Texas Wildfire Response Project TexFire Initiative II: Location - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

texas wildfire response project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Texas Wildfire Response Project TexFire Initiative II: Location - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Texas Wildfire Response Project TexFire Initiative II: Location Analysis and Business Case May 8, 2014 Jorge Gonzalez and Shawn Minnich Advisors: Dr. Dick Barr and Mr. Bill Plummer Texas Wildfires April 19, 2011, Strawn TX (South of Possum


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Texas Wildfire Response Project

TexFire Initiative II: Location Analysis and Business Case

May 8, 2014 Jorge Gonzalez and Shawn Minnich Advisors: Dr. Dick Barr and Mr. Bill Plummer

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Texas Wildfires

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Why is it important?
  • High Season in 2011
  • 31,453 fires
  • 4,011,709 acres
  • 38,962 homes saved
  • 2,947 homes destroyed
  • 13,058 other structures saved
  • 2,804 other structures destroyed

Background

April 19, 2011, Strawn TX (South of Possum Kingdom Lake)

Bastrop Case or The Perfect Storm Started Sept. 4 Ended Sept. 30 Devoured 32,000 acres 1700 Home & Businesses $325M in Damage 2 Deaths

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Problems

  • There are fires that could have been prevented or

extinguished sooner

  • What aircraft do we use?
  • Where to base our SEATs
  • How much will it cost us to set up this project?
  • Is the project going to work?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project Definition

  • SMU research project for the creation of an aerial

response system to efficiently assist with the suppression of wildfires within the State of Texas.

  • Currently, the State of Texas:

– Limited aerial firefighting capability – Relies on national assets for aerial wildfire suppression There is an opportunity to establish an aerial initial wildfire attack unit capable of quicker response times resulting in less wildfire damage.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Project Goals

  • Research to find fire history and understand wildfires
  • Understand and Implement the current process
  • Find an aircraft suitable for fire fighting
  • Build a model to allocate the SEATs
  • Build a Business Case for the project
  • Prove that the project will in fact work
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Aerial Firefighting Aircraft Procurement and Procedures

  • TX does not own assets
  • Numerous agencies involved
  • 1 day minimum response
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Firefighting Aircraft Types – Pro’s and Con’s

slide-9
SLIDE 9

…and the recommended choice: SEATs

  • Single Engine Air Tanker
  • Air Tractor AT-802F
  • Manufactured in Olney, TX
  • 200mph when loaded
  • 4 hour endurance
  • 800 gallon capacity
  • 4180 flight hours, 2011
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Airfield Requirements and Locations

For Firefighting Ops:

  • 3000’ RWY length
  • Ready access to fuel

and water

  • Priority over other air

traffic Airfields to the right have TFS SEAT plans in place For Basing:

  • Hangar availability
  • Maintenance space
  • Administrative space
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Understanding the Wildfire Threat

Many factors contribute to Texas wildfires

  • Diverse landscape
  • Wide range of surface fuels
  • Diverse population density
  • Extended draught conditions – since 2010
  • High wind speeds - 20-30mph common
  • Ignition sources – Lightning, Equipment, People
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Texas Vegetation

*TxWARP - Texas A&M Forest Service (TFS) Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Texas Surface Fuels

*TxWARP - Texas A&M Forest Service (TFS) Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Characteristic Rate of Spread

*TxWARP - Texas A&M Forest Service (TFS) Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Texas Wildfire Threat

*TxWARP - Texas A&M Forest Service (TFS) Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Wildfire Ignition Density and Cause

(2005-2009 Source: TxWARP*)

*TxWARP - Texas A&M Forest Service (TFS) Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Large Wildfires vs. Population Density

(2001-2009 Source: TxWARP)

*TxWARP - Texas A&M Forest Service (TFS) Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Facility Location Model in GAMS

  • Mixed Integer Program
  • CPLEX Solver
  • 5 primary equations
  • Combined run for Distance

Only & Distance+TorchScore

  • Runtime - 18 seconds
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Facility Location Model

  • Optimized for Distance
  • Relative uniform distribution

Facilities Opened Optimized Airfield Selection Counties Serviced 2 CLL – College Station 142 SNK - Snyder 112 3 PSN – Palestine 84 PVW – Plainview 80 T82 – Fredricksburg 90 4 AMA – Amarillo 35 BPG – Big Spring 69 GVT – Greenville 72 VCT - Victoria 78

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Facility Location Model

  • Optimized for Distance +

TorchScore

  • TorchScore combines

population density and wildfire threat to optimize placement

  • Not as uniform-but that’s OK

Facilities Opened Optimized Airfield Selection Counties Serviced 2 CDS – Childress 170 EBG – Edinburg 84 3 AMA – Amarillo 61 EBG – Edinburg 44 MWL – Mineral Wells 149 4 AMA – Amarillo 37 EBG – Edinburg 43 MWL – Mineral Wells 127 ODO - Odessa 47

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Large Wildfires vs. Population Density

(2001-2009 Source: TxWARP)

*TxWARP - Texas A&M Forest Service (TFS) Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Previous and New Aircraft Basing Assumption

  • Maximized statewide

coverage

  • Minimized statewide

response time

  • Maximimized

Coverage and Minimized Response Times

  • Optimal

Number of Facilities

  • Fire Damage

Accounted

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Business Case

  • Mostly

provided by similar businesses and aircraft dealerships.

  • Bastrop case

insurance expenses up to date sum up to over $350 million.

  • If project is

implemented, 44% reduction of damage can pay the project 14.36 times!

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Simulation Against 2009 Fires

  • 19 Fires: > 500 acres, < 32 hours actual contain time,

and no air tanker use

  • 1 aircraft
  • Included “Time to Initial Drop” analysis and decision
  • Repeated drop cycles up to actual control time
  • Used values to determine reduction in acres burned
  • Less Acres Burned = Less $ Damages
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Simulation Against 2009 Fires

Results

  • 54% average reduction acres burned per fire
  • 48% reduction of over all acres burned (22,600 to 11, 700)
  • Transit Time – avg. 1.2hrs Drop Cycle – avg. 0.7hrs
  • 5000

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5 34 57 80 80 84 111 117 149 150 153 182 187 191 200 229 257 288 317 341 350 373 Acres Burned Cumulative Burn Hours

2009 0 & 1 Day Cumulative Acres Burned

Linear (Unattended) Linear (Actual Acres Burned) Linear (Simulated Acres Burned w/ 1 aircraft)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Conclusions

Positives

  • SEATS will help reduce the wildfire impact
  • Avg. 1hr response much more ideal than 1 day
  • Feasible solution

Potential Issues

  • High start-up costs / Funding
  • High use / Low Use years

– No fires are a good thing! Unless you’re in the firefighting business – Need Alternative uses

  • Current SEAT contracting structure
  • Concurrence, coordination, cooperation, and support from state

agencies will be crucial

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Alternate Uses?

  • Can aircraft be reconfigured for multi-purpose use?
  • Aerial fire fighting
  • Reforestation efforts
  • Agricultural spraying
  • West Nile spraying
  • Border protection/surveillance
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Questions?

Brian Covish, waves to fire bombers from the roof of his home on Cedar Lane in the Blue Bonnet Acres subdivision west of Bastrop, Texas on Monday, September 05, 2011.

(AP Photo/Austin American-Statesman, RODOLFO GONZALEZ)