Ten years of cosmic muons observation with Borexino Davide DAngelo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ten years of cosmic muons observation with borexino
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ten years of cosmic muons observation with Borexino Davide DAngelo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

16 th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics 9-13 September 2019 Toyama, Japan Ten years of cosmic muons observation with Borexino Davide DAngelo on behalf of the Borexino Collaboration Universit


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ten years of cosmic muons

  • bservation with Borexino

Davide D’Angelo

  • n behalf of the Borexino Collaboration

Università degli Studi di Milano Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, sez. di Milano

16th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics 9-13 September 2019 Toyama, Japan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why Borexino?

  • D. D'Angelo

2 TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

Ø A low energy neutrino detector Ø based on elastic scattering on electrons Ø highly purified organic liquid scintillator Solar neutrinos: 7Be, 8B, pep, pp and possibly CNO. Geo-neutrinos, supernova explosion, neutrino magnetic moment, … See talk by S. Zavatarelli See talk by L. Ludhova

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Water Tank: γ and n shield μ water Č detector 208 PMTs in water 2100 m3 Scintillator: 278 t PC+PPO (1.4 g/l) Stainless Steel Sphere:

  • 2212 PMTs
  • ~ 1000 m3 buffer of pc+dmp

(light quenched) Nylon vessels: (125 μm thick) Inner r: 4.25 m Outer r: 5.50 m (radon barrier)

The Borexino Detector

  • D. D'Angelo

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

3800m w.e. of rock shielding

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • D. D'Angelo

Spherical detector: no systematics due to angular dependence of the acceptance

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons 4

Why Borexino?

Ø A low energy neutrino detector Ø based on elastic scattering on electrons Ø highly purified organic liquid scintillator Solar neutrinos: 7Be, 8B, pep, pp and possibly CNO. Geo-neutrinos, supernova explosion, neutrino magnetic moment, …

Ø Also a powerful detector for muons, neutrons and

cosmogenic backgrounds.

Ø Muon detection occurs with both Inner and Outer

detector

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Phase 2

  • pp ν: 1st observation (Nature 2014)
  • seasonal modulation of 7Be ν
  • Comprehensive measurement of pp-

chain solar neutrinos: Nature 562, 505–510 (2018)

  • more details:arXiV:1707.09279, 1709.00756/

May 2007 May 2010 Oct. 2011 Purification

Preparation

Borexino data taking campaign

5

  • D. D'Angelo

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

Jan 2017

now

Phase 1

  • 7Be ν : 1st observ. +

precision; Day/Night asymm.;

  • pep ν : 1st observation;
  • 8B ν with low thresh.;
  • CNO ν : best limit;

6 cycles of water extr. temperature stabilization

CNO Campaign

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Phase 2

  • pp ν: 1st observation (Nature 2014)
  • seasonal modulation of 7Be ν
  • Comprehensive measurement of pp-

chain solar neutrinos: Nature 562, 505–510 (2018)

  • more details:arXiV:1707.09279, 1709.00756

May 2007 May 2010 Oct. 2011 Purification

Preparation

Borexino data taking campaign

6

  • D. D'Angelo

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

Jan 2017

now

Phase 1

  • 7Be ν : 1st observ. +

precision; Day/Night asymm.;

  • pep ν : 1st observation;
  • 8B ν with low thresh.;
  • CNO ν : best limit;

6 cycles of water extr. temperature stabilization

CNO Campaign 10 years observation of cosmogenic muons!

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • D. D'Angelo

7 TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • urnal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

An IOP and SISSA journal

J

Modulations of the cosmic muon signal in ten years of Borexino data

The Borexino collaboration

JCAP 02 (2019) 046

— 16th May 2007 – 15th May 2017 — CNGS muons (2008-2012) removed — 3218 days used — no prolonged downtimes — Muons crossing both Inner and Outer Detector

  • efficiency 0.9928(2)

— Detector cross sections for muons:146 m2 — Total exposure: 4.2 105 m2 d

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10yr muon modulation analysis

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

8

]

  • 1

Average Muon Flux [d

4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600

Borexino Muon Data Seasonal Modulation Fit

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

σ (Data-Fit)/

6 − 4 − 2 − 2 4 6

Iµ(t) = I0

µ + δIµ cos

✓2π T (t − t0) ◆

d T = (366.3±0.6) d

± · is δIµ = (58.9±1.9) d−1 = (1.36±0.04)% ± Jun 25th

x I0

µ = (3.432±0.001)·10−4 m−2s−1

±

−1

is χ2/NDF = 3921/3214.

± ase t0 = (174.8±3.8) d.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Or folded to 1y

— Period fixed to

1yr

— Rate and

amplitude unchanged

— Better

determination of the phase

  • D. D'Angelo

9 TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov ]

  • 1

Average Muon Flux [d

4200 4250 4300 4350 4400 4450

10 yr Borexino Data Seasonal Modulation Fit

is χ2/NDF = 13702/362.

Jul 1st

e t0 = (181.7 ± 0.4) d,

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why a muon seasonal modulation?

(in a nutshell)

— Muons originate from π and K

meson decay high in the atmosphere.

— The muon flux observed

underground depends on the fraction of mesons that decay before first interaction

— Hotter air is less dense leading

to reduced interaction chance

  • D. D'Angelo

higher temperature è more visible muons

10 TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

slide-11
SLIDE 11

T [K] 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 1 10

2

10

3

10 Height [km] 10 20 30 40 50 60 Normalized Weight 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Pressure [hPa]

Normalized Weights Temperature Normalized Weights (!

n $ + ! n K)

Effective atmospheric temperature

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

11

∆Iµ I0

µ

= ⇤ ∞ dXα(X)∆T(X) T 0(X) Teff ⇤ N

n=0 ∆XnT(Xn)(W π n + W K n )

N

n=0 ∆Xn(W π n + W K n )

W π,K(X) ⇤ (1 X/Λ⇥

π,K)2eX/Λπ,KA1 π,K

⇥ + (⇥ + 1)B1

π,KK(X)(⌅Eth cos ⌅⇧/⇤π,K)2

  • nly site-related parameter

∆Iµ I0

µ

= T ∆Teff Teff T(X) W(X)

h i , hEthr cos ✓i = (1.34 ± 0.18) TeV

new from our simulation [formerly 1.833 TeV from Grashorn et al. (2010)]

d A1

K = 0.38 · rK/π, w

eter B1 considers

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Air temperature data

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

12 Time

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Temperature [K]

212 214 216 218 220 222 224 226 228 230

ECMWF Data Seasonal Modulation Fit Jul/2014 Dec/2014 Jul/2015 Jan/2016

Deviation from mean (%)

10 − 8 − 6 − 4 − 2 − 2 4 6 8 10

Close agreement also on short scale variations

ü 4 daily measures: 0h, 6h, 12h, 18h. ü 37 pressure levels: [1-1000]hPa. ü 1.5km spaced grid ü interpolate to LNGS coordinates

Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW): ~1-2w winter maxima due to artic cyclone deformations. [Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 L05809 (2009)]‏

Temperature Borexino muon rate European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecast (ECMWF):

slide-13
SLIDE 13

αT

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

13

Error halved ! ∆Iµ I0

µ

= T ∆Teff Teff

(%) 〉

eff

T 〈 /

eff

T Δ

5 − 4 − 3 − 2 − 1 − 1 2 3

(%) 〉

µ

I 〈 /

µ

I Δ

10 − 5 − 5 10

Data 0.02 ± = 0.90

T

α

R-value=0.55

Experiment Time period ↵T Borexino (This work) 2007–2017 0.90 ± 0.02 Borexino Phase I [6] 2007–2011 0.93 ± 0.04 GERDA [7] 2010–2013 0.96 ± 0.05 0.91 ± 0.05 MACRO [31] 1991–1997 0.91 ± 0.07 LVD [5] 1992–2016 0.93 ± 0.02

↵T = 1 Dπ 1/✏K + AK(Dπ/DK)2/✏π 1/✏K + AK(Dπ/DK)/✏π ,

↵T = T I0

µ

@Iµ @T

Dπ,K ⌘

  • + 1

✏π,K 1.1hEthr cos ✓i + 1

with some parametrization….

d AK = 0.38⇥rK/π the product of the t

Revising the value from 1.833 TeV to 1.34 TeV, the prediction shifts from αT = 0.92 ± 0.02 to αT = 0.895 ± 0.15

Predicted αT at LNGS:

slide-14
SLIDE 14

[TeV] 〉 θ cos

thr

E 〈

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

T

α

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

LNGS Weighted Mean Ice Cube MINOS Double Chooz ND Double Chooz FD Daya Bay EH1 Daya Bay EH2 Daya Bay EH3 Barrett AMANDA

T

α

π

)

T

α (

K

)

T

α ( 0.02 ± = 0.08

π K/

Fit: r

T

α

π

)

T

α (

K

)

T

α ( 0.02 ± = 0.08

π K/

Fit: r

0.85 0.9 0.95 1

Borexino Borexino LVD GERDA I GERDA II MACRO (This Work) (2012)

αT

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

14

based on rK/π = 0.149 ± 0.06 literature value

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Kaon/Pion ratio indirect measure

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

15

π K/

Atmospheric Kaon to Pion Ratio r 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

T

α

0.84 0.86 0.88 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98

T

α Experimental

T

α Theoretical Fit

2

χ Combined

  • 0.07

+0.11

= 0.11

π K/

Best Fit Value: r

[GeV] s

2

10

3

10

π K/

r

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

)

atm

Borexino (this work) (p+A )

atm

MINOS (p+A )

atm

IceCube (p+A NA49 (Pb+Pb) )

  • π

/

  • STAR (Au+Au, K

+p) p E735 (

comparison with existing measurements

duction ratio, we es

  • f rK/π = 0.11+0.11

−0.07.

2 profiles of the B

gy ps = (190 ± 28) GeV,

√s computed assuming a fixed nucleon target hit by a proton of 18 TeV, computed as 10x the simulated

  • n a fixed nucleon target. Th

gy hEthri = (1.8±0.2) TeV , given that cosmic muons

slide-16
SLIDE 16

long term modulation

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

16

]

  • 1

Average Muon Flux [d 4300 4310 4320 4330 4340 4350 4360 2007 2008 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2016 2017

Borexino Muon Data Long-Term Modulation

Ampl = (0.34±0.04)% Tlong=(8.25+0.82)yr muon flux

  • nly

not in T!

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ü we speculate on a possible correlation ü we cannot prove nor rule out a correlation ü anti-correlation observed in this work, dominated by MACRO+LVD data:

ü

  • E. Fernandez-Martinez and R. Mahbubani, The Gran Sasso muon

puzzle, JCAP 07 (2012) 029

Period [d] 10

2

10

3

10

4

10 Lomb-Scargle Power P

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10 99.5% C.L. Sunspot Data

Solar activity

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

17

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Sunspot Number

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Sunspot Data Solar Cycle Fit

F(t) = A ✓t − ts b ◆3 " exp ✓t − ts b ◆2 − c #−1

Half Period/ Rise Time [d] Maximum Muon Flux (Sinusoidal Fit) 1505 ± 150 16th of June 2012 ± 271 d Muon Flux (Gaussian Fit) 1207 ± 116 4th of March 2012 ± 180 d Solar Sunspot Activity (Gaussian Fit) 1578 ± 3 8th of April 2013 ± 5 d

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov ]

  • 1

Neutrons [d

58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 10 yr Borexino Data Seasonal Modulation Fit

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov ]

  • 1

Neutron-producing muons [d

35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 10 yr Borexino Data Seasonal Modulation Fit

Neutron modulation

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

18

n-producing muons low (<10) multiplicity neutrons

ü We observe neutron capture gammas (2.2 or 4.9 MeV) in the wake (τ~ 260μs) of muons. ü Modulation in the neutron rate only with a low multiplicity cut (<10). ü Showering muons with neutron multiplicity up to 1000 neutrons

  • non-Poissonian probability distribution

ü Confirmed by Lomb-Scargle ü Why such high amplitude? Variations in <Eμ>? ü Requires <Eμ> = (280±4.5) GeV. From our simulations it would reflect in >10% muon flux variation which is not

  • bserved.

Neutron Phase Amplitude Multiplicity Projected [months] Projected [%] Neutron-producing muons 6.3 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.5 n = 1 6.6 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.6

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

—

We have analyzed 10 years of cosmogenic muons collected with Borexino continuously running.

—

We reported a high-statistics seasonal modulation with t0=(181.7±0.4) or Jul 1st.

—

We observed the same modulation in atmospheric temperature data.

—

We measured the correlation coefficient αT=0.90±0.02

—

We measured the Kaon/Pion ratio in muon production rK/π=0.11+0.11

  • 0.07

—

We observe a secondary long term modulation with T~8.25yr and main peak in Jun 2012.

—

We observe seasonal modulation on the cosmogenic neutron rate only for low multiplicity events (<10) and with an amplitude unexpectedly larger than muon modulation.

  • D. D'Angelo

19 TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

Tiank you for your atuentjon!

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Ciao Simone!

  • D. D'Angelo

20 TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

Simone Marcocci 1989-2019

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ADDITIONAL MATERIAL

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

  • D. D'Angelo

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

slide-23
SLIDE 23

a little bibliography on muon modulation

— Muon modulation is known since ‘50s:

  • Barrett et al. Rev. Mod. Phys., 24:133, 1952.

— First observed at LNGS by MACRO in ‘97:

  • M. Ambrosio et al. Seasonal variations in the underground muon intensity as seen

by macro. Astropart. Phys., 7:109–124, 1997.

  • Revised in: M. Ambrosio et al., Phys. Rev. D67, 042002 (2003).

— Extensive by MINOS:

  • P

. Adamson et al. (MINOS coll.). Observation of muon intensity variations by season with the MINOS far detector. Phys. Rev. D81, 012001, 2010. arXiv: 0909.4012 [hep-ex]. — Also observed at LNGS by LVD and GERDA: — M.Selvi (for the LVD coll.) In Proc. 31st ICRC, 2009. — C. Vigorito (for the LVD coll.) In Proc. 35th ICRC, 2017. — GERDA coll., Astrop. Physics 84 (2016) 29. — Borexino previous work — Borexino collaboration, Cosmic-muon flux and annual modulation in Borexino at 3800 m water-equivalent depth, JCAP 05 (2012) 015

  • D. D'Angelo

23 TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • D. D'Angelo

Abruzzo, Italy 120 Km from Rome

Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso Assergi (AQ) Italy 1400 m of rock shielding ~3800 m w.e.

Borexino Detector and Plants

External Labs

The experimental site

24 TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

slide-25
SLIDE 25

f

  • A

r

  • d

l n t: , e

  • Neutrino energy (MeV)

1 10 Pee 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 pp

7Be

pep

8B

Vacuum-LMA MSW-LMA

(assuming HZ-SSM)

  • Pee(pp)=0.57±0.09
  • Pee(7Be,862keV)=0.53±0.05
  • Pee(pep)=0.43±0.11
  • Pee(8B, 8.7MeV)=0.37±0.08

*oscillation parameters from: I.Esteban, MC.Gonzalez-

Concha, M.Maltoni, I.Martinez-Soler and T.Schwetz, Journal

  • f High Energy Physics 01 (2017)

Survival probability meas. by Borexino

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

25

Borexino only

The whole pp-chain is measured by the same experiment!

See talk by S. Zavatarelli in the neutrino session

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Comparison with other LNGS results

TAUP 2019 – Borexino Cosmic Muons

  • D. D'Angelo

26 Experiment Borexino Borexino I GERDA MACRO LVD I LVD II (This Work) [6] [7] [31] [4] [5] Location Hall C Hall C Hall A Hall B Hall A Hall A Time 2007–2017 2007–2011 2010–2013 1991–1997 2001–2008 1992–2016 Rate [10−4m−2s−1] 3.432 ± 0.001 3.41 ± 0.01 3.47 ± 0.07 3.22 ± 0.08 3.31 ± 0.03 3.3332 ± 0.0005 Amplitude [10−6m−2s−1] 4.7 ± 0.2 4.4 ± 0.2 4.72 ± 0.33 — 5.0 ± 0.2 5.2 ± 0.3 Amplitude (%) 1.36 ± 0.04 1.29 ± 0.07 1.36 ± 0.07 — 1.51 ± 0.03 1.56 ± 0.01 Period [d] 366.3 ± 0.6 366 ± 3 — — 367 ± 15 365.1 ± 0.2 Phase [d] 181.7 ± 0.4 179 ± 3 191 ± 4 — 185 ± 15 187 ± 3