Teacher and Principal Teacher and Principal Effectiveness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Teacher and Principal Teacher and Principal Effectiveness Initiative Effectiveness Initiative Developing and Implementing Developing and Implementing Frameworks for Teaching and Frameworks for Teaching and Leading Leading

Why Change? Why Change? � Education Reform Act of 2010 � Education Reform Act of 2010 � MSDE Race to the Top � MSDE Race to the Top 2 2

RACE TO THE TOP EXPECTATIONS FOR RACE TO THE TOP EXPECTATIONS FOR EVALUATING TEACHERS’ ’ AND PRINCIPALS AND PRINCIPALS’ ’ SKILLS, SKILLS, EVALUATING TEACHERS KNOWLEDGE, AND PRACTICES KNOWLEDGE, AND PRACTICES � 50% of the total evaluation rating � 50% of the total evaluation rating based on skills, knowledge, and based on skills, knowledge, and practice; 50% based on student practice; 50% based on student growth growth � Annual evaluation for all teachers � Annual evaluation for all teachers � Statewide pilot 2012; full � Statewide pilot 2012; full implementation 2013 implementation 2013 3 3

MSDE Criteria for Teacher Evaluation MSDE Criteria for Teacher Evaluation “…evaluation of teachers shall include at evaluation of teachers shall include at “… least these four components: planning and least these four components: planning and preparation, classroom environment, preparation, classroom environment, instruction, and professional instruction, and professional responsibility.” ” responsibility. “The 4 domains in the Danielson The 4 domains in the Danielson “ Framework were determined to best Framework were determined to best represent key common domains.” ” represent key common domains. MSDE Race to the Top Application MSDE Race to the Top Application 4 4

MSDE Criteria for Principal Evaluation MSDE Criteria for Principal Evaluation “For an additional 25% of the evaluation For an additional 25% of the evaluation “ rating of principals, LEAs will be rating of principals, LEAs will be expected to assess the principal's skills, expected to assess the principal's skills, knowledge, practice, and leadership in knowledge, practice, and leadership in the 8 areas defined by The Maryland The Maryland the 8 areas defined by Instructional Leadership Framework . . The The Instructional Leadership Framework final 25% of principals’ ’ evaluations will evaluations will final 25% of principals be at the discretion of the LEAs.” ” be at the discretion of the LEAs. MSDE Race to the Top Application MSDE Race to the Top Application 5 5

COMMITTEE MEMBERS - - TEACHER TEACHER COMMITTEE MEMBERS Co- -Chairs Chairs – – M. Pfaff and M. Tomko M. Pfaff and M. Tomko Co � Mike Alban � Linda Kephardt � � Mike Alban Linda Kephardt � Crystal Arndt � Eric King � � Crystal Arndt Eric King � Mary Butler � Jeanne � � Mary Butler Jeanne McDearmon McDearmon � Christy Calvert � Christy Calvert � Ted Payne � Ted Payne � Karen Covino � Karen Covino � Dwayne Piper � Dwayne Piper � Stacy DeColli � Stacy DeColli � Alice Rau � Alice Rau � Simao Drew � Simao Drew � Heather Romig � Heather Romig � Heather Goodhart � Heather Goodhart � Jimmie Saylor � Jimmie Saylor � Donn Hicks � Donn Hicks � Mary Swack � Mary Swack � Susan Hopkins � Susan Hopkins 6 6

COMMITTEE MEMBERS – – PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS Co- -Chairs Chairs – – M. Pfaff and T. Clowes M. Pfaff and T. Clowes Co � J. Alisaukus � J. Alisaukus � R. Mattavi � R. Mattavi � D. Benner � D. Benner � C. McCabe � C. McCabe � S. Bream � S. Bream � P. Mesta � P. Mesta � M. Cashdollar � M. Cashdollar � K. Morgan � K. Morgan � B. Gelsinger � B. Gelsinger � J. Rogers � J. Rogers � G. Hill � G. Hill � C. Schnorr � C. Schnorr � J. Janowich � J. Janowich � K. Streaker � K. Streaker � K. Luniewski � K. Luniewski � C. Thomas � C. Thomas 7 7

Committees’ ’ Responsibilities Responsibilities Committees � The charge � The charge � Identify criteria for the CCPS Framework Identify criteria for the CCPS Framework � for Teaching and Framework for Leadership for Teaching and Framework for Leadership (the 50% skills, knowledge, practice) (the 50% skills, knowledge, practice) � Design data collection tools for teacher and Design data collection tools for teacher and � principal evaluation principal evaluation � The non � The non- -charge charge � Determine student growth measures or Determine student growth measures or � %ages %ages � Recommend changes in evaluation Recommend changes in evaluation � procedures procedures 8 8

Timeline and Completed Tasks Timeline and Completed Tasks � Monthly work sessions January � Monthly work sessions January – – June June 2011 2011 � Gap analysis � Gap analysis � Danielson/Leadership Framework � Danielson/Leadership Framework alignment alignment � CCPS Framework design � CCPS Framework design � Rubrics and rating system � Rubrics and rating system � Evaluation and Observation tools � Evaluation and Observation tools � Professional Development Planning � Professional Development Planning 9 9

Progress to Date Progress to Date � Both frameworks have been designed � Both frameworks have been designed and shared informally and shared informally � Rubrics have been developed � Rubrics have been developed � Evaluation tools and rating scales have � Evaluation tools and rating scales have been developed been developed � Tools for teacher observation have � Tools for teacher observation have been designed been designed 10 10

Next Steps Next Steps � Begin professional development � Begin professional development – – summer 2011 summer 2011 � Fall introduction with professional � Fall introduction with professional development development � System � System- -wide use of wide use of observation/evaluation using the new observation/evaluation using the new frameworks frameworks � Tailored frameworks to be developed � Tailored frameworks to be developed for non- -traditional classroom teachers traditional classroom teachers for non and supervisory groups and supervisory groups 11 11

Next Steps, cont. Next Steps, cont. � Collect feedback from users and � Collect feedback from users and consider for revisions consider for revisions � Follow MSDE � Follow MSDE’ ’s lead to begin exploring s lead to begin exploring and making decisions related to the and making decisions related to the 50% student growth component 50% student growth component 12 12

13 13