A Canadian Focused Gold Producer CORPORATE PRESENTATION
CIBC WHISTLER INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR CONFERENCE
JANUARY 23, 2019
CIBC WHISTLER INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR CONFERENCE JANUARY 23, 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Canadian Focused Gold Producer CORPORATE PRESENTATION CIBC WHISTLER INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR CONFERENCE JANUARY 23, 2019 Cautionary Statements ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
A Canadian Focused Gold Producer CORPORATE PRESENTATION
JANUARY 23, 2019
2 ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, which address events, results, outcomes or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “targeted”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward looking statements in this presentation include statements with respect to: guidance for production and costs, and the factors contributing to those expected results, including mill throughput, metal recoveries and ore grade, as well as expected capital and other expenditures; planned development activities and timing for 2018 and future years; and the expected completion of the Rainy River security perfection. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this presentation, New Gold’s latest annual management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”), Annual Information Form and Technical Reports filed at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsewhere, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the following assumptions: (1) there being no significant disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developments in jurisdictions where New Gold
estimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and U.S. dollar, and to a lesser extent, the Mexican Peso, being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (6) equipment, labour and materials costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7) arrangements with First Nations and other Aboriginal groups in respect of the Rainy River mine and Blackwater project being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all required permits, licenses and authorizations being obtained from the relevant governments and other relevant stakeholders within the expected timelines and the absence of material negative comments during the applicable regulatory processes; and (9) in the case of production, cost and expenditure
for the purposes for 2018. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements and the availability and management of capital resources; additional funding requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for metals and other commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States and, to a lesser extent, Mexico; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; risks related to early production at the Rainy River Mine, including failure of equipment, machinery, the process circuit or other processes to perform as designed or intended; fluctuation in treatment and refining charges; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States and, to a lesser extent, Mexico or any other country in which New Gold currently or may in the future carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, the lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of mineral reserves and mineral resources; competition; loss of key employees; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of Indigenous groups; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with
business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses and risks associated with the start of production of a mine, such as Rainy River, (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s Annual Information Form, MD&A and other disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com and
in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this news release are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or
3
Rainy River Mine: Ontario, Canada
recoveries
New Afton Mine: B.C., Canada
extension; internally funded
(1) Refer to Endnote on Free Cash Flow under the heading “Non-GAAP measures” Rainy River Gold Mine Open pit & underground Located near Ft. Frances, Ont. 2018 production: 227koz Blackwater Gold Project +8 Million gold oz in Reserves New Afton Gold/Copper Mine Underground block cave Located near Kamloops, BC 2018 production: 77koz gold and 85.1Mlb copper Cerro San Pedro Gold/Silver Mine Residual leach Reclamation underway
~$400M Short-term Liquidity
Undrawn credit facility
Cash & Cash Eq. (1) $287M
4
New Gold Share Capital
Issued & Outstanding Shares 579M Fully Diluted 589M Market Capital $625M
1. Cash and cash equivalents as at September 30, 2018 plus proceeds of approx. $158 million from the sale of the Mesquite Mine on October 30, 2018. 2. Until the Rainy River security is perfected, which is expected to occur by early 2019, the credit facility will be limited to a maximum draw of $225 million. Credit facility has been extended by one year to 2021. 3. As at September 30, 2018. $111 million of $400 million facility used for Letters of Credit and $160 million drawn at September 30, 2018. 4. Refer to Appendix for further details
New Gold Debt Structure Face Value ($M) Maturity Interest Rate
Revolving Credit Facility2,3,4 $4002,3
LIBOR + 2.25%-3.75% Senior Unsecured Notes4 $500
6.25% Senior Unsecured Notes4 $300 May 2025 6.375%
security perfection imminent
under review
As of January 14, 2019
5
Mineral Reserves and Resources (June 30, 2018)4 Gold Grade (g/t) Gold (Koz) Open Pit P&P (direct processing) 1.17 2,701 Underground P&P (direct processing) 3.55 1,021 Open Pit P&P (low grade) 0.36 398 Stockpile reserves 0.58 99 Total Proven & Probable 1.09 4,220 Measured & Indicated(4) 1.06 2,142 Inferred 1.10 313
Resources” and “Technical Information”. Additional information can also be found in Appendix 3. Resources are exclusive of Reserves.
Production Q4 2018 2018 2018 Guidance2 Gold Production (oz)1 77,202 227,284 210k-250k Operating Costs Q4 2018 9 Months 2018 2018 Guidance2 Operating expense per oz.
730-770 AISC per oz.3
1,600-1,700 Capital ($M) Q4 2018 9 Months 2018 2018 Guidance2 Sustaining Capital
210 Growth Capital
35
guidance
65km from Fort Frances, Ontario Mine life of 14 years
Tailings Management Area Overburden Stockpile West Mine Rock Stockpile Open Pit Mill East Mine Rock Stockpile Low Grade Stockpile
Operational Metrics Q1 18 Q2 18 Q3 18 Q4 18 2018 Tonnes mined per day (ore and waste) 112,432 107,416 102,290 111,507 108,392 Ore tonnes mined per day 36,296 36,043 30,439 32,054 33,687 Strip Ratio (waste:ore) 2.1 1.98 2.36 2.48 2.22 Tonnes milled per day 17,534 16,549 16,962 20,668 17,934 Tonnes milled run rate1 22,771 22,364 22,318 25,835 23,291 Gold grade milled (g/t) 1.08 1.24 1.21 1.42 1.25 Gold recovery (%) 81% 87% 87% 89% 86% Mill availability (%) 77% 74% 76% 80% 77% Production 39,325 55,219 55,538 77,202 227,284
6
shape models
SAG mill starter and ball mill trunnion
in H1 2019 as upgrades and optimization of grinding circuit are completed
Reserve Pit Underground Reserves and Infrastructure
Co Cons nstruc uction Co n Completion
Open P en Pit
efficiencies (OEE)
Mill F Faci acility
and recoveries Organi anic G Growth O Opportuni unities es
underground mine plan
7
22,771 771 22,364 364 22,318 318 25,835 835 26,000 000 17,534 534 16,549 549 16,962 962 20,668 668 24,000 000 77% 77% 74% 74% 76% 76% 80% 80% 92% 92% 81% 81% 87% 87% 87% 87% 89% 89% 93% 93%
Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 H1 Target
Tonnes milled run rate1 Tonnes milled per calendar day Mill availability (%) Gold recovery (%)
Focus cused o
n improving avai ailab ability and and thr hroughput
Incr ncrea ease r reco ecoveries es t to 93% tar arget b by y mini nimizing go gold l loss in n solids and and solut ution
size of 75 microns while maintaining high throughput
ution: n: Optimize carbon stripping and carbon regeneration
8
economics
9
Mineral Reserves and Resources (Dec., 2017) 4 Gold Grade (g/t) Gold (Koz) Copper Grade (%) Copper Mlbs. Proven & Probable 0.61 1,078 0.78 941 Measured & Indicated4 0.63 1,170 0.76 968 Inferred 0.39 192 0.41 131
Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”. Additional information can also be found in Appendix 3. Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
Production Q4 2018 2018 2018 Guidance2 Gold Production (oz)1 18,778 77,329 55k-65k Copper Production (Mlbs)1 20.8 85.1 75-85 Operating Costs Q4 2018 9 Months 2018 2018 Guidance2 Operating expense/Au oz.3
455-495 Operating expense/Cu lb.3
1.10-1.30 AISC per oz.3
(1,020)-(980) Capital ($M) Q3 2018 9 Months 2018 2018 Guidance2 Sustaining Capital 9 28 40 Growth Capital 1 2 5
10
mine plan; permit applications submission
advanced; ore scanner commissioned
supergene recovery completed on time and on budget
exploration targets located within 5km of mill facility
11
Prince George
processing options
with a grade of 0.74 g/t gold
expected in 2019
Mineral Reserves and Resources (December 31, 2017) (1) Gold Grade (g/t) Gold (Koz) Proven & Probable 0.74 8,170 Measured & Indicated(2) 0.71 1,402 Inferred 0.66 385 Mineral Reserves and Resources (December 31, 2017) (1) Silver Grade (g/t) Silver (Koz) Proven & Probable 5.5 60,800 Measured & Indicated(2) 4.5 8,915 Inferred 3.9 2,267
readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”. Additional information can also be found in Appendix 3.
12
agencies
years of final processing, including residual leaching in line with permit requirements
local communities and the country of Mexico
13
2019 Corporate Guidance (second-half January) Q4 and Annual Financial Results (Feb. 14) Completion of Rainy River mill upgrades (end of Q2) Completion of New Afton mill upgrade (H2) Optimization studies for Rainy River and New Afton (Q4) Launch of exploration program at both operations (Q1) Q1 production preview (mid-April)
15 15
Appendix 1
Gold Production Copper Production Operating Expense Operating Expense All-in Sustaining Costs1 (thousand ounces) (million pounds) ($ per gold ounce) ($ per copper pound) ($ per gold ounce) Rainy River2
210 - 250 – $730 - $770 – $1,600 - $1,700
New Afton
55 - 65 75 - 85 $455 - $495 $1.10 - $1.30 ($1,020) - ($980)
Cerro San Pedro2
10 – 15 – $1,960 - $2,000 – $2,000 - $2,140
2018 Guidance 2018 guidance assumptions
2018 Gold price ($/oz) 1,300 Silver price ($/oz) 16.00 Copper price ($/lb) 3.00 CDN/USD 1.30 MXN/USD 18.00
16 REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES (November 2012) SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES (May 2017) Face Value $400 million(1)(2) $500 million $300 million Maturity August 14, 2021 November 15, 2022 May 15, 2025 Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ below 6.25% 6.375% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Current trading value n/a 85.00(4) 78.50(4) Key features
LIBOR +2.25%-3.75% based on leverage ratio
3.25%
declining to 100% after 2020
May 15, 2020 at 104.8%, declining to 100% after 2023
be limited to a maximum draw of $225 million. Figures shown reflect the full credit facility, which will be available after security perfection.
No long-term debt maturities for four years
Appendix 1
17 17
From Geology – Ore from Survey: 2017 Resource Block Model(1) Tonnes Au g/t Ag g/t Au Ounces Ag Ounces HGO 1,490,076 1.54 2.39 73,868 114,325 MGO 859,475 0.64 1.73 17,687 47,865 LGO 681,798 0.40 1.63 8,811 35,628 Total 3,031,349 1.03 2.03 100,396 197,949 From Geology – Ore from Survey: Grade Control Blocks Block Model Tonnes Au g/t Ag g/t Au Ounces Ag Ounces HGO 1,572,593 1.54 2.07 77,970 104,627 MGO 904,452 0.64 1.72 18,685 49,907 LGO 705,987 0.39 1.54 8,950 34,921 Total 3,183,032 1.03 1.85 105,659 189,777 From Geology – Ore from Surveyed Dig Shapes: Grade Control Blocks Dig Blocks Tonnes Au g/t Ag g/t Au Ounces Ag Ounces HGO 1,854,754 1.26 1.85 75,428 110,539 MGO 760,113 0.77 2.06 18,877 50,418 LGO 214,705 0.45 1.66 3,118 11,473 Total 2,829,571 1.07 1.90 97,423 172,429 From Mill – Ore Processed Tonnes Au g/t Ag g/t Au Ounces Ag Ounces Milled 1,620,498 1.21 1.80 62,949 94,029
Reconciliation between resource and blast hole model
in line with the blast hole block model Dilution sources
shapes
mining shovel (PC 8000)
favourably to the reserve model RC Drilling
improve grade control practices and near-term mine plan
HGO: High grade ore MGO: Medium grade ore LGO: Low grade ore
Appendix 1
18 Insti titu tuti tion Na Name Shar ares es H Held % O Owne nershi hip Loc
ion Van Eck Associates Corporation 79,531,692 13.74 New York Kopernik Global Investors, LLC 38,810,125 6.71 Tampa Dimensional Fund Advisors, L.P. (U.S.) 21,307,533 3.68 Austin Morgan Stanley & Company , LLC 20,000,000 3.46 Singapore EXOR Investments (U.K.), LLP 16,717,997 2.89 London
14,803,970 2.56 Baltimore The Vanguard Group, Inc. 14,085,477 2.43 Malvern Ingalls & Snyder, LLC (Asset Management) 8,026,375 1.39 New York Saba Capital Management, L.P. 7,055,498 1.22 New York Renaissance Technologies, LLC 6,832,384 1.18 New York First Eagle Investment Management, LLC 5,987,931 1.03 New York Morgan Stanley & Company, LLC 5,845,314 1.01 New York Sprott Asset Management, L.P. 5,515,588 0.95 Toronto Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas 5,353,430 0.93 New York BlackRock Fund Advisors 5,340,013 0.92 San Francisco Norges Bank Investment Management (Norway) 5,235,294 0.90 Oslo Fidelity Management & Research Company 5,178,619 0.89 Boston Newton Investment Management, LTD 4,861,561 0.84 London Exane Derivatives SNC 4,586,349 0.79 Paris TD Asset Management, Inc. 4,244,851 0.73 Toronto BMO Asset Management, Inc. 4,049,916 0.70 Toronto Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC (Broker) 3,989,468 0.69 New York Schroder Investment Management, LTD 3,872,957 0.67 London Hexavest, Inc. 3,827,980 0.66 Montreal BlueMountain Capital Management, LLC 3,824,559 0.66 New York
Source: Ipreo BD Corporate (as of January 14, 2019)
Appendix 2
19 19
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2017 AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2016 GOLD Koz SILVER Moz COPPER Mlbs GOLD Koz SILVER Moz COPPER Mlbs
Prov Proven a and P Prob robable re reserv rves
13,468 68 77 77 941 41 13, 13,274 75 75 1,033 033
Rainy River (1)
4,220 12 – 3,943 10 –
New Afton
1,078 4 941 1,161 4 1,033
Blackwater
8,170 61 – 8,170 61 –
Measured a and I Indica cated r resources (ex exclusive o e of reser erves)(1)
1)
4,715 715 21 21 968 68 4,325 325 19 19 950 50
Inferre rred re resourc rces(1)
1)
890 90 4 131 31 1,392 392 4 137 37
Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary
Appendix 3
20 20
New Af Afton A&B Zones Proven
– – – – – – –
Probable
28,126 0.51 2.2 0.79 462 1,961 488
C-zone Proven
– – – – – – –
Probable
26,741 0.72 1.8 0.77 616 1,571 453
Tot Total New Af Afton P P&P
54, 54,867 67 0. 0.61 61 2. 2.0 0. 0.78 78 1, 1,078 078 3, 3,533 533 941 941
Proven and Probable
Appendix 3
METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs
Rain ainy R Riv iver(1) Direct
processing
reserves Open Pit Proven
21,468 1.22 2.5 – 842 1,739 –
Probable
50,409 1.15 3.1 – 1,860 5,069 –
Open Pit P&P (direct processing)
71,878 1.17 2.9 – 2,701 6,807 –
Underground Proven
– – – – – – –
Probable
8,954 3.55 9.5 – 1,021 2,728 –
Underground P&P (direct processing)
8,954 3.55 9.5 – 1,021 2,728 –
Low grade reserves Open Pit Proven
7,407 0.38 2.0 – 90 478 –
Probable
26,900 0.36 2.4 – 308 2,086 –
Open Pit P&P (low grade)
34,307 0.36 2.3 – 398 2,564 –
Stockpile Proven
5,313 0.58 1.8 – 99 299 –
Stockpile reserves
5,313 0.58 1.8 – 99 299 –
Combined P&P Proven
34,189 0.94 2.3 – 1,031 2,516 –
Probable
86,263 1.15 3.6 – 3,189 9,882 –
Total R al Rainy y River P er P&P
120, 120,45 451 1. 1.09 09 3. 3.2 – 4, 4,220 220 12, 12,39 398 –
21 21
METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs
Blackwat ater er Direct processing material Proven
124,500 0.95 5.5 – 3,790 22,100 –
Probable
169,700 0.68 4.1 – 3,730 22,300 –
P&P (direct processing)
294,200 0.79 4.7 – 7,520 44,400 –
Low grade reserves Proven
20,100 0.50 3.6 – 325 2,300 –
Probable
30,100 0.34 14.6 – 325 14,100 –
P&P (stockpile)
50,200 0.40 10.2 – 650 16,400 –
Total al Blac ackwat ater P P&P
344, 344,40 400 0.74 5. 5.5 5 – 8,170 60, 60,800 00 –
Proven and Probable continued
Appendix 3
22 22
Appendix 3
METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs
Rain ainy R Riv iver(1) Direct
processing
resources Open Pit Measured
2,996 1.14 5.7 – 109 550 –
Indicated
26,541 1.12 3.4 – 957 2,921 –
Open Pit M&I (direct processing)
29,537 1.12 3.7 – 1,066 3,471 –
Underground Measured
– – – – – – –
Indicated
7,934 3.06 8.6 – 780 2,206 –
Underground
7,934 3.06 8.6 – 780 2,206 –
Low grade resources Open Pit Measured
2,462 0.35 3.3 – 28 261 –
Indicated
23,175 0.36 2.3 – 268 1,713 –
Open Pit M&I (low grade)
25,637 0.36 2.4 – 296 1,974 –
Combined M&I Measured
5,458 0.78 4.6 – 137 811 –
Indicated
57,650 1.08 3.7 – 2,005 6,840 –
Total R al Rainy y River M er M&I
63, 63,10 108 1. 1.06 06 3. 3.8 – 2, 2,142 142 7, 7,651 651 –
Measured and Indicated (Exclusive of Reserves)
New Af Afton A&B Zones Measured
17,155 0.63 2.0 0.83 348 1,090 313
Indicated
10,689 0.46 2.4 0.68 159 824 159
A&B Zone M&I
27,844 0.57 2.1 0.77 507 1,909 473
C-zone Measured
6,424 0.91 2.3 1.07 188 471 152
Indicated
11,918 0.74 2.1 0.88 284 816 231
C-zone M&I
18,342 0.80 2.2 0.95 472 1,284 383
HW Lens Measured
– – – – – – –
Indicated
11,841 0.50 2.0 0.43 191 750 111
HW Lens M&I
11,841 0.50 2.0 0.43 191 750 111
Tot Total New Af Afton M& M&I
58, 58,03 038 0. 0.63 63 2. 2.1 0.76 1, 1,170 170 3, 3,970 970 968 968
23
METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs
Blackwat ater er Direct processing resources Measured
288 1.39 6.6 – 13 61 –
Indicated
45,440 0.84 4.7 – 1,227 6,866 –
M&I (direct processing)
45,728 0.84 4.7 – 1,240 6,927 –
Low grade resources Measured
11 0.29 7.4 – – 3 –
Indicated
15,831 0.32 3.9 – 162 1,985 –
M&I (low grade)
15,842 0.32 3.9 – 162 1,988 –
Total al Blac ackwat ater M M&I
61,570 61,570 0.71 0.71 4.5 4.5 – 1,402 1,402 8,915 8,915 –
Measured and Indicated (Exclusive of Reserves) continued
Appendix 3
24
METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs
Rain ainy R Riv iver(1) Direct processing Open Pit
3,697 1.06 3.2 – 126 385 –
Underground
1,215 3.59 2.7 – 140 107 –
Total Direct Processing
4,912 1.69 3.4 – 266 492 –
Low grade material Open Pit
3,959 0.37 1.4 – 47 180 –
Total R al Rainy y River I er Inferred erred
8,871 8,871 1.10 1.10 2.4 2.4 – 313 313 672 672 –
Blackwat ater er Direct processing
13,933 0.76 4.0 – 341 1,792 –
Low grade resources
4,225 0.32 3.5 – 44 475 –
Total al Blac ackwat ater I Inferred rred
18,159 18,159 0.66 0.66 3.9 3.9 – 385 385 2,267 2,267 –
Inferred Resources
Appendix 3
New Af Afton A&B Zones
7,564 0.35 1.3 0.35 85 322 58
C-zone
7,688 0.43 1.3 0.48 106 325 72
HW Lens
– – – – – – –
Total al New Afton I Inferred rred
15,253 15,253 0.39 0.39 1.3 1.3 0.41 0.41 192 192 647 647 131 131
25
MINERAL PROPERTY RESERVES LOWER CUT-OFF RESOURCES LOWER CUT-OFF GOLD $/oz SILVER $/oz COPPER $/lb CAD/USD MXN/USD
Mineral eral Reserv erves $1,275 $17.00 $2.75 1.30 18.00 Mineral eral Resourc rces es $1,375 $19.00 $3.00 1.30 18.00
43-101.
River, which have been reported as of June 30, 2018 per the Technical Report dated July 25, 2018.
Technical Report dated July 25, 2018, have been estimated based on the following metal prices and foreign exchange rate criteria: Blackwat ater er O/P direct processing: O/P low grade material: 0.26 – 0.38 g/t AuEq 0.32 g/t AuEq All Resources: 0.40% AuEq Rain ainy R Riv iver O/P direct processing: 0.30 – 0.50 g/t AuEq 0.30 – 0.50 g/t AuEq O/P low grade material: 0.30 g/t AuEq 0.30 g/t AuEq U/G direct processing: 2.20 g/t AuEq 2.00 g/t AuEq
Appendix 3
New Af Afton Main Zone – B1 & B2 Block: C$ 17.00/t All Resources: 0.40% CuEq B3 Block & C-Zone: C$ 24.00/t
26
mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence, economic and legal feasibility, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are likewise exclusive of mineral reserves. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable to their potential commercial extraction. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a mineral resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and ‘underground’ are used to indicate the envisioned mining method. Likewise in certain instances, the designators ‘direct processing’ and ‘lower grade reserves’ or ‘lower grade resources’ have been applied to differentiate material envisioned to be mined and processed directly from material to be mined and stored separately for future processing. Mineral reserves and mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other risks and relevant issues. Additional information regarding mineral reserve and mineral resource estimation, classification, reporting parameters, key assumptions and associated risks for each of New Gold’s material properties are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports, which are available at www.sedar.com.
the following criteria: Underground mineral reserves are reported peripheral to and/or below the open pit mineral reserve pit shell, which has been designed and optimized based on a $1,275/oz gold price. Open pit and underground mineral resources are reported based on a $1,375/oz gold price. Open pit mineral resources are reported from within an open pit resource shell that extends to a depth of approximately 400 metres from surface. Underground mineral resources are reported below and peripheral to the mineral resource pit shell. Approximately forty percent (40%) of the gold metal content defined as underground mineral reserves is derived from material located between the mineral reserve pit shell and the mineral resource pit shell; the remaining sixty percent (60%) of the metal content defined as underground mineral reserves is derived from material located below the mineral resource pit shell. Open pit mineral resources exclude material reported as underground mineral reserves.
NI 43-101, under the oversight and review of Mr. Mark A. Petersen, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
27
CAUT UTIONA NARY NO NOTE E TO U. U.S. REA EADER ERS C CONC NCER ERNI NING NG ES ESTIMATES OF MINER NERAL RES ESER ERVES ES A AND ND MINER NERAL R RES ESOUR URCES ES Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this news release are Canadian mining terms as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council on May 10, 2014 and incorporated by reference in National Instrument 43-101. While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, certain information contained in this news release concerning descriptions of mineralization and mineral resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence category. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve estimation is made. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral
Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICAL INFOR FORMATION ON The scientific and technical information relating to the operation of New Gold’s operating mines contained herein has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Nicholas Kwong, Director, Business Improvement of New Gold. All other scientific and technical information contained herein has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Mark A. Petersen, Vice President, Exploration of New Gold. Mr. Kwong is a Professional Engineer and a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia. Mr. Petersen is a SME Registered Member and AIPG Certified Professional Geologist. Mr. Kwong and Mr. Petersen are "Qualified Persons" for the purposes of Canadian NI 43-101. For additional technical information on New Gold’s material properties, including a detailed breakdown of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources by category, as well as key assumptions, parameters and risks, refer to New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed on www.sedar.com and the Rainy River Technical Report dated July 25, 2018. NO NON-GA GAAP M MEA EASUR URES ES (1 (1) A ) ALL-IN S N SUS USTAINI NING C NG COSTS “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure. Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 by the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature (as presented in the cash flow statement), corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides further transparency into costs associated with producing gold and assists analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the Company in assessing the Company’s operating performance, its ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and its overall value. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. All-in sustaining costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under IFRS. Further details regarding historical all-in sustaining costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. “Sustaining costs” is a non-GAAP financial measure. New Gold defines sustaining costs as the difference between all-in sustaining costs and total cash costs, being the sum of net capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature, and environmental reclamation costs. Management uses sustaining costs to understand the aggregate net result of the drivers of all-in sustaining costs other than total cash costs. The line items between cash costs and all in sustaining costs in the tables below break down the components of sustaining costs. Sustaining costs is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.
28
(2) 2) TO TOTAL TAL C CAS ASH COSTS TS “Total cash costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure which is calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products that ceased operations in 2002. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other
generate liquidity through operating cash flow to fund future capital expenditures and working capital needs. This measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of the Company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing and administration costs, royalties, production taxes, and realized gains and losses on fuel contracts, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs and net of by-product sales. Total cash costs are then divided by ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. Co-product cash costs remove the impact of other metal sales that are produced as a by-product of gold production and apportion the cash costs to each metal produced on a percentage of revenue basis, and subsequently divides the amount by the total ounces of gold or silver or pounds
data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total cash costs and co-product cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding historical total cash costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (3) C CASH GENER GENERATED F FROM OPER ERATIONS NS B BEF EFORE E CHANGES NGES IN N WORKING NG CAPITAL “Cash generated from operations before changes in working capital” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS, excludes changes in non-cash operating working capital. Management uses this measure to evaluate the Company’s ability to generate cash from its operations before working capital changes. Further details regarding cash generated from operations before changes in working capital and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (4) A ADJUS JUSTED ED NET NET EA EARNI NINGS NGS/(LOSS) “Adjusted net earnings/(loss)” and “adjusted net earnings/(loss) per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net earnings/(loss) have been adjusted and tax affected for the group of costs in “Other gains and losses” on the condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted for tax to the extent that the underlying entries are impacted for tax in the unadjusted net earnings/(loss) from continuing operations. The Company uses this measure for its own internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance do not reflect fair value changes on senior notes and non-hedged derivatives, foreign currency translation and fair value through profit or loss and financial asset gains/losses. Consequently, the presentation of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and other mining companies. Adjusted net (loss)/earnings and adjusted net (loss)/earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures
5) AVE VERA RAGE RE REALIZED PRI PRICE “Average realized price per ounce or pound sold” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS. Management uses this measure to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold, silver, and copper sales. Average realized price is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS; it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently and this measure is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Further details regarding average realized price and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (6) O OPER ERATING M NG MARGI GIN “Operating margin” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS, which management uses to evaluate the Company’s aggregated and mine-by-mine contribution to net earnings before non-cash depreciation and depletion charges. (7) FR FREE CASH FL FLOW OW “Free cash flow” is defined as operating cash flow less capital expenditures.