THE CLEAN MACHINE… A GLIMPSE AT ‘REAL WORLD’
SPRAYER CLEAN OUT PRACTICES
Thia Walker Colorado State University Extension Specialist-Pesticide Safety Education
- Dr. Delphine Farmer
Colorado State University Department of Chemistry
T HE C LEAN M ACHINE A GLIMPSE AT REAL WORLD SPRAYER CLEAN OUT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
T HE C LEAN M ACHINE A GLIMPSE AT REAL WORLD SPRAYER CLEAN OUT PRACTICES Thia Walker Colorado State University Extension Specialist-Pesticide Safety Education Dr. Delphine Farmer Colorado State University Department of Chemistry W
Thia Walker Colorado State University Extension Specialist-Pesticide Safety Education
Colorado State University Department of Chemistry
Thia Walker – CSU Extension Specialist
46% 46% 40% 30% 30% 28%
(n=433)
Ag weed T/O weed ROW Ag Insects Rangeland
94% 58% 40% 22% 43%
(n=440)
Weed Insect Plant disease Rangeland ROW
4% 12% 84%
(n=584)
Less than 1 year 1-3 years More than 3 years 5% 96%
(n=611)
Aerial Ground
The majority found the following
Time Consuming (n=596) Too much ‘downtime’ for equipment (n=593) Cost of tank cleaning additives (n=598)
The majority found the following
No suitable place to clean sprayer (n=600) Limited availability of clean water (n=600) Limited place to put rinsates during cleaning
Difficulty in thoroughly rinsing sprayer tank
When switching types of pesticide (60%) When switching sites (31%) At end of season as part of winterizing equipment (37%) At the end of each day’s use (22%)
Less than 30 minutes (30%) 30 minutes to 1 hour (53%) More than 1 hour (18%)
At the application site (n=598)
At the facility where sprayer is stored
23% 71% 23%
Pull the plug & let it drain Apply to labeled application site Store for future use
Which procedure do you typically use? (n=599)
Run water through, then water + tank
Run water through system, followed by water
Just run water through system (34%)
pesticidestewardship.org
36% 35% 17% 13%
Less than 1/3 1/3-1/2 full More than 1/2 full Completely full
92% 8%
Commercial applicators: Do you wear PPE when cleaning the sprayer? (n=416)
Yes No 87% 13%
All applicators: Do you wear PPE when cleaning the sprayer? (n=595)
Yes No 85% 15%
Private applicators: Do you wear PPE when cleaning the sprayer? (n=431)
Yes No
48% 40% 14% 9%
Just Water Commercial tank cleaner Ammonia Bleach
Complex phosphates, sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, monocyclic terpenes, and nonionic surfactant
Approved by IRB Participants provided with: 6 Sampling jars
Water source Spray sol’n Rinse 1, Rinse 2, Rinse 3 Tank cleaner
Shipping box /packing
tape, ship label for return to CSU
Paperwork to document
info about equipment, pesticides in tank, and procedure used
By August, 26 samples had been
Of the 8 analyzed, 2 indicate that the
Average cleanout efficiency was 95% Chemicals recently used:
Comparing final rinse analysis to MCL for
Sample 23: 1 rinse, no tank cleaner (15 gal tank) 2,4-D
94.5%
Dicamba
96.2%
Sample 36: 2 rinses, tank cleaner (25 gal tank) 2,4-D
99.6%
Dicamba
99.8%
Sample 1: 3 rinses, no tank cleaner (150 gal tank) 2,4-D
99.7%
Dicamba
99.9%
Sample 7: 3 rinses, tank cleaner (1000 gal tank) 2,4-D
99.7%
Dicamba
99.8%
Sample 36: 2 rinses, no tank cleaner (25 gal tank) 2,4-D
94.0% 99.6%
Dicamba
96.8% 99.8%
Sample 17: 3 rinses, no tank cleaner (30 gal tank) 2,4-D
91.5% 90.2% 97.2%
Dicamba
98.6% 99.1% 100%
Chlorsulfuron
96.7% 99.8% 100%
Sample 42: 3 rinses, tank cleaner (390 gal tank) 2,4-D
84.2% 94.5% 99.8%
Dicamba
88.4% 99.5% 100%
Aminopyralid
94.4% 99.9% 100%
Picloram
91.7% 99.2% 99.9%
17% of the samples had 2,4-D &
300 gal tank, 3 rinses, no tank cleaner
60/40/40 rinse
2,4-D 99.9% removed Dicamba 100% removed Fluroxypyr 100% removed Mecoprop 100% removed
300 gal tank, 2 rinses, tank cleaner
100/ rinse
2,4-D 98.7% removed Dicamba 99.9% removed Imazapyr 99.9% removed
1000 gal tank, 3 rinses
250/rinse
2,4-D 99.7% removed Dicamba 99.9% removed
1200 gal tank, 2 rinses (no tank cleaner)
300/rinse
2,4-D 91.6% removed
1200 gal tank, 3 rinses
75-100/rinse
2,4-D 99.7% removed Dicamba 99.8% removed
1500 gal tank, 3 rinses
100/rinse
2,4-D 98.4% removed Dicamba 100% removed
1000 gal tank, 3 rinses
250/rinse
750 GALLONS
1200 gal tank, 2 rinses
300/rinse
600 GALLONS
1200 gal tank, 3 rinses
75-100/rinse
225-300 GALLONS
1500 gal tank, 3 rinses
100/rinse
300 GALLONS
1200 gal tank, 3 rinses 100/400/300
Number of Products per tank mix One – 3 samples Two – 11 samples Three – 35 samples Four – 4 samples Number of Active Ingredients per tank mix Two – 9 samples Three – 19 samples Four – 14 samples Five – 4 samples Six – 1 sample Seven – 2 samples Eight – 2 samples
Use PPE for the most ‘restrictive’ product Purestand (metsulfuron)
CAUTION
Rifle (dicamba)
WARNING
Grazon P & D (picloram & 2,4-D)
DANGER
Watch for MAXIMUM seasonal or crop cycle rates
Trimec plus MEC Amine D (2,4-D, dicamba, MCPP)
Maximum seasonal limits on 2,4-D and dicamba a.e.
ManKocide plus Kocide (Cu Hydroxide – 30% Cu)
Cu doesn’t breakdown - it can accumulate!
Number of rinses? 3 rinses, most below detection Cleaning agent? Possibly helps…choose the
Other products used in tank mix? Surfactants,
Agitation during cleaning cycles seems to help Read labels for cleaning instructions – generics?
Emphasize it is a Handler activity requiring PPE –
Three rinses are effective at removing most of
Applicators must choose appropriate sites for cleaning Amount of water to use should be based on size of
Tank rinsing nozzles can be
Inline filters and screens should be