cost: US$ 3 mn Benefit: Enhance CDU-1 feed by 5 kbd Expected C.O.D : Mid 2006

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

'000 MW

Developing Project: New IPP

  • Invitation to bid for new IPP project is postponed to 2007 due to

trimmed demand from high oil prices in 2005 and Tsunami effect which force the government to adjust the demand projection and structure of fuel sources.

  • TOP is a very advantages position given infrastructure available for

an additional 2x700MW power plants:

  • Land of 100 Rais (40 acres)
  • 28” natural gas / raw water pipeline
  • 230 KV transmission lines and available diesel oil storage

facilities for back up

Thailand Electricity Power Generating Capacity (Thailand Power Development Plan 2004, EGAT Plc.)

Source: EGAT Plc., August 2004 and EGAT Plc.’s Prospectus

New Power Capacity Allocation Between EGAT Plc. & Private EGAT Plc. Private

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 ‘000 MW 50 100 150 200 250 MWh EGAT Plc. Private EGCO+RATCH Import New Private Supply

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

V) Conclusion

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Thaioil’s Vision and Strategy

Remain primarily a Remain primarily a “ “pure play pure play” ” refiner refiner Increase Increase participation in participation in power generation power generation Expand refining Expand refining capacity to capture capacity to capture future domestic growth future domestic growth Integrate and expand Integrate and expand petrochemical petrochemical business business Continue to enhance Continue to enhance refining margins and refining margins and rationalize costs rationalize costs

“We shall be a leading regional integrated refinery, petrochemicals and power company with sustainable growth, competitive return on assets and commitment to environmental and social well being to optimize stakeholder value.”

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Conclusion

  • One of the most complex, cost-efficient

and modern refinery in the region;

  • Favorable oil & petrochemical

industries - inability of supply to keep up with continuously growing demand;

  • Investment strengths: High barrier to

entry due to investment cost, limited new supplied, prospect demand and captive market.

  • Significant increased contributions

from subsidiaries, as a result of business restructuring & synergy within the group;

  • Strong financial position post-

completion of the refinancing exercise;

  • Effective project development

enhances investment returns & ensures growth;

  • One of the most complex, cost-efficient

and modern refinery in the region;

  • Favorable oil & petrochemical

industries - inability of supply to keep up with continuously growing demand;

  • Investment strengths: High barrier to

entry due to investment cost, limited new supplied, prospect demand and captive market.

  • Significant increased contributions

from subsidiaries, as a result of business restructuring & synergy within the group;

  • Strong financial position post-

completion of the refinancing exercise;

  • Effective project development

enhances investment returns & ensures growth;

2004

Best Equity Deal, Best IPO, Best Privatization and Best Thailand

Deal for the Year 2004

Best Deal of the Year for IPO in Thailand in 2004 Thai Capital Market Deal in 2004 Asia’s Best Equity Deal in 2004 Best IPO Deals in 2004 Best Newly Listed Company

  • f the Year 2004

2005 Best Newly Listed Company in Asia Most Improved Companies in Asia

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

THANK YOU

Any further questions, please contact Investor Relations Dept. Tel: (662) 299-0124 Fax: (662) 617-8295 email: ir@thaioil.co.th website: www.thaioil.co.th

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Appendix

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Aerial View of Facilities Aerial View of Facilities Aerial View of Facilities

Land area ~ 777 acres (1,963 rais)

TPX TPX IPT IPT TLB TLB TP TP

Taken 9 September 2004

Thaioil Thaioil

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Strategic Location Strategic Location Strategic Location

The site is in the Eastern region, 124 km from

Bangkok

Has 2 mooring facilities for crude receiving and product

export

Close to market by connecting to multi-product pipeline Has space available for future expansion

Source: Ministry of Energy 2003

9% 10% 59%

11% 11%

SARABURI LUMLUKKA DONMUANG SUVARNABHUMI Esso

GULF OF THAILAND

Shell (RRC) Caltex (SPRC) MAP TA PHUT SRIRACHA

Ø24”, 134 km Ø18”, 38 km Ø10”, 29 km Ø18”, 92 km

Main Line Expansion Pipeline SBM Facility

Domestic demand distribution THAIOIL

Bangchak TPI

SBM

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Excellent position with respect to domestic competition Excellent position with respect to domestic competition Excellent position with respect to domestic competition

Refinery Size & Complexity Refinery Size & Complexity

  • Thaioil has the largest and most sophisticated refinery capacity

Thaioil has the largest and most sophisticated refinery capacity in Thailand in Thailand

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

16% 14% 19% 19% 34% 56% 57% 41% 47% 47% 47% 28% 45% 34% 34% 18% 11% 10% 75% 14% 33%

Thai Demand Thaioil Esso RRC SPRC TPI Bangchak

Thai Refinery Production & Domestic Use Thai Refinery Production & Domestic Use Thai Refinery Production & Domestic Use

2004 Thai Refinery Product Mix vs. 2004 Thai Refinery Product Mix vs. Thailand Demand Thailand Demand

Source: PTIT Focus Special Annual Issue 2004 (1) Light distillates includes propylene, LPG, ULG, gasohol, isomerate, reformate, naphtha, solvent, and mixed-xylenes (2) Middle distillates includes kerosene, jet fuel and diesel (3) Heavy distillates includes fuel oil, bitumen (4) Middle distillates Includes petrochemical products (44%)and solvent (5) Include Long Residue supplied to Thaioil

Middle(2) Heavy(3) Light(1)

(4) (5)

Light Middle Heavy Total

Industry

7% 6% 62% 13%

Transport

68% 72% 23% 67%

Electricity

0% 0% 14% 2%

Other

25% 22% 1% 18% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Source: Ministry of Energy

Domestic Use of oil products Domestic Use of oil products

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

PTT

TOP

220 KBD

EGAT

IPT

700 MW

TPX

348 Kt/y

TLB

270 Kt/y

Integration among Thaioil’s Group In Inte tegration gration among among Thaioil Thaioil’ ’s s Group Group

Alternative Sources Alternative Sources Long Residue 850,000 T/yr By-products

TP

118 MW

  • N. Gas

28 mmcfd

  • N. Gas

120 mmcfd Reformate 1.5 mn T/yr By-Products Domestic 90% Export 10% Domestic 70% Export 30% Lube Base Oil 41 MW 50 MW 84 T/hr 10 MW 40 T/hr 11.5 MW 42 T/hr Domestic 50% Export 50% 700 MW Finished Products PX

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Rationales Ethanol Project Background

  • Government plans to phase out MTBE by 2007

and use Ethanol as high octane component instead for environmental concern/import reduction/agricultural support.

  • There is insufficient domestic ethanol supply

as only 3 licensees (from 24 licensees) is currently in operation for 300,000 L/Day.

  • Abundant feedstock as Thailand exports

Tapioca chips more than 3 mn Tons/Yr (1 mn L/Day of Ethanol requires about 0.9 mn Ton/Yr

  • f Tapioca Chips).

New Developing Project: Ethanol

  • Ethanol Plant Capacity

1 – 2 Mn L/Day

  • Feedstocks: Tapioca Chips

1 – 2 Mn T/Yr

  • Estimated Investment Cost

150 – 250 Mn USD

  • Site Location

under consideration Economy of Scale

  • Government promotion
  • Supply of raw material is abundant because Thailand is largest exporter
  • Raw material price and availability is less volatile, compared with Molasses
  • Low cost produces due to economy of scale