Teacher and Principal Teacher and Principal Effectiveness - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Teacher and Principal Teacher and Principal Effectiveness Initiative Effectiveness Initiative

Developing and Implementing Developing and Implementing Frameworks for Teaching and Frameworks for Teaching and Leading Leading

Why Change? Why Change?

• Education Reform Act of 2010

Education Reform Act of 2010

• MSDE Race to the Top

MSDE Race to the Top

2 2

• 50% of the total evaluation rating

50% of the total evaluation rating based on skills, knowledge, and based on skills, knowledge, and practice; 50% based on student practice; 50% based on student growth growth

• Annual evaluation for all teachers

Annual evaluation for all teachers

• Statewide pilot 2012; full

Statewide pilot 2012; full implementation 2013 implementation 2013

RACE TO THE TOP EXPECTATIONS FOR RACE TO THE TOP EXPECTATIONS FOR EVALUATING TEACHERS EVALUATING TEACHERS’ ’ AND PRINCIPALS AND PRINCIPALS’ ’ SKILLS, SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE, AND PRACTICES KNOWLEDGE, AND PRACTICES

3 3

“… “…evaluation of teachers shall include at evaluation of teachers shall include at least these four components: planning and least these four components: planning and preparation, classroom environment, preparation, classroom environment, instruction, and professional instruction, and professional responsibility. responsibility.” ” “ “The 4 domains in the Danielson The 4 domains in the Danielson Framework were determined to best Framework were determined to best represent key common domains. represent key common domains.” ”

MSDE Criteria for Teacher Evaluation MSDE Criteria for Teacher Evaluation

MSDE Race to the Top Application MSDE Race to the Top Application

4 4

“ “For an additional 25% of the evaluation For an additional 25% of the evaluation rating of principals, LEAs will be rating of principals, LEAs will be expected to assess the principal's skills, expected to assess the principal's skills, knowledge, practice, and leadership in knowledge, practice, and leadership in the 8 areas defined by the 8 areas defined by The Maryland The Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework Instructional Leadership Framework. . The The final 25% of principals final 25% of principals’ ’ evaluations will evaluations will be at the discretion of the LEAs. be at the discretion of the LEAs.” ”

MSDE Race to the Top Application MSDE Race to the Top Application

MSDE Criteria for Principal Evaluation MSDE Criteria for Principal Evaluation

5 5

• Mike Alban

Mike Alban

• Crystal Arndt

Crystal Arndt

• Mary Butler

Mary Butler

• Christy Calvert

Christy Calvert

• Karen Covino

Karen Covino

• Stacy DeColli

Stacy DeColli

• Simao Drew

Simao Drew

• Heather Goodhart

Heather Goodhart

• Donn Hicks

Donn Hicks

• Susan Hopkins

Susan Hopkins

• Linda Kephardt

Linda Kephardt

• Eric King

Eric King

• Jeanne

Jeanne McDearmon McDearmon

• Ted Payne

Ted Payne

• Dwayne Piper

Dwayne Piper

• Alice Rau

Alice Rau

• Heather Romig

Heather Romig

• Jimmie Saylor

Jimmie Saylor

• Mary Swack

Mary Swack

COMMITTEE MEMBERS COMMITTEE MEMBERS -

• TEACHER

TEACHER

Co Co-

• Chairs

Chairs – – M. Pfaff and M. Tomko

• M. Pfaff and M. Tomko

6 6

COMMITTEE MEMBERS COMMITTEE MEMBERS – – PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL

Co Co-

• Chairs

Chairs – – M. Pfaff and T. Clowes

• M. Pfaff and T. Clowes
• J. Alisaukus
• J. Alisaukus
• D. Benner
• D. Benner
• S. Bream
• S. Bream
• M. Cashdollar
• M. Cashdollar
• B. Gelsinger
• B. Gelsinger
• G. Hill
• G. Hill
• J. Janowich
• J. Janowich
• K. Luniewski
• K. Luniewski
• R. Mattavi
• R. Mattavi
• C. McCabe
• C. McCabe
• P. Mesta
• P. Mesta
• K. Morgan
• K. Morgan
• J. Rogers
• J. Rogers
• C. Schnorr
• C. Schnorr
• K. Streaker
• K. Streaker
• C. Thomas
• C. Thomas

7 7

Committees Committees’ ’ Responsibilities Responsibilities

• The charge

The charge

• Identify criteria for the CCPS Framework

Identify criteria for the CCPS Framework for Teaching and Framework for Leadership for Teaching and Framework for Leadership (the 50% skills, knowledge, practice) (the 50% skills, knowledge, practice)

• Design data collection tools for teacher and

Design data collection tools for teacher and principal evaluation principal evaluation

• The non

The non-

• charge

charge

• Determine student growth measures or

Determine student growth measures or %ages %ages

• Recommend changes in evaluation

Recommend changes in evaluation procedures procedures

8 8

Timeline and Completed Tasks Timeline and Completed Tasks

• Monthly work sessions January

Monthly work sessions January – – June June 2011 2011

• Gap analysis

Gap analysis

• Danielson/Leadership Framework

Danielson/Leadership Framework alignment alignment

• CCPS Framework design

CCPS Framework design

• Rubrics and rating system

Rubrics and rating system

• Evaluation and Observation tools

Evaluation and Observation tools

• Professional Development Planning

Professional Development Planning

9 9

Progress to Date Progress to Date

• Both frameworks have been designed

Both frameworks have been designed and shared informally and shared informally

• Rubrics have been developed

Rubrics have been developed

• Evaluation tools and rating scales have

Evaluation tools and rating scales have been developed been developed

• Tools for teacher observation have

Tools for teacher observation have been designed been designed

10 10

Next Steps Next Steps

• Begin professional development

Begin professional development – – summer 2011 summer 2011

• Fall introduction with professional

Fall introduction with professional development development

• System

System-

• wide use of

wide use of

• bservation/evaluation using the new
• bservation/evaluation using the new

frameworks frameworks

• Tailored frameworks to be developed

Tailored frameworks to be developed for non for non-

• traditional classroom teachers

traditional classroom teachers and supervisory groups and supervisory groups

11 11

Next Steps, cont. Next Steps, cont.

• Collect feedback from users and

Collect feedback from users and consider for revisions consider for revisions

• Follow MSDE

Follow MSDE’ ’s lead to begin exploring s lead to begin exploring and making decisions related to the and making decisions related to the 50% student growth component 50% student growth component

12 12

13 13