t he t op 5 p apers of 2017
play

T HE T OP 5 P APERS OF 2017 Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

T HE T OP 5 P APERS OF 2017 Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD MSc FRCPC No Disclosures T OP 5 P APERS PFO closure in stroke PE in syncope Re-evaluating asthma diagnosis BNP-guided treatment in heart failure


  1. T HE T OP 5 P APERS OF 2017 Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD MSc FRCPC

  2. • No Disclosures

  3. T OP 5 P APERS • PFO closure in stroke • PE in syncope • Re-evaluating asthma diagnosis • BNP-guided treatment in heart failure • Opioid prescribing in ED

  4. I S T HAT A PFO S IGHTING ?

  5. C ASE 1 • 47F with left MCA stroke. • No atrial fibrillation, no signs of hypercoagulability, no large vessel atherosclerotic disease. • PFO found on TTE. “Should I refer to cardiology for PFO?”

  6. T HE B OTTOM L INE • This multinational randomized trial of PFO closure in younger patients with cryptogenic stroke demonstrated a reduction in recurrent clinical stroke • NNT = 28 at 24 months

  7. • Design – Multinational RCT, open-label • Participants: – 664 patients 18-59 yo (45 yrs) • 25% HTN, 4% DM – Cryptogenic stroke – PFO on TEE, with signs of R-L shunt • Comparison: – PFO Closure + Antiplatelet vs. Antiplatelet alone

  8. • Outcomes (followed 2-5 yrs): – clinical stroke: 1.4% vs. 5.4% – silent stroke: 4.4% vs. 4.5%

  9. • Safety Outcomes – Procedure-related: 2.5% – Device-related: 1.4% • Dislocation 0.7% • Thrombosis 0.5% • Aortic Dissection 0.2% – Atrial Fibrillation 6.6% vs. 0.4%

  10. D ISCUSSION • Other studies: – CLOSE trial, RESPECT long-term outcomes • Key differences between older trials – Careful patient selection • Limitations – Differential rates of follow-up – Lack of prolonged cardiac monitoring – Unblinded, ? referral bias for clinical stroke

  11. T AKE -H OME M ESSAGE PFO closure is compelling … …in patients who are younger than 60, have cryptogenic non-lacunar stroke, and who have a PFO with (moderate-large) shunt.

  12. C ASE 1 • 47F with left MCA stroke. • No atrial fibrillation, no signs of hypercoagulability, no large vessel atherosclerotic disease. • PFO found on TTE. “Should I refer to cardiology for PFO?”

  13. T O PE OR N OT TO PE

  14. C ASE 2 • 76F presents to ED with first episode of syncope. • History not suggestive of vasovagal, situational, or orthostatic cause • Normal ECG, normal cardiac examination. • No clear etiology “Should I work-up for Pulmonary Emboli?”

  15. T HE B OTTOM L INE • This multicenter cross-sectional study of 560 Italian patients admitted for their first episode of syncope identified pulmonary embolism in 17% of individuals.

  16. • Design: – Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study – Blinded adjudication of outcomes • Participants: – 560 patients, 72-85 yo (76 yrs) – First episode syncope (not due to seizure, stroke or head trauma) • Exposure: – Stratified into PE “likely” or “unlikely” (Well’s score and D-dimer results) – “Likely” (Well’s >4, D-dimer>250-500 ug/mL) • CTPA or V/Q scan

  17. • Outcomes: – 97/560 (17%) had PE • 45/97 (46%) individuals with PE also had alternative explanation

  18. D IAGNOSTIC Y IELD (GEMINI V . PESIT)

  19. B ASELINE C HARACTERISTICS • 24/97 (25%) had no signs or symptoms of PE

  20. T AKE -H OME M ESSAGE Syncope is a challenging diagnosis … …patients should receive systematic clinical assessment (Wells Score +/- investigations) for pulmonary embolism.

  21. C ASE 2 • 76F presents to ED with first episode of syncope. • Normal ECG, normal cardiac examination. • History not suggestive of vasovagal, situational, or orthostatic cause • No clear etiology “Should I work-up for Pulmonary Emboli?”

  22. A IRWAY TODAY , GONE TOMORROW ?

  23. C ASE 3 • 53M diagnosed with asthma several years ago. • Has never smoked. • May have had PFTs, but not quite sure. • Takes daily budesonide/formoterol. • Occasional dyspnea on exertion. “Should I order PFTs? Should I try to taper asthma medications?”

  24. T HE B OTTOM L INE • This multicentre prospective cohort study showed that 1/3 of adults with physician- diagnosed asthma did not have the diagnosis on subsequent testing and could be safely tapered off of medications.

  25. • Participants: – Random digit dialing in 10 largest cities in Canada – Adults with physician-diagnosed asthma in past 5 years – Excluded: > 10 py smoking • Intervention/Measurements: – Diagnostic algorithm of spirometry with bronchodilator and methacholine challenge – Follow-up for 12 months – Contacted MD offices re: initial diagnosis

  26. R ESULTS • 701 adults entered study, and 613 completed study – 87% recently using asthma medications – 45% daily use of asthma medications • Asthma ruled out in 33% – 97% did not re-start meds after 12 months

  27. • Rate of asthma testing was 51% – Tested à more likely asthma confirmed • Results at diagnosis not always confirmed on repeat testing: – At least 16% negative to positive – At least 12% positive to negative

  28. D ISCUSSION • Reason for change in asthma diagnosis: – Misdiagnosis – Natural history of disease – Change in environmental exposures • Limitations – Selection bias – Mild-moderate asthma (less severe)

  29. T AKE -H OME M ESSAGE • Spirometry must be part of asthma diagnosis • Worth revisiting the diagnosis – With close follow-up, medications can be safely stopped for up to 1/3 patients

  30. C ASE 3 • 53M diagnosed with asthma several years ago. • Has never smoked. • May have had PFTs, but not quite sure. • Takes daily budesonide/formoterol. • Occasional dyspnea on exertion. “Should I order PFTs? Should I try to taper asthma medications?”

  31. D ON ’ T S TOP BNP IN ’?

  32. C ASE 4 • 62M with HF for just over 1 year • LVEF 25%, NYHA 2-3 with CAD and DM on a b -B and an ACEi • Recent hospitalization, with NT-proBNP 2653 pg/mL “Should I repeat his BNP in clinic? Should this guide therapy?”

  33. T HE B OTTOM L INE • In patients with chronic HFrEF, there was no difference in time to first hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality using a BNP- guided strategy, raising doubts about its utility in management.

  34. • Design: – Unblinded multicenter RCT • Participants: – 894 patients 51-72 yo (63 yrs) • ~50% CAD, ~90% on BB, ~70% ACEi, ~50% MRA – NT-proBNP > 2000 pg/mL (BNP > 400 pg/mL) – Decompensated HF within 1 year • Comparison: – NT-proBNP target <1000 pg/mL v. Usual Care without BNP • Focus on neurohormonal therapies, not diuresis

  35. • Outcomes at 1 year: – Hospitalization or CV Death: 33.8% v. 36.0% – All-cause mortality: 15% v. 17%

  36. • Limitations: – Only 45% achieved ‘target’ BNP – 50% reduction in BNP in all individuals

  37. T AKE -H OME M ESSAGE Management of chronic heart failure … …should not include the use of BNP to guide titration of therapies for those with HFrEF… but adhering to guidelines works!

  38. C ASE 4 • 62M with HF for just over 1 year • LVEF 25%, NYHA 2-3 with CAD and DM on a b -B and an ACEi • Recent hospitalization, with NT-proBNP 2653 pg/mL “Should I repeat his BNP in clinic? Should this guide therapy?”

  39. “T HE P ATH TO D ISCHARGE IS P AVED WITH P ERCOCET ”

  40. C ASE 5 • 67F with back pain who visits the ED for sudden and severe onset of pain. • Found to have osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. • Plan to discharge home from ED. “I’ll give her a short course of opioids, how much harm could it do?”

  41. T HE B OTTOM L INE • This large observational study found that long-term opioid use was more common among ED patients who received a prescription from high-intensity prescribers than low-intensity prescribers. • 48 opioid prescriptions à 1 long-term user

  42. Participants: • 20% random sample of US Medicare beneficiaries 2008-2011 (n=375,000) • ED visit and not admitted to hospital • No opioid Rx filled in 6 months prior Exposure: • Doctors categorized as ‘high intensity’ or ‘low intensity’ prescribers Outcome: • Long-term opioid use: ≥ 180 d opioids in 12 months

  43. 1.51% 24.1% 7.3% 1.16%

  44. R ESULTS • NNH: – 48 opioid prescriptions à 1 long-term user • Small increase in opioid-related hospitalizations • No signs of ‘undertreatment’ in low- intensity group

  45. T AKE -H OME M ESSAGES • Opioid prescribing varies widely (3-fold) among ED physicians • Meaningful, but modest, differences in long-term opioid use (0.35%, NNH 48) • Episodic care can cause harm

  46. C ASE 5 • 67F with back pain who visits the ED for sudden and severe onset of pain. • Found to have osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. • Plan to discharge home from ED. “I’ll give her a short course of opioids, how much harm could it do?”

  47. T HE T OP 5 P APERS OF 2017 Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD MSc FRCPC

  48. SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDES

  49. PFO

  50. PFO

  51. PFO

  52. PFO

  53. A STHMA

  54. A STHMA

  55. PESIT

  56. PESIT

  57. BNP

  58. BNP

  59. BNP

  60. BNP

  61. O PIOIDS

  62. O PIOIDS

  63. OPIOIDS

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend