CIBC Whistler 2014 Investor Conference
January 2014
CIBC Whistler 2014 Investor Conference January 2014 Cautionary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CIBC Whistler 2014 Investor Conference January 2014 Cautionary statements All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING
January 2014
2
All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, that address events or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “for ward-looking statements”. Forw ard-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not alw ays, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward-looking statements in this presentation include, among others, statements with respect to: guidance for production, cash costs and all-in sustaining costs (and its components); the potential difference between gold price and cash and all-in sustaining costs, including relative to other companies; potential modifications to operations (and the cost of any such modifications) and potential opportunities to increase throughput at New Afton exploration potential and the results of future exploration activities; expected future mining activities; the expected or potential annual production, expected cash costs and expected development cost of New Gold’s projects; the estimation of mineral reserves and resources and the realization of such estimates; the results of the Blackwater and Rainy River feasibility studies (including expected costs, mine life, the expected NPV, IRR associated with each project); the timing of resource and reserve updates and other technical work or reports; the timing of permitting activities and environmental assessment processes; targeted timing for commencement of production at Rainy River; the adequacy of capital resources; and expected capitalexpenditures and exploration expenditures. All for ward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Material assumptions regarding our forward looking statements are discussed in this presentation, our MD&A’s, our Annual Information Form and our Technical Reportsfiled at www.sedar.com. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsew here, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the follow ing assumptions: (1) there being no signification disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developments in jurisdictions where New Gold operates, or may in the future operate, being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (3) the accuracy of New Gold’s current mineral reserve and resource estimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Chilean Peso and U.S. dollar being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent w ith current levels; (6) labour and materials costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7) permitting and arrangements w ith First Nations and other Aboriginal groups in respect of Rainy River and Blackw ater being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all environmental approvals (including the environmental assessment process for the Blackwater and Rainy River Projects), required permits, licenses and authorizations will be obtained from the relevant governments and other relevant stakeholders w ithin the expected timelines; and (9) the results of the feasibility studies for New Gold’s Rainy River and Blackw ater projects being realized. Forw ard-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile; discrepancies bet ween actual and estimated production, bet ween actual and estimated reserves and resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile or any other country in which New Gold currently
nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in w hich New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits for Blackwater and the Rainy River Gold Project; in Mexico, w here Cerro San Pedro has a history of ongoing legal challenges related to our environmental authorization (EIS); and in Chile, w here the courts had temporarily suspended the approval of the environmental permit for El Morro; the lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves and resources; competition; loss of key employees; additional funding requirements; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the Feasibility Studies for Blackwater and Rainy River; changes to New Afton’s mine plan or profitability or o New Gold’s asset profile that might alter the allocation of tax attributes to Rainy River; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of First Nations; and other Aboriginal groups; uncertainties with respect to obtaining all necessary surface and other land use rights or tenure for Rainy River; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated w ith obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying w ith permitting requirements, including those associated w ith the environmental assessment process for Blackwater and Rainy
unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com. Forw ard-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of ne w information, events or otherwise, except in accordancew ith applicable securities law s. Allendnotes can be found at the conclusion of the presentation and should be review ed.
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with solid track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history
creation
3
Blackwater New Afton Rainy River Mesquite Cerro San Pedro El Morro Peak Mines
#2
CA NA DA
#6
UNITED STATES
#5
MEXICO
#3
CHILE
#1
AUSTRALIA
OPERATING DEVELOPMENT
4
Mining investment – country rankings(1)
Growing gold resource base in Canada
13.0 Canada 2.3 USA 2.9 Chile 0.8 Mexico 0.7 Australia
GOLD RESERVES (Moz)(1) – 20 Moz
Blackwater feasibility studies adds to reserve base
reserves in Canada
(inclusive of Reserves)
5
6
Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Robert Gallagher President & CEO Brian Penny Executive VP & CFO Ernie Mast VP Operations
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM BOARD OF DIRECTORS
David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister James Estey Former Chairman, UBS Securities Canada Robert Gallagher President & CEO Vahan Kololian Founder, Terra Nova Partners Martyn Konig Former Chairman, European Goldfields Pierre Lassonde Chairman, Franco-Nevada Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Raymond Threlkeld Mining Consultant
Significantly invested team
sustaining costs(1) results in incremental margin(2)
in cash costs(3) from 2009 to 2013E
2013 GUIDANCE – ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS ($/OZ)(1)
New Gold Mid-Tier Average(4) Senior Average(5)
~$900 ~$1,050 ~$1,100
7
Lower costs driving margin expansion
New Afton moving successfully beyond base case
per day in September 2013
8
Evaluating Further Throughput Increases in 2014 and Beyond
per day over five day period in August 2013
throughput, however a decrease in recovery was seen
increase recoveries at higher throughput
end of the flotation circuit
15 22 25 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013
PRODUCTION (Koz) PRODUCTION (Mlbs)
GOLD COPPER
12 19 21 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013
Looking Northwest C Zone B Zone Reserve New Afton C-Zone exploration program
9
MAY 2013 C-ZONE RESOURCE SUMMARY(1)
incorporated into year-end mineral reserve and resource update
Measured and Indicated Inferred GOLD 0.3 Moz at 0.77 g/t 0.4 Moz at 0.62 g/t COPPER 211 Mlbs at 0.77% 301 Mlbs at 0.68%
Industry leading organic growth profile
equivalent to over 2x today’s production
increased shares outstanding by 25% for potential ~175% increase in production
all-in sustaining costs well below today’s industry average for each project
Four current
Three organic projects +900 Koz(1) Blackwater Rainy River
2013 Gold Production Annual Production Potential of Growth Assets
El Morro
10
Further establishing Canadian presence
Gold Reserves(1) 3.8 Moz Gold M&I Resources(1)(2) 6.2 Moz Exploration Potential Intrepid Zone/Multiple Regional T argets Jurisdiction Ontario, Canada
Rainy River
11
January 2014
potential Average Annual Gold Production 325,000 ounces(3) Average All-In Sustaining Costs $736 per ounce(5)
2014 Feasibility Study Highlights – First Nine Years
Average Total Cash Costs $613 per ounce(4)
After-tax Economics Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,450 1,600 5% NPV ($mm)(6) 100 314 520 706 IRR (%)(6) 7.1 11.3 14.9 17.8
Further establishing Canadian presence
Gold Reserves(1) 8.2 Moz Gold M&I Resources(1)(2) 9.5 Moz Exploration Potential Capoose/Multiple Regional T argets Jurisdiction British Columbia, Canada
Blackwater
12
inclusive of $190 million contingency
~1,100 km2 Average Annual Gold Production 485,000 ounces(3) Average All-In Sustaining Costs $685 per ounce(5) Average Total Cash Costs $555 per ounce(4)
2013 Feasibility Study Highlights – First Nine Years
Pre-tax Economics Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,450 1,600 5% NPV ($mm) 402 991 1,582 2,120 IRR (%) 7.8 11.3 14.4 16.8
155% 24% 23% 168% 30% 34% 3% 10% (16%) 9% 7% (14%) (52%) (28%) (52%) 306% 43% (36%)
Cumulative five year outperformance versus gold price and S&P/TSX Global Gold Index
13
S&P/TSX Global Gold Index(1) Gold Price New Gold (NYSE)
LAST FIVE YEAR SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Since January 2009
2013 production and cost results Updated mineral reserves and resources 2014 guidance (production, cost, capital expenditures) New Afton mill expansion update/timelines Development project updates New Afton C-Zone update General exploration updates
14
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with solid track record Peer-leading growth pipeline Track record
creation
16
Appendices Page 1. Financial information 17 2. Consolidated operating performance/Q3’13 summary 19 3. El Morro 24 4. Reserves and resource notes 26 5. Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions 34
17
ber 30, 2013.
illion of total $150 m illion currently used for Letters of Credit.
m ary of debt for detailed breakdown of com ponents of debt.
during 2012 ($300 million at 7.00%, $500 million at 6.25%)
503 million
Appendix 1 Cash and Equivalents(1) Undrawn Credit Facility(2)
18
Undrawn Credit Facility Senior Unsecured Notes (April 2012) Senior Unsecured Notes (November 2012) El Morro Funding Loan Face Value $150 million(1) $300 million $500 million $76 million Maturity 1 year with annual extensions permitted April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 n/a Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ 7.00% 6.25% 4.58% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Upon start of production Conversion price n/a n/a n/a n/a Current trading value n/a ~103 ~97 n/a Key features
covenants Interest Rate
LIBOR based on ratios
1.06%
2016 at 103.5% down to 100% of face after 2018
leverage ratio below 2:1
November 15, 2017 at par plus half coupon, declining ratably to par
leverage ratio below 2:1
repay Goldcorp
30% share of cash flow once El Morro starts production
illion currently allocated for Letters of Credit.
Appendix 1
19
throughput three months ahead of schedule
Lowest cost quarter in company’s history Appendix 2
aining 2.5% acquired in Q4.
20
New Afton 25 ($1,310) ($365) 62 ($1,104) ($191) Cerro San Pedro 24 $723 $771 81 $605 $674 Mesquite 21 $1,017 $1,098 72 $936 $1,162 Peak Mines 24 $856 $1,332 77 $874 $1,405 94 $280 $779 291 $399 $905
2013 THIRD QUARTER
Gold sales (000s ounces) Cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPT 30, 2013
Gold sales (000s ounces) Cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)
New Afton co-product cash costs(1) Gold ($/oz) $454 $526 Copper ($/lb) $1.05 $1.24
2013 THIRD QUARTER NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPT 30, 2013
Appendix 2
21
2012 THIRD QUARTER 2013 THIRD QUARTER
Revenue ($ million) $196 $196 Earnings from mine operations ($ million) $51 $77 Net earnings ($ million) $12 $18 Net earnings per share ($/share) $0.02 $0.04 Adjusted net earnings(1) ($ million) $20 $43 Adjusted net earnings per share(1) ($/share) $0.04 $0.09 Adjusted net cash generated from operations(2) ($ million) $54 $47 Average realized prices Gold ($/oz) $1,359 $1,560 Copper ($/lb) $3.25 $3.69 Silver ($/oz) $21.31 $30.09
Appendix 2
22
ated capital expenditures excluding expenditures related to growth-related initiatives.
Appendix 2
Total cash costs(1) ~$375/oz General and administrative ~$70/oz Exploration expense ~$80/oz Sustaining capital(2) ~$375/oz
$465 $418 $446 $421 $375 $478 $557 $643 $738 $782 $200 $400 $600 $800 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E
23
es no change to industry average cash costs for rem ainder of 2013.
Total Cash Costs (US$/oz)(2)
New Gold offers shareholders potential for over $400 per ounce(1) of incremental margin Appendix 2
(4)
funded by Goldcorp
deposit
underexplored
copper to reserves(1)
source to northern Chilean development projects
24
ine co-product costs estim ated at $550/oz gold and $1.45/lb copper at com m
ptions of $1,200/oz gold and $2.75/lb copper.
Location Chile Mine type Open Pit Reserves(1) – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlbs) 2.9/2,097 Resources(1) – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlbs) 2.9/2,097 Estimate mine life 17 years LOM production/yr (Au Koz/Cu Mlbs) 90/85 LOM cash costs/oz by-product(2) ($700)
Appendix 3
25
ates based on Decem ber 2011 Feasibility Study.
Appendix 3
Funded by $1.2 billion interest at 4.58% ~ $2.7 billion 70% 20% 80%
30% 70% 30%
Total Capital 100% ~ $3.9 billion 100% Average annual cash flow
Carried funding repayment
26
ation regarding reserve and resource estim ates; refer to: New Gold’s “Annual Inform ation Form for the Financial Year Ended Decem ber 31, 2012” dated March 27, 2013; news release dated April 4, 2013 “New Gold Announces Increased Gold Resources at Blackwater Project”; news release dated May 1, 2013 “New Gold Announces 2013 First Quarter Results – Increases Gold and Copper Resources at New Afton C-Zone by Over 300 Percent”; news release dated July 31, 2013 “New Gold Second Quarter Delivers Increased Production at Lower Costs - Second Half of 2013 Rem ains on Track to Provide Strong Finish to the Year”; news release dated Decem ber 12, 2013 “New Gold Announces Blackwater Feasibility Study Results ” and news release dated January 16, 2014 “New Gold Announces its Rainy River Feasibility Study Results”.
ber 31, 2012 except Blackwater which is effective Decem ber 2, 2013, New Afton C-Zone which is effective May 1, 2013 and Rainy River which is effective Novem ber 2, 2013.
ber 31, 2011.
Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary 2012(1)(2) 2011(3) Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Proven and Probable Reserves 19,695 101,466 3,282 7,863 34,347 2,888 Measured and Indicated Resources (inclusive of Reserves) 29,311 160,882 4,223 18,797 115,268 3,946 Inferred Resources 5,315 83,093 1,187 6,323 76,856 2,202 M&I Resources (inclusive of Reserves) Mesquite 5,684
1,703 57,980
55,860
880 1,350 146 948 1,570 167 New Afton 2,224 7,292 1,980 1,742 5,470 1,586 Blackwater 9,497 70,128
25,774
196 9,497
26,594
6,236 14,635
n/a n/a El Morro 2,891
2,954
Total M&I 29,311 160,882 4,223 18,797 115,268 3,946
Appendix 4
27
2012 Mineral Reserve Statement(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Proven 13,140 0.68
114,409 0.56
127,549 0.57
Proven 21,100 0.52 17.1
11,600
26,400 0.48 17.4
14,800
47,500 0.50 17.3
26,400
Proven 2,109 5.89 7.5 1.08 399 510 50 Probable 2,118 3.82 6.8 1.18 260 466 55 Peak P&P 4,227 4.85 7.2 1.13 659 976 105 New Afton Proven
52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 New Afton P&P 52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080
Appendix 4
ber 31, 2012 except Blackwater which is effective Decem ber 2, 2013, New Afton C-Zone which is effective May 1, 2013 and Rainy River which is effective Novem ber 2, 2013.
28
2012 Mineral Reserves Statement(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Blackwater Direct processing material Proven 124,500 0.95 5.5
22,100
169,700 0.68 4.1
22,300
294,300 0.79 4.7
44,400
Proven 20,100 0.50 3.6
2,300
30,100 0.34 14.6
14,100
50,200 0.40 10.2
16,400
344,400 0.74 5.5
60,800
Proven 22,681 1.14 1.88
1,370
81,594 1.12 3.06
8,040
104,275 1.12 2.80
9,410
100% Basis 30% Basis
Proven 307,949 0.57
1,705
Probable 335,152 0.37
1,186
El Morro P&P 643,101 0.47
2,891
Total Proven 7,694 37,880 1,185 Total Probable 12,011 63,586 2,097 Total P&P 19,695 101,466 3,282
Appendix 4
ber 31, 2012 except Blackwater which is effective Decem ber 2, 2013, New Afton C-Zone which is effective May 1, 2013 and Rainy River which is effective Novem ber 2, 2013.
29
2012 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Statement (inclusive of Reserves)(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Measured - oxide 19,100 0.51
274,100 0.38
293,200 0.39
4,900 0.88
96,000 0.61
100,900 0.62
394,100 0.45
Measured - oxide 27,100 0.34 15.0
13,100
49,000 0.24 13.0
20,480
76,100 0.28 13.7
33,580
15,200 0.47 11.9
5,800
60,400 0.41 9.6
18,600
75,600 0.42 10.1
24,400
151,700 0.35 11.9
57,980
Measured 2,700 5.74 7.5 1.05 494 647 62 Indicated 3,200 3.75 6.8 1.19 386 703 84 Peak M&I 5,900 4.66 7.1 1.13 880 1,350 146 New Afton A&B Zones Measured 33,500 0.86 2.9 1.18 929 3,160 873 Indicated 45,900 0.67 2.4 0.89 984 3,530 896 A&B Zone M&I 79,400 0.75 2.6 1.01 1,913 6,690 1,769 C-Zone Measured 1,282 0.75 1.4 0.79 31 56 22 Indicated 11,205 0.78 1.5 0.77 280 548 189 C-Zone M&I 12,486 0.77 1.5 0.77 311 602 211 Total New Afton M&I 91,886 0.75 2.6 1.00 2,224 7,292 1,980
Appendix 4
ber 31, 2012 except Blackwater which is effective Decem ber 2, 2013, New Afton C-Zone which is effective May 1, 2013 and Rainy River which is effective Novem ber 2, 2013.
30
2012 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Statement (inclusive of Reserves)(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Blackwater Direct processing material Measured 116,955 1.04 5.6
21,057
189,044 0.78 6.0
36,467
305,999 0.88 5.8
57,524
Measured 26,521 0.30 4.1
3,496
64,382 0.30 4.4
9,108
90,903 0.30 4.3
12,604
396,902 0.74 5.5
70,128
Indicated 14,200 0.43 20.8
9,497
Measured 26,665 1.21 1.79
1,531
150,696 1.07 2.70
13,104
177,361 1.09 2.57
14,635
100% Basis 30% Basis Measured 307,949 0.57
1,705
Indicated 335,152 0.37
1,186
El Morro M&I 643,101 0.47
2,891
Total Measured 9,330 48,847 2,092 Total Indicated 19,983 112,037 2,131 Total M&I 29,311 160,882 4,223
Appendix 4
ber 31, 2012 except Blackwater which is effective Decem ber 2, 2013, New Afton C-Zone which is effective May 1, 2013 and Rainy River which is effective Novem ber 2, 2013.
31
2012 Inferred Resource Statement(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Oxide 35,200 0.33
15,700 0.55
50,900 0.40
Oxides 53,400 0.17 9.0
15,400
50,500 0.34 8.5
13,800
103,900 0.25 8.8
29,200
1,700 2.64 4.8 1.13 144 261 42 New Afton A&B-Zone 14,900 0.45 2.0 0.65 216 940 212 C-Zone 20,221 0.62 1.4 0.68 401 923 301 New Afton Inferred 35,121 0.56 1.5 0.68 617 1,863 513 Blackwater Direct processing 13,815 0.76 4.1
1,821
3,785 0.31 3.6
438
17,600 0.66 4.0
2,263
64,070 0.29 23.2
47,789
20,655 1.16 2.58
1,717
30% Basis El Morro 137,555 0.99
1,310
Total Inferred 5,315 83,093 1,187
Appendix 4
ber 31, 2012 except Blackwater which is effective Decem ber 2, 2013, New Afton C-Zone which is effective May 1, 2013 and Rainy River which is effective Novem ber 2, 2013.
32
Mineral reserves are contained w ithin Measured and Indicated mineral resources. Measured and Indicated mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability as defined by a technical Feasibility Study. New Gold reports its Measured and Indicated mineral resources inclusive of its mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources are not know n w ith the same degree of certainty as Measured and Indicated resources, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral reserves have been estimated and reported in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (‘CIM’) definition standards and guidelines and Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (‘NI 43-101’). 1) Mineral Reserves for the company’s mineral properties have been calculated based on the follow ing metal prices and low er cut-off criteria: Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off Mesquite $1,300
0.41 g/t Au – Non-oxide reserves Cerro San Pedro $1,300 $24.00
Peak Mines $1,300 $24.00 $3.00 A$120 – 253/t NSR New Afton $1,300
US$24/t NSR El Morro $1,350
0.20% CuEq Blackw ater $1,300 $22.00
Rainy River $1,250 $25.00
3.5 g/t AuEq - Underground
Appendix 4
33
2) Mineral Resources for the company’s mineral properties have been calculated based on the follow ing metal prices and low er cut-off criteria: Mineral resources have been estimated and reported in accordance with CIM definition standards and guidelines and Canadian NI 43-101. Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off Mesquite $1,400
0.24 g/t Au – Non-oxide resources Cerro San Pedro $1,400 $28.00
0.4g/t AuEq – Open pit sulphide resources Peak Mines $1,400 $28.00 $3.25 A$97 - 137/t NSR New Afton $1,400 $28.00 $3.25 0.40% CuEq – All resources El Morro $1,500
0.15% Cu – Open pit resources 0.20% Cu – Underground resources Blackw ater $1,400 $28.00
Capoose $1,400
Rainy River $1,100 $22.50
2.5 g/t AuEq – Underground
3) Mineral resources are classif ied as Measured, Indicated and Inf erred resources and are reported based on technical and economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable f or their potential commercial
Additional details regarding mineral resource estimation, classif ication and reporting parameters f or each of New Gold’s mineral properties are prov ided in the respectiv e NI 43-101 Technical Reports which are av ailable
4) Blackwater April 4, 2013 update:
metallurgical recov eries of 88.0% gold and 64.0% silv er f or oxide mineralization, 85.0% gold and 58.0% silv er f or transitional oxide/sulf ide mineralization and 85.0% gold and 44.0% silv er f or sulf ide mineralization. The 2012 y ear-end mineral resource estimate utilizes av erage metallurgical recov eries of 86% gold and 44.9% silv er f or all material ty pes.
AuEq and a 0.40 AuEq cut-of f that is suitable f or stockpiling and f uture processing based on av erage metallurgical recov eries as described in Note 1 abov e. 5) Qualif ied Person: The preparation of New Gold’s mineral reserv e and resource statements has been done by or under the superv ision of Qualif ied Persons as def ined under Canadian NI 43-101 and they were rev iewed and approv ed by Mark Petersen, a Qualif ied Person under NI 43-101 and an of f icer of New Gold. 6) For additional inf ormation regarding reserv e and resource estimates, ref er to: New Gold’s “Annual Inf ormation Form f or the Financial Year Ended December 31, 2012” dated March 27, 2013; news release dated April 4, 2013 “New Gold Announces Increased Gold Resources at Blackwater Project”; news release dated May 1, 2013 “New Gold Announces 2013 First Quarter Results – Increases Gold and Copper Resources at New Af ton C-Zone by Ov er 300 Percent”; news release dated July 31, 2013 “New Gold Second Quarter Deliv ers Increased Production at Lower Costs - Second Half of 2013 Remains on Track to Prov ide Strong Finish to the Year”, news release dated December 12, 2013 “New Gold Announces Blackwater Feasibility Study ” and news release dated January 16, 2014 “New Gold Announc es its Rainy Riv er Feasibility Study Results”.
Appendix 4
34
Guidance assumptions(1) Spot:
2013 Gold price ($/oz) ~1,300 Silver price ($/oz) ~20.00 Copper price ($/oz) ~3.25 USD/AUD 1.00 USD/CAD 1.00 USD/MXN 13.00 Spot Gold price ($/oz) 1,250 Silver price ($/oz) 20.35 Copper price ($/oz) 3.30 USD/AUD 0.90 USD/CAD 0.92 USD/MXN 13.05
ber 30, 2013 and assum ptions for the fourth quarter of 2013: Gold - $1,300 per ounce; Copper - $3.25 per pound; Silver - $20.00 per ounce; AUD/USD and CDN/USD parity.
Appendix 5
Page 4 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”. Page 5 1. Refer to Appendix 4 for detailed breakdow n of reserves and resources and information related to reserve and resource estimate s. Page 7 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 2. Based on comparison w ith costs published by issuers listed in notes 4 and 5. The manner in w hich costs are determined may va ry from one issuer to another. 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 4. Mid-tier average includes: Alamos, Eldorado, Agnico Eagle, Aurico and IAMGOLD. The manner in w hich costs are determined may vary from one issuer to another. 5. Senior average includes: Barrick, Goldcorp, Kinross and New mont. The manner in w hich costs are determined may vary from one issuer to another. Page 9 1. Refer to Appendix 4 for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations and information related to reserve and resource estimates. Page 10 1. Based on ~325Koz from Rainy River, ~485Koz from Blackw ater and ~90Koz from El Morro as outlined in the feasibility studies fo r the projects. Page 11 1. Refer to Appendix 4 for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations. 2. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated and InferredResources” and “Technical Information”. Measured and Indicated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. At Rainy River, the 6.2 million ounces of Resources referred to above includes 1.0 million ounces of material to be stockpiled w hich has been classified as Measured and Indicated Resource. 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 4. Rainy River production and cash costs based on April 2013 Feasibility Study. 5. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 6. Assumes 10% Ontario mining taxes on income, 2.7% Ontario corporate minimum tax and 15% federal tax on income and assumes dist ribution of tax attributes as betw een Rainy River, New Afton and New Gold’s other operations in a manner that first maximizes New Afton’s life of mine cash flow ge neration based on the current New Afton mine plan. For further details refer to the press release entitled “New Gold Announces its Rainy River Feasibility Study Resu lts” dated January 16, 2014. Page 12 1. Refer to Appendix 4 for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations. 2. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated and InferredResources” and “Technical Information”. Measured and Indicated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. At Blackw ater, the 9.5 million ounces of Resources referred to above includes 0.9 million ounces of material to be stockpiled w hich has been classified as Measured and Indicated Resource. 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 4. Blackw ater production and cash costs based on December 2013 Feasibility Study. 5. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Page 13 1. S&P/TSX Global Gold Index includes 37 gold companies in various stages of development/production.
35
36
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MEASURED, INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “In dicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this presentation are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with National Instrument 43 -101 (“NI 43-101”) under guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by the CIM Council on November 2 7, 2010. While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Under United States standards, mineralization may no t be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the Reserve calculation ismade. As such, certain information contained in this presentation concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar in formation made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inferred Mineral Resou rce” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” wil l ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of Measured or Indicated Resources will ever be converted into Mineral Reserves. Readers are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists, or is economically or legally
Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICAL INFORMATION The scientific and technical information in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Mark Petersen, a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 and officer of New Gold. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources The estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources discussed in this presentation may be materially affected by environmenta l, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other relevant issues. Further details regarding Mineral Reserve and Resource estimates, including classifications, key assumptions and parameters used in such estimates and other related information for each of New Gold's mineral properties are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports, which are available at www.sedar.com.
37
NON-GAAP MEASURES TOTAL CASH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce figures are non-GAAP measures which are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products included leading North American gold producers which ceased operations in 2002. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing, administration, royalties and production taxes, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and explo ration costs. Total cash costs are reduced by any by-product revenue and is then divided by ounces sold to arrive at the total by-product cash cost of sales. The measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP measure. Total cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation a s a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding this measure and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying our financial statements. ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 from the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, sustaining capital expenditures, corporate general & administrative costs, capitalized and expen sed exploration that is sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP measure provides further transparency into costs associated with producing gold and will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the comp any in assessing its operating performance, its ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and its overall value. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding this measure and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure is provided in the MD&A’s accompanying our financial statements. ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS “Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net earnings have been adjusted and tax affected for the group of costs in “Other gains and losses” on the condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted for tax to the extent that the underlying entries are impacted for tax in the unadjusted net earnings from continuing operations. The company uses this measure for its own internal purposes and believes the presentation of adjusted net earnings enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and other mining companies. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under GAAP. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Further details regarding this measure and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure is provided in the MD&A’s accompanying our financial statements. ADJUSTED NET CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS “Adjusted net cash generated from operations” is a non-GAAP financial measure. Net cash generated from operations has been adjusted for one-time expenses related to the company’s acquisition of Rainy River in the third quarter and a one-time charge incurred in the second quarter related to the settlement of the company’s legacy gold hedge position. The company believes the presentation of adjusted net cash generated from operations enables investors and analysts to better understand theunderlying operating performance of our core mining
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Further details regarding this measure and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure is provided in the MD&A’s accompanying our financial statements.
38
Investor Relations Hannes Portmann Vice President, Corporate Development 416-324-6014 hannes.portmann@newgold.com