T HE T OP 5 P APERS OF 2017 Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

t he t op 5 p apers of 2017
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

T HE T OP 5 P APERS OF 2017 Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

T HE T OP 5 P APERS OF 2017 Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD MSc FRCPC No Disclosures T OP 5 P APERS PFO closure in stroke PE in syncope Re-evaluating asthma diagnosis BNP-guided treatment in heart failure


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THE TOP 5 PAPERS OF 2017

Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD MSc FRCPC

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • No Disclosures
slide-3
SLIDE 3

TOP 5 PAPERS

  • PFO closure in stroke
  • PE in syncope
  • Re-evaluating asthma diagnosis
  • BNP-guided treatment in heart failure
  • Opioid prescribing in ED
slide-4
SLIDE 4

IS THAT A PFO SIGHTING?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CASE 1

  • 47F with left MCA stroke.
  • No atrial fibrillation, no signs of

hypercoagulability, no large vessel atherosclerotic disease.

  • PFO found on TTE.

“Should I refer to cardiology for PFO?”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

THE BOTTOM LINE

  • This multinational randomized trial of PFO

closure in younger patients with cryptogenic stroke demonstrated a reduction in recurrent clinical stroke

  • NNT = 28 at 24 months
slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Design

– Multinational RCT, open-label

  • Participants:

– 664 patients 18-59 yo (45 yrs)

  • 25% HTN, 4% DM

– Cryptogenic stroke – PFO on TEE, with signs of R-L shunt

  • Comparison:

– PFO Closure + Antiplatelet vs. Antiplatelet alone

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Outcomes (followed 2-5 yrs):

– clinical stroke: 1.4% vs. 5.4% – silent stroke: 4.4% vs. 4.5%

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Safety Outcomes

– Procedure-related: 2.5% – Device-related: 1.4%

  • Dislocation 0.7%
  • Thrombosis 0.5%
  • Aortic Dissection 0.2%

– Atrial Fibrillation 6.6% vs. 0.4%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

DISCUSSION

  • Other studies:

– CLOSE trial, RESPECT long-term outcomes

  • Key differences between older trials

– Careful patient selection

  • Limitations

– Differential rates of follow-up – Lack of prolonged cardiac monitoring – Unblinded, ? referral bias for clinical stroke

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

PFO closure is compelling … …in patients who are younger than 60, have cryptogenic non-lacunar stroke, and who have a PFO with (moderate-large) shunt.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CASE 1

  • 47F with left MCA stroke.
  • No atrial fibrillation, no signs of

hypercoagulability, no large vessel atherosclerotic disease.

  • PFO found on TTE.

“Should I refer to cardiology for PFO?”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TO PE OR NOT TO PE

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CASE 2

  • 76F presents to ED with first episode of

syncope.

  • History not suggestive of vasovagal,

situational, or orthostatic cause

  • Normal ECG, normal cardiac examination.
  • No clear etiology

“Should I work-up for Pulmonary Emboli?”

slide-15
SLIDE 15

THE BOTTOM LINE

  • This multicenter cross-sectional study of

560 Italian patients admitted for their first episode of syncope identified pulmonary embolism in 17% of individuals.

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Design:

– Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study – Blinded adjudication of outcomes

  • Participants:

– 560 patients, 72-85 yo (76 yrs) – First episode syncope (not due to seizure, stroke or head trauma)

  • Exposure:

– Stratified into PE “likely” or “unlikely” (Well’s score and D-dimer results) – “Likely” (Well’s >4, D-dimer>250-500 ug/mL)

  • CTPA or V/Q scan
slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Outcomes:

– 97/560 (17%) had PE

  • 45/97 (46%) individuals with PE also had

alternative explanation

slide-18
SLIDE 18

DIAGNOSTIC YIELD

(GEMINI V. PESIT)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS

  • 24/97 (25%) had no signs or symptoms of

PE

slide-20
SLIDE 20

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

Syncope is a challenging diagnosis … …patients should receive systematic clinical assessment (Wells Score +/- investigations) for pulmonary embolism.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

CASE 2

  • 76F presents to ED with first episode of

syncope.

  • Normal ECG, normal cardiac examination.
  • History not suggestive of vasovagal,

situational, or orthostatic cause

  • No clear etiology

“Should I work-up for Pulmonary Emboli?”

slide-22
SLIDE 22

AIRWAY TODAY, GONE TOMORROW?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

CASE 3

  • 53M diagnosed with asthma several years

ago.

  • Has never smoked.
  • May have had PFTs, but not quite sure.
  • Takes daily budesonide/formoterol.
  • Occasional dyspnea on exertion.

“Should I order PFTs? Should I try to taper asthma medications?”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

THE BOTTOM LINE

  • This multicentre prospective cohort study

showed that 1/3 of adults with physician- diagnosed asthma did not have the diagnosis on subsequent testing and could be safely tapered off of medications.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Participants:

– Random digit dialing in 10 largest cities in Canada – Adults with physician-diagnosed asthma in past 5 years – Excluded: > 10 py smoking

  • Intervention/Measurements:

– Diagnostic algorithm of spirometry with bronchodilator and methacholine challenge – Follow-up for 12 months – Contacted MD offices re: initial diagnosis

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

RESULTS

  • 701 adults entered study, and 613

completed study

– 87% recently using asthma medications – 45% daily use of asthma medications

  • Asthma ruled out in 33%

– 97% did not re-start meds after 12 months

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Rate of asthma testing was 51%

– Tested à more likely asthma confirmed

  • Results at diagnosis not always confirmed
  • n repeat testing:

– At least 16% negative to positive – At least 12% positive to negative

slide-29
SLIDE 29

DISCUSSION

  • Reason for change in asthma diagnosis:

– Misdiagnosis – Natural history of disease – Change in environmental exposures

  • Limitations

– Selection bias – Mild-moderate asthma (less severe)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

  • Spirometry must be part of asthma

diagnosis

  • Worth revisiting the diagnosis

– With close follow-up, medications can be safely stopped for up to 1/3 patients

slide-31
SLIDE 31

CASE 3

  • 53M diagnosed with asthma several years

ago.

  • Has never smoked.
  • May have had PFTs, but not quite sure.
  • Takes daily budesonide/formoterol.
  • Occasional dyspnea on exertion.

“Should I order PFTs? Should I try to taper asthma medications?”

slide-32
SLIDE 32

DON’T STOP BNPIN’?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

CASE 4

  • 62M with HF for just over 1 year
  • LVEF 25%, NYHA 2-3 with CAD and DM
  • n a b-B and an ACEi
  • Recent hospitalization, with NT-proBNP

2653 pg/mL “Should I repeat his BNP in clinic? Should this guide therapy?”

slide-34
SLIDE 34

THE BOTTOM LINE

  • In patients with chronic HFrEF, there was

no difference in time to first hospitalization

  • r cardiovascular mortality using a BNP-

guided strategy, raising doubts about its utility in management.

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • Design:

– Unblinded multicenter RCT

  • Participants:

– 894 patients 51-72 yo (63 yrs)

  • ~50% CAD, ~90% on BB, ~70% ACEi, ~50% MRA

– NT-proBNP > 2000 pg/mL (BNP > 400 pg/mL) – Decompensated HF within 1 year

  • Comparison:

– NT-proBNP target <1000 pg/mL v. Usual Care without BNP

  • Focus on neurohormonal therapies, not diuresis
slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Outcomes at 1 year:

– Hospitalization or CV Death: 33.8% v. 36.0% – All-cause mortality: 15% v. 17%

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • Limitations:

– Only 45% achieved ‘target’ BNP – 50% reduction in BNP in all individuals

slide-38
SLIDE 38

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

Management of chronic heart failure … …should not include the use of BNP to guide titration of therapies for those with HFrEF… but adhering to guidelines works!

slide-39
SLIDE 39

CASE 4

  • 62M with HF for just over 1 year
  • LVEF 25%, NYHA 2-3 with CAD and DM
  • n a b-B and an ACEi
  • Recent hospitalization, with NT-proBNP

2653 pg/mL “Should I repeat his BNP in clinic? Should this guide therapy?”

slide-40
SLIDE 40

“THE PATH TO DISCHARGE IS PAVED

WITH PERCOCET”

slide-41
SLIDE 41

CASE 5

  • 67F with back pain who visits the ED for

sudden and severe onset of pain.

  • Found to have osteoporotic vertebral

compression fracture.

  • Plan to discharge home from ED.

“I’ll give her a short course of opioids, how much harm could it do?”

slide-42
SLIDE 42

THE BOTTOM LINE

  • This large observational study found that

long-term opioid use was more common among ED patients who received a prescription from high-intensity prescribers than low-intensity prescribers.

  • 48 opioid prescriptions à 1 long-term user
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Participants:

  • 20% random sample of US Medicare

beneficiaries 2008-2011 (n=375,000)

  • ED visit and not admitted to hospital
  • No opioid Rx filled in 6 months prior

Exposure:

  • Doctors categorized as ‘high intensity’ or

‘low intensity’ prescribers Outcome:

  • Long-term opioid use: ≥ 180 d opioids in

12 months

slide-44
SLIDE 44

1.16% 1.51% 7.3% 24.1%

slide-45
SLIDE 45

RESULTS

  • NNH:

– 48 opioid prescriptions à 1 long-term user

  • Small increase in opioid-related

hospitalizations

  • No signs of ‘undertreatment’ in low-

intensity group

slide-46
SLIDE 46

TAKE-HOME MESSAGES

  • Opioid prescribing varies widely (3-fold)

among ED physicians

  • Meaningful, but modest, differences in

long-term opioid use (0.35%, NNH 48)

  • Episodic care can cause harm
slide-47
SLIDE 47

CASE 5

  • 67F with back pain who visits the ED for

sudden and severe onset of pain.

  • Found to have osteoporotic vertebral

compression fracture.

  • Plan to discharge home from ED.

“I’ll give her a short course of opioids, how much harm could it do?”

slide-48
SLIDE 48

THE TOP 5 PAPERS OF 2017

Amol Verma MD MSc FRCPC Kieran Quinn MD MSc FRCPC

slide-49
SLIDE 49

SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDES

slide-50
SLIDE 50

PFO

slide-51
SLIDE 51

PFO

slide-52
SLIDE 52

PFO

slide-53
SLIDE 53

PFO

slide-54
SLIDE 54

ASTHMA

slide-55
SLIDE 55

ASTHMA

slide-56
SLIDE 56

PESIT

slide-57
SLIDE 57

PESIT

slide-58
SLIDE 58

BNP

slide-59
SLIDE 59

BNP

slide-60
SLIDE 60

BNP

slide-61
SLIDE 61

BNP

slide-62
SLIDE 62

OPIOIDS

slide-63
SLIDE 63

OPIOIDS

slide-64
SLIDE 64

OPIOIDS

slide-65
SLIDE 65