System for Opioid Overdose Surveillance (S.O.S.) Mahshid Abir, MD, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
System for Opioid Overdose Surveillance (S.O.S.) Mahshid Abir, MD, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
System for Opioid Overdose Surveillance (S.O.S.) Mahshid Abir, MD, MSc Rebecca Cunningham, MD Amy Bohnert, PhD, MHS October 22, 2018 Disclosure This project is funded by the UM Injury Prevention Center, Michigan HIDTA, and the Michigan
Disclosure
- This project is funded by the UM Injury Prevention Center,
Michigan HIDTA, and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS)
https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/index.html
Opioid Crisis: View from the Frontline
Opioid Overdose: Tip of the Iceberg
Challenges of Surveillance in Michigan
- Emergency medical services (EMS) naloxone
deployments can be tracked through the Michigan EMS Information System (MI-EMSIS)
- Emergency department (ED) data is not centralized
– No system currently tracks ED overdoses statewide
- Medical examiner (ME) data is not centralized
– Current fatal overdose data lags 18 months statewide
System for Opioid Overdose Surveillance (S.O.S.)
Note: Example of geo-coding hot spots. This is NOT real data.
- Scalable—By using the
minimum number of datasets to obtain the most relevant data
- Maximizes limited
resources—By identifying “hotspots” of fatal and non- fatal overdose
- Timely and accurate—By
providing overdose data that is not over- or under-counted
Phase 1: Washtenaw County Pilot
Medical Examiner
Washtenaw County
EMS
Huron Valley Ambulance
Emergency Departments
Michigan Medicine
- St. Joseph Mercy
Health
Opioid Overdose Non-fatal Locations
Washtenaw County: Jan. 1, 2017-Dec. 31, 2017
Blue = Residence Location Green = Incident Location Data sources: Huron Valley Ambulance, Michigan Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Health Hot spots found in zip codes: 48109, 48104, 48198
Opioid Overdose Fatal Locations
Washtenaw County: Jan. 1, 2017-Dec. 31, 2017
Data sources: Washtenaw County Medical Examiner, Michigan Medicine emergency department, St. Joseph Mercy Health emergency department
Red = Incident Location Blue = Resident Location Hot spots found in zip codes: 48109, 48104, 48198
S.O.S. Expansion to 3 HIDTA Counties by end of 2018: Washtenaw, Kent, Muskegon
- Obtain EMS data through MI-EMSIS
database
- Partnership with Great Lakes
Health Connect (GLHC) to obtain real-time ED overdose data from the lower peninsula
– Cannot be used for research
- Partnership with MDILog to obtain
real-time ME overdose data
– Used in 42 of 83 (50%) Michigan counties
- Further develop the S.O.S. interface
Medical Examiner
MDILog death database
EMS
MI-EMSIS
Emergency Departments
HIE Company: Great Lakes Health Connect
Standardize & Match Data
S.O.S. Interface
About page
S.O.S. Interface
Emergency Department
Opioid Overdose Emergency Department visits by County Michigan Medicine ED, 1/1/2017-10/25/2017
S.O.S. Interface
Detail Map: EMS Incident Locations
EMS, Emergency Department, and Medical Examiner 1/1/2017-10/25/2017
S.O.S. Interface
Detail Map: Fatal Heatmap
EMS, Emergency Department, and Medical Examiner 1/1/2017-10/25/2017
S.O.S. Interface
Emergency Department
S.O.S. Capabilities
- Non-fatal Overdoses
– EMS: Update 3 times a week – ED: Update every 24 hours
- Fatal Overdoses (ODs)
– Update suspected ODs every 24 hours – Confirm ODs after toxicology results are obtained ~90 days later
- Linkage of 3 datasets- eliminates over counting of EMS and fatal
ED visits
- Presents both rates and raw numbers of events
- Provides both location of home and location of death for fatal
- verdoses and non-fatal EMS: allows for tracking of movement
- County level data available to the public
- Census tract data password protected for key stakeholder access
Next Steps
- Continue expanding
surveillance to remaining 9 High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) counties
- Ultimate goal of
statewide surveillance in the next 3 years
Implications
- S.O.S. allows both public health
to:
- 1. Continuously follow the size,
spread, and trends of non- fatal and fatal overdoses
- 2. Implement interventions in
communities where they are most needed
- 3. Inform allocation of