T exture mo dels, neutrino observ ables and Leptogenesis - - PDF document

t exture mo dels neutrino observ ables and leptogenesis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

T exture mo dels, neutrino observ ables and Leptogenesis - - PDF document

T exture mo dels, neutrino observ ables and Leptogenesis Martin Hirsch Univ ersit y of Southampton 1. Neutrino oscillation data and neutrino masses 2. T exture mo dels, U (1) family symmetries and O (1) co


slide-1
SLIDE 1 T exture mo dels, neutrino
  • bserv
ables and Leptogenesis Martin Hirsch Univ ersit y
  • f
Southampton 1. Neutrino
  • scillation
data and neutrino masses 2. T exture mo dels, U (1) family symmetries and O (1) co ecien ts 3. Neutrino
  • bserv
ables and Leptogenesis 4. Summary
  • M.
Hirsc h and S.F. King, in preparation
slide-2
SLIDE 2 Neutrino masses: Exp erimen tal facts A) Limits (PDG2000): m
  • e
  • 3
eV m
  • 190
k eV m
  • 18:2
MeV hm
  • i
  • (0:2
  • 0:6)
eV B) \Hin ts"
  • n
non-zero neutrino masses: ) A tmospheric neutrinos: Ratio
  • f
  • e
=
  • ev
en ts disagrees with exp ectation, Sup erKamiok ande conrms earlier exp erimen ts with high statistics ) Solar neutrinos 5 exp erimen ts (using 3 exp erimen tal tec hniques)
  • bserv
e less neutrinos than exp ected ) neutrinos as hot dark matter (HDM) Small (O [eV ]) neutrino mass migh t help structure formation ) LSND exp erimen t
slide-3
SLIDE 3 Neutrino masses and the seesa w mec hanism ) In the SM neutrinos are massless, b ecause N
  • R
do es not exist ) Supp
  • se
N exists, add the follo wing mass terms: L = m D
  • L
N + M M N N ) Giv es the follo wing mass matrix (one generation notation): M
  • N
= B @ m D m D M M 1 C A : ) Assuming m D
  • M
M ,
  • ne
arriv es at the famous seesa w form ula: m
  • '
m 2 D M M ) Smallness
  • f
  • bserv
ed neutrino masses explained b y large mass scale M M ) Ho w ev er, seesa w mec hanism alone do es not x relativ e size
  • f
dieren t en tries in the mass matrix
slide-4
SLIDE 4 F rogatt-Nielson mec hanism Assume some hea vy singlet
  • exists.
Additional exotic v ector matter with mass M V allo ws an expansion parameter
  • to
b e generated b y a F roggatt-Nielsen mec hanism, <
  • >
M V = <
  • >
M V =
  • 0:22
Assign U (1) c harges to L i , N Ri , etc: L 3 (l 3 ) N 3 (n 3 ) h i (1) H' (l 3 + n 3 ) (M) H (0) (+ insertions) The ab
  • v
e diagram generates mass term: m L 3 ;N 3
  • jl
3 +n 3 j hH i Ev en if coupling at v ertex is
  • f
O (1), strong suppression can b e generated!
slide-5
SLIDE 5 U (1) F amily Symmetry and T extures Using basic idea
  • f
F rogatt-Nielsen mec hanism, assign a v
  • ur
c harges (F C) to all elds, leading to mass matrices
  • f
the form: Y
  • B
B B B B @ a 11
  • jl
1 +n 1 j a 12
  • jl
1 +n 2 j a 13
  • jl
1 +n 3 j a 21
  • jl
2 +n 1 j a 22
  • jl
2 +n 2 j a 23
  • jl
2 +n 3 j a 31
  • jl
3 +n 1 j a 32
  • jl
3 +n 2 j a 33
  • jl
3 +n 3 j 1 C C C C C A M RR
  • B
B B B B @ A 11
  • j2n
1 + j A 12
  • jn
1 +n 2 + j A 13
  • jn
1 +n 3 + j A 12
  • jn
1 +n 2 + j A 22
  • j2n
2 + j A 23
  • jn
2 +n 3 + j A 13
  • jn
1 +n 3
  • j
A 23
  • jn
2 +n 3 + j A 33
  • j2n
3 + j 1 C C C C C A ) Since
  • is
  • 1,
a high p
  • w
er in the exp
  • nen
t leads to v ery small en tries in the mass matrices, so-called texture zeros Example (F C1): l 1 = 2, l 2 = 0, l 3 = 0, n 1 = 2, n 2 = 1, n 3 = and
  • =
0, leads to (after the seesa w): m F C 1 LL
  • B
B B B B @
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
1 1
  • 2
1 1 1 C C C C C A + O B B B B B @
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
1 C C C C C A : ) Adv an tage: Smallness
  • f
mass and relativ e size
  • f
en tries can b e easily xed ) Disdv an tage: Co ecien ts a ij and A ij (assumed to b e O (1) couplings) not predicted
slide-6
SLIDE 6 O (1) co ecien ts Basic idea: ) Since O (1) co ecien ts not predicted, assume them to b e a random n um b ers ) Cho
  • se
in terv al for co ecien ts suc h that texture struc- ture
  • f
mass matrix is not destro y ed ) Run a h uge sample
  • f
mo dels in a computer program ) Plot the lo garithmic al ly binne d distributions with cor- rect relativ e normalisation for eac h mo del ) A mo del is then considered to b e a \go
  • d"
mo del, if the p eaks
  • f
the distributions coincide with (or are close to) the preferred exp erimen tal v alue
slide-7
SLIDE 7 The atmospheric angle Figure: The atmospheric angle for 5 dieren t mo dels (10 8 random sets p er mo del): a) red: F C1, b) F C2 (dot-dashes), c) F C3 (thic k dots), d) F C4 (thin dots), e) blue: neutrino mass anarc h y (No structure in neutrino mass matrix).

0.15 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1

arbitrary units s atm It is easy to generate large atmospheric angle!
slide-8
SLIDE 8 The solar angle Figure: The solar angle for 5 dieren t mo dels: a) red: F C1, b) F C2 (dot-dashes), c) F C3 (thic k dots), d) F C4 (thin dots), e) blue: neutrino mass anarc h y.

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

arbitrary units s
  • Anarc
h y prefers large solar angle Fla v
  • ur
mo dels can b e constructed for either, large (F C1, F C3 and F C4)
  • r
small (F C2) solar angle
slide-9
SLIDE 9 The \Cho
  • z
angle" Figure: s C = 4jU e3 j 2 (1
  • jU
e3 j 2 ) for 5 dieren t mo dels: a) red: F C1, b) F C2 (dot-dashes), c) F C3 (thic k dots), d) F C4 (thin dots), e) blue: neutrino mass anarc h y.

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

arbitrary units s C Exp erimen tally: s C
  • (0:1
  • 0:3)
in SK region Anarc h y prefers large s C , p eaks at s C = 1! Cho
  • z
angle imp
  • rtan
t discriminator!
slide-10
SLIDE 10 Ratio
  • f
m 2 's Figure: R
  • jm
2 12 j=jm 2 23 j for 5 dieren t mo dels: a) red: F C1, b) F C2 (dot-dashes), c) F C3 (thic k dots), d) F C4 (thin dots), e) blue: neutrino mass anarc h y.

10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100

arbitrary units R Spread in R h uge! Co ecien ts a ij and A ij can not b e neglected! Small v alues
  • f
R disfa v
  • ur
neutrino mass anarc h y
slide-11
SLIDE 11 V ariation in range
  • f
co ecien ts Figure: Solar angle for 3 dieren t ranges
  • f
co ecien ts for the mo del F C2: a) red: [ p 2; 1= p 2], b) magen ta: [0:82; 1:18], c) blue [0:95; 1:05].

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

arbitrary units s
  • Choice
  • f
co ecien ts v ery imp
  • rtan
t! ) Theoretical w
  • rk
in texture mo dels should concen trate
  • n
calculation
  • f
co ecien ts!
slide-12
SLIDE 12 Leptogenesis ) CP violation in deca y
  • f
ligh test N R comes from in terference b et w een tree-lev el and
  • ne-lo
  • p
amplitude:
  • =
(N R1 ! L j + H 2 )
  • (N
y R1 ! L j y + H y 2 ) (N R1 ! L j + H 2 ) + (N y R1 ! L j y + H y 2 ) = 1 8 (Y y
  • Y
  • )
11 X i6=1 I m
  • (Y
y
  • Y
  • )
1i
  • 2
! B @ f ( M 2 1 M 2 i ) + g ( M 2 1 M 2 i ) 1 C A where f (x) = p x 2 4 1
  • (1
+ x) ln @ 1 + x x 1 A 3 5 ; g (x) = p x 1
  • x
: ) T exture mo dels x
  • rder
  • f
magnitude
  • f
Y
  • )
T aking in to accoun t O (1) co ecien ts
  • can
b e calculated lik e an y lo w-energy
  • bserv
able ) Con v ersion
  • $
Y B dep ends
  • n
assumed thermal history
  • f
the univ erse
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • and
Y B for F C1-F C4

10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100

  • 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4
Y B
slide-14
SLIDE 14 Neutrino
  • bserv
ables for v arian ts
  • f
F C3

0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 0.15 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1

s atm s
  • 0.001

0.01 0.1 1

10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1

s C R ) V arian ts dier
  • nly
in l i , while k eeping n i and
  • constan
t ) Keeps lo w-energy
  • bserv
ables unc hanged, re-scales Y uk a w a matrix Mo dels l 1 l 2 l 3 n 1 n 2 n 3
  • Colour:
F actor: F C3
  • 1
1 1 1=2
  • 1=2
  • 1
red 1 F C3a
  • 2
2 2 1=2
  • 1=2
  • 1
blue 1:05 F C3b
  • 3
3 3 1=2
  • 1=2
  • 1
magen ta 1:1 F C3c
  • 4
4 4 1=2
  • 1=2
  • 1
green 1:15
slide-15
SLIDE 15 Leptogenesis and LA-MSW solution: V arian ts
  • f
F C3

10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2

  • 10-12

10-10 10-8 10-6

Y B ) without sp ecic assumptions ab
  • ut
Y uk a w a matrix, Leptogenesis indep enden t from lo w energy
  • bserv
ables!
slide-16
SLIDE 16 Leptogenesis and SA-MSW solution: V arian ts
  • f
F C2

10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100

s
  • s
C

10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-13 10-11 10-9 10-7

  • Y
B Mo dels l 1 l 2 l 3 n 1 n 2 n 3
  • Colour:
F actor: F C2
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1
3 red 1 F C2a
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 1
3 blue 1:1 F C2b
  • 4
  • 1
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1
3 magen ta 1 F C2c
  • 5
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 1
3 green 1:1
slide-17
SLIDE 17 Leptogenesis and LO W-MSW solution:

10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1

R

10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2

  • a)
blue: F C5, dened as (l 1 ; l 2 ; l 3 ; n 1 ; n 2 ; n 3 ;
  • )
= (3; 3; 3; 0; 1=2; 1; 1) b) for comparison red: F C2b
slide-18
SLIDE 18 Summary ) O (1) co ecien ts in texture mo dels are v ery imp
  • rtan
t: F uture progress in texture mo dels will b e p
  • ssible
  • nly
if these co ecien ts can b e calculated sucien tly accurate ) Without sp ecic assumptions
  • n
Y uk a w a matrix, Leptogenesis completely indep enden t from lo w-energy
  • bserv-
ables ) Leptogenesis can pro vide information
  • n
mo dels
  • therwise
unaccesible