Th The R Rol ole of of Citi ities a and nd Stat ates/Territ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

th the r rol ole of of citi ities a and nd stat ates
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Th The R Rol ole of of Citi ities a and nd Stat ates/Territ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Th The R Rol ole of of Citi ities a and nd Stat ates/Territ rritor orie ies in Shaping ping a Robomo mobile Wo World Dr. Katherine Kortum Transportation Research Board 3 rd International Research Seminar on Robomobility 16


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Th The R Rol

  • le of
  • f Citi

ities a and nd Stat ates/Territ rritor

  • rie

ies in Shaping ping a Robomo mobile Wo World

  • Dr. Katherine Kortum

Transportation Research Board 3rd International Research Seminar on Robomobility 16 September 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

U.S. Federal Government

  • Debated but did not enact automated vehicle

legislation: the AV START Act (American Vision for Safer Transportation trough Advancement

  • f Revolutionary Technologies Act)

– Bill originates in the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

  • AV 4.0 is the latest set of “principles” for

automated vehicle development

  • In reality, little federal role
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

U.S. Federal and state roles

  • Federal: regulate the vehicle

– Vehicle testing and safety standards – Vehicle emissions standards

  • States: regulate the driver

– Driver licensing – Driver insurance requirements

  • These roles are beginning to blur
slide-6
SLIDE 6

States and AVs

  • 5 states simply authorize a study, define key

terms or state contacts, or authorize funding

  • 12 states authorize testing, while 16 states

and the District of Columbia authorize full

  • deployment. Of these, 18 states now allow

testing or deployment without a human

  • perator in the vehicle.
  • 4 states regulate truck platooning.

Source: Governors Highway Safety Association

slide-7
SLIDE 7

States regulate insurance

Some states require liability insurance for testing automated vehicles; some do not For states that do require the insurance, most common amount is $5 million

slide-8
SLIDE 8

City and state infrastructure

  • Nearly all roads in the US are owned and

maintained by either a state, a county, or a city

  • Design and maintenance standards vary
  • Automated vehicles need infrastructure that is

standardized as much as possible

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A Pennsylvania Specialty

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Unique city intersections

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Every state road sign is different

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Road maintenance varies

  • Road maintenance varies because of:

– Climate – Budget – Traffic volumes – Regional politics – Population trends – Regional industry

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Road maintenance varies

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Phoenix, Arizona

slide-16
SLIDE 16

California

Los Angeles, California

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Highway interchanges

Los Angeles, CA Dallas, TX

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Automation in Cities

The most common automation issue that cities control is traffic enforcement.

– Red light cameras – Speed cameras – Bus lane cameras

However, some states do not allow cities to set their own automated camera programs.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

City considerations for AVs

  • Many laws that AVs must follow are set by

cities:

– Speed limits – Bicycle passing distances – Requirements to yield to pedestrians

  • Cities need to be involved in the development
  • f AV specifications and policies
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Parking in cities

  • All cities establish parking regulations

– Some cities have minimums – Some cities have maximums

  • Some cities own and operate parking

– Philadelphia has parking revenue of $36 million – NYC issues 30,000+ parking tickets each day – Los Angeles earns $250 million from parking violations

slide-21
SLIDE 21

COVID-19’s Effects on AVs

Technolo

  • logy D

y Develop lopment

  • Fundamentals
  • Component performance

and development

  • System level simulation
  • Physical testing protocols
  • Investment

Deplo loym yment

  • Rethinking use cases
  • User behavior and

preferences

  • Personal use/transit

– Riskier driver behavior prior to stay-at-home orders – Decreased use of transit and ridehailing – Protocols/risk mitigation measures

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Katherine Kortum Senior Program Officer Transportation Research Board kkortum@nas.edu