Teacher and Principal Effectiveness Initiative Developing and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Teacher and Principal Effectiveness Initiative

Developing and Implementing the Student Growth Component

Why Change?

• Education Reform Act 2010
• Race to the Top
• CCPS need to update criteria and process for

both teachers and principals

2

Performance Evaluation Criteria

50% Professional Practice

• Teacher Criteria

– Planning and preparation – Classroom environment – Instruction – Professional practice

• Principal Criteria

– Leading with Vision – Creating a Culture – Aligning the Curriculum – Improving Instruction – Planning with Data – Building Capacity – Involving the Community – Managing Professional and Personal Responsibilities

3

Performance Criteria

50% Student Growth

• Teacher Criteria

– MSA growth – Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) – HSA – Summative Assessments

• Principal Criteria

– School Progress Index – student achievement and college and career readiness – Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) – Summative Assessments

4

Professional Practice

CCPS Framework for Leadership

50% Qualitative Measures

Leading with Vision 6.25% Creating a Culture 6.25%

Aligning

the Curriculum 6.25%

CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION MODEL

Improving

Instruction 6.25%

Student Growth

50% Quantitative Measures

Elementary/Middle School

20% MSA Growth 30% Student Learning Objectives High School 10% Student Achievement (SPI) 10% College and Career Ready Score (SPI) 30% Student Learning Objectives Other (Alternative Schools, CC Career and Tech Center) 20% Summative Assessment 30% Student Learning Objectives Planning

with Data 6.25% Managing Personal and Professional Responsibilities 6.25% Building Capacity 6.25%

Involving

the Community 6.25%

5

Professional Practice

CCPS Framework for Teaching

50% Qualitative Measures Planning and Preparation 12.5% Instruction 12.5% Classroom Environment 12.5% Professional Responsibilities 12.5%

Student Growth

50% Quantitative Measures

Elementary/Middle School Teacher One State Assessed Area 20% Math MSA

• r

20% Reading MSA 30% Student Learning Objectives Elementary/Middle School Teacher Locally Assessed Areas 20% Summative Assessment for all Attributed Students 30% Student Learning Objectives High School Teacher Locally Assessed Area 20% Summative Assessment for all Attributed Students 30% Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle

School Teacher Two State Assessed Areas 10% Math MSA and 10% Reading MSA 30% Student Learning Objectives

CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHER EVALUATION MODEL

6

Additional Requirements

• Three year evaluation cycle for teachers

– Professional practice component required once every 3 years for tenured teachers; annually for non-tenured – Student growth component required annually – Rating calculated annually based on new student growth data and standing professional practice rating

• Overall rating levels: highly effective,

effective, ineffective

7

Additional Requirements, cont.

• Annual evaluation cycle for principals

– Student growth and professional practice each assessed and rated annually – Overall rating levels: highly effective, effective, ineffective

8

Rating System

• All components of the evaluation given a

numerical rating based on rubric or student assessment data

• Numerical ratings combined for overall

total

• Rating levels were determined based on

trend data

• Electronically calculated and stored

9

Measure Percentage Points Actual Score Points Rating

Professional Practice Domain 50%

Planning and Preparation

12.5% 8 .667

Instruction

12.5% 10 .833

Classroom Environment

12.5% 9 .750

Professional Responsibilities

12.5% 12 .833 Total for Professional Practice

3.083 E

Student Growth Multiple Measures 50%

MSA ELA

20% E 1

SLO

30% #1 HE #2 E 1.5 .75 Total for Student Growth

3.25 E

Overall Total

6.333 E

Example of Scoring Totals - Teacher

10

Measure Percentage Points Actual Score Points Rating Professional Practice Domain 50%

Leading the Vision 6.25% 8 .417 Creating a Culture 6.25% 10 .347 Aligning the Curriculum 6.25% 9 .469 Improving Instruction 6.25% 12 .625 Planning with Data 6.25% 11 .573 Building Capacity 6.25% 10 .521 Involving the Community 6.25% 12 .625 Managing Resources 6.25% 13 .542

Total for Professional Practice

4.119 H

Student Growth Multiple Measures 50%

MSA (ELA and Math) 20%

E

1 Student Learning Objectives (2) 30%

#1 HE #2 E

1.5 .75

Total for Student Growth 3.25 E Overall Total

7.369 E

Example of Scoring Totals - Principal

11

2012-13 Field Test

• Student learning objectives
• Design team meetings
• Ongoing communication
• Professional development

12

Challenges

• Summative Assessments
• Understanding of Student Learning

Objectives

• Student growth component for non-teachers
• f record
• Lag data
• Curriculum alignment to MSA

13

Next Steps

• Summer work sessions on SLOs
• Transition implementation responsibilities

to Supervisor of Teacher and Leadership Development

• Curriculum writing – summative

assessments

• Fall introduction with professional

development

• Refine frameworks for other teacher/A & S

groups

14

Important Acknowledgements

• Design Teams
• CCEA
• Department of Research and

Accountability

• Technology Services

15