SLIDE 1
THE TOP 5 PAPERS OF 2017
Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD MSc FRCPC
SLIDE 3 TOP 5 PAPERS
- PFO closure in stroke
- PE in syncope
- Re-evaluating asthma diagnosis
- BNP-guided treatment in heart failure
- Opioid prescribing in ED
SLIDE 4
IS THAT A PFO SIGHTING?
SLIDE 5 CASE 1
- 47F with left MCA stroke.
- No atrial fibrillation, no signs of
hypercoagulability, no large vessel atherosclerotic disease.
“Should I refer to cardiology for PFO?”
SLIDE 6 THE BOTTOM LINE
- This multinational randomized trial of PFO
closure in younger patients with cryptogenic stroke demonstrated a reduction in recurrent clinical stroke
SLIDE 7
– Multinational RCT, open-label
– 664 patients 18-59 yo (45 yrs)
– Cryptogenic stroke – PFO on TEE, with signs of R-L shunt
– PFO Closure + Antiplatelet vs. Antiplatelet alone
SLIDE 8
- Outcomes (followed 2-5 yrs):
– clinical stroke: 1.4% vs. 5.4% – silent stroke: 4.4% vs. 4.5%
SLIDE 9
– Procedure-related: 2.5% – Device-related: 1.4%
- Dislocation 0.7%
- Thrombosis 0.5%
- Aortic Dissection 0.2%
– Atrial Fibrillation 6.6% vs. 0.4%
SLIDE 10 DISCUSSION
– CLOSE trial, RESPECT long-term outcomes
- Key differences between older trials
– Careful patient selection
– Differential rates of follow-up – Lack of prolonged cardiac monitoring – Unblinded, ? referral bias for clinical stroke
SLIDE 11
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
PFO closure is compelling … …in patients who are younger than 60, have cryptogenic non-lacunar stroke, and who have a PFO with (moderate-large) shunt.
SLIDE 12 CASE 1
- 47F with left MCA stroke.
- No atrial fibrillation, no signs of
hypercoagulability, no large vessel atherosclerotic disease.
“Should I refer to cardiology for PFO?”
SLIDE 13
TO PE OR NOT TO PE
SLIDE 14 CASE 2
- 76F presents to ED with first episode of
syncope.
- History not suggestive of vasovagal,
situational, or orthostatic cause
- Normal ECG, normal cardiac examination.
- No clear etiology
“Should I work-up for Pulmonary Emboli?”
SLIDE 15 THE BOTTOM LINE
- This multicenter cross-sectional study of
560 Italian patients admitted for their first episode of syncope identified pulmonary embolism in 17% of individuals.
SLIDE 16
– Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study – Blinded adjudication of outcomes
– 560 patients, 72-85 yo (76 yrs) – First episode syncope (not due to seizure, stroke or head trauma)
– Stratified into PE “likely” or “unlikely” (Well’s score and D-dimer results) – “Likely” (Well’s >4, D-dimer>250-500 ug/mL)
SLIDE 17
– 97/560 (17%) had PE
- 45/97 (46%) individuals with PE also had
alternative explanation
SLIDE 18
DIAGNOSTIC YIELD
(GEMINI V. PESIT)
SLIDE 19 BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS
- 24/97 (25%) had no signs or symptoms of
PE
SLIDE 20
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
Syncope is a challenging diagnosis … …patients should receive systematic clinical assessment (Wells Score +/- investigations) for pulmonary embolism.
SLIDE 21 CASE 2
- 76F presents to ED with first episode of
syncope.
- Normal ECG, normal cardiac examination.
- History not suggestive of vasovagal,
situational, or orthostatic cause
“Should I work-up for Pulmonary Emboli?”
SLIDE 22
AIRWAY TODAY, GONE TOMORROW?
SLIDE 23 CASE 3
- 53M diagnosed with asthma several years
ago.
- Has never smoked.
- May have had PFTs, but not quite sure.
- Takes daily budesonide/formoterol.
- Occasional dyspnea on exertion.
“Should I order PFTs? Should I try to taper asthma medications?”
SLIDE 24 THE BOTTOM LINE
- This multicentre prospective cohort study
showed that 1/3 of adults with physician- diagnosed asthma did not have the diagnosis on subsequent testing and could be safely tapered off of medications.
SLIDE 25
– Random digit dialing in 10 largest cities in Canada – Adults with physician-diagnosed asthma in past 5 years – Excluded: > 10 py smoking
- Intervention/Measurements:
– Diagnostic algorithm of spirometry with bronchodilator and methacholine challenge – Follow-up for 12 months – Contacted MD offices re: initial diagnosis
SLIDE 26
SLIDE 27 RESULTS
- 701 adults entered study, and 613
completed study
– 87% recently using asthma medications – 45% daily use of asthma medications
– 97% did not re-start meds after 12 months
SLIDE 28
- Rate of asthma testing was 51%
– Tested à more likely asthma confirmed
- Results at diagnosis not always confirmed
- n repeat testing:
– At least 16% negative to positive – At least 12% positive to negative
SLIDE 29 DISCUSSION
- Reason for change in asthma diagnosis:
– Misdiagnosis – Natural history of disease – Change in environmental exposures
– Selection bias – Mild-moderate asthma (less severe)
SLIDE 30 TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
- Spirometry must be part of asthma
diagnosis
- Worth revisiting the diagnosis
– With close follow-up, medications can be safely stopped for up to 1/3 patients
SLIDE 31 CASE 3
- 53M diagnosed with asthma several years
ago.
- Has never smoked.
- May have had PFTs, but not quite sure.
- Takes daily budesonide/formoterol.
- Occasional dyspnea on exertion.
“Should I order PFTs? Should I try to taper asthma medications?”
SLIDE 32
DON’T STOP BNPIN’?
SLIDE 33 CASE 4
- 62M with HF for just over 1 year
- LVEF 25%, NYHA 2-3 with CAD and DM
- n a b-B and an ACEi
- Recent hospitalization, with NT-proBNP
2653 pg/mL “Should I repeat his BNP in clinic? Should this guide therapy?”
SLIDE 34 THE BOTTOM LINE
- In patients with chronic HFrEF, there was
no difference in time to first hospitalization
- r cardiovascular mortality using a BNP-
guided strategy, raising doubts about its utility in management.
SLIDE 35
– Unblinded multicenter RCT
– 894 patients 51-72 yo (63 yrs)
- ~50% CAD, ~90% on BB, ~70% ACEi, ~50% MRA
– NT-proBNP > 2000 pg/mL (BNP > 400 pg/mL) – Decompensated HF within 1 year
– NT-proBNP target <1000 pg/mL v. Usual Care without BNP
- Focus on neurohormonal therapies, not diuresis
SLIDE 36
– Hospitalization or CV Death: 33.8% v. 36.0% – All-cause mortality: 15% v. 17%
SLIDE 37
– Only 45% achieved ‘target’ BNP – 50% reduction in BNP in all individuals
SLIDE 38
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
Management of chronic heart failure … …should not include the use of BNP to guide titration of therapies for those with HFrEF… but adhering to guidelines works!
SLIDE 39 CASE 4
- 62M with HF for just over 1 year
- LVEF 25%, NYHA 2-3 with CAD and DM
- n a b-B and an ACEi
- Recent hospitalization, with NT-proBNP
2653 pg/mL “Should I repeat his BNP in clinic? Should this guide therapy?”
SLIDE 40
“THE PATH TO DISCHARGE IS PAVED
WITH PERCOCET”
SLIDE 41 CASE 5
- 67F with back pain who visits the ED for
sudden and severe onset of pain.
- Found to have osteoporotic vertebral
compression fracture.
- Plan to discharge home from ED.
“I’ll give her a short course of opioids, how much harm could it do?”
SLIDE 42 THE BOTTOM LINE
- This large observational study found that
long-term opioid use was more common among ED patients who received a prescription from high-intensity prescribers than low-intensity prescribers.
- 48 opioid prescriptions à 1 long-term user
SLIDE 43 Participants:
- 20% random sample of US Medicare
beneficiaries 2008-2011 (n=375,000)
- ED visit and not admitted to hospital
- No opioid Rx filled in 6 months prior
Exposure:
- Doctors categorized as ‘high intensity’ or
‘low intensity’ prescribers Outcome:
- Long-term opioid use: ≥ 180 d opioids in
12 months
SLIDE 44 1.16% 1.51% 7.3% 24.1%
SLIDE 45 RESULTS
– 48 opioid prescriptions à 1 long-term user
- Small increase in opioid-related
hospitalizations
- No signs of ‘undertreatment’ in low-
intensity group
SLIDE 46 TAKE-HOME MESSAGES
- Opioid prescribing varies widely (3-fold)
among ED physicians
- Meaningful, but modest, differences in
long-term opioid use (0.35%, NNH 48)
- Episodic care can cause harm
SLIDE 47 CASE 5
- 67F with back pain who visits the ED for
sudden and severe onset of pain.
- Found to have osteoporotic vertebral
compression fracture.
- Plan to discharge home from ED.
“I’ll give her a short course of opioids, how much harm could it do?”
SLIDE 48
THE TOP 5 PAPERS OF 2017
Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD MSc FRCPC
SLIDE 49
SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDES
SLIDE 50
PFO
SLIDE 51
PFO
SLIDE 52
PFO
SLIDE 53
PFO
SLIDE 54
ASTHMA
SLIDE 55
ASTHMA
SLIDE 56
PESIT
SLIDE 57
PESIT
SLIDE 58
BNP
SLIDE 59
BNP
SLIDE 60
BNP
SLIDE 61
BNP
SLIDE 62
OPIOIDS
SLIDE 63
OPIOIDS
SLIDE 64
OPIOIDS
SLIDE 65